Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

A parity construction in characteristic two


This page records the one constant-cap mechanism developed in the bounded-blocking proof sketch, with a complete author proof by Plasma AI and no independent review, and limitations of two possible extensions to other planes. The construction is not claimed to be new. Szőnyi's survey, Blocking sets in finite planes and spaces, reports on printed p. 102, as Theorem 4.3, the result of Illés, Szőnyi and Wettl (Blocking sets and maximal strong representative systems in finite projective planes, Mitt. Math. Sem. Giessen 201 (1991), 97–107) that PG(2,2r)(2,2^r) has a blocking set with at most 55 points on a line when rr is even and at most 66 when rr is odd, the latter from three suitably chosen conics. That original was not read, and whether its conics are the ones below was not checked.

The construction

Theorem. Let q=2hq=2^h with h≥2h\ge2, and let γ1,γ2,γ3\gamma_1,\gamma_2,\gamma_3 be distinct nonzero elements of Fq\mathbb F_q with γ1+γ2+γ3=0\gamma_1+\gamma_2+\gamma_3=0. In PG(2,q)(2,q) let CiC_i be the conic γiX2=YZ\gamma_iX^2=YZ and S=C1∪C2∪C3S=C_1\cup C_2\cup C_3. Then ∣S∣=3q−1|S|=3q-1, and every line meets SS in at least 11 and at most 66 points.

For example γ=(1,g,1+g)\gamma=(1,g,1+g) with g∉{0,1}g\notin\{0,1\}, which exists because q≥4q\ge4.

Proof. Use the chart Z=1Z=1 with x=X/Zx=X/Z, y=Y/Zy=Y/Z, and the points O=(0:0:1)O=(0:0:1), V=(0:1:0)V=(0:1:0) and N0=(1:0:0)N_0=(1:0:0). The conic CiC_i consists of the qq affine points (x,γix2)(x,\gamma_ix^2) and, on Z=0Z=0, of VV alone. Two of the conics meet where γix2=γjx2\gamma_ix^2=\gamma_jx^2, that is only in OO and VV. Hence ∣S∣=3(q+1)−4=3q−1|S|=3(q+1)-4=3q-1. Let Tr:Fq→F2\mathrm{Tr}:\mathbb F_q\to\mathbb F_2 be the absolute trace. It is additive, satisfies Tr(u2)=Tr(u)\mathrm{Tr}(u^2)=\mathrm{Tr}(u), and u↦Tr(λu)u\mapsto\mathrm{Tr}(\lambda u) is a nonzero functional for every λ≠0\lambda\ne0. Every line is of one of four kinds.

  • The line Z=0Z=0 meets each conic only in VV: one point.
  • A horizontal line y=dy=d passes through N0∉SN_0\notin S at infinity and meets CiC_i where γix2=d\gamma_ix^2=d, in exactly one point because squaring is a bijection of Fq\mathbb F_q: between one and three points.
  • A vertical line x=ax=a contains VV and the points (a,γia2)(a,\gamma_ia^2): between two and four points.
  • A line y=mx+dy=mx+d with m≠0m\ne0 has its point (1:m:0)(1:m:0) at infinity outside SS, and meets CiC_i where Li(x)=dL_i(x)=d for Li(x)=γix2+mxL_i(x)=\gamma_ix^2+mx.

In the last case LiL_i is additive with kernel {0,m/γi}\{0,m/\gamma_i\}, so the line meets CiC_i in exactly two points when dd lies in the index-two subgroup Hi=Li(Fq)H_i=L_i(\mathbb F_q), and in none otherwise. For λ=γi/m2\lambda=\gamma_i/m^2,

Tr(λLi(x))=Tr(λγi x)+Tr(λmx)=0for all x,\mathrm{Tr}\bigl(\lambda L_i(x)\bigr) =\mathrm{Tr}\bigl(\sqrt{\lambda\gamma_i}\,x\bigr)+\mathrm{Tr}(\lambda mx)=0 \qquad\text{for all }x,

because λγi=γi/m=λm\sqrt{\lambda\gamma_i}=\gamma_i/m=\lambda m. Both HiH_i and the kernel of u↦Tr(λu)u\mapsto\mathrm{Tr}(\lambda u) have index two, so Hi={d:εi(d)=0}H_i=\{d:\varepsilon_i(d)=0\} with εi(d)=Tr(γid/m2)\varepsilon_i(d)=\mathrm{Tr}(\gamma_id/m^2). Now

ε1(d)+ε2(d)+ε3(d)=Tr((γ1+γ2+γ3)d/m2)=0,\varepsilon_1(d)+\varepsilon_2(d)+\varepsilon_3(d) =\mathrm{Tr}\bigl((\gamma_1+\gamma_2+\gamma_3)d/m^2\bigr)=0,

so an even number of the εi(d)\varepsilon_i(d) equal 11, and the line meets one or three of the conics. It therefore contains at least the two points of one conic and at most six points of SS. □\square

The evidence entry point checks the statement by direct incidence counts for h=2,…,7h=2,\dots,7, with six attained for h≥3h\ge3. As a negative control it checks that γ=(1,g,g2)\gamma=(1,g,g^2), whose sum is nonzero there, leaves a line uncovered for h=3,…,7h=3,\dots,7. These finite checks guard the computation; the theorem for every hh rests on the proof.

For q=2q=2, a full line is already a blocking set with cap three, so a cap of six also covers that remaining characteristic-two Desarguesian plane.

The mechanism. For each slope, whether a line meets a given conic is an affine condition over F2\mathbb F_2 on its intercept. A linear relation among the three conditions forces an odd number of them to hold. Loads are then controlled exactly, not statistically: the cap is the sum of the three conics' bounded intersections. The resulting bounded distribution still satisfies the variance identity of the all-plane identities. For even hh it is weaker than the reported cap 55.

Why it does not reach odd characteristic

No relation among conics in odd characteristic. Let qq be odd and let η\eta be the quadratic character of Fq\mathbb F_q. For a nondegenerate conic vTMv=0v^{\mathsf T}Mv=0 and a line spanned by v1,v2v_1,v_2, with coordinate vector u=v1×v2u=v_1\times v_2, the restricted binary form has discriminant

(v1TMv2)2−(v1TMv1)(v2TMv2)=−uTadj⁡(M) u,(v_1^{\mathsf T}Mv_2)^2-(v_1^{\mathsf T}Mv_1)(v_2^{\mathsf T}Mv_2) =-u^{\mathsf T}\operatorname{adj}(M)\,u,

the identity of Lagrange when M=IM=I. So the line meets the conic in two, one or no points as η(−Q∗(u))\eta(-Q^*(u)) is 11, 00 or −1-1, where Q∗(u)=uTadj⁡(M)uQ^*(u)=u^{\mathsf T}\operatorname{adj}(M)u. Whether a line meets a conic is thus governed by a multiplicative character of a quadratic form in the line coordinates. The characteristic-two argument used an identity among the hit conditions; the analogous identity for a nonempty family of distinct conics CiC_i, i∈Ii\in I, is ∏i∈IQi∗=cR2\prod_{i\in I}Q_i^*=cR^2 for a nonzero constant cc and a polynomial RR, which would fix the product of the characters η(−Qi∗(u))\eta(-Q_i^*(u)). A nondegenerate ternary quadratic form is absolutely irreducible, so unique factorization pairs the Qi∗Q_i^* into proportional forms. If adj⁡(Mj)=νadj⁡(Mi)\operatorname{adj}(M_j)=\nu\operatorname{adj}(M_i), then det⁡(Mj)Mj=adj⁡(adj⁡Mj)=ν2det⁡(Mi)Mi\det(M_j)M_j=\operatorname{adj}(\operatorname{adj}M_j)=\nu^2\det(M_i)M_i, so Cj=CiC_j=C_i. Distinct conics therefore admit no such polynomial identity. The lemma excludes only this identity; it does not by itself show that some line misses every conic.

This lemma explains, at the level of mechanism, the theorem of Ughi (On (k,n)(k,n)-blocking sets which can be obtained as a union of conics, Geom. Dedicata 26 (1988), 241–245) that the survey reports on p. 102: in PG(2,q)(2,q), qq odd, a union of cc conics never blocks every line once qq is large compared to cc, while clog⁡qc\log q suitable conics do. The original was not read, and turning the lemma into Ughi's theorem needs character sum estimates not supplied here.

Additive pieces have caps of order pp. Let q=phq=p^h and let ff be an Fp\mathbb F_p-linear map of Fq\mathbb F_q. In any affine chart, a point set containing the graph {(x,f(x))}\{(x,f(x))\} meets some line in at least pp points.

Proof. Fix x0≠0x_0\ne0 and put m=f(x0)/x0m=f(x_0)/x_0. The kernel KK of x↦f(x)−mxx\mapsto f(x)-mx is an Fp\mathbb F_p-subspace containing x0x_0, so ∣K∣≥p|K|\ge p, and the line y=mxy=mx contains (x,f(x))(x,f(x)) for every x∈Kx\in K. □\square

The conics above are graphs of x↦γix2x\mapsto\gamma_ix^2, which is F2\mathbb F_2-linear. Any construction of the same kind in characteristic pp contains such graphs and so has cap at least pp, in line with the reported bounds p+1p+1 of Boros and 44 of Bruen and Fisher for p=3p=3. For q=pq=p prime the Fp\mathbb F_p-linear maps are x↦cxx\mapsto cx, whose graphs are lines. The mechanism therefore gives no bounded cap along any family whose characteristic grows, and in particular nothing for the prime-order planes PG(2,p)(2,p). This obstructs the mechanism class only, not other constructions.