Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Diameter triangles and bounded odd diameter cycles
Theorem. If a planar point set has three points whose mutual distances all equal its diameter, then .
Also, along any unbounded sequence in which the diameter graph contains an odd cycle of bounded length, .
These cover additional diameter graphs, not arbitrary sets: a diameter graph can be acyclic, and its odd cycle can have unbounded length.
Reuleaux triangle geometry
Normalize the diameter to one and write the diameter triangle as . Let
This is the Reuleaux triangle of width one and contains . Its boundary points are exactly those points of active for the diameter: every boundary point has a corner as a diameter partner; an interior point cannot attain the diameter of . Put , , , , and let be the second-largest distance. If , distances to the three corners show . For example, their squared distances from any point sum to at least one.
Let , so . Here is a useful strict arc inequality. In coordinates centered at a unit-circle arc's center, an interior point of its short arc from to has
If , expansion gives
Thus every point of is within of all of , and strictly within of every noncorner boundary point. In particular, there are no -pairs between and .
Opposite support points of have projections and in each unit direction . For , the distance bounds to those points imply
Every width of , and hence its diameter, is at most . Therefore
Every -- distance is at least : use a diameter partner in for its endpoint in , and the triangle inequality.
For , at most three points of are on two of its defining circles, and none is on all three. Indeed, each pair of the circles has at most one intersection in the third disk, and the unique point equidistant from all three corners has distance . Consequently
At , is a singleton and (3) also holds.
Three path components on the boundary
Assume , and that contains the three corners and has no distance in . Put
We prove
The constant-width two-intersection theorem makes this graph have maximum degree two. Each corner has degree at most one. To see this at , put . Its two possible boundary neighbors are separated by
With , the same expression is . They cannot both belong to . This already proves the second bound in (4) by handshaking.
For the first bound, start a path and interchange if necessary so that is on the arc -- centered at . Then
If has a second -neighbor , boundary-distance monotonicity and the two-intersection theorem place in the interior arc -- centered at . Thus , while . If , then
forcing . Exclude that case. Now ; also , since otherwise the two-intersection count for the circle about would be exceeded. Any next neighbor must lie in the interior arc -- centered at . Hence . A noncorner boundary point has just one diameter partner, its arc center. Thus , and the spectral gap makes it at most . We would have
The following calculation rules this out. For two points at distance , and , the point of farthest from is the equilateral completion on the opposite side of from . In coordinates , take . The lens conditions give . On its circle-about- arc, and , so ; the other arc gives the same maximum at .
In the original coordinates put . Then
The angle between the two unit summands is . Here
For the upper inequality, reduces after squaring positive quantities to . The lower inequality is immediate from , . Thus and
contradicting (5). Every corner component is consequently a path of at most two edges and contains no other corner. There are three distinct path components; all remaining maximum-degree-two components have no more edges than vertices. This proves the first bound in (4).
Completing the finite theorem
If is empty, the constant-width theorem makes every distance rare, and there are at least distances. Otherwise, when , (2)--(4) give
For and , take . By (2),
It has no -- occurrences. Its pairs inside number at most by the constant-width theorem, and inside at most by the diameter theorem. Hence is rare and differs from the full diameter. If , the single interior point has at most two corner neighbors at , and (4) gives . This proves in all cases.
Bounded-length odd diameter cycles
Let be the vertices of an odd diameter cycle, with consecutive cycle vertices at distance . In any constant-width- completion of , the short radius- arc centered at from to lies in . The arc lemma in constant_width proves inclusion in ; being at distance from forces boundary inclusion.
No other cycle vertex is interior to this arc, because interior points have the unique diameter partner , whereas a cycle vertex has two distinct partners. Distinct arcs have disjoint interiors: an interior overlap on the Jordan curve would contain an interval, impossible for arcs on distinct circles. Their endpoint graph is the step-two cycle on the indices, connected since is odd. Their union is therefore a closed subcurve and equals .
For any , the radius- version of (1) now gives
whenever is nonempty. The support-projection proof above applies with width .
Suppose and , while is bounded. Choose a rich distance among the largest ranks, so . Such ranks exist eventually: two anchors already bound , so . Put
This set lies on at most circles. The circle theorem implies , uniformly. The complement lies in , so (6) makes a vertex cover of the -graph. Its (2)-core has maximum degree at most , hence has at most edges. But the rich long-core surplus, using a rich short rank , gives a surplus of at least . This is a contradiction, proving divergence under the bounded-cycle hypothesis.
Quantitative cycle restrictions
The quantitative circle bound improves the last conclusion: under , every circle has points. Thus the exceptional cover above satisfies
The bounded-degree core and its linear surplus force . Consequently any odd diameter cycle in a bounded-rarity sequence has
In particular, forces rarity divergence.
For the stronger bound
follows. Let be the diameter-active set and . At the second distance , every point of is within of every point of . Formula (6) makes independent, and the strict arc inequality makes all its -neighbors belong to . In the -core , let count -- edges and count its -vertices. The arc-leaf argument in diameter_activity gives at most two core neighbors in for each vertex of , so . The core degree bound six gives . The constant-width theorem gives no positive surplus on . Hence
The known surplus lower bound for the rich minimum and second-largest classes is , proving (8).
The author checked the arc contraction, the corner-path trigonometry, the exceptional case, the odd-cycle tiling and core count, and (7)--(8) against their stated inputs; the argument is author-recorded. No conclusion covers acyclic diameter graphs or general growing odd cycles. Neither unrestricted target has been resolved.