Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Quantitative short incidences and moving triangle frames


These are necessary conditions for hypothetical bounded-rarity sequences, not a proof of either assertion of Problem 132. Constants may depend on a fixed rarity bound KK or fixed distance rank. The later anchor-multiplicity estimate improves the short-incidence exponent to 55/5655/56 and gives a polynomial convex-cover bound. The earlier calculation is retained below for comparison; the patch radius uses the improved estimate. The new weighted circle theorem gives

M(A):=max⁡γ circle∣A∩γ∣=OK(n7/8)when R(A)≤K.M(A):=\max_{\gamma\text{ circle}}|A\cap\gamma|=O_K(n^{7/8}) \quad\text{when }R(A)\le K.

Two external estimates

Write νC(g)=∣C∩gC∣\nu_C(g)=|C\cap gC| for a direct rigid motion. The estimates used are

#{g:νC(g)≥k}≪∣C∣3/k2(2≤k≤∣C∣),(1)\#\{g:\nu_C(g)\ge k\}\ll |C|^3/k^2\quad(2\le k\le |C|), \tag{1}

and, for a finite S⊂Aff⁡(C)S\subset\operatorname{Aff}(\mathbb C),

E(S)≪V1/2∣S∣5/2+H∣S∣2.(2)E(S)\ll V^{1/2}|S|^{5/2}+H|S|^2. \tag{2}

Here E(S)E(S) counts g1g2−1=g3g4−1g_1g_2^{-1}=g_3g_4^{-1}, and V,HV,H are the largest intersections of SS with vertical and nonvertical complex lines in the coordinates g(z)=az+bg(z)=az+b. These are equation (1) and Theorem 4.1 of Mansfield--Passant, A Structural Theorem for Sets with Few Triangles, full primary paper. The author checked both full statements; (2) is their stated theorem of Petridis--Roche-Newton--Rudnev--Warren. The use of (1) always separates one-point overlaps, since the family of such motions can be infinite.

Strict convexity also gives

rC(v)≤2 (v≠0),E+(C)≤3∣C∣2−2∣C∣,r_C(v)\le2\ (v\ne0),\qquad E_+(C)\le3|C|^2-2|C|,

as proved in motion_incidence.

Quantitative rich motions on a convex set

Let CC be strictly convex, ∣C∣=m|C|=m, with at most hh points on any circle. Let SS consist of s=O(m)s=O(m) distinct direct motions, each having at least k≥2k\ge2 overlaps with CC. Then

k5s2≪m6log⁡(2m)(s+h).(3)k^5s^2\ll m^6\log(2m)(\sqrt s+h). \tag{3}

For a fixed rotation coefficient aa, the corresponding overlaps are representation counts in C−aCC-aC. Their squared sum is E+(C,aC)≤E+(C)≤3m2E_+(C,aC)\le E_+(C)\le3m^2, by Cauchy--Schwarz. Thus V≤3m2/k2V\le3m^2/k^2. A nonvertical line is a coset g(x)=yg(x)=y. For each p∈C∖{x}p\in C\setminus\{x\}, its images under the distinct motions in this coset are distinct points of a circle centered at yy. Hence H(k−1)≤mhH(k-1)\le mh, giving H≪mh/kH\ll mh/k. Estimate (2) now gives

E(S)≪(m/k)s2(s+h).E(S)\ll (m/k)s^2(\sqrt s+h).

For the reverse estimate, count pairs (g,x)(g,x) with x,gx∈Cx,gx\in C. There are at least ksks such pairs. Cauchy--Schwarz over the mm possible sources gives at least k2s2/mk^2s^2/m pairs of these actions sharing a source. For fixed g,g′g,g', their number is at most νC(g′g−1)\nu_C(g'g^{-1}). A second Cauchy--Schwarz, grouped by this quotient, gives

(k2s2/m)2≤E(S)∑u∈SS−1νC(u)2.(k^2s^2/m)^2 \le E(S)\sum_{u\in SS^{-1}}\nu_C(u)^2.

By (1) and dyadic summation, the contribution with νC(u)≥2\nu_C(u)\ge2 is O(m3log⁡(2m))O(m^3\log(2m)); the contribution with νC(u)=1\nu_C(u)=1 is at most s2=O(m2)s^2=O(m^2). Consequently E(S)≫k4s4/(m5log⁡(2m))E(S)\gg k^4s^4/(m^5\log(2m)), proving (3).

Quantitative short incidences

Suppose q(A)=O(n)q(A)=O(n), a length rr has fixed smallest-distance rank ℓ\ell, and EE unordered rr-edges touch a strictly convex subset. Partition that subset into the bounded number of narrow chains used in short_incident_inverse. One chain supports ≫E\gg E oriented anchors; call its size mm. The fixed-rank degree bound gives m≫Em\gg E.

In the narrow-chain proof, choose bin overload threshold ≍n/m\asymp n/m, rather than suppressing this dependence in a constant. Each anchor retains ≫m\gg m apices, and there are O(n2/m)O(n^2/m) retained oriented triangle types. The same two Cauchy--Schwarz counts then supply

k≍m3/n2,s≍Em2/n2(4)k\asymp m^3/n^2,\qquad s\asymp E m^2/n^2 \tag{4}

distinct kk-rich motions, after taking a subset of them if needed. Here s=O(m)s=O(m) since E=O(m)E=O(m) by the fixed-rank degree bound. If either expression in (4) is too small to round to the required positive integers, then E=O(n2/3)E=O(n^{2/3}), already below the bound below.

Substitution into (3) gives

E2m13≪log⁡(2n)(n13E m+n14h).(5)E^2m^{13}\ll\log(2n) \left(n^{13}\sqrt E\,m+n^{14}h\right). \tag{5}

The first term, with m≫Em\gg E, gives E≪n26/27(log⁡(2n))2/27E\ll n^{26/27}(\log(2n))^{2/27}. The second gives E15≪n14hlog⁡(2n)E^{15}\ll n^{14}h\log(2n). Under R(A)≤KR(A)\le K the circle bound h≪Kn7/8h\ll_K n^{7/8} therefore yields

E≪K,ℓn119/120(log⁡(2n))1/15.(6)E\ll_{K,\ell} n^{119/120}(\log(2n))^{1/15}. \tag{6}

The constants are uniform over the convex subset and any fixed finite set of smallest-distance ranks.

Counting the multiplicity of each motion more carefully, rather than retaining just O(m)O(m) motions, now gives the stronger bound

E≪K,ℓn55/56(log⁡(2n))1/7.(6a)E\ll_{K,\ell}n^{55/56}(\log(2n))^{1/7}. \tag{6a}

The complete proof, including the rank dependence and one-point quotient overlaps, is in quantitative short incidences.

Growing patches when there is only one rare distance

Use the established one-rare reduction, with minimum separation normalized to one and I=A∖(L1∪L2)I=A\setminus(L_1\cup L_2). Let bb be the number of vertices of II having fewer than six unit neighbors in II. Since ∣I∣<n/3|I|<n/3 and

e1(I)≤3∣I∣−b/2,e_1(I)\le3|I|-b/2,

richness of the minimum distance implies b<2e1(L1∪L2,A)b<2e_1(L_1\cup L_2,A). Formula (6a) bounds bb by its right-hand side.

Eventually every whole minimum-distance component lies in a triangular lattice, by the previously proved exact spectrum through length two. A radius-LL graph ball in such a lattice has O(L2)O(L^2) vertices. Thus only O(bL2)O(bL^2) interior vertices lie within graph distance LL of a bad vertex. The others have complete radius-LL triangular patches. For sufficiently small fixed c>0c>0, take

L=⌊cn1/112(log⁡(2n))−1/14⌋.(7)L=\left\lfloor c n^{1/112}(\log(2n))^{-1/14}\right\rfloor. \tag{7}

There are then ≫n\gg n complete-patch centers. This improves the earlier fixed-radius statement to a polynomially growing radius. It still does not align the different patches.

For completeness, in any point-stabilizer coset of these canonically oriented patch frames there are O(n/L2)O(n/L^2) frames. Such a coset contains at most one frame of each orientation. Two radius-⌊L/2⌋\lfloor L/2\rfloor subpatches with different orientations cannot intersect: a shared point has a complete unit hexagon in both larger patches, whose directions must agree since the global minimum distance is one. These subpatches are therefore disjoint, each containing ≫L2\gg L^2 points.

Many congruent triangles for every bounded rarity

Assume now only R(A)≤KR(A)\le K along an unbounded sequence. There are αK,βK>0\alpha_K,\beta_K>0, a strictly convex C⊂AC\subset A with ∣C∣≥αKn|C|\ge\alpha_Kn, a noncollinear rooted triangle TnT_n, and at least βKn\beta_Kn direct isometries gg such that

gTn⊂A∖C,gT_n\subset A\setminus C,

with all roots g(0)g(0) distinct.

Indeed the rank-layer bound gives a convex layer of size at least αKn\alpha_Kn, where αK=1/((K+1)(2K+1))\alpha_K=1/((K+1)(2K+1)). Choose a rich length among the first K+1K+1 smallest lengths. Its graph has maximum degree DK=6(K+1)D_K=6(K+1), and only o(n)o(n) edges touch CC, by (6), or already by the qualitative short-incidence theorem. Its induced graph on A∖CA\setminus C therefore has at least n−o(n)n-o(n) edges. At least αKn/(DK−2)\alpha_Kn/(D_K-2) vertices have degree at least three, since otherwise the degree sum is less than 2(n−∣C∣)+(DK−2)αKn/(DK−2)2(n-|C|)+(D_K-2)\alpha_Kn/(D_K-2).

There are OK(1)O_K(1) lengths at most 2r2r. A radius-2r2r disk is covered by 196196 squares of side r/3r/3; each square has diameter less than rr, hence at most KK internal lengths, and at most 2(K+1)22(K+1)^2 points by the two-anchor bound. Thus the total number of pairs of length at most 2r2r is at most 196(K+1)2n196(K+1)^2n. Since all but at most KK such lengths are rich, there are at most JK=K+196(K+1)2J_K=K+196(K+1)^2 occurring lengths in this interval.

Choose at each degree-three root two noncollinear rr-neighbors. Pigeonhole their base length among these JKJ_K possibilities, then order the neighbors counterclockwise. This supplies βKn\beta_Kn directly congruent triangles with distinct roots. The triangle TnT_n may vary with nn and may approach degeneracy; no contrary uniformity claim is made.

Expansion of the inverse-image union

More generally, let ∣C∣≥αn|C|\ge\alpha n be strictly convex and let GG contain at least βn\beta n direct motions with distinct roots g(0)∈Ag(0)\in A. Put

U=⋃g∈Gg−1C,N=∣U∣,M=M(A).U=\bigcup_{g\in G}g^{-1}C,\qquad N=|U|,\qquad M=M(A).

Then

N2(N+M)≫α,βn3log⁡(2n).(8)N^2(\sqrt N+M)\gg_{\alpha,\beta}\frac{n^3}{\log(2n)}. \tag{8}

To prove this, put m=∣C∣m=|C|, p=∣G∣≤np=|G|\le n. A same-orientation fiber with vv roots BB contributes a rotated copy of C−BC-B to UU. Convex difference multiplicities and Cauchy--Schwarz give

N≥∣C−B∣≥m2vm+2v−2;N\ge |C-B|\ge\frac{m^2v}{m+2v-2};

hence V≪αN/nV\ll_\alpha N/n. A nonvertical line b=λa+μb=\lambda a+\mu in motion coordinates puts its distinct roots on ∣b−μ∣=∣λ∣|b-\mu|=|\lambda| if λ≠0\lambda\ne0; if λ=0\lambda=0 it contains at most one root. Thus H≤MH\le M. Applying (2) gives

E(G)≪αn2(N+M).E(G)\ll_\alpha n^2(\sqrt N+M).

On the other hand, if r(z)=∣{g:z∈g−1C}∣r(z)=|\{g:z\in g^{-1}C\}|, then

I:=∑zr(z)2=∑urGG−1(u)νC(u)≥m2p2N.I:=\sum_zr(z)^2 =\sum_u r_{GG^{-1}}(u)\nu_C(u) \ge\frac{m^2p^2}{N}.

Cauchy--Schwarz and (1), again including at most p2p^2 one-point quotient overlaps, give

E(G)≫α,βn5N2log⁡(2n).E(G)\gg_{\alpha,\beta}\frac{n^5}{N^2\log(2n)}.

This proves (8). Under bounded rarity M≪Kn7/8M\ll_K n^{7/8}, so

N≫Kmin⁡{n6/5(log⁡(2n))2/5,n17/16log⁡(2n)}≫Kn17/16log⁡(2n).(9)N\gg_K \min\left\{ \frac{n^{6/5}}{(\log(2n))^{2/5}}, \frac{n^{17/16}}{\sqrt{\log(2n)}} \right\} \gg_K\frac{n^{17/16}}{\sqrt{\log(2n)}}. \tag{9}

Apply this to the triangle frames above. Every z∈Uz\in U has all three distances to TnT_n in D(A)∪{0}D(A)\cup\{0\}. The checked uniform three-anchor theorem in translated_triangles gives only N=OK(n12/7)N=O_K(n^{12/7}), using the updated Solymosi--Zahl input there. The two exponents are compatible. No stronger many-anchor estimate sufficient to contradict (9) was proved.

Collinear anchors alone cannot provide one: for fixed LL, take zx,k=(x,R2+k−x2)z_{x,k}=(x,\sqrt{R^2+k-x^2}), 1≤x≤M01\le x\le M_0, 0≤k≤M00\le k\le M_0, and R>(2L+2)M0R>(2L+2)M_0. The squared distances to (j,0)(j,0), 0≤j≤L0\le j\le L, are R2+k−2jx+j2R^2+k-2jx+j^2. They occupy only OL(M0)O_L(M_0) values for Θ(M02)\Theta(M_0^2) distinct points.

There is a restricted many-anchor improvement: if the squared palette is covered by rr progressions of at most QQ terms, the uniform ellipse argument gives N≪ε(q+1)r2QεN\ll_\varepsilon(q+1)r^2Q^\varepsilon and M(A)≪εr2QεM(A)\ll_\varepsilon r^2Q^\varepsilon. Combined with (8), it forces r≥n1/10−o(1)r\ge n^{1/10-o(1)} when QQ is polynomial in nn. This does not control an arbitrary palette.

The author checked the displayed derivations, the external statements, the fixed-rank uniformity, the growing-patch argument, the circle improvement, and the two quantitative energy calculations; the arguments are author-recorded. These results do not close the unrestricted gap.