Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

The integer factorization used in the cubic abc proof

P699 research · The cubic abc proof


This note collects the unconditional algebra needed in Sections 1 and 4 of the cubic abc proof. Its input is the endpoint reduction. These are necessary conditions for badness, not a converse: the higher Lucas digits are not imposed by the factorization.

1. The factorization for all hypothetical bad triples

For a bad triple write

n=2hu,c=n−j,d=c−j>0,t=v2(j),g=gcd⁡(u,3),v=u/g,n=2^hu,\quad c=n-j,\quad d=c-j>0,\quad t=v_2(j),\quad g=\gcd(u,3),\quad v=u/g,

where uu is odd, h≥2h\ge2, 4≤j<n/24\le j<n/2, and 3u3<2h3u^3<2^h. The endpoint conditions give

u(n−1)∣3jc,u(n−1)(n−2)∣j(j−1)(j−2),u(n-1)\mid3jc,\qquad u(n-1)(n-2)\mid j(j-1)(j-2),

and the corresponding condition for cc. At each active odd component pa∥n−ip^a\Vert n-i, they give j mod pa∈{0,…,i}j\bmod p^a\in\{0,\ldots,i\}. Only a component 313^1 can be inactive. We also use the proved alternating-coefficient inequality d2>3n−2d^2>3n-2.

The normalization gives m:=h−t≥2m:=h-t\ge2, v2(c)=tv_2(c)=t, and v2(d)=t+1v_2(d)=t+1. Here is a short justification. Put W=u(n−1)(n−2)/6W=u(n-1)(n-2)/6. The four coefficients (j3−i)(ci)/W\binom j{3-i}\binom ci/W, 0≤i≤30\le i\le3, are positive integers and sum to 2h2^h. If t≥ht\ge h, all four are divisible by 2h2^h, which is impossible. For t<ht<h their exact common two-part is 2t2^t: each is divisible by 2t2^t, and their derivative sum is 3c/u3c/u, of valuation tt. Dividing by 2t2^t proves m≥2m\ge2. The assertions about c,dc,d follow. These coefficient divisibilities also follow directly from the residue labels at each active prime.

Set

K=jcn−1,M=n−22,λ=den⁡(K)∈{1,3},k=λK.K=\frac{jc}{n-1},\qquad M=\frac{n-2}{2},\qquad \lambda=\operatorname{den}(K)\in\{1,3\},\qquad k=\lambda K.

The denominator is in lowest terms. If λ=3\lambda=3, then 3∣n−13\mid n-1 and 3∤kuM3\nmid k u M; hence in all cases gcd⁡(k,k−λ)=gcd⁡(λ,M)=1\gcd(k,k-\lambda)=\gcd(\lambda,M)=1. Partition the full prime-power factors of MM by their labels j≡0,1,2j\equiv0,1,2, and call their products U,B,VU,B,V, respectively. Thus U=C0U=C_0, B=C1B=C_1, and V=C2V=C_2 in residue-group notation. The component 313^1, if present, also has one of these three labels. Thus M=UBVM=UBV, with U,B,VU,B,V pairwise coprime. Put A=UVA=UV. The labels and

K−1=(j−1)(c−1)n−1K-1=\frac{(j-1)(c-1)}{n-1}

give A∣kA\mid k and B2∣k−λB^2\mid k-\lambda. Define positive integers R,sR,s by

AR=k,B2s=k−λ.(1)AR=k,\qquad B^2s=k-\lambda.\tag{1}

In particular gcd⁡(AR,Bs)=1\gcd(AR,Bs)=1 and gcd⁡(λ,s)=1\gcd(\lambda,s)=1. The label-zero conditions at the active components of uu give v∣j,c,d/2v\mid j,c,d/2; removing gg accounts for its possibly inactive single factor three. Since gcd⁡(v,A(n−1))=1\gcd(v,A(n-1))=1, we have v2∣Rv^2\mid R. Also v2(R)=2tv_2(R)=2t. Define

w=22tv2,R=wr,L=2tvB.w=2^{2t}v^2,\qquad R=wr,\qquad L=2^tvB.

Then rr is a positive odd integer. To define the remaining parameter, put e=d/2e=d/2. The middle label gives B∣j−1B\mid j-1, so the identity

e=M−(j−1)=AB−(j−1)e=M-(j-1)=AB-(j-1)

proves B∣eB\mid e without assuming any auxiliary quotient integral. As gcd⁡(B,v)=1\gcd(B,v)=1, the preceding divisibilities and v2(e)=tv_2(e)=t give the positive odd integer f=e/Lf=e/L.

We have obtained

AB+1=2h−1u,wAr−B2s=λ,λwf2=λA2−s(2AB+1),A3r−λf2=22m−2g2s.(2)\boxed{\begin{aligned} AB+1&=2^{h-1}u,\\ wAr-B^2s&=\lambda,\\ \lambda w f^2&=\lambda A^2-s(2AB+1),\\ A^3r-\lambda f^2&=2^{2m-2}g^2s. \end{aligned}}\tag{2}

For the third identity use e2=(M+1)2−K(2M+1)e^2=(M+1)^2-K(2M+1), then substitute (1) and e=Lfe=Lf. For the fourth, subtract the third from A2(wAr−B2s)=λA2A^2(wAr-B^2s)=\lambda A^2 and use (AB+1)2/w=22m−2g2(AB+1)^2/w=2^{2m-2}g^2.

The coprimalities needed below are

gcd⁡(Ar,s)=gcd⁡(B,r)=gcd⁡(A,f)=gcd⁡(s,f)=1.(3)\gcd(Ar,s)=\gcd(B,r)=\gcd(A,f)=\gcd(s,f)=1.\tag{3}

The first two follow from (1). At a prime of AA, the outer label makes e≡1e\equiv1 or −1-1 modulo that prime, proving the third. The third identity of (2), together with gcd⁡(λA,s)=1\gcd(\lambda A,s)=1, proves the fourth. The last identity of (2) also shows that a common prime of r,fr,f can only be three. Finally d2>3n−2d^2>3n-2 gives

K<M/2,R<λB/2.(4)K<M/2,\qquad R<\lambda B/2.\tag{4}

For the first abc application, the three terms A3rA^3r, λf2\lambda f^2, and 22m−2g2s2^{2m-2}g^2s have common gcd at most nine. Indeed, (3) forces a common prime to divide gg; if it is three, then 3∤s3\nmid s and the last term has valuation two.

2. The conic and parameter sizes

Put

T=n/2=AB+1,q=λB,F=Lf=d/2.T=n/2=AB+1,\qquad q=\lambda B,\qquad F=Lf=d/2.

The notation separates the full coefficient R=wrR=wr from its odd factor rr; qq is the middle-group coefficient, while LL contains the column's two-part, vv, and the middle group BB. Since K/M=R/qK/M=R/q and F2=T2−K(2T−1)F^2=T^2-K(2T-1), we obtain

qF2=(q−2R)T2+3RT−R,0<R<q/2.(5)\boxed{qF^2=(q-2R)T^2+3RT-R,\qquad 0<R<q/2.}\tag{5}

All four parameters are positive integers. Also gcd⁡(q,R)=1\gcd(q,R)=1, because gcd⁡(B,R)=1\gcd(B,R)=1 and λ=3\lambda=3 implies 3∤R3\nmid R. The elementary size and support relations used in the abc proof are

Bv≤L,q≤3L,u≤3L,rad⁡(T)≤2u.Bv\le L,\qquad q\le3L,\qquad u\le3L,\qquad \operatorname{rad}(T)\le2u.

3. Paired factors at n minus one and n minus two

Choose either orientation (J,C)=(j,c)(J,C)=(j,c) or (c,j)(c,j). Reassign U,VU,V to the zero and two labels of JJ; reflection exchanges them and leaves A,B,R,qA,B,R,q unchanged. Partition

n−1λ=D0D1,D0∣J,D1∣C.\frac{n-1}{\lambda}=D_0D_1,\qquad D_0\mid J,\quad D_1\mid C.

These factors are coprime and contain the full components with labels zero and one, respectively. When λ=1\lambda=1, integrality of KK also supplies the label at a possibly inactive component three. When λ=3\lambda=3, that component is removed; an active component at three would already force KK integral. All factors of D0D1D_0D_1 are coprime to UBVUBV. Define

α=JD0U,β=CD1V,κ=n+J−2D1U,ℓ=n+C−2D0V.(6)\alpha=\frac{J}{D_0U},\quad \beta=\frac{C}{D_1V},\quad \kappa=\frac{n+J-2}{D_1U},\quad \ell=\frac{n+C-2}{D_0V}.\tag{6}

The labels prove that these are positive integers, for even as well as odd columns. Their products and linear relations are

αβ=R,κℓ=R+4q,κU+βV=2λD0,αU+ℓV=2λD1,ℓD0−βD1=2BU,κD1−αD0=2BV.(7)\boxed{\begin{gathered} \alpha\beta=R,\qquad \kappa\ell=R+4q,\\ \kappa U+\beta V=2\lambda D_0,\qquad \alpha U+\ell V=2\lambda D_1,\\ \ell D_0-\beta D_1=2BU,\qquad \kappa D_1-\alpha D_0=2BV. \end{gathered}}\tag{7}

These follow by multiplying or adding (6); for the second product use (n+J−2)(n+C−2)=JC+2(n−1)(n−2)(n+J-2)(n+C-2)=JC+2(n-1)(n-2). Moreover v2(α)=v2(β)=tv_2(\alpha)=v_2(\beta)=t, and gcd⁡(λ,R(R+4q))=1\gcd(\lambda,R(R+4q))=1. Reflection interchanges α↔β\alpha\leftrightarrow\beta and κ↔ℓ\kappa\leftrightarrow\ell.

4. The paired abc identity

The same labels give positive integers

X1=J−1BD1,Z1=J−2V.X_1=\frac{J-1}{BD_1},\qquad Z_1=\frac{J-2}{V}.

They satisfy the identity used in the second abc application:

λ2αD03Z1+βκ=4B3TX12.(8)\boxed{\lambda^2\alpha D_0^3Z_1+\beta\kappa =4B^3T X_1^2.}\tag{8}

To prove it, multiply by D12UVD_1^2UV and substitute (6), λD0D1=n−1\lambda D_0D_1=n-1, and 2BUV=n−22BUV=n-2. The result is

(n−1)2J(J−2)+C(n+J−2)=n(n−2)(J−1)2,(n-1)^2J(J-2)+C(n+J-2)=n(n-2)(J-1)^2,

which follows from (n−1)2−(J−1)2=C(n+J−2)(n-1)^2-(J-1)^2=C(n+J-2). Every term in (8) is positive. The abc proof controls the common divisor and radical before applying abc.

The identities here are repository deductions, extracted from the earlier factorization calculations. No elliptic-curve or number-field assumption is used in this note.