Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Diameter triangles and bounded odd diameter cycles


Theorem. If a planar n≥5n\ge5 point set has three points whose mutual distances all equal its diameter, then R(A)≥2R(A)\ge2.

Also, along any unbounded sequence in which the diameter graph contains an odd cycle of bounded length, R(A)→∞R(A)\to\infty.

These cover additional diameter graphs, not arbitrary sets: a diameter graph can be acyclic, and its odd cycle can have unbounded length.

Reuleaux triangle geometry

Normalize the diameter to one and write the diameter triangle as a=0,b=1,c=ω=eiπ/3a=0,b=1,c=\omega=e^{i\pi/3}. Let

K=B‾(a,1)∩B‾(b,1)∩B‾(c,1).K=\overline B(a,1)\cap\overline B(b,1)\cap\overline B(c,1).

This is the Reuleaux triangle of width one and contains AA. Its boundary points are exactly those points of AA active for the diameter: every boundary point has a corner as a diameter partner; an interior point cannot attain the diameter of KK. Put S=A∩∂KS=A\cap\partial K, T=A∖ST=A\setminus S, s=∣S∣s=|S|, t=∣T∣t=|T|, and let r<1r<1 be the second-largest distance. If T≠∅T\ne\varnothing, distances to the three corners show r≥1/3r\ge1/\sqrt3. For example, their squared distances from any point sum to at least one.

Let Q=⋂v∈{a,b,c}B‾(v,r)Q=\bigcap_{v\in\{a,b,c\}}\overline B(v,r), so T⊆QT\subseteq Q. Here is a useful strict arc inequality. In coordinates centered at a unit-circle arc's center, an interior point ww of its short arc from pp to qq has

w=λp+μq,λ,μ>0,h=λ+μ>1.w=\lambda p+\mu q,\qquad\lambda,\mu>0,\qquad h=\lambda+\mu>1.

If ∣z−p∣,∣z−q∣≤r<1|z-p|,|z-q|\le r<1, expansion gives

∣z−w∣2≤r2−(h−1)(∣z∣2+1−r2)<r2.(1)|z-w|^2\le r^2-(h-1)(|z|^2+1-r^2)<r^2. \tag{1}

Thus every point of QQ is within rr of all of KK, and strictly within rr of every noncorner boundary point. In particular, there are no rr-pairs between TT and S∖{a,b,c}S\setminus\{a,b,c\}.

Opposite support points of KK have projections hK(u)h_K(u) and hK(u)−1h_K(u)-1 in each unit direction uu. For z∈Qz\in Q, the distance bounds to those points imply

hK(u)−r≤z⋅u≤hK(u)−1+r.h_K(u)-r\le z\cdot u\le h_K(u)-1+r.

Every width of QQ, and hence its diameter, is at most 2r−12r-1. Therefore

diam⁡T≤2r−1<r.(2)\operatorname{diam}T\le2r-1<r. \tag{2}

Every SS--TT distance is at least 1−r1-r: use a diameter partner in SS for its endpoint in SS, and the triangle inequality.

For r>1/3r>1/\sqrt3, at most three points of QQ are on two of its defining circles, and none is on all three. Indeed, each pair of the circles has at most one intersection in the third disk, and the unique point equidistant from all three corners has distance 1/31/\sqrt3. Consequently

er(T,{a,b,c})≤t+3.(3)e_r(T,\{a,b,c\})\le t+3. \tag{3}

At r=1/3r=1/\sqrt3, QQ is a singleton and (3) also holds.

Three path components on the boundary

Assume 1/3≤r<11/\sqrt3\le r<1, and that S⊂∂KS\subset\partial K contains the three corners and has no distance in (r,1)(r,1). Put

r0=(5−1)/2.r_0=(\sqrt5-1)/2.

We prove

er(S)≤s−3(r≠r0),er(S)≤s−2(r=r0).(4)e_r(S)\le s-3\quad(r\ne r_0),\qquad e_r(S)\le s-2\quad(r=r_0). \tag{4}

The constant-width two-intersection theorem makes this graph have maximum degree two. Each corner has degree at most one. To see this at aa, put θ=arccos⁡(r/2)>π/3\theta=\arccos(r/2)>\pi/3. Its two possible boundary neighbors are separated by

d=2rsin⁡(θ−π/6)>r.d=2r\sin(\theta-\pi/6)>r.

With β=π−2θ∈(0,π/3)\beta=\pi-2\theta\in(0,\pi/3), the same expression is d=2cos⁡(π/3−β)−1<1d=2\cos(\pi/3-\beta)-1<1. They cannot both belong to SS. This already proves the second bound in (4) by handshaking.

For the first bound, start a path a−xa-x and interchange b,cb,c if necessary so that xx is on the arc aa--cc centered at bb. Then

x=(r2/2,r4−r2/2)=reiθ,∣c−x∣=1−r2/4−3r/2<r.x=(r^2/2,r\sqrt{4-r^2}/2)=r e^{i\theta},\qquad |c-x|=\sqrt{1-r^2/4}-\sqrt3r/2<r.

If xx has a second rr-neighbor yy, boundary-distance monotonicity and the two-intersection theorem place yy in the interior arc bb--cc centered at aa. Thus ∣a−y∣=1|a-y|=1, while ∣b−y∣,∣c−y∣≤r|b-y|,|c-y|\le r. If ∣b−y∣=r|b-y|=r, then

y=(1−r2/2,r4−r2/2),∣x−y∣=1−r2=r,y=(1-r^2/2,r\sqrt{4-r^2}/2),\qquad |x-y|=1-r^2=r,

forcing r=r0r=r_0. Exclude that case. Now ∣b−y∣<r|b-y|<r; also ∣c−y∣<r|c-y|<r, since otherwise the two-intersection count for the circle about yy would be exceeded. Any next neighbor zz must lie in the interior arc aa--bb centered at cc. Hence ∣c−z∣=1|c-z|=1. A noncorner boundary point has just one diameter partner, its arc center. Thus ∣x−z∣<1|x-z|<1, and the spectral gap makes it at most rr. We would have

z∈L:=B‾(x,r)∩B‾(y,r),∣c−z∣=1.(5)z\in L:=\overline B(x,r)\cap\overline B(y,r),\qquad |c-z|=1. \tag{5}

The following calculation rules this out. For two points x,yx,y at distance rr, and c∈Lc\in L, the point of LL farthest from cc is the equilateral completion e−e_- on the opposite side of xyxy from cc. In coordinates x=(0,0),y=(r,0),c=(u,v)x=(0,0),y=(r,0),c=(u,v), take v≥0v\ge0. The lens conditions give 0≤u≤r0\le u\le r. On its circle-about-xx arc, cos⁡ϕ≥1/2\cos\phi\ge1/2 and sin⁡ϕ≥−3/2\sin\phi\ge-\sqrt3/2, so ucos⁡ϕ+vsin⁡ϕ≥u/2−3v/2u\cos\phi+v\sin\phi\ge u/2-\sqrt3v/2; the other arc gives the same maximum at e−=(r/2,−3r/2)e_-=(r/2,-\sqrt3r/2).

In the original coordinates put α=arccos⁡(1/(2r))\alpha=\arccos(1/(2r)). Then

y=ei(θ−α),e−=ωx+ω‾y,1−x=e−iβ,c−e−=ω(1−x+ωy).y=e^{i(\theta-\alpha)},\quad e_-=\omega x+\overline\omega y,\quad 1-x=e^{-i\beta},\quad c-e_-=\omega(1-x+\omega y).

The angle between the two unit summands is γ=4π/3−θ−α\gamma=4\pi/3-\theta-\alpha. Here

π/3<θ+α<2π/3.\pi/3<\theta+\alpha<2\pi/3.

For the upper inequality, cos⁡(θ+α)>−1/2\cos(\theta+\alpha)>-1/2 reduces after squaring positive quantities to 4(1−r2)2>04(1-r^2)^2>0. The lower inequality is immediate from θ>π/3\theta>\pi/3, α>0\alpha>0. Thus 2π/3<γ<π2\pi/3<\gamma<\pi and

∣c−e−∣=2cos⁡(γ/2)<1,|c-e_-|=2\cos(\gamma/2)<1,

contradicting (5). Every corner component is consequently a path of at most two edges and contains no other corner. There are three distinct path components; all remaining maximum-degree-two components have no more edges than vertices. This proves the first bound in (4).

Completing the finite theorem

If TT is empty, the constant-width theorem makes every distance rare, and there are at least ⌊n/2⌋≥2\lfloor n/2\rfloor\ge2 distances. Otherwise, when r≠r0r\ne r_0, (2)--(4) give

mA(r)≤(s−3)+(t+3)=n.m_A(r)\le(s-3)+(t+3)=n.

For r=r0<2/3r=r_0<2/3 and t≥2t\ge2, take τ=diam⁡T>0\tau=\operatorname{diam}T>0. By (2),

τ≤2r−1<1−r.\tau\le2r-1<1-r.

It has no SS--TT occurrences. Its pairs inside SS number at most ss by the constant-width theorem, and inside TT at most tt by the diameter theorem. Hence τ\tau is rare and differs from the full diameter. If t=1t=1, the single interior point has at most two corner neighbors at r0>1/3r_0>1/\sqrt3, and (4) gives mA(r0)≤s<nm_A(r_0)\le s<n. This proves R(A)≥2R(A)\ge2 in all cases.

Bounded-length odd diameter cycles

Let V={c0,…,cℓ−1}V=\{c_0,\ldots,c_{\ell-1}\} be the vertices of an odd diameter cycle, with consecutive cycle vertices at distance DD. In any constant-width-DD completion KK of AA, the short radius-DD arc centered at cic_i from ci−1c_{i-1} to ci+1c_{i+1} lies in partialKpartial K. The arc lemma in constant_width proves inclusion in KK; being at distance DD from cic_i forces boundary inclusion.

No other cycle vertex is interior to this arc, because interior points have the unique diameter partner cic_i, whereas a cycle vertex has two distinct partners. Distinct arcs have disjoint interiors: an interior overlap on the Jordan curve partialKpartial K would contain an interval, impossible for arcs on distinct circles. Their endpoint graph is the step-two cycle on the indices, connected since ℓ\ell is odd. Their union is therefore a closed subcurve and equals partialKpartial K.

For any r<Dr<D, the radius-DD version of (1) now gives

Qr:=⋂v∈VB‾(v,r)=⋂x∈KB‾(x,r),diam⁡Qr≤2r−D<r,(6)Q_r:=\bigcap_{v\in V}\overline B(v,r) =\bigcap_{x\in K}\overline B(x,r),\qquad \operatorname{diam}Q_r\le2r-D<r, \tag{6}

whenever QrQ_r is nonempty. The support-projection proof above applies with width DD.

Suppose R(A)≤MR(A)\le M and n→∞n\to\infty, while ℓ\ell is bounded. Choose a rich distance r=rkr=r_k among the largest M+1M+1 ranks, so 2≤k≤M+12\le k\le M+1. Such ranks exist eventually: two anchors already bound n≤2q(A)2+2n\le2q(A)^2+2, so q(A)→∞q(A)\to\infty. Put

B={p∈A:∣p−v∣>r for some v∈V}.B=\{p\in A:|p-v|>r\text{ for some }v\in V\}.

This set lies on at most ℓ(k−1)\ell(k-1) circles. The circle theorem implies ∣B∣=o(n)|B|=o(n), uniformly. The complement lies in QrQ_r, so (6) makes BB a vertex cover of the rr-graph. Its (2)-core has maximum degree at most 4k−24k-2, hence has at most (4k−2)∣B∣=o(n)(4k-2)|B|=o(n) edges. But the rich long-core surplus, using a rich short rank s≤M+1s\le M+1, gives a surplus of at least n/(3s)−o(n)n/(3s)-o(n). This is a contradiction, proving divergence under the bounded-cycle hypothesis.

Quantitative cycle restrictions

The quantitative circle bound improves the last conclusion: under R(A)≤MR(A)\le M, every circle has OM(n31/32)O_M(n^{31/32}) points. Thus the exceptional cover above satisfies

∣B∣≤CMℓn31/32.|B|\le C_M\ell n^{31/32}.

The bounded-degree core and its linear surplus force ∣B∣≥cMn|B|\ge c_M n. Consequently any odd diameter cycle in a bounded-rarity sequence has

ℓ≥cM′n1/32.(7)\ell\ge c'_M n^{1/32}. \tag{7}

In particular, ℓ=o(n1/32)\ell=o(n^{1/32}) forces rarity divergence.

For R=1R=1 the stronger bound

ℓ≥(1/5−o(1))n(8)\ell\ge(1/5-o(1))n \tag{8}

follows. Let SS be the diameter-active set and T=A∖ST=A\setminus S. At the second distance rr, every point of TT is within rr of every point of AA. Formula (6) makes TT independent, and the strict arc inequality makes all its rr-neighbors belong to VV. In the 22-core HH, let EE count VV--TT edges and tHt_H count its TT-vertices. The arc-leaf argument in diameter_activity gives at most two core neighbors in TT for each vertex of VV, so E≤2ℓE\le2\ell. The core degree bound six gives tH≥E/6t_H\ge E/6. The constant-width theorem gives no positive surplus on H[S]H[S]. Hence

e(H)−v(H)≤E−tH≤5E/6≤5ℓ/3.e(H)-v(H)\le E-t_H\le5E/6\le5\ell/3.

The known surplus lower bound for the rich minimum and second-largest classes is n/3−o(n)n/3-o(n), proving (8).

The author checked the arc contraction, the corner-path trigonometry, the exceptional case, the odd-cycle tiling and core count, and (7)--(8) against their stated inputs; the argument is author-recorded. No conclusion covers acyclic diameter graphs or general growing odd cycles. Neither unrestricted target has been resolved.