Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Translated triangles, convex differences, and lattice orientations


These results use the small global palette directly, without requiring the triangle copies to touch or lie near the convex subset. They do not resolve either unrestricted question in Problem 132.

A translation bound

Let C⊆A⊂R2C\subseteq A\subset\mathbb R^2, with CC strictly convex and ∣C∣=m≥3|C|=m\ge3. Let T={t1,t2,t3}T=\{t_1,t_2,t_3\} be a fixed noncollinear triangle, and let PP be a nonempty set of translation vectors such that

P+T⊆A,∣P∣=p.P+T\subseteq A,\qquad |P|=p.

There is an absolute constant c0>0c_0>0 such that

q(A)+1≥c0(m2pm+2p−2)7/12.(1)q(A)+1\ge c_0 \left(\frac{m^2p}{m+2p-2}\right)^{7/12}. \tag{1}

For a finite set XX, let rX(v)r_X(v) count ordered representations of vv as a difference of two points of XX. Strict convexity gives rC(v)≤2r_C(v)\le2 for every nonzero vv. One elementary justification is to rotate vv horizontally: each representation is a full horizontal chord of the convex hull of length ∣v∣|v|. Three such chords would, by concavity of the horizontal width, force the left and right boundary functions to be affine between their heights. Their middle endpoints would not be extreme points. Two representations at the same height would likewise contradict strict convexity.

The additive energy consequently satisfies

E(C,P)=∑vrC(v)rP(v)≤mp+2p(p−1).E(C,P)=\sum_v r_C(v)r_P(v) \le mp+2p(p-1).

Applying Cauchy--Schwarz to representations of C−PC-P gives

∣C−P∣≥m2p2mp+2p(p−1)=m2pm+2p−2.(2)|C-P|\ge\frac{m^2p^2}{mp+2p(p-1)} =\frac{m^2p}{m+2p-2}. \tag{2}

Every z=c−u∈C−Pz=c-u\in C-P satisfies

∣z−ti∣=∣c−(u+ti)∣∈D(A)∪{0}.|z-t_i|=|c-(u+t_i)|\in D(A)\cup\{0\}.

Solymosi--Zahl's improved three-anchor theorem says that the distances from three noncollinear fixed points to NN other planar points include at least cN7/12cN^{7/12} values. Apply it to (C−P)∖T(C-P)\setminus T, losing at most three points, and absorb the small cases using the added one in (1). This proves (1).

The external input is Theorem 1.4 and Section 1.1 of József Solymosi and Joshua Zahl, Improved Elekes--Szabó type estimates using proximity. The full statements were checked; the constant in Theorem 1.4 depends only on polynomial degree. A uniformity check is given below. This replaces the earlier 6/116/11 theorem of Sharir--Solymosi, whose weaker consequences remain valid.

In particular, if ∣A∣=n|A|=n, m≥cnm\ge cn, and q(A)≤Bnq(A)\le Bn, then p≤np\le n and (1) imply

p=OB,c(n5/7).(3)p=O_{B,c}(n^{5/7}). \tag{3}

Uniformity of the improved three-anchor estimate

Normalize the anchors to (0,0),(1,0),(a,b)(0,0),(1,0),(a,b), with b>0b>0. Their squared-distance triples (X,Y,Z)(X,Y,Z) satisfy the degree-two equation

b2(X−Y+1)2+((1−a)X+aY−Z+a2+b2−a)2−4b2X=0.(7)b^2(X-Y+1)^2+ \bigl((1-a)X+aY-Z+a^2+b^2-a\bigr)^2-4b^2X=0. \tag{7}

An invertible affine change of coordinates turns the left side into 4b2(x2+y2−X)4b^2(x^2+y^2-X), so it is irreducible. Its three pure second derivatives are nonzero, excluding an axis-parallel cylinder.

For completeness, it is also not one of the additive-group surfaces excluded by the theorem. Such a surface, locally written Z=f(X,Y)Z=f(X,Y), would satisfy ∂X∂Ylog⁡(fX/fY)=0\partial_X\partial_Y\log(f_X/f_Y)=0 wherever these derivatives are defined. On the branch with y>0y>0, use

X=x2+y2,Y=(x−1)2+y2,X=x^2+y^2,\quad Y=(x-1)^2+y^2, fX=(1−a)y+b(x−1)y,fY=ay−bxy,f_X=\frac{(1-a)y+b(x-1)}y,\qquad f_Y=\frac{ay-bx}y, ∂X=12∂x+1−x2y∂y,∂Y=−12∂x+x2y∂y.\partial_X=\tfrac12\partial_x+\frac{1-x}{2y}\partial_y, \qquad \partial_Y=-\tfrac12\partial_x+\frac{x}{2y}\partial_y.

At y=by=b, direct differentiation gives

∂X∂Ylog⁡(fX/fY)=x3−3ax2+(3a−1−b2)x+b2(1−a)4b4(x−a)2.\partial_X\partial_Y\log(f_X/f_Y)= \frac{x^3-3ax^2+(3a-1-b^2)x+b^2(1-a)} {4b^4(x-a)^2}.

This rational function is not identically zero, since its numerator has leading coefficient one. Derivatives of the logarithm here mean the rational logarithmic derivatives; no choice of a real logarithm is required. Irreducibility then excludes a generic local separated form. Theorem 1.4 therefore applies with an absolute degree-two constant, even when bb tends to zero.

The distance triple determines (x,y)(x,y) uniquely by subtraction of squared distances. Thus a qq-element nonnegative squared palette permits only O(q12/7)O(q^{12/7}) points for any noncollinear anchor triangle. The author checked the polynomial identity, recomputed the displayed derivative, and checked the primary theorem and its stated application; the argument is author-recorded.

Consequences for a hypothetical one-rare sequence

Assume n→∞n\to\infty and R(A)=1R(A)=1, with minimum distance δ\delta. Use the checked triangular-core reduction. There is a convex subset of size at least (1/3−o(1))n(1/3-o(1))n, while q(A)≤n/2q(A)\le n/2. In

I=A∖(L1∪L2),I=A\setminus(L_1\cup L_2),

all but b=o(n)b=o(n) points have six minimum-distance neighbors in II. Call those points good. At each good point the six directions form a regular hexagon. Group good points according to these direction sets, that is, according to lattice orientation modulo π/3\pi/3.

For each orientation choose the same two adjacent length-δ\delta vectors u,vu,v. Every good center in the group supplies a translate of {0,u,v}\{0,u,v\}. Formula (3) shows that each group has O(n5/7)O(n^{5/7}) centers, with one constant valid for all the groups. Since there are (1/3+o(1))n(1/3+o(1))n good centers, the number of orientations is

Ω(n2/7).(4)\Omega(n^{2/7}). \tag{4}

Thus no such unbounded family can have all its points in one triangular lattice of mesh δ\delta, or a positive fraction of its good centers in parallel translates of that lattice. This does not exclude a common finer triangular lattice, which can have minimum-length vectors in many orientations; the refinement must, however, be superpolynomial, as shown below.

Every entire minimum-distance component has o(n)o(n) vertices. Indeed, the earlier reduction puts each component in a mesh-δ\delta triangular lattice. Its good vertices number O(n5/7)O(n^{5/7}); there are only o(n)o(n) bad interior vertices in total. The outer layers have only o(n)o(n) minimum-distance incidences, so only o(n)o(n) of their vertices can belong to nontrivial minimum-distance components.

The first exceptional length must therefore exist eventually. Otherwise all distances have mesh-δ\delta triangular lattice norms; distances to a unit equilateral triangle in a good patch then put every point in its mesh-δ\delta lattice by the integral norm argument in that note, contradicting (4). Its ranks from both ends still tend to infinity, as established there.

A lower bound on the exceptional vertices

Let SS range over components induced by good vertices in II. Each has at most Cn5/7C n^{5/7} vertices. In its own axial lattice coordinates, let aS,bSa_S,b_S count the occupied coordinate values. The boundary edges in two lattice directions alone number at least 2(aS+bS)≥4∣S∣2(a_S+b_S)\ge4\sqrt{|S|}, since ∣S∣≤aSbS|S|\le a_Sb_S. Every outgoing lattice neighbor exists in II, by goodness, and is bad. Each bad vertex receives at most six such incidences. Hence

6b≥4∑S∣S∣≥4∑S∣S∣Cn5/7≫n9/14.(5)6b\ge4\sum_S\sqrt{|S|} \ge\frac{4\sum_S|S|}{\sqrt{C n^{5/7}}} \gg n^{9/14}. \tag{5}

Richness of the second-largest distance and its 3∣L1∪L2∣/23|L_1\cup L_2|/2 upper bound give ∣I∣<n/3|I|<n/3. Also

eδ(I)≤3∣I∣−b/2,e_\delta(I)\le3|I|-b/2,

because each bad vertex has degree at most five. Since the full minimum class is rich, at least b/2≫n9/14b/2\gg n^{9/14} of its pairs touch the outer two layers. This remains compatible with their previously proved o(n)o(n) upper bound; it is not a contradiction.

A common finer lattice requires superpolynomial refinement

Suppose additionally that AA lies in a triangular lattice of mesh hh. Then M=δ2/h2M=\delta^2/h^2 is a positive integer. Each minimum-length orientation is represented by an Eisenstein integer of norm MM, modulo the six unit rotations. The ideal-count argument in arithmetic palettes, now in Q(−3)\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-3}), bounds the number of such orientations by τ(M)\tau(M). Consequently (4) gives

τ(M)≫n2/7.\tau(M)\gg n^{2/7}.

Since τ(M)=Oε(Mε)\tau(M)=O_\varepsilon(M^\varepsilon) for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, it follows that M>nBM>n^B eventually for every fixed BB. Thus a polynomially finer common triangular lattice is excluded, not merely the lattice of mesh δ\delta.

There is a coordinate-free arithmetic consequence. Normalize δ=1\delta=1. If the squared-distance palette is contained in D−1ZD^{-1}\mathbb Z, with DD a positive integer, choose a good unit equilateral triangle with vertices 0,u,v0,u,v. For every p∈Ap\in A, subtraction of its squared distances gives

U=2p⋅u∈D−1Z,V=2p⋅v∈D−1Z,U=2p\cdot u\in D^{-1}\mathbb Z,\qquad V=2p\cdot v\in D^{-1}\mathbb Z, p=2U−V3u+2V−U3v.p=\frac{2U-V}{3}u+\frac{2V-U}{3}v.

Hence A⊆(3D)−1ΛA\subseteq(3D)^{-1}\Lambda, where Λ\Lambda is the unit triangular lattice generated by u,vu,v. Applying the preceding result with M=9D2M=9D^2 shows that D>nBD>n^B eventually for every fixed BB. No bounded-height rational reduction is inferred for arbitrary sets.

The missing rotation estimate

More generally, if GG is a family of direct isometries with gT⊆AgT\subseteq A, then

∣⋃g∈Gg−1C∣=O((q(A)+1)12/7).(6)\left|\bigcup_{g\in G}g^{-1}C\right| =O\bigl((q(A)+1)^{12/7}\bigr). \tag{6}

Every point of this union has its three anchor distances in D(A)∪{0}D(A)\cup\{0\}, so the same theorem proves (6). For translations, convex difference multiplicities supply (2). For varying rotations, the collision count instead involves intersections C∩gCC\cap gC. The moving-frame argument supplies a lower bound ≫Kn17/16/log⁡n\gg_K n^{17/16}/\sqrt{\log n} under bounded rarity, still compatible with (6). The arithmetic-palette argument closes this gap only under its progression-cover hypothesis. No common orientation or unrestricted contradiction is inferred.

The author checked (1)--(4), the primary source, the boundary count, and the scope of the common-lattice conclusion in (5); the argument is author-recorded. Neither unrestricted assertion is solved.

A local field-alignment observation for finite patches

Let ω=eiπ/3\omega=e^{i\pi/3} and Λ=Z+Zω\Lambda=\mathbb Z+\mathbb Z\omega. Suppose

P⊂z+a{u+vω:∣u∣,∣v∣≤L},a≠0,L≥1.P\subset z+a\{u+v\omega:|u|,|v|\le L\},\qquad a\ne0,\quad L\ge1.

If a point xx is equidistant from three distinct points of PP, then

(x−z)/a∈Q(ω),∣x−z∣=O(∣a∣L3).(x-z)/a\in\mathbb Q(\omega),\qquad |x-z|=O(|a|L^3).

Indeed, normalize z=0,a=1z=0,a=1 and write x=s+tωx=s+t\omega. Three points on a circle are noncollinear. Subtracting their squared-distance equations therefore gives an invertible two-by-two integer linear system for s,ts,t: its coefficients are differences of 2u+v2u+v and u+2vu+2v, of size O(L)O(L), and its right sides are differences of Q(u,v)Q(u,v), of size O(L2)O(L^2). The determinant is a nonzero integer of size O(L2)O(L^2); Cramer's rule bounds the numerators by O(L3)O(L^3) and proves both assertions.

If a second patch is contained in w+bΛw+b\Lambda and b/a∉Q(ω)b/a\notin\mathbb Q(\omega), at most one of its points can be such a circumcenter of three points of PP, even allowing different radii. Two distinct centers would have difference both in aQ(ω)a\mathbb Q(\omega) and in bΛ∖{0}b\Lambda\setminus\{0\}, forcing b/a∈Q(ω)b/a\in\mathbb Q(\omega). Thus any fixed cross-distance graph between two such patches has degree at most two at all but one vertex on each side, by applying the statement in both directions.

This does not bound the multiplicity in the full configuration: one vertex may have two neighbors in each of many different patches. Field-commensurable but differently oriented patches are not excluded. No near-linear many-anchor bound, palette progression cover, or global alignment conclusion was established. The author checked the integer linear system and the field intersection argument; they are author-recorded.