Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Supporting disks and activity below the diameter


The later long-rank gap theorem uses the linear core surplus proved here to obtain adjacent gaps OK,k(Δ/n2)O_{K,k}(\Delta/n^2) at rich fixed ranks, and growing odd girth for fixed top-rank unions. These are further necessary conditions, not an unrestricted conclusion.

All counts are unordered. For an occurring distance rr, let

S={x∈A:some y∈A has ∣x−y∣>r},T=A∖S.S=\{x\in A:\text{some }y\in A\text{ has }|x-y|>r\}, \qquad T=A\setminus S.

Write H=Gr(A)H=G_r(A), s=∣S∣s=|S|, and h=e(H[S])h=e(H[S]). The key point is that every radius-rr disk centered at a point of TT contains all of AA.

Exposed points and circular leaves

Every rr-active point of TT is exposed in conv⁡T\operatorname{conv}T: if ∣x−y∣=r|x-y|=r, the disk centered at yy contains TT and its tangent at xx supports TT uniquely. If xx has an rr-neighbor in TT, the same disk contains all of AA, so xx is exposed in conv⁡A\operatorname{conv}A.

For any y∈Ay\in A, its rr-neighbors in TT occupy an arc of angle at most π/3\pi/3. Indeed, their mutual distances are at most rr; the angular localization argument in star_diameter applies after scaling. Every neighbor strictly between the two extremes has global rr-degree one. The unit-circle arc lemma applies because each extreme belongs to TT, and hence is within rr of every point of AA. Thus each y∈Sy\in S has at most two nonleaf neighbors in TT.

Partition TT into C,F,P,ZC,F,P,Z: CC consists of points incident with an rr-edge inside TT; FF consists of global degree-one points whose neighbor is in SS; PP consists of points with no neighbor in TT and global degree at least two; and ZZ consists of isolated points. The preceding argument gives

eH(S,T)≤∣F∣+2s.e_H(S,T)\le |F|+2s.

The graph on CC is a diameter graph, so e(H[T])≤∣C∣e(H[T])\le |C|. Consequently the following elementary bound needs no stronger description of that graph:

mA(r)≤n+h+s−∣P∣−∣Z∣.(1)m_A(r)\le n+h+s-|P|-|Z|. \tag{1}

In particular, richness implies ∣P∣+∣Z∣≤h+s−1|P|+|Z|\le h+s-1, while T∖ZT\setminus Z is strictly convex. At the second-largest distance, SS is the set of diameter-active vertices. Its points lie on a constant-width boundary, so the boundary theorem gives h≤sh\le s. Thus a rich second distance supplies a convex subset of size at least n−3s+1n-3s+1.

The sharper inactivity estimate

Let DD be the diameter, d=mA(D)d=m_A(D), and let rr be the second-largest distance. Vesztergombi's theorem states

mA(r)≤n+2d.(2)m_A(r)\le n+2d. \tag{2}

This was checked on p. 380 of the full 1996 paper.

Suppose mA(r)>nm_A(r)>n, and delete all zz points isolated in Gr(A)G_r(A). The retained set must still contain a diameter pair: otherwise its rr-graph would be a diameter graph with more edges than vertices. Applying (2) to the retained set, whose second-largest distance is still rr, gives

n+1≤mA(r)≤n−z+2d,n+1\le m_A(r)\le n-z+2d,

so z≤2d−1z\le2d-1. Deleting the diameter-active vertices as well leaves a strictly convex subset of size at least

n−∣S∣−2d+1≥n−4d+1.(3)n-|S|-2d+1\ge n-4d+1. \tag{3}

Thus bounded diameter multiplicity and a rich second distance force all but a bounded number of points into convex position.

Scope and the unresolved step

These disk and counting arguments were checked by the author and are author-recorded. The source inequality is used as stated; no stronger inequality such as mA(r)≤n+dm_A(r)\le n+d is assumed. That proposed strengthening is false: Vesztergombi's even-ring construction has d=n/4d=n/4 and mA(r)=3n/2m_A(r)=3n/2.

Neither (1) nor (3) supplies a constant-width boundary or bounded individual rank omissions for the resulting convex subset. Under bounded rarity, (3) only gives a convex core with q≤∣C∣/2+O(d+R(A))q\le |C|/2+O(d+R(A)). The required arbitrary-convex inverse at bounded additive excess remains unproved. No induction on diameter multiplicity or unrestricted asymptotic conclusion follows.

A circle bound for the active support of a long distance

Let k≥1k\ge1 be an integer and r>0r>0. Suppose at most k−1k-1 distinct distances exceed rr, and let X={q∈A:deg⁡Gr(A)q>0}X=\{q\in A:\deg_{G_r(A)}q>0\}. Every circle of radius R>rR>r, with arbitrary center, contains at most 4k−24k-2 points of XX.

To prove this, apply the balanced-circle lemma to its N≥2N\ge2 points of XX, selecting qq, and choose an rr-neighbor ww of qq. The center oo of the chosen circle differs from ww, since R>rR>r. Writing ρ=∣o−w∣\rho=|o-w|, its intersection with the closed radius-rr disk about ww satisfies

cos⁡θ≥R2+ρ2−r22Rρ>0.\cos\theta\ge\frac{R^2+\rho^2-r^2}{2R\rho}>0.

This is an arc shorter than a semicircle, or a singleton, with endpoint qq. One semicircle from qq, excluding qq, is strictly outside the disk and contains at least ⌊(N−1)/2⌋\lfloor(N-1)/2\rfloor selected points. Their distances to ww have at most k−1k-1 possible values, each with at most two circle intersections. Thus N≤4k−2N\le4k-2. The cases N≤1N\le1 are immediate.

In particular, every larger-distance graph induced on XX has maximum degree at most 4k−24k-2. Unlike the original core lemma, this assertion requires no vertex peeling.

Linear surplus in a rich fixed-long-rank core

Suppose R(A)≤KR(A)\le K along an unbounded sequence. Choose a rich smallest-distance rank s≤K+1s\le K+1, and let rkr_k be any rich fixed largest-distance rank. Such a kk is necessarily at least two. The finitely many possible choices of ss allow all asymptotic estimates below to be uniform, or one may pass to a subsequence with ss fixed.

Write Bk=L1∪⋯∪LkB_k=L_1\cup\cdots\cup L_k. The short-edge inverse gives only o(n)o(n) edges of the chosen short class touching BkB_k. Its degree bound 6s6s therefore implies

n−∣Bk∣≥n/(3s)−o(n).n-|B_k|\ge n/(3s)-o(n).

The rkr_k-graph is supported on BkB_k. If its 2-core HH has vv vertices, peeling removes at most ∣Bk∣−v|B_k|-v edges. Consequently

e(H)−v≥mA(rk)−∣Bk∣≥n/(3s)−o(n).(4)e(H)-v\ge m_A(r_k)-|B_k|\ge n/(3s)-o(n). \tag{4}

The 2-core bound gives Δ(H)≤4k−2\Delta(H)\le4k-2. Since ∑x∈H(deg⁡Hx−2)=2(e(H)−v)\sum_{x\in H}(\deg_Hx-2)=2(e(H)-v), at least n/[6s(k−1)]−o(n)n/[6s(k-1)]-o(n) core vertices have degree at least three.

There is also a linear matching of pairs longer than rkr_k inside this core. Let JJ be the graph of those longer pairs, and let μ\mu be its maximum matching size. The 2μ2\mu endpoints UU of a maximum matching cover JJ. Thus the remaining points have diameter at most rkr_k, so e(H−U)≤v−∣U∣e(H-U)\le v-|U|. At most (4k−2)∣U∣(4k-2)|U| edges of HH touch UU, yielding

e(H)≤v+2(4k−3)μ,μ≥n/[6s(4k−3)]−o(n).e(H)\le v+2(4k-3)\mu,\qquad \mu\ge n/[6s(4k-3)]-o(n).

If kk is the first rich largest rank, all the k−1k-1 larger classes are rare, and at least one contains a linear matching. These conclusions use the coexistence of a rich short class with a rich long class, not just the long class's core-degree bound.

For a rich second-largest distance, the checked bound mA(r2)≤∣B2∣+2mA(Δ)m_A(r_2)\le |B_2|+2m_A(\Delta), obtained by applying (2) on B2B_2, also gives mA(Δ)≥n/(6s)−o(n)m_A(\Delta)\ge n/(6s)-o(n). In particular, a hypothetical unbounded R=1R=1 family has at least (1/6−o(1))n(1/6-o(1))n diameter pairs, since its minimum distance is rich and one may use s=1s=1.

The author checked the active-circle geometry, peeling deficit, matching deletion, and unordered-pair factors; the argument is author-recorded. Linear branching and a linear diameter matching do not imply circular concentration: the even-order extremal deformations already exhibit those features without five concyclic points. No new connection to the interior short-distance palette follows from (4).