Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
A parity construction in characteristic two
This page records the one constant-cap mechanism developed in the bounded-blocking proof sketch, with a complete author proof by Plasma AI and no independent review, and limitations of two possible extensions to other planes. The construction is not claimed to be new. Szőnyi's survey, Blocking sets in finite planes and spaces, reports on printed p. 102, as Theorem 4.3, the result of Illés, Szőnyi and Wettl (Blocking sets and maximal strong representative systems in finite projective planes, Mitt. Math. Sem. Giessen 201 (1991), 97–107) that PG has a blocking set with at most points on a line when is even and at most when is odd, the latter from three suitably chosen conics. That original was not read, and whether its conics are the ones below was not checked.
The construction
Theorem. Let with , and let be distinct nonzero elements of with . In PG let be the conic and . Then , and every line meets in at least and at most points.
For example with , which exists because .
Proof. Use the chart with , , and the points , and . The conic consists of the affine points and, on , of alone. Two of the conics meet where , that is only in and . Hence . Let be the absolute trace. It is additive, satisfies , and is a nonzero functional for every . Every line is of one of four kinds.
- The line meets each conic only in : one point.
- A horizontal line passes through at infinity and meets where , in exactly one point because squaring is a bijection of : between one and three points.
- A vertical line contains and the points : between two and four points.
- A line with has its point at infinity outside , and meets where for .
In the last case is additive with kernel , so the line meets in exactly two points when lies in the index-two subgroup , and in none otherwise. For ,
because . Both and the kernel of have index two, so with . Now
so an even number of the equal , and the line meets one or three of the conics. It therefore contains at least the two points of one conic and at most six points of .
The evidence entry point checks the statement by direct incidence counts for , with six attained for . As a negative control it checks that , whose sum is nonzero there, leaves a line uncovered for . These finite checks guard the computation; the theorem for every rests on the proof.
For , a full line is already a blocking set with cap three, so a cap of six also covers that remaining characteristic-two Desarguesian plane.
The mechanism. For each slope, whether a line meets a given conic is an affine condition over on its intercept. A linear relation among the three conditions forces an odd number of them to hold. Loads are then controlled exactly, not statistically: the cap is the sum of the three conics' bounded intersections. The resulting bounded distribution still satisfies the variance identity of the all-plane identities. For even it is weaker than the reported cap .
Why it does not reach odd characteristic
No relation among conics in odd characteristic. Let be odd and let be the quadratic character of . For a nondegenerate conic and a line spanned by , with coordinate vector , the restricted binary form has discriminant
the identity of Lagrange when . So the line meets the conic in two, one or no points as is , or , where . Whether a line meets a conic is thus governed by a multiplicative character of a quadratic form in the line coordinates. The characteristic-two argument used an identity among the hit conditions; the analogous identity for a nonempty family of distinct conics , , is for a nonzero constant and a polynomial , which would fix the product of the characters . A nondegenerate ternary quadratic form is absolutely irreducible, so unique factorization pairs the into proportional forms. If , then , so . Distinct conics therefore admit no such polynomial identity. The lemma excludes only this identity; it does not by itself show that some line misses every conic.
This lemma explains, at the level of mechanism, the theorem of Ughi (On -blocking sets which can be obtained as a union of conics, Geom. Dedicata 26 (1988), 241–245) that the survey reports on p. 102: in PG, odd, a union of conics never blocks every line once is large compared to , while suitable conics do. The original was not read, and turning the lemma into Ughi's theorem needs character sum estimates not supplied here.
Additive pieces have caps of order . Let and let be an -linear map of . In any affine chart, a point set containing the graph meets some line in at least points.
Proof. Fix and put . The kernel of is an -subspace containing , so , and the line contains for every .
The conics above are graphs of , which is -linear. Any construction of the same kind in characteristic contains such graphs and so has cap at least , in line with the reported bounds of Boros and of Bruen and Fisher for . For prime the -linear maps are , whose graphs are lines. The mechanism therefore gives no bounded cap along any family whose characteristic grows, and in particular nothing for the prime-order planes PG. This obstructs the mechanism class only, not other constructions.