Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

All distances are rare on a constant-width boundary


This is a restricted geometric criterion, not a proof of either unrestricted assertion of Problem 132.

Boundary theorem

Theorem. If an nn-point set lies on the boundary of a planar convex body of constant width, then every occurring distance has at most nn unordered occurrences. Consequently

R(A)=q(A)≥⌊n/2⌋.R(A)=q(A)\ge\lfloor n/2\rfloor.

Let the body KK have width D>0D>0. It has diameter DD: project any chord onto its own direction for the upper bound, and use opposite support points for the lower bound. If qq has unit outward supporting normal ν\nu, an opposite support point q′q' satisfies

(q−q′)⋅ν=D,∣q−q′∣≤D,(q-q')\cdot\nu=D,\qquad |q-q'|\le D,

so q′=q−Dνq'=q-D\nu. Every support face is therefore a singleton (fixing q′q' uniquely fixes qq), and KK is strictly convex.

Fix p∈∂Kp\in\partial K. We show that each circle centered at pp with radius 0<r<D0<r<D meets ∂K\partial K in exactly two points. Suppose q≠pq\ne p is a local extremum of distance from pp along the boundary. Let u,vu,v be its two one-sided unit tangent directions pointing away from qq, and put w=p−qw=p-q.

If the tangent cone has angle less than π\pi, strict convexity puts ww strictly inside it, so w=au+bvw=a u+b v with a,b>0a,b>0. At a local minimum, one-sided differentiation gives w⋅u,w⋅v≤0w\cdot u,w\cdot v\le0, contradicting

0<∣w∣2=a w⋅u+b w⋅v.0<|w|^2=a\,w\cdot u+b\,w\cdot v.

At a local maximum the inequalities reverse, making ν=−w/∣w∣\nu=-w/|w| an outward normal. If the tangent-cone angle is π\pi, then u=−vu=-v, and either type of extremum forces w⋅u=0w\cdot u=0; since pp is inside the supporting half-plane, ν=−w/∣w∣\nu=-w/|w| is again outward. These one-sided tangents exist for the boundary of every planar convex body; no smoothness is used.

Thus at any nonzero local extremum, both p=q−rνp=q-r\nu and q−Dνq-D\nu lie on the boundary. Strict convexity excludes 0<r<D0<r<D, so the extremum has value DD. Parametrize the boundary from pp back to pp. Its DD-level set is an interval: a gap would contain a positive local minimum below DD. Before this interval the distance is strictly increasing, and afterward it is strictly decreasing; otherwise there would again be a nonzero local extremum below DD. This proves the two-intersection assertion.

Every distance r<Dr<D consequently gives a graph of maximum degree two on AA, hence at most nn unordered edges. If DD occurs, apply the planar diameter theorem. This proves all-rarity. Finally (n2)≤nq(A)\binom n2\le nq(A) gives q(A)≥⌈(n−1)/2⌉=⌊n/2⌋q(A)\ge\lceil(n-1)/2\rceil=\lfloor n/2\rfloor.

Diameter-active points

Corollary. Let SS consist of the points of AA incident with a pair attaining its diameter DD. Every distance r<Dr<D has maximum degree at most two on SS. If S=AS=A, all distances of AA are rare.

Here is a self-contained proof of the completion fact needed for the corollary. Choose, by maximality under inclusion, a diameter-DD set KK containing AA. The union of a chain of admissible sets remains admissible, so Zorn's lemma applies. Closure and convex hull do not increase diameter; hence KK is compact and convex. It has interior: a segment or point can be enlarged without increasing its positive diameter. Maximality also gives

K=⋂x∈KB‾(x,D).(1)K=\bigcap_{x\in K}\overline B(x,D). \tag{1}

At q∈∂Kq\in\partial K, let

Cq={q−x:x∈K, ∣q−x∣=D}.C_q=\{q-x:x\in K,\ |q-x|=D\}.

It is nonempty by compactness and (1). Its vectors have length DD and pairwise angles at most π/3\pi/3, because ∣x−y∣≤D|x-y|\le D. Every outward supporting normal ν\nu at qq belongs to their positive cone. Otherwise separation supplies vv with ν⋅v>0\nu\cdot v>0 and a⋅v≤0a\cdot v\le0 for all a∈Cqa\in C_q. Perturb vv slightly toward an interior point of KK to make all the latter inequalities strictly negative. Compactness then shows that q+tvq+tv belongs to every disk in (1) for sufficiently small t>0t>0: nearly active disks have negative first derivative, and the remaining disks have uniform slack. This contradicts the supporting inequality in direction ν\nu.

Normalize ν\nu to length one. In the plane it lies between two extreme active normals q−x,q−yq-x,q-y. Their angle is at most π/3\pi/3. The point q−Dνq-D\nu lies on the short radius-DD arc from xx to yy centered at qq. For every z∈Kz\in K, both ∣z−x∣|z-x| and ∣z−y∣|z-y| are at most DD. The short-circle-arc lemma gives ∣z−(q−Dν)∣≤D|z-(q-D\nu)|\le D. By (1), q−Dν∈Kq-D\nu\in K. The width in direction ν\nu is therefore DD; the diameter bound supplies the reverse inequality. Thus KK has constant width.

Every diameter-active point lies on ∂K\partial K: an interior point at distance DD from another point could be moved slightly farther away while remaining in KK. The boundary theorem now proves the corollary.

Scope and checks

The argument was checked for nonsmooth boundaries, the possible diametral arc, and unordered multiplicities. The maximal-set completion argument was also checked by the author and is author-recorded. It gives no bound for distance edges touching the points outside SS. Bounded rarity has not been shown to force S=AS=A, or even all but a bounded number of points into SS.