Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Quantitative short incidences and polynomial convex-cover bounds


All multiplicities count unordered pairs. Write n=∣A∣n=|A|, q=q(A)q=q(A), R=R(A)R=R(A), and λ=log⁡(2n)\lambda=\log(2n). Constants in ≪\ll below are absolute unless dependencies are indicated.

The improvement over moving frames is to count how often each motion is induced by an anchor pair: its multiplicity is at most 6j6j times its overlap with the convex chain, rather than merely the total number of anchors. This gives the following conclusions.

Short incidences. If R(A)≤KR(A)\le K and rr has fixed smallest-distance rank jj, the number of rr-edges touching any strictly convex subset is

OK,j(n55/56λ1/7).(1)O_{K,j}\bigl(n^{55/56}\lambda^{1/7}\bigr). \tag{1}

Convex covers. If AA is covered by L≥1L\ge1 strictly convex subsets, then for an absolute c>0c>0,

R(A)+1≥cn1/64L7/8λ1/8.(2)R(A)+1\ge c\frac{n^{1/64}}{L^{7/8}\lambda^{1/8}}. \tag{2}

In particular a fixed convex cover gives polynomial rarity growth. More generally L=o(n1/56/λ1/7)L=o(n^{1/56}/\lambda^{1/7}) forces R(A)→∞R(A)\to\infty. Neither conclusion supplies such a cover for arbitrary planar sets.

Rich motions without a restriction on their number

Let CC be strictly convex, ∣C∣=m|C|=m, and suppose every circle contains at most hh points of CC. For a finite family SS of ss direct motions having overlap νC(g)=∣C∩gC∣≥t≥2\nu_C(g)=|C\cap gC|\ge t\ge2, we have

t5s2≪m3(m3log⁡(2m)+s2)(s+h).(3)t^5s^2\ll m^3\bigl(m^3\log(2m)+s^2\bigr)(\sqrt{s}+h). \tag{3}

Here is the extension of the calculation in moving frames. The affine-group energy bound and the vertical/nonvertical fiber bounds V≤3m2/t2V\le3m^2/t^2, H≪mh/tH\ll mh/t give

E(S)≪(m/t)s2(s+h).E(S)\ll(m/t)s^2(\sqrt{s}+h).

On the other hand, two applications of Cauchy--Schwarz give

t4s4m2≤E(S)∑u∈SS−1νC(u)2.\frac{t^4s^4}{m^2} \le E(S)\sum_{u\in SS^{-1}}\nu_C(u)^2.

The rich-motion estimate #{u:νC(u)≥v}≪m3/v2\#\{u:\nu_C(u)\ge v\}\ll m^3/v^2 for v≥2v\ge2 bounds the sum by O(m3log⁡(2m)+s2)O(m^3\log(2m)+s^2); the last term accounts for one-point overlaps. Combining proves (3). No upper bound on ss was used.

The two external inputs are equation (1) and Theorem 4.1 of Mansfield--Passant, A Structural Theorem for Sets with Few Triangles. Their full statements were rechecked for this application. The remaining fiber estimates and the energy calculation are proved in the linked note.

An explicit narrow-chain estimate

Assume q(A)≤nq(A)\le n, and let rr have smallest-distance rank jj in AA. Let C⊂AC\subset A be an ordered strictly convex chain of mm vertices whose consecutive edge directions lie in an interval of width π/3\pi/3. Suppose FF is a collection of E≤nE\le n distinct ordered anchors (p,q0)(p,q_0) with p∈Cp\in C, q0∈Aq_0\in A, and ∣p−q0∣=r|p-q_0|=r. Then

E≪j17/12n11/12+j19/15n14/15λ2/15+j8/7n6/7(hλ)1/7,(4)E\ll j^{17/12}n^{11/12} +j^{19/15}n^{14/15}\lambda^{2/15} +j^{8/7}n^{6/7}(h\lambda)^{1/7}, \tag{4}

where hh is the largest circular subset of CC.

The case E=0E=0 is immediate. The short-rank degree bound gives E≤6jmE\le6jm. Use the narrow-chain bin argument, now keeping the dependence on jj explicit. A radius interval of length rr has at most 20j20j pinned endpoints on the chain. Taking the bin overload threshold ⌈240jn/m⌉+1\lceil240jn/m\rceil+1 leaves, for m≥8m\ge8, at least m/2m/2 noncollinear apices per anchor and at most 1452jn2/m1452jn^2/m oriented triangle types. For m≤7m\le7, (4) follows directly from E≤42jE\le42j; assume otherwise.

Thus the number of ordered pairs of retained congruent triangles is at least

P0=cE2m3jn2,c=1/6000.(5)P_0=c\frac{E^2m^3}{jn^2},\qquad c=1/6000. \tag{5}

Every ordered pair of anchors determines one direct motion. Let f(g)f(g) count the anchor pairs inducing gg, so ∑gf(g)=E2\sum_g f(g)=E^2. Their number of matching apex pairs is at most νC(g)\nu_C(g) each. Discard motions with overlap less than

k=P02E2=cm32jn2;k=\frac{P_0}{2E^2}=\frac{cm^3}{2jn^2};

they account for at most P0/2P_0/2 matches. If k<2k<2, then m3≪jn2m^3\ll jn^2 and E≤6jm≪j4/3n2/3E\le6jm\ll j^{4/3}n^{2/3}, absorbed by the first term of (4).

The additional observation is

f(g)≤6jνC(g).(6)f(g)\le6j\nu_C(g). \tag{6}

Indeed, a source anchor root must lie in C∩g−1CC\cap g^{-1}C, and there are at most 6j6j choices of its distance-rr neighbor. Once the source anchor is fixed, its image is fixed. This argument also applies to the identity motion.

Group the remaining generated motions into dyadic overlap intervals [t,2t)[t,2t), starting at kk, and write sts_t for the number in a level. There are at most E2≤n2E^2\le n^2 generated motions altogether. By (6),

P0/2≤24j∑tt2st.(7)P_0/2\le24j\sum_t t^2s_t. \tag{7}

Apply (3) to each level. If k5k^5 is not larger than a sufficiently large absolute constant times m3nm^3n, then m12≪j5n11m^{12}\ll j^5n^{11} and E≤6jmE\le6jm give the first term of (4). Otherwise, since st+h≤2n\sqrt{s_t}+h\le2n, the st2s_t^2 term on the right of (3) can be absorbed into the left for every t≥kt\ge k. We obtain

t5st2≪m6λ(st+h),t^5s_t^2\ll m^6\lambda(\sqrt{s_t}+h),

and hence

st≪m4λ2/3t−10/3+m3(hλ)1/2t−5/2.(8)s_t\ll m^4\lambda^{2/3}t^{-10/3} +m^3(h\lambda)^{1/2}t^{-5/2}. \tag{8}

Substituting (8) into (7) gives convergent geometric sums, not an additional logarithmic loss:

P0≪jm4λ2/3k−4/3+jm3(hλ)1/2k−1/2.P_0\ll jm^4\lambda^{2/3}k^{-4/3} +jm^3(h\lambda)^{1/2}k^{-1/2}.

Insert (5) and the value of kk. At least one of

E6m9≪j10n14λ2,E4m3≪j5n6hλE^6m^9\ll j^{10}n^{14}\lambda^2, \qquad E^4m^3\ll j^5n^6h\lambda

holds. Using m≥E/(6j)m\ge E/(6j) yields respectively the second and third terms of (4). This proves the estimate, including its rounding and low-overlap cases; real thresholds can equivalently be rounded after changing absolute constants.

Consequences for bounded rarity and convex covers

The weighted-circle theorem implies, when q(A)≤nq(A)\le n,

M(A):=max⁡γ∣A∩γ∣≪n7/8+R(A).(9)M(A):=\max_\gamma|A\cap\gamma| \ll n^{7/8}+R(A). \tag{9}

Indeed, above its absolute C(q+1)7/8C(q+1)^{7/8} threshold a circular subset of size hh forces R(A)≥h/4R(A)\ge h/4.

Under R(A)≤KR(A)\le K, pair counting gives q(A)≤nq(A)\le n for large nn. Partition any convex subset into at most twelve narrow chains and orient incident edges from that subset. Apply (4) and (9) to each chain. If there are more than nn anchors on a chain, first take nn of them; (4) excludes this for large nn. Thus every chain has OK,j(n55/56λ1/7)O_{K,j}(n^{55/56}\lambda^{1/7}) anchors, proving (1).

For (2), cases R≥min⁡(n/4,n7/8)R\ge\min(n/4,n^{7/8}) already satisfy the result, after reducing the absolute constant. If every distance is rare, the two-anchor bound n≤2q2+2n\le2q^2+2 gives the result as well. In the remaining cases pair counting gives q(A)≤nq(A)\le n. The first rich distance has rank j≤R+1j\le R+1. Select exactly nn of its unordered edges. Assign each edge to one endpoint, one of the LL covering convex subsets containing that endpoint, and one of its at most twelve narrow chains. Some chain has n/(12L)n/(12L) assigned ordered anchors. Formula (4), with (9) and R≤n7/8R\le n^{7/8}, gives at least one of

n≪L12j17,n≪L15j19λ2,n≪L56j64λ8.n\ll L^{12}j^{17},\qquad n\ll L^{15}j^{19}\lambda^2,\qquad n\ll L^{56}j^{64}\lambda^8.

The last right side dominates the first two because L,j,λ≥1L,j,\lambda\ge1. Replacing jj by R+1R+1 proves (2). One- and two-point covering sets cause no difficulty; they enter the bounded-chain-size case of (4).

If bb points are uncovered, the same argument gives

R(A)+1≫min⁡{nb+1,n1/64L7/8λ1/8}.(10)R(A)+1\gg\min\left\{\frac{n}{b+1}, \frac{n^{1/64}}{L^{7/8}\lambda^{1/8}}\right\}. \tag{10}

Indeed, either 6jb>n/26jb>n/2, giving the first lower bound, or at least n/2n/2 selected edges have a covered endpoint, and the same chain argument applies. Consequently the growing-cover divergence criterion also permits o(n)o(n) exceptional points.

Finally, the patch argument in moving frames uses a bad-vertex count bounded by the short incidences. Replacing its older estimate by (1) gives complete triangular patches of radius

⌊cn1/112λ−1/14⌋\left\lfloor c n^{1/112}\lambda^{-1/14}\right\rfloor

at linearly many centers in any hypothetical unbounded R=1R=1 sequence. This still does not align the different lattices or close the unrestricted palette obstruction.

The author checked the motion multiplicity, generalized energy estimate, absorption, geometric sums, and all displayed exponents; the argument is author-recorded. No unrestricted conclusion follows.