Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Partial-box compression and the bounded-box limit


Standing

The finite influence calculation in Section 4 below precisely limits one attempted route from approximate profiles to actual good cells. It does not exclude optimized profile-dependent clustering.

This strengthens profile compression by allowing only some product cells to be monochromatic. It then proves a limitation of that mechanism: every fixed bound on the number of disjoint constant-sign boxes admits a uniform finite coloring; 16 colors suffice for two boxes. The bound is uniform over the distinct odd-prime tensors. This is not a coloring avoiding all signed relations, and does not settle the main coloring obligation.

The proofs below are elementary, including the finite local lemma used in the coloring construction. No computation is used.

1. Compression of good cells only

Let ff be a proper dissociated qq-coloring of E=⨂iSpiE=\bigotimes_i S_{p_i}. Partition coordinate [pi][p_i] into nonempty blocks Ai,1,…,Ai,miA_{i,1},\ldots,A_{i,m_i}. Call a product cell good when ff is constant on that whole box. Put

N=∏imi,d=∏i(mi−1),R=d/N,L=∑ilog⁡(mi−1)mi,α=#{good cells}N.N=\prod_i m_i,\quad d=\prod_i(m_i-1),\quad R=d/N,\quad L=\sum_i\frac{\log(m_i-1)}{m_i},\quad \alpha=\frac{\#\{\text{good cells}\}}N.

For mi≥2m_i\geq2 and α>0\alpha>0,

αq<4R(1+2Llog⁡2).(1)\frac\alpha q<4R\left(1+\frac{2L}{\log2}\right). \tag{1}

If some mi=1m_i=1, then α=0\alpha=0, since any good cell would contain a monochromatic full simplex fiber.

Proof

The block sums wi,a=∑x∈Ai,asi,xw_{i,a}=\sum_{x\in A_{i,a}}s_{i,x} form a linear copy of SmiS_{m_i}. A rational relation between these sums expands to a simplex relation constant on each block; the only such relations have the same coefficient on every block. A signed relation among same-colored good indexed cells expands over disjoint original boxes and retains every coefficient in {−1,0,1}\{-1,0,1\}. Thus the good cells have a proper partial coloring of the indexed compressed tensor. Nongood cells are not colored.

For any dissociated indexed subset DD of the compressed tensor, randomly choose one distinguished simplex column in each coordinate and use all the other columns as the integer basis. Every fixed tensor column has expected logarithmic ℓ1\ell_1-norm LL. Some basis therefore makes the average logarithmic norm over DD at most LL, and at least ∣D∣/2|D|/2 columns have norm at most e2Le^{2L}. If L=0L=0, all columns have norm one.

Let s≥∣D∣/2s\geq|D|/2 denote this subcollection's size. Its distinct subset sums fit in coordinate intervals whose total width is at most se2Ls e^{2L}. Counting integer points and applying arithmetic--geometric mean gives

2s≤(1+se2Ld)d.2^s\leq\left(1+\frac{s e^{2L}}d\right)^d.

The elementary bound used in the small-column argument, 2t≤1+Mt⇒t<2log⁡2(2M)2^t\leq1+Mt\Rightarrow t<2\log_2(2M) for M≥1M\geq1, gives ∣D∣<4d(1+2L/log⁡2)|D|<4d(1+2L/\log2). A largest color class of good cells has size at least αN/q\alpha N/q, proving (1).

For all odd primes through P≥e5P\geq e^5, put DP=∑p≤P, p odd(1/mp−1/p)D_P=\sum_{p\leq P,\ p\text{ odd}}(1/m_p-1/p). The estimates already proved in profile compression give

αq<24(DP+2)e−DP≤48e−DP/2,DP<2log⁡(48q/α).(2)\frac\alpha q<24(D_P+2)e^{-D_P}\leq48e^{-D_P/2}, \qquad D_P<2\log(48q/\alpha). \tag{2}

When all mi=2m_i=2, the sharper exact conclusion is #{good cells}≤q\#\{\text{good cells}\}\leq q: every compressed indexed column is one of two opposite values, so any two labels of the same color would be dependent with coefficients of magnitude one.

2. A uniform coloring avoiding every two-box relation

A product box means a nonempty set ∏iAi\prod_i A_i in a finite tensor grid. Consider relations whose coefficient function is constant +1+1 or −1-1 on each of at most two disjoint such boxes, and zero elsewhere. There is a 16-coloring of each odd-prime grid with no monochromatic relation of this form. The same holds on the infinite finite-support odd-prime grid.

Primitive edges

Fix a nonempty finite set II of prime coordinates and fix every other coordinate. Choose nonempty proper Ap⊂[p]A_p\subset[p], p∈Ip\in I, and set

B=∏p∈IAp,B∗=∏p∈IApc,h=B∪B∗.B=\prod_{p\in I}A_p,\qquad B^*=\prod_{p\in I}A_p^c, \qquad h=B\cup B^*.

The two boxes are disjoint, and their vector sums differ by the sign (−1)∣I∣(-1)^{|I|}. Thus hh supports a signed relation. Its size shs_h satisfies

sh=∏p∈Iap+∏p∈I(p−ap)≥2+∑p∈I(p−2)≥3.(3)s_h=\prod_{p\in I}a_p+\prod_{p\in I}(p-a_p) \geq2+\sum_{p\in I}(p-2)\geq3. \tag{3}

Here ∏jbj≥1+∑j(bj−1)\prod_j b_j\geq1+\sum_j(b_j-1) for positive integers bjb_j. The case ∣I∣=1|I|=1 is a full prime fiber.

Local-lemma estimate

Color each vertex independently with 16 colors. Let HhH_h be the event that a primitive edge hh is monochromatic, so P(Hh)=161−sh\mathbb P(H_h)=16^{1-s_h}, and put xh=4−shx_h=4^{-s_h}. For a fixed vertex vv, orient any incident edge so that v∈Bv\in B. For fixed II there are at most ∏p∈I2p−1\prod_{p\in I}2^{p-1} choices of the sets ApA_p containing vpv_p. This may count an edge repeatedly, which only enlarges the bound. By (3),

∑h∋vxh≤116(∏p in the grid(1+23−p)−1)≤116(exp⁡∑p odd23−p−1)<316.(4)\begin{aligned} \sum_{h\ni v}x_h &\leq\frac1{16} \left(\prod_{p\text{ in the grid}}(1+2^{3-p})-1\right)\\ &\leq\frac1{16}\left(\exp\sum_{p\text{ odd}}2^{3-p}-1\right) <\frac3{16}. \tag{4} \end{aligned}

Indeed ∑p odd23−p≤∑j≥04−j=4/3<log⁡4\sum_{p\text{ odd}}2^{3-p}\leq\sum_{j\geq0}4^{-j}=4/3 <\log4. For example log⁡2>2/3\log2>2/3 follows by integrating the strictly convex function 1/x1/x over [1,2][1,2].

Use intersecting supports as the event dependency graph. Disjoint supports give independence from the entire corresponding event sigma-algebra. Since xh≤1/64x_h\leq1/64, log⁡(1−xh)≥−2xh\log(1-x_h)\geq-2x_h. Therefore

∏g∼h(1−xg)>exp⁡(−3sh/8).\prod_{g\sim h}(1-x_g)> \exp(-3s_h/8).

For s≥3s\geq3,

log⁡4−se−3s/8161−s=(s−2)log⁡4−3s/8>0,\log\frac{4^{-s}e^{-3s/8}}{16^{1-s}} =(s-2)\log4-3s/8>0,

because the left expression increases with ss, and at s=3s=3 it is log⁡4−9/8>0\log4-9/8>0. Hence

P(Hh)<xh∏g∼h(1−xg).(5)\mathbb P(H_h)<x_h\prod_{g\sim h}(1-x_g). \tag{5}

For completeness, the finite asymmetric local lemma in precisely this form has a short induction proof. For every event HiH_i and collection SS of other events, induction on ∣S∣|S| proves P(Hi∣⋂j∈SHjc)≤xi\mathbb P(H_i\mid\bigcap_{j\in S}H_j^c)\leq x_i. Separate SS into neighbors DD and nonneighbors JJ. The numerator is at most P(Hi∣⋂j∈JHjc)=P(Hi)\mathbb P(H_i\mid\bigcap_{j\in J}H_j^c)=\mathbb P(H_i), while successive conditional complementary probabilities bound the denominator below by ∏j∈D(1−xj)\prod_{j\in D}(1-x_j). Each conditioning collection for this denominator is smaller than SS. If DD is empty, independence applies directly. Equation (5) gives the claimed inductive bound and all conditioning events have positive probability. Multiplying the resulting complementary conditional probabilities shows that avoiding all events has positive probability.

We thus obtain the desired finite coloring. A diagonal subsequence on nested prime prefixes stabilizes each vertex's color and avoids every primitive edge globally, since every edge has finite support.

Why primitive edges cover all two-box relations

The sum of a product box is the tensor product of its coordinate sums. It is zero precisely when a coordinate side is the full simplex; such a box contains a full monochromatic prime fiber if it is monochromatic.

Otherwise all coordinate sums are nonzero. If two box sums agree up to sign, uniqueness of nonzero pure tensors makes their coordinate sums proportional. For nonempty proper simplex subsets A,CA,C, the condition w(A)=λw(C)w(A)=\lambda w(C), λ≠0\lambda\ne0, says that 1A−λ1C1_A-\lambda1_C is constant. Inspecting the membership patterns shows that either A=C,λ=1A=C,\lambda=1, or C=Ac,λ=−1C=A^c,\lambda=-1. Thus every coordinate side is either identical or complementary. At least one coordinate is complementary for distinct disjoint boxes. Fix a symbol in every identical side; the remaining two subboxes form a primitive edge. The constructed coloring therefore excludes the original monochromatic relation as well.

3. Every fixed disjoint-box complexity is finitely colorable

Fix M≥1M\geq1. An MM-box relation is a nonzero ternary relation whose coefficient function is constant +1+1 or −1-1 on each of at most MM pairwise disjoint product boxes. There is a coloring avoiding all such monochromatic relations on the entire finite-support odd-prime grid with at most

QM=22M+4∏p<2M+4p odd primep(6)Q_M=2^{2M+4}\prod_{\substack{p<2M+4\\p\text{ odd prime}}}p \tag{6}

colors. For M=2M=2, the separate two-box proof improves this general palette bound to 16 colors.

Slicing a relation to full projections

If a relation's projection onto coordinate pp is a proper subset A⊊[p]A\subsetneq[p], write it as ∑a∈Asp,a⊗ua=0\sum_{a\in A}s_{p,a}\otimes u_a=0. The proper simplex subset is independent, so every ua=0u_a=0. Choose any occupied slice. Its formal relation is nonzero and still consists of at most MM disjoint constant-sign boxes: a slice either deletes a box or fixes its pp-coordinate, and distinct surviving boxes stay disjoint. Remove that fixed coordinate and repeat as necessary. The process ends at a nontrivial relation having full projection on every remaining coordinate. At least one coordinate remains, since a nonzero zero-dimensional tensor cannot have a nontrivial one-point signed relation.

Counting an enlarged tail hypergraph

Put P0=2M+4P_0=2M+4. In the tail p≥P0p\geq P_0, include as edges all disjoint unions of r≤Mr\leq M product boxes which have full projection in every coordinate of some nonempty finite varying set II, with other coordinates fixed. Such an edge need not itself support a relation. If its side sizes are aj,pa_{j,p} and its cardinality is mm, then

m=∑j=1r∏p∈Iaj,p≥r+∑p∈I(∑jaj,p−r)≥r+∑p∈I(p−r)≥12∑p∈Ip.(7)\begin{aligned} m=\sum_{j=1}^r\prod_{p\in I}a_{j,p} &\geq r+\sum_{p\in I}\left(\sum_j a_{j,p}-r\right)\\ &\geq r+\sum_{p\in I}(p-r) \geq\tfrac12\sum_{p\in I}p. \end{aligned}\tag{7}

Full projection also gives m≥max⁡p∈Ip≥P0m\geq\max_{p\in I}p\geq P_0. For a vertex vv and fixed II, the outside context is forced; there are at most M2M∑p∈IpM2^{M\sum_{p\in I}p} ordered box presentations of incident edges. This bound ignores all disjointness, incidence, and full-projection restrictions and therefore overcounts safely.

Set x=2−2M−2x=2^{-2M-2} and give edge hh charge x∣h∣x^{|h|}. Equation (7) bounds the incident charge by

C:=sup⁡v∑h∋vx∣h∣≤M(∏p≥P0(1+2−p)−1)≤M(e21−P0−1)≤2M21−P0=M2−2M−2≤116.(8)\begin{aligned} C:=\sup_v\sum_{h\ni v}x^{|h|} &\leq M\left(\prod_{p\geq P_0}(1+2^{-p})-1\right)\\ &\leq M\left(e^{2^{1-P_0}}-1\right) \leq2M2^{1-P_0}=M2^{-2M-2}\leq\tfrac1{16}. \end{aligned}\tag{8}

Here the prime sum was bounded by all integers at least P0P_0, and et−1≤2te^t-1\leq2t for 0≤t≤10\leq t\leq1 suffices.

Independently color a finite tail grid with q=22M+4=4/xq=2^{2M+4}=4/x colors. A monochromatic edge of size mm has probability q1−mq^{1-m}. As in Section 2, its neighbor charge product is at least e−2mC≥e−m/2e^{-2mC}\geq e^{-m/2}. Moreover

log⁡xme−m/2q1−m=m(log⁡4−1/2)−P0log⁡2≥P0(log⁡2−1/2)>0.\log\frac{x^m e^{-m/2}}{q^{1-m}} =m(\log4-1/2)-P_0\log2 \geq P_0(\log2-1/2)>0.

The proved finite local lemma therefore supplies a coloring avoiding every enlarged edge. Diagonal compactness gives one such coloring on the whole tail.

Finally color a full tuple by its tail color together with its complete tuple of small-prime symbols p<P0p<P_0, using the palette in (6). Any monochromatic MM-box relation would be fixed on these small coordinates. Slicing its tail relation as above gives a nontrivial monochromatic enlarged edge, a contradiction.

4. A finite approximate-profile certificate and its limit

Let f:∏i=1k[pi]→[q]f:\prod_{i=1}^k[p_i]\to[q], and define the full-profile influence

Ii=Pr⁡[f(X)≠f(X(i))],I_i=\Pr[f(X)\ne f(X^{(i)})],

where XX is uniform and Xi(i)X^{(i)}_i is a uniformly chosen different symbol, with all other coordinates unchanged. This is not single-coordinate mutual information.

In coordinate ii, prescribe positive block sizes summing to pip_i, with mi≥2m_i\ge2 blocks, and randomly permute the symbols into those blocks. Put bi=pi/mib_i=p_i/m_i. Some choices of the partitions have good-cell fraction

α≥1−W,W=∑i(bi−1)(∏j<ibj)Ii.(9)\alpha\ge1-W,\qquad W=\sum_i(b_i-1)\left(\prod_{j<i}b_j\right)I_i. \tag{9}

Here cells, not original vertices, receive equal weight.

For a proof choose a compressed cell uniformly. If its side sizes are sis_i, a rooted Cartesian spanning tree has (si−1)∏j<isj(s_i-1)\prod_{j<i}s_j edges of type ii: vary coordinate ii from its first symbol, allow all earlier coordinates, and fix all later coordinates at their first symbols. Each such edge under the random coordinate permutations has disagreement probability IiI_i. A nonmonochromatic cell has a disagreeing tree edge. Average the union bound, using independence of the chosen block indices and Esi=bi\mathbb E s_i=b_i, to obtain (9).

If every full prime fiber is nonmonochromatic, then

Ii≥2pi.I_i\ge\frac2{p_i}.

Indeed a nonconstant fiber has at least 2(pi−1)2(p_i-1) ordered disagreeing pairs, out of pi(pi−1)p_i(p_i-1). Hence, with D=∑i(1/mi−1/pi)D=\sum_i(1/m_i-1/p_i),

W≥2∑ibi−1pi=2D.(10)W\ge2\sum_i\frac{b_i-1}{p_i}=2D. \tag{10}

The displayed lower-bound certificate 1−W>01-W>0 therefore requires D<1/2D<1/2.

In the odd-prime-prefix regime of Section 1, where its stated cutoff hypothesis holds, contradiction via the 4848-constant deficit bound would require α>48qe−D/2\alpha>48q e^{-D/2}. For D<1/2D<1/2 the right side exceeds one. Thus (9) cannot supply the required good-cell fraction for that criterion.

This is a limitation of this random-label merging and tree union-bound certificate only. It is not a theorem about optimized profile-dependent clusterings, all first-moment arguments, or the entire signed relation system. The finite inequality, its averaging convention, and this exact scope received independent internal review. No experiment was run.

Exact remaining requirement

No claim here colors all signed relations: MM is fixed before the coloring, and QMQ_M grows with MM. Thus a successful box-based proof of unbounded chromatic number must use unbounded disjoint-box complexity. In particular, binary block compression cannot on its own prove unbounded chromatic number: the displayed existence theorem supplies a fixed-palette coloring under which every binary product partition has at most one good cell per color. A successful further use of (1)--(2) needs additional information from the full signed relation system, not a Ramsey assertion contradicted by this coloring. Both finite-coloring proofs received independent internal audits of slicing, incidence counting, the local lemma, and compactness.