Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Supporting disks and activity below the diameter
The later long-rank gap theorem uses the linear core surplus proved here to obtain adjacent gaps at rich fixed ranks, and growing odd girth for fixed top-rank unions. These are further necessary conditions, not an unrestricted conclusion.
All counts are unordered. For an occurring distance , let
Write , , and . The key point is that every radius- disk centered at a point of contains all of .
Exposed points and circular leaves
Every -active point of is exposed in : if , the disk centered at contains and its tangent at supports uniquely. If has an -neighbor in , the same disk contains all of , so is exposed in .
For any , its -neighbors in occupy an arc of angle at most . Indeed, their mutual distances are at most ; the angular localization argument in star_diameter applies after scaling. Every neighbor strictly between the two extremes has global -degree one. The unit-circle arc lemma applies because each extreme belongs to , and hence is within of every point of . Thus each has at most two nonleaf neighbors in .
Partition into : consists of points incident with an -edge inside ; consists of global degree-one points whose neighbor is in ; consists of points with no neighbor in and global degree at least two; and consists of isolated points. The preceding argument gives
The graph on is a diameter graph, so . Consequently the following elementary bound needs no stronger description of that graph:
In particular, richness implies , while is strictly convex. At the second-largest distance, is the set of diameter-active vertices. Its points lie on a constant-width boundary, so the boundary theorem gives . Thus a rich second distance supplies a convex subset of size at least .
The sharper inactivity estimate
Let be the diameter, , and let be the second-largest distance. Vesztergombi's theorem states
This was checked on p. 380 of the full 1996 paper.
Suppose , and delete all points isolated in . The retained set must still contain a diameter pair: otherwise its -graph would be a diameter graph with more edges than vertices. Applying (2) to the retained set, whose second-largest distance is still , gives
so . Deleting the diameter-active vertices as well leaves a strictly convex subset of size at least
Thus bounded diameter multiplicity and a rich second distance force all but a bounded number of points into convex position.
Scope and the unresolved step
These disk and counting arguments were checked by the author and are author-recorded. The source inequality is used as stated; no stronger inequality such as is assumed. That proposed strengthening is false: Vesztergombi's even-ring construction has and .
Neither (1) nor (3) supplies a constant-width boundary or bounded individual rank omissions for the resulting convex subset. Under bounded rarity, (3) only gives a convex core with . The required arbitrary-convex inverse at bounded additive excess remains unproved. No induction on diameter multiplicity or unrestricted asymptotic conclusion follows.
A circle bound for the active support of a long distance
Let be an integer and . Suppose at most distinct distances exceed , and let . Every circle of radius , with arbitrary center, contains at most points of .
To prove this, apply the balanced-circle lemma to its points of , selecting , and choose an -neighbor of . The center of the chosen circle differs from , since . Writing , its intersection with the closed radius- disk about satisfies
This is an arc shorter than a semicircle, or a singleton, with endpoint . One semicircle from , excluding , is strictly outside the disk and contains at least selected points. Their distances to have at most possible values, each with at most two circle intersections. Thus . The cases are immediate.
In particular, every larger-distance graph induced on has maximum degree at most . Unlike the original core lemma, this assertion requires no vertex peeling.
Linear surplus in a rich fixed-long-rank core
Suppose along an unbounded sequence. Choose a rich smallest-distance rank , and let be any rich fixed largest-distance rank. Such a is necessarily at least two. The finitely many possible choices of allow all asymptotic estimates below to be uniform, or one may pass to a subsequence with fixed.
Write . The short-edge inverse gives only edges of the chosen short class touching . Its degree bound therefore implies
The -graph is supported on . If its 2-core has vertices, peeling removes at most edges. Consequently
The 2-core bound gives . Since , at least core vertices have degree at least three.
There is also a linear matching of pairs longer than inside this core. Let be the graph of those longer pairs, and let be its maximum matching size. The endpoints of a maximum matching cover . Thus the remaining points have diameter at most , so . At most edges of touch , yielding
If is the first rich largest rank, all the larger classes are rare, and at least one contains a linear matching. These conclusions use the coexistence of a rich short class with a rich long class, not just the long class's core-degree bound.
For a rich second-largest distance, the checked bound , obtained by applying (2) on , also gives . In particular, a hypothetical unbounded family has at least diameter pairs, since its minimum distance is rich and one may use .
The author checked the active-circle geometry, peeling deficit, matching deletion, and unordered-pair factors; the argument is author-recorded. Linear branching and a linear diameter matching do not imply circular concentration: the even-order extremal deformations already exhibit those features without five concyclic points. No new connection to the interior short-distance palette follows from (4).