Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Uniform extraction from axis lines with linearly growing sides
Theorem and scope
For integers , put
and let consist of the indicator vectors of all full axis-parallel lines. Thus an -line has entries equal to one. Different lines give distinct, nonzero, non-antipodal vectors.
Write for the positive-real Sidon parameter: for every complex coefficient family ,
The direct finite estimate is
In particular, if
then every has positive-real Sidon parameter at least , and there is one such that every subset of every contains a dissociated subset of relative size at least .
This includes the dense linear schedule , with . A sharper elementary estimate below gives . More generally, for , integers , one has and .
This is a new direct estimate for the line subfamily. It does not assert proportional dissociation of the full simplex tensors at a linear schedule, which the full-tensor entropy obstruction rules out. It also does not prove that the coloring numbers are unbounded. The proof below is self-contained until its final application of the supplied Pisier theorem. Independent internal review checked the finite induction, constants, embeddings, and exact Pisier hypotheses; no defect was found.
1. A target-independent root-polygon rounding lemma
For every integer and , there is a finite random variable satisfying
Indeed the -th roots of are the vertices of a rotated regular -gon. Its convex hull contains the closed disk centered at zero of radius . The positive real number therefore is a convex combination of those vertices. Use the combination's weights as probabilities.
The distribution may depend on , but its expectation does not. Independent copies of (4), with possibly different prescribed targets, therefore satisfy
for every finite set of distinct indices. No uniform choice of the whole distribution, and no measurable choice in the target, is required: only finitely many targets occur in a given step.
2. Directional induction
For a polynomial on , denote its total coefficient magnitude in direction by . We prove the stronger directional assertion
For , the family has a single line, whose character can be assigned any unit value, so works.
Suppose the assertion holds through , and put . Decompose the point variables into layers , . An arbitrary polynomial on has the form
where each uses precisely the old line directions.
In each , multiply every direction- coefficient by , obtaining . Choose the layers independently using the induction hypothesis for these rescaled polynomials. Their total real value satisfies
All layer choices are now fixed.
For each , if , prescribe
if , choose any . Choose independent random variables from (4), with targets , and replace every layer coordinate by
Every new-axis term then equals deterministically, since . An old -line character, in any layer, is multiplied by the product of over its distinct base points. By (5), its expected multiplier is exactly . Consequently
The random choice has finite support, so one outcome attains at least this expectation. This proves (6), with and , hence (2).
Rescaling before optimization is essential: no sign or phase of an old individual term is assumed favorable. The target-dependent distributions are selected only after the old layers are fixed. Independence is required across base points, not across layers; the same is deliberately used in all layers so that (9) is solved exactly.
3. Uniform constants and dense schedules
For ,
One elementary proof observes that is nondecreasing on . The sign of its derivative is the sign of . Here , and
Thus , giving (12). Combining (12) with (3) gives
For the arithmetic schedule , monotonicity and an integral comparison give
For these increasing arithmetic schedules, improve (12) to
For , set . The elementary inequalities and show that the left side of (14a) is at most , which is at most its right side because . For , the left side is , using and . Every future side , , is at least four, and
Here , so (14a) justifies the first inequality. Consequently:
- has .
- has .
- A dyadic block schedule in which side is repeated times, for , has : from any point in its block, the remaining same-block contribution to is less than one, and all later blocks contribute exactly one. Hence it has the uniform bound .
The number of columns is
so the arithmetic and displayed repeated-dyadic schedules have an unbounded line-to-point ratio. Equation (15) alone is not a chromatic lower bound: dissociated classes may have rational dependencies.
4. Independent additive-loss version
There is also a simpler, weaker directional estimate
For each prescribed target , choose a finite random real lift with , mean zero, and : take the two adjacent lifts surrounding zero with their mean-zero probabilities. Use independent lifts across base points. Replace all by . New terms again align exactly, while the phase correction on an old -line has mean zero and variance at most . The inequality
therefore bounds its expected loss by . This time optimize the unscaled old layer polynomials and induct with an additive loss for each direction, yielding (16). For , it gives the independent explicit bound .
The multiplicative root-polygon argument is stronger because its expectation is exactly real and target-independent; unlike the accumulated additive estimate, it remains positive for .
5. One full-dissociation extraction constant
Embed into by . This is a primitive direct-summand embedding, and takes every old axis line to a line in the fixed new-coordinate slice. Consequently the are nested in the direct-limit free abelian group . Every character of extends to .
Under (3), every finite polynomial supported on therefore satisfies the ordinary Sidon estimate with constant at most , by (13). Apply Pisier's Theorem 2 once to this one infinite set in the dual of the compact abelian group . It gives one integer such that every finite subset of has a dissociated subset of size at least its cardinality divided by . Set .
The exact theorem statement was checked in the supplied full source, Theorem 2 on reading-copy page 3, after reading its digest. The source does not provide an explicit dependence of on the Sidon constant, so no numerical extraction constant is asserted. The analytic constants above are explicit.
The carry-free integer realization and separated-block assembly already available in the wiki apply to these finite -column families. They do not settle the remaining obligation
for any of these schedules. No completion claim follows from this extraction theorem alone.