Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Necessary growth of tensor side sizes


A finite extraction upper bound — proved

For E=⨂i=1kSpiE=\bigotimes_{i=1}^k S_{p_i}, with pi≥3p_i\geq3, write

N=∏ipi,d=∏i(pi−1),r=d/N,L=∑ilog⁡(pi−1)pi.N=\prod_i p_i,\quad d=\prod_i(p_i-1),\quad r=d/N, \qquad L=\sum_i\frac{\log(p_i-1)}{p_i}.

Let η(E)=min⁡∅≠F⊆Erdiss(F)/∣F∣\eta(E)=\min_{\varnothing\ne F\subseteq E}r_{\rm diss}(F)/|F|. Then

η(E)<4r(1+2Llog⁡2).(1)\eta(E)<4r\left(1+\frac{2L}{\log2}\right). \tag{1}

Each simplex column has integer ℓ1\ell_1-norm one except its last column, which has norm pi−1p_i-1. The ℓ1\ell_1-norm of a pure tensor is the product of the factor norms. Therefore a uniformly chosen column vv has Elog⁡∥v∥1=L\mathbb E\log\|v\|_1=L. At least N/2N/2 columns belong to

F={v∈E:∥v∥1≤e2L}.F=\{v\in E:\|v\|_1\leq e^{2L}\}.

If D⊆FD\subseteq F is dissociated, its 2∣D∣2^{|D|} subset sums are distinct integer vectors. The total of their coordinate-box widths is at most e2L∣D∣e^{2L}|D|. Arithmetic–geometric mean gives

2∣D∣≤(1+e2L∣D∣/d)d.2^{|D|}\leq(1+e^{2L}|D|/d)^d.

For every real M≥1M\geq1, the inequality 2t≤1+Mt2^t\leq1+Mt implies t<2log⁡2(2M)t<2\log_2(2M). One elementary check uses log⁡2(2M)≤2M−1\log_2(2M)\leq2M-1: at t0=2log⁡2(2M)t_0=2\log_2(2M), 2t0=4M2>1+Mt02^{t_0}=4M^2>1+Mt_0, and log⁡2(1+Mt)−t\log_2(1+Mt)-t decreases for t≥2t\geq2. Apply this with M=e2LM=e^{2L}, and divide by ∣F∣≥N/2|F|\geq N/2, to get (1).

Linearly bounded side schedules cannot work

In particular, if 3≤pi≤Ci3\leq p_i\leq Ci for all ii, where CC is fixed, then

η(Ek)=OC(k−1/C(log⁡k)2)⟶0.(2)\eta(E_k)=O_C(k^{-1/C}(\log k)^2)\longrightarrow0. \tag{2}

Indeed, put A=∑i≤k1/piA=\sum_{i\leq k}1/p_i and a=Hk/Ca=H_k/C. We have A≥aA\geq a, r≤e−Ar\leq e^{-A}, and L≤Alog⁡(Ck)L\leq A\log(Ck). For a≥1a\geq1, both e−Ae^{-A} and Ae−AAe^{-A} decrease as AA increases, so (1) is at most

4e−a(1+2alog⁡(Ck)log⁡2).4e^{-a}\left(1+\frac{2a\log(Ck)}{\log2}\right).

This proves (2). Thus choosing tensor side sizes proportional to the number of successive chromatic stages cannot give the required uniform extraction constant, regardless of improvements to the analytic proof. Inserting arbitrarily large nonjump factors does not repair such a jump subsequence: fixing those extra coordinates leaves a relation-isomorphic linearly bounded tensor slice, and hereditary extraction restricts to that slice. The explicit 1000ilog⁡2(i+1)1000i\log_2(i+1) schedule is not excluded by this bound.

A lower bound on uniform phase-lift variance

There is also an intrinsic limitation on the lattice-rounding approach. For the tensor zero-line-sum lattice Λ=⨂iApi−1⊂W⊂RN\Lambda=\bigotimes_i A_{p_i-1}\subset W\subset\mathbb R^N,

det⁡(Λ)2/d=∏ipi1/(pi−1).(3)\det(\Lambda)^{2/d}= \prod_i p_i^{1/(p_i-1)}. \tag{3}

This follows from det⁡(Ap−1)=p\det(A_{p-1})=\sqrt p and the Gram determinant formula for tensor bases. Suppose every torus point in W/(2πΛ)W/(2\pi\Lambda) has a random radian lift X∈WX\in W with EXa2≤Q\mathbb E X_a^2\leq Q at every coordinate. Some lift then satisfies ∥X∥22≤NQ\|X\|_2^2\leq NQ, so balls of radius NQ\sqrt{NQ} centered on 2πΛ2\pi\Lambda cover WW. Their volume must be at least the fundamental-domain volume. Writing vdv_d for unit-ball volume gives

Q≥4π2Nvd−2/d∏ipi1/(pi−1)≥2πedN∏ipi1/(pi−1).(4)Q\geq\frac{4\pi^2}{N}v_d^{-2/d} \prod_i p_i^{1/(p_i-1)} \geq\frac{2\pi}{e}\frac dN \prod_i p_i^{1/(p_i-1)}. \tag{4}

For the second inequality, Gaussian integration yields vd≤(2πe/d)d/2v_d\leq(2\pi e/d)^{d/2}: on the unit ball, e−d∥x∥2/2≥e−d/2e^{-d\|x\|^2/2}\geq e^{-d/2}.

The logarithm of the product on the right of (4), including d/Nd/N, is

∑ilog⁡pi−1pi+O ⁣(∑ilog⁡pipi2).\sum_i\frac{\log p_i-1}{p_i} +O\!\left(\sum_i\frac{\log p_i}{p_i^2}\right).

Thus replacing Gram–Schmidt rounding by a better target-uniform lift cannot remove the leading ∑(log⁡pi)/pi\sum(\log p_i)/p_i growth. This statement concerns that particular uniform-lift method, not all possible analytic constructions.