Erdős 699: an integer factorization of the cubic discriminant
This is a retained earlier research note. The current reading guide gives the latest status and distinguishes completed proofs from remaining cases.
P699 research ·
The conductor normalization ·
The integer cubics
The endpoint conditions give a factorization of the cubic discriminant
into a square and one additional integer. It applies to every hypothetical
bad triple, including the cases with a canceled factor of three. In the
hard subcase n=2h, j odd, the equations resemble equations suited to
Vieta descent, but their natural coordinate mutations fail to give a
smaller positive integral solution. No global finiteness result follows.
1. The factorization for all hypothetical bad triples
Use the established notation
n=2hu,c=n−j,d=n−2j,t=v2(j)=v2(c),m=h−t≥2,
where u is odd, 4≤j<n/2, and d2>3n−2. Put
K=n−1jc,M=2n−2,g=gcd(u,3),v=u/g.
Since 3K=22tk is an integer, the reduced denominator λ of
K belongs to {1,3}. Write κ=λK. If λ=3,
then 3∣n−1, so 3∤uM and 3∤κ. Consequently
gcd(κ,κ−λ)=1,gcd(λ,M)=1.
Lemma. There are unique coprime positive integers A,B such that
M=AB,A∣κ,B2∣κ−λ,
where A contains exactly the prime-power factors of M whose primes
divide κ.
Proof. For every pa∥M, the endpoint conditions give
jmodpa∈{0,1,2}. The only possibly inactive prime is p=3,a=1;
the same assertion then holds without a restriction. If j≡0 or
2(modpa), then pa∣jc, hence pa∣κ. If
j≡1(modpa), both j−1 and c−1 are divisible by pa.
Using
K−1=n−1(j−1)(c−1)
gives p2a∣κ−λ. Here p∤λ(n−1).
Coprimality of κ and κ−λ makes the alternatives
disjoint and proves the assertion. □
Write κ=AR, κ−λ=B2s, and e=d/2. Both
A,B are odd, v2(R)=2t, and v2(e)=t. The identity
q=λ23tMκe
and gcd(B,R)=1 imply B∣e. Also v∣j,c,e and
gcd(v,M)=1. The denominators in K are coprime to v, so
v2∣R. Thus positive odd integers r,f are defined by
R=22tv2r,e=2tBvf.
The resulting exact equations are
AB+122tv2Ar−B2sλ22tv2f2=2h−1u,=λ,=λA2−s(2AB+1).(1)
For the last equation, use e2=(M+1)2−K(2M+1).
Eliminating B2s from (1) gives
A3r−λf2=22m−2g2s.(2)
The normalized curve from the conductor note therefore has
k0=λ3Ar,q0=λrf,E0: y2=x3−k0x+2q0.(3)
These coefficients are integers. In particular, when λ=3,
one has 3∤Ar and 3∣f.
The exact cubic discriminant factorization is
DiscP=λ3g427r2s.(4)
Indeed, the earlier discriminant formula is
DiscP=27K2(K−1)/(24tu4M2), and substitution
gives (4). The only denominator in (4) is a power of three; its
integrality is already supplied by P∈Z[z].
The same equations give
gcd(Ar,s)=gcd(B,r)=gcd(A,f)=gcd(s,f)=1.
Equation (2) shows that every common prime divisor of r,f divides
3: any such prime must divide g or λ, and λ=3
excludes 3∣r. Finally, d2>3n−2 gives K<M/2, hence
r<22t+1v2λB.(5)
2. The odd conductor away from six
For p≥5 dividing s, (2)--(3) give
vp(c4)=0 and vp(Δ)=vp(s): the reduction is multiplicative,
with conductor exponent one.
For p≥5 dividing r, put a=vp(r). The coprimalities above give
vp(c4)=a+vp(A),vp(c6)=a,vp(Δ)=2a.
Write a=6b+d with 0≤d<6. Scaling the Weierstrass coordinates
by p2b,p3b gives valuations 2b+d+vp(A),d,2d.
This model is minimal, since its constant coefficient has valuation
d<6. It has good reduction for d=0 and additive reduction otherwise.
At p≥5 the latter has conductor exponent two. Thus, exactly,
N(E0){2,3}′=p≥5p∣s∏p⋅p≥5p∣r6∤vp(r)∏p2.(6)
The subscript removes the prime factors two and three. These are the standard local conductor
rules used in the conductor note.
In particular, if r,s are squarefree away from six, their contribution
has the full size r2s away from six. The endpoint equations alone have
not forced repeated prime factors that would improve this bound.
3. Coordinate Vieta mutations in the hard subcase
Now assume u=1,t=0. Thus g=v=1, h≥4, and (1) simplifies to
AB+1=2h−1,Ar−B2s=λ,λf2=λA2−s(2AB+1),r<λB/2.(7)
This includes both λ=1 and the canceled case λ=3.
All of A,B,r,f are odd. Reduction modulo eight shows
8∣s and r≡−λB(mod8). These conditions and
r<λB/2 exclude B=1. Also A>2Bs/λ.
Eliminating s gives the quadratic in A
B(λB−2r)A2+(2λB−r)A+λ−λB2f2=0.(8)
The second root is
A′=−A−B(λB−2r)2λB−r.
It is never integral: gcd(B,r)=1 makes the fraction's numerator
coprime to B>1. Holding A,r,f fixed instead gives the quadratic
λ(A2−f2)B2−2A(Ar−λ)B−(Ar−λ)=0,
whose second root is B′=−B/(2AB+1)∈(−1,0), also nonintegral.
The other two coordinate choices do not give positive solutions.
Eliminating A and regarding the result as a quadratic in r gives
the second root
r′=−λA−2BsλAr<0.
Regarding it as a quadratic in s gives
s′=B3(λB−2r)sλ(λ2−r2f2)≤0,
because rf/λ=q0 is a positive integer. Changing the sign of
f exchanges j,c. Thus these coordinate root exchanges do not give
a descent among positive admissible tuples. This does not exclude
other transformations or an argument using higher Lucas digits.
The factorization and the conductor formula are uniform necessary
conditions. They do not prove that arbitrary positive solutions of
(1) satisfy all the original Lucas conditions, nor do they bound
r2s. A restriction on these factors beyond (1)--(5) is still needed
to obtain a contradiction or global finiteness.
4. Splitting the two outer residue groups
The residue-group proof
excludes an empty outer group by a small square identity. Here is its
extension when both outer groups are present. Write
U=C0, V=C2, B=C1, so A=UV, and use the unnormalized
R from Section 1:
UVR−B2s=λ.
Set j=Ua, c=Ub+2, where a,b>0 and a+b=2BV. The same
elimination as in the empty-group proof gives
D=2BV2R−λab,UD=2λa−VR>0,
and
[VR−λ(a−BV)]2=B2(λ2V2−Ds).
Positivity follows from VR=λac/(n−1)<λa. Since
a rational square root of an integer is integral, there is an integer
z with
Ds=λ2V2−z2,∣z∣<λV.
When V=1, this restricts Ds to the short list used in the proof.
For variable V, the list grows with V2. Thus this extension of
the identity does not give a uniform bound when all three groups grow.