Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Uniform extraction from axis lines with linearly growing sides


Theorem and scope

For integers di≥3d_i\geq3, put

Xt=∏i=1t[di],Nt=∣Xt∣,X_t=\prod_{i=1}^t[d_i],\qquad N_t=|X_t|,

and let Lt⊂ZXtL_t\subset\mathbb Z^{X_t} consist of the indicator vectors of all full axis-parallel lines. Thus an ii-line has did_i entries equal to one. Different lines give distinct, nonzero, non-antipodal vectors.

Write ρ(Lt)\rho(L_t) for the positive-real Sidon parameter: for every complex coefficient family (cℓ)ℓ∈Lt(c_\ell)_{\ell\in L_t},

max⁡z∈TXtRe⁡∑ℓ∈Ltcℓ∏x∈ℓzx ≥ ρ(Lt)∑ℓ∈Lt∣cℓ∣.(1)\max_{z\in\mathbb T^{X_t}} \operatorname{Re}\sum_{\ell\in L_t}c_\ell\prod_{x\in\ell}z_x \ \geq\ \rho(L_t)\sum_{\ell\in L_t}|c_\ell|. \tag{1}

The direct finite estimate is

ρ(Lt)≥min⁡1≤i≤t∏j=i+1tcos⁡(π/dj)di.(2)\boxed{\displaystyle \rho(L_t)\geq \min_{1\leq i\leq t} \prod_{j=i+1}^t\cos(\pi/d_j)^{d_i}.} \tag{2}

In particular, if

M=sup⁡i≥1di∑j>idj−2<∞,(3)M=\sup_{i\geq1}d_i\sum_{j>i}d_j^{-2}<\infty, \tag{3}

then every LtL_t has positive-real Sidon parameter at least 2−9M2^{-9M}, and there is one δ>0\delta>0 such that every subset of every LtL_t contains a dissociated subset of relative size at least δ\delta.

This includes the dense linear schedule di=i+2d_i=i+2, with M≤1M\leq1. A sharper elementary estimate below gives ρ(Lt)≥exp⁡(−π2/2)\rho(L_t)\geq\exp(-\pi^2/2). More generally, for di=a+b(i−1)d_i=a+b(i-1), integers a≥3,b≥1a\geq3,b\geq1, one has M≤1/bM\leq1/b and ρ(Lt)≥exp⁡(−π2/(2b))\rho(L_t)\geq\exp(-\pi^2/(2b)).

This is a new direct estimate for the line subfamily. It does not assert proportional dissociation of the full simplex tensors at a linear schedule, which the full-tensor entropy obstruction rules out. It also does not prove that the coloring numbers χ1(Lt)\chi_1(L_t) are unbounded. The proof below is self-contained until its final application of the supplied Pisier theorem. Independent internal review checked the finite induction, constants, embeddings, and exact Pisier hypotheses; no defect was found.

1. A target-independent root-polygon rounding lemma

For every integer d≥3d\geq3 and u∈Tu\in\mathbb T, there is a finite random variable Y∈TY\in\mathbb T satisfying

Yd=usurely,EY=ad:=cos⁡(π/d)>0.(4)Y^d=u\quad\hbox{surely},\qquad \mathbb EY=a_d:=\cos(\pi/d)>0. \tag{4}

Indeed the dd-th roots of uu are the vertices of a rotated regular dd-gon. Its convex hull contains the closed disk centered at zero of radius cos⁡(π/d)\cos(\pi/d). The positive real number ada_d therefore is a convex combination of those vertices. Use the combination's weights as probabilities.

The distribution may depend on uu, but its expectation does not. Independent copies of (4), with possibly different prescribed targets, therefore satisfy

E∏x∈FYx=ad∣F∣(5)\mathbb E\prod_{x\in F}Y_x=a_d^{|F|} \tag{5}

for every finite set FF of distinct indices. No uniform choice of the whole distribution, and no measurable choice in the target, is required: only finitely many targets occur in a given step.

2. Directional induction

For a polynomial on LtL_t, denote its total coefficient magnitude in direction ii by WiW_i. We prove the stronger directional assertion

max⁡zRe⁡P(z)≥∑i=1tri,tWi,ri,t=∏j=i+1tadjdi.(6)\max_z\operatorname{Re}P(z) \geq\sum_{i=1}^t r_{i,t}W_i, \qquad r_{i,t}=\prod_{j=i+1}^t a_{d_j}^{d_i}. \tag{6}

For t=1t=1, the family has a single line, whose character can be assigned any unit value, so r1,1=1r_{1,1}=1 works.

Suppose the assertion holds through t−1t-1, and put d=dtd=d_t. Decompose the point variables into layers z(s)=(zx,s)x∈Xt−1z^{(s)}=(z_{x,s})_{x\in X_{t-1}}, s∈[d]s\in[d]. An arbitrary polynomial on LtL_t has the form

P(z)=∑s=1dPs(z(s))+∑x∈Xt−1bx∏s=1dzx,s,(7)P(z)=\sum_{s=1}^d P_s(z^{(s)}) +\sum_{x\in X_{t-1}}b_x\prod_{s=1}^d z_{x,s}, \tag{7}

where each PsP_s uses precisely the old line directions.

In each PsP_s, multiply every direction-ii coefficient by addia_d^{d_i}, obtaining P~s\widetilde P_s. Choose the layers z(s)z^{(s)} independently using the induction hypothesis for these rescaled polynomials. Their total real value satisfies

∑sRe⁡P~s(z(s))≥∑i<tri,t−1addiWi.(8)\sum_s\operatorname{Re}\widetilde P_s(z^{(s)}) \geq\sum_{i<t}r_{i,t-1}a_d^{d_i}W_i. \tag{8}

All layer choices are now fixed.

For each xx, if bx≠0b_x\ne0, prescribe

ux=b‾x∣bx∣(∏szx,s)−1;(9)u_x= \frac{\overline b_x}{|b_x|} \left(\prod_s z_{x,s}\right)^{-1}; \tag{9}

if bx=0b_x=0, choose any ux∈Tu_x\in\mathbb T. Choose independent random variables YxY_x from (4), with targets uxu_x, and replace every layer coordinate by

zx,s′=zx,sYx.(10)z'_{x,s}=z_{x,s}Y_x. \tag{10}

Every new-axis term then equals ∣bx∣|b_x| deterministically, since Yxd=uxY_x^d=u_x. An old ii-line character, in any layer, is multiplied by the product of YxY_x over its did_i distinct base points. By (5), its expected multiplier is exactly addia_d^{d_i}. Consequently

ERe⁡P(z′)=∑sRe⁡P~s(z(s))+Wt≥∑i<tri,t−1addiWi+Wt.(11)\begin{aligned} \mathbb E\operatorname{Re}P(z') &=\sum_s\operatorname{Re}\widetilde P_s(z^{(s)})+W_t\\ &\geq\sum_{i<t}r_{i,t-1}a_d^{d_i}W_i+W_t. \end{aligned} \tag{11}

The random choice has finite support, so one outcome attains at least this expectation. This proves (6), with ri,t=ri,t−1adtdir_{i,t}=r_{i,t-1}a_{d_t}^{d_i} and rt,t=1r_{t,t}=1, hence (2).

Rescaling before optimization is essential: no sign or phase of an old individual term is assumed favorable. The target-dependent distributions are selected only after the old layers are fixed. Independence is required across base points, not across layers; the same YxY_x is deliberately used in all layers so that (9) is solved exactly.

3. Uniform constants and dense schedules

For d≥3d\geq3,

−log⁡cos⁡(π/d)≤9log⁡2d2.(12)-\log\cos(\pi/d)\leq\frac{9\log2}{d^2}. \tag{12}

One elementary proof observes that F(x)=−log⁡cos⁡x /x2F(x)=-\log\cos x\,/x^2 is nondecreasing on (0,π/3](0,\pi/3]. The sign of its derivative is the sign of h(x)=xtan⁡x+2log⁡cos⁡xh(x)=x\tan x+2\log\cos x. Here h(0)=0h(0)=0, and

h′(x)=xsec⁡2x−tan⁡x=x−sin⁡xcos⁡xcos⁡2x≥0.h'(x)=x\sec^2x-\tan x =\frac{x-\sin x\cos x}{\cos^2x}\geq0.

Thus F(x)≤F(π/3)=9log⁡2/π2F(x)\leq F(\pi/3)=9\log2/\pi^2, giving (12). Combining (12) with (3) gives

ri,t≥exp⁡(−9log⁡2 di∑j>idj−2)≥2−9M.(13)r_{i,t}\geq \exp\left(-9\log2\,d_i\sum_{j>i}d_j^{-2}\right) \geq2^{-9M}. \tag{13}

For the arithmetic schedule di=a+b(i−1)d_i=a+b(i-1), monotonicity and an integral comparison give

∑j>idj−2≤∫0∞(di+bu)−2 du=1bdi.(14)\sum_{j>i}d_j^{-2} \leq\int_0^\infty(d_i+bu)^{-2}\,du =\frac1{bd_i}. \tag{14}

For these increasing arithmetic schedules, improve (12) to

−log⁡cos⁡(π/n)≤π22n(n−1),n≥4.(14a)-\log\cos(\pi/n)\leq\frac{\pi^2}{2n(n-1)},\qquad n\geq4. \tag{14a}

For n≥5n\geq5, set u=π2/(2n2)u=\pi^2/(2n^2). The elementary inequalities cos⁡(π/n)≥1−u\cos(\pi/n)\geq1-u and −log⁡(1−u)≤u/(1−u)-\log(1-u)\leq u/(1-u) show that the left side of (14a) is at most π2/(2n2−π2)\pi^2/(2n^2-\pi^2), which is at most its right side because π2<10≤2n\pi^2<10\leq2n. For n=4n=4, the left side is (log⁡2)/2<3/8<π2/24(\log2)/2<3/8<\pi^2/24, using log⁡2<3/4\log2<3/4 and π>3\pi>3. Every future side djd_j, j>ij>i, is at least four, and

di∑j=i+1t−log⁡cos⁡(π/dj)≤π2di2∑j=i+1t1djdj−1=π2di2b(1di−1dt)≤π22b.(14b)\begin{aligned} d_i\sum_{j=i+1}^t-\log\cos(\pi/d_j) &\leq\frac{\pi^2d_i}{2} \sum_{j=i+1}^t\frac1{d_jd_{j-1}}\\ &=\frac{\pi^2d_i}{2b} \left(\frac1{d_i}-\frac1{d_t}\right) \leq\frac{\pi^2}{2b}. \end{aligned} \tag{14b}

Here dj−1≥dj−1d_j-1\geq d_{j-1}, so (14a) justifies the first inequality. Consequently:

  • di=i+2d_i=i+2 has ρ(Lt)≥exp⁡(−π2/2)\rho(L_t)\geq\exp(-\pi^2/2).
  • di=10id_i=10i has ρ(Lt)≥exp⁡(−π2/20)\rho(L_t)\geq\exp(-\pi^2/20).
  • A dyadic block schedule in which side 2m2^m is repeated 2m2^m times, for m≥2m\geq2, has M≤2M\leq2: from any point in its block, the remaining same-block contribution to di∑j>idj−2d_i\sum_{j>i}d_j^{-2} is less than one, and all later blocks contribute exactly one. Hence it has the uniform bound ρ(Lt)≥2−18\rho(L_t)\geq2^{-18}.

The number of columns is

∣Lt∣=Nt∑i≤t1di,(15)|L_t|=N_t\sum_{i\leq t}\frac1{d_i}, \tag{15}

so the arithmetic and displayed repeated-dyadic schedules have an unbounded line-to-point ratio. Equation (15) alone is not a chromatic lower bound: dissociated classes may have rational dependencies.

4. Independent additive-loss version

There is also a simpler, weaker directional estimate

ρ(Lt)≥min⁡i≤t(1−π2di2∑j=i+1tdj−2).(16)\rho(L_t)\geq \min_{i\leq t}\left(1- \frac{\pi^2d_i}{2}\sum_{j=i+1}^t d_j^{-2}\right). \tag{16}

For each prescribed target ux=eiθxu_x=e^{i\theta_x}, choose a finite random real lift XxX_x with eiXx=uxe^{iX_x}=u_x, mean zero, and EXx2≤π2\mathbb EX_x^2\leq\pi^2: take the two adjacent lifts surrounding zero with their mean-zero probabilities. Use independent lifts across base points. Replace all zx,sz_{x,s} by zx,seiXx/dz_{x,s}e^{iX_x/d}. New terms again align exactly, while the phase correction on an old ii-line has mean zero and variance at most π2di/d2\pi^2d_i/d^2. The inequality

Re⁡(weiv)≥Re⁡w−vIm⁡w−12∣w∣v2\operatorname{Re}(we^{iv}) \geq\operatorname{Re}w-v\operatorname{Im}w-\tfrac12|w|v^2

therefore bounds its expected loss by π2di∣w∣/(2d2)\pi^2d_i|w|/(2d^2). This time optimize the unscaled old layer polynomials and induct with an additive loss for each direction, yielding (16). For di=10id_i=10i, it gives the independent explicit bound ρ(Lt)≥1−π2/20>1/2\rho(L_t)\geq1-\pi^2/20>1/2.

The multiplicative root-polygon argument is stronger because its expectation is exactly real and target-independent; unlike the accumulated additive estimate, it remains positive for di=i+2d_i=i+2.

5. One full-dissociation extraction constant

Embed Ht=ZXtH_t=\mathbb Z^{X_t} into Ht+1H_{t+1} by ex↦e(x,1)e_x\mapsto e_{(x,1)}. This is a primitive direct-summand embedding, and takes every old axis line to a line in the fixed new-coordinate slice. Consequently the LtL_t are nested in the direct-limit free abelian group HH. Every character of HtH_t extends to HH.

Under (3), every finite polynomial supported on L=⋃tLt⊂HL=\bigcup_tL_t\subset H therefore satisfies the ordinary Sidon estimate with constant at most 29M2^{9M}, by (13). Apply Pisier's Theorem 2 once to this one infinite set in the dual of the compact abelian group H^\widehat H. It gives one integer kk such that every finite subset of LL has a dissociated subset of size at least its cardinality divided by kk. Set δ=1/k\delta=1/k.

The exact theorem statement was checked in the supplied full source, Theorem 2 on reading-copy page 3, after reading its digest. The source does not provide an explicit dependence of kk on the Sidon constant, so no numerical extraction constant is asserted. The analytic constants above are explicit.

The carry-free integer realization and separated-block assembly already available in the wiki apply to these finite 0,10,1-column families. They do not settle the remaining obligation

sup⁡tχ1(Lt)=∞\sup_t\chi_1(L_t)=\infty

for any of these schedules. No completion claim follows from this extraction theorem alone.