Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Compression obstructions
Neither assertion of Problem 644 is resolved here. These examples rule out several unqualified shifting arguments, not every possible symmetrization or a carefully selected sequence with small loss.
Write for the condition that every at-most- edges have a transversal of size at most two. For distinct points , the ordinary shift replaces an edge containing but not by
if that replacement is not already in the family; otherwise it retains . The examples use notation such as for .
A shift can destroy the local property while preserving the transversal number
Consider the -uniform family on
For the edges in this order, the following pairs miss the designated edge and meet all the other edges:
Every subfamily with at most seven edges omits some designated edge and therefore has a two-point transversal. Thus has .
The shift changes only to . Its image contains the seven edges
Their complements in are
Every pair of is contained in at least one of these complements, so no pair covers (1). Hence the shifted family fails .
For completeness, the original family also has no two-point transversal. Its eight complementary triples are
which again contain every pair of . The triple covers both the original family and its shifted image. Both transversal numbers are therefore three.
If exchanges and , then . Consequently even completing a family under a single transposition can destroy .
The same failure at every uniformity
Section 6 of third independent record gives a relabeling of the preceding example and a valid padding extension. For every , append fresh points to each edge of , sharing the padding exactly within the pairs
and using disjoint padding otherwise. The original deletion covers still prove .
Under , the shared padding retains the two mirror collisions and . Thus only the padded edge changes, to padded . The seven padded edges corresponding to (1) still have no two-cover: two original points fail by the preceding certificate, while every original point meets at most four of these seven edges and every padding point meets at most two.
Both entire eight-edge families have transversal number three. The original triple covers both. Two original points fail to cover either entire family; any padding point together with an original point meets at most edges, and two padding points meet at most four. Consequently a single ordinary shift can destroy at every uniformity , while retaining . This strengthens the finite-rank scope of the obstruction, not its asymptotic ratio.
Seven star-forcing anchors can be necessary
Call a subfamily star-forcing at if every transversal of size at most two contains . In applications below the subfamily has a two-point transversal; the assertion is not based on absence of all two-point transversals.
Short-anchor bound. Suppose a rank-at-most- family has and contains star-forcing reference edges at , at least one of which avoids . Put
The reference edges have precisely the two-point covers with , and . Then
To prove this, partition into parts of size at most . If the bound failed, for each part choose an edge avoiding that part together with . Adjoin these edges to the references. Any two-cover must contain and some , but the edge queried for the part containing avoids both points. This contradicts . Repeated query edges can simply be removed, since the total number of distinct edges is at most seven. In particular, gives .
The following -uniform example strengthens the obstruction to extracting a short star-forcing subfamily:
For its edges in this order, deletion leaves the two-point covers
Thus every proper subfamily has a two-point transversal, proving and hence . The complements of the nine edges are
They contain every pair of , so . Adjoining one point of a deleted edge to its cover in (3) gives a three-point transversal. Thus , and deletion of every edge reduces the transversal number to two.
The shift changes only to : the potential replacements of and are already and . Its image contains the bad seven-tuple
The complementary triples are
Each pair of appears in exactly one triple of (5). These are the lines of a Fano plane, and (4) consists of its complementary caps. In particular, (4) has no two-point transversal.
Undo the changed row, obtaining
Any two-cover of avoiding would still cover (4): if such a pair meets , it meets it at , , or , all of which remain in . Hence is star-forcing at . It does have the two-cover .
Moreover, no subfamily of with six or fewer edges is star-forcing at . For the seven displayed rows of , respectively, the pairs
avoid , miss the designated row, and meet every other row of . Any star-forcing subfamily must therefore contain all seven designated rows. This is an exact obstruction to replacing an unsafe-shift witness by at most six star-forcing anchors, even though the original family has .
Linear cumulative loss along shifts that all preserve
The following construction starts with a uniform family that is both transversal-critical and domination-reduced. Here a vertex is dominated by a different vertex if every edge containing also contains .
Fix an integer and put
Let and partition the complete family into its orbits under cyclic rotation. For each orbit , introduce a distinct padding vertex . Set
Every core edge occurs exactly once in (7). The family is -uniform with .
The local property
The complete core has . Indeed, seven -subsets have total degree , so some core point lies in at least five of them. The at most two remaining sets intersect because . These one or two core points cover all seven sets. There are more than seven core edges, so the at-most-seven version follows as well.
Every corresponding padded family, including each intermediate family below, is covered by the same core points. Thus (7) has .
The transversal number
Any core points cover all core -sets, giving . Suppose conversely that a cover uses core points and padding points, with
At least
core edges avoid the selected core points. Every orbit has at most edges.
If , (8) already contradicts coverage. If , note that is increasing for integral , since the ratio of its successive values is
Consequently
The selected padding vertices cover at most core edges, fewer than the number in (8), again a contradiction.
It remains to exclude . Choose an -subset of the core points outside the selected points. Its subsets of size must all belong to the one selected orbit . Write . Rotation invariance makes every core point have degree within . Every point of lies in of those edges, so , forcing and degree exactly at every core point. The incidences of each point of are already exhausted by the edges inside . The remaining edges of must therefore lie wholly in . But
which is impossible for an -edge. Thus no cover of size at most exists, and
Criticality and absence of dominated vertices
For an edge based on , the core complement has size , misses that edge, and meets every other edge because distinct core edges have the same size . Deleting any edge therefore reduces the transversal number to at most . It cannot reduce it further, since one point from the deleted edge could then be added to give a cover of smaller than . Thus is transversal-critical.
Each cyclic orbit has empty common core intersection. Its intersection is rotation-invariant, hence is either empty or all of , and the latter is impossible because . Thus no padding vertex is dominated by a core vertex. Different padding vertices have disjoint nonempty incidence sets, so do not dominate each other.
No core vertex is dominated by another core vertex, since the complete core separates them. A core vertex belongs to
edges; here and . A padding vertex belongs to at most edges. Hence no core vertex is dominated by a padding vertex. This proves that the entire uniform family (7) is domination-reduced.
The shifts
Choose one padding vertex and successively apply ordinary shifts replacing every other padding label by . These can be ordinary left-shifts in a fixed order with first. When an edge based on still has label , the edge is absent: every core edge has exactly one padding label throughout. Therefore the shift replaces every edge with label , with no mirror collision.
At every stage, the same complete core certifies . At the end the family is
which has transversal number one. The cumulative loss is
Thus even a sequence consisting entirely of -preserving shifts can lose a positive linear fraction of the rank.
This construction does not show that every shifting order suffers linear loss. Also, although its initial family has no dominated vertices, deleting all padding vertices preserves and , and reduces the rank by one. It does not obstruct a more substantial preliminary reduction that removes such dispensable incidences.
What full shifting would require
Suppose a -uniform family on an ordered ground set is fully shifted and has transversal number . The initial segment fails to cover it, so there is an edge disjoint from . Shiftedness then gives , and subsequently every -subset of . Therefore
Together with the complete-family bound, this would give the desired -scale conclusion for fully shifted families.
Ordinary shifts preserve the number of edges. The first example has eight edges, fewer than ; the second has nine, fewer than . Neither can become fully shifted through any ordinary shifting sequence while retaining its transversal number three. These finite examples do not disprove a theorem restricted to hypothetical families above , nor do they exclude adding edges by a more selective operation that retains .