Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Translated triangles, convex differences, and lattice orientations
These results use the small global palette directly, without requiring the triangle copies to touch or lie near the convex subset. They do not resolve either unrestricted question in Problem 132.
A translation bound
Let , with strictly convex and . Let be a fixed noncollinear triangle, and let be a nonempty set of translation vectors such that
There is an absolute constant such that
For a finite set , let count ordered representations of as a difference of two points of . Strict convexity gives for every nonzero . One elementary justification is to rotate horizontally: each representation is a full horizontal chord of the convex hull of length . Three such chords would, by concavity of the horizontal width, force the left and right boundary functions to be affine between their heights. Their middle endpoints would not be extreme points. Two representations at the same height would likewise contradict strict convexity.
The additive energy consequently satisfies
Applying Cauchy--Schwarz to representations of gives
Every satisfies
Solymosi--Zahl's improved three-anchor theorem says that the distances from three noncollinear fixed points to other planar points include at least values. Apply it to , losing at most three points, and absorb the small cases using the added one in (1). This proves (1).
The external input is Theorem 1.4 and Section 1.1 of József Solymosi and Joshua Zahl, Improved Elekes--Szabó type estimates using proximity. The full statements were checked; the constant in Theorem 1.4 depends only on polynomial degree. A uniformity check is given below. This replaces the earlier theorem of Sharir--Solymosi, whose weaker consequences remain valid.
In particular, if , , and , then and (1) imply
Uniformity of the improved three-anchor estimate
Normalize the anchors to , with . Their squared-distance triples satisfy the degree-two equation
An invertible affine change of coordinates turns the left side into , so it is irreducible. Its three pure second derivatives are nonzero, excluding an axis-parallel cylinder.
For completeness, it is also not one of the additive-group surfaces excluded by the theorem. Such a surface, locally written , would satisfy wherever these derivatives are defined. On the branch with , use
At , direct differentiation gives
This rational function is not identically zero, since its numerator has leading coefficient one. Derivatives of the logarithm here mean the rational logarithmic derivatives; no choice of a real logarithm is required. Irreducibility then excludes a generic local separated form. Theorem 1.4 therefore applies with an absolute degree-two constant, even when tends to zero.
The distance triple determines uniquely by subtraction of squared distances. Thus a -element nonnegative squared palette permits only points for any noncollinear anchor triangle. The author checked the polynomial identity, recomputed the displayed derivative, and checked the primary theorem and its stated application; the argument is author-recorded.
Consequences for a hypothetical one-rare sequence
Assume and , with minimum distance . Use the checked triangular-core reduction. There is a convex subset of size at least , while . In
all but points have six minimum-distance neighbors in . Call those points good. At each good point the six directions form a regular hexagon. Group good points according to these direction sets, that is, according to lattice orientation modulo .
For each orientation choose the same two adjacent length- vectors . Every good center in the group supplies a translate of . Formula (3) shows that each group has centers, with one constant valid for all the groups. Since there are good centers, the number of orientations is
Thus no such unbounded family can have all its points in one triangular lattice of mesh , or a positive fraction of its good centers in parallel translates of that lattice. This does not exclude a common finer triangular lattice, which can have minimum-length vectors in many orientations; the refinement must, however, be superpolynomial, as shown below.
Every entire minimum-distance component has vertices. Indeed, the earlier reduction puts each component in a mesh- triangular lattice. Its good vertices number ; there are only bad interior vertices in total. The outer layers have only minimum-distance incidences, so only of their vertices can belong to nontrivial minimum-distance components.
The first exceptional length must therefore exist eventually. Otherwise all distances have mesh- triangular lattice norms; distances to a unit equilateral triangle in a good patch then put every point in its mesh- lattice by the integral norm argument in that note, contradicting (4). Its ranks from both ends still tend to infinity, as established there.
A lower bound on the exceptional vertices
Let range over components induced by good vertices in . Each has at most vertices. In its own axial lattice coordinates, let count the occupied coordinate values. The boundary edges in two lattice directions alone number at least , since . Every outgoing lattice neighbor exists in , by goodness, and is bad. Each bad vertex receives at most six such incidences. Hence
Richness of the second-largest distance and its upper bound give . Also
because each bad vertex has degree at most five. Since the full minimum class is rich, at least of its pairs touch the outer two layers. This remains compatible with their previously proved upper bound; it is not a contradiction.
A common finer lattice requires superpolynomial refinement
Suppose additionally that lies in a triangular lattice of mesh . Then is a positive integer. Each minimum-length orientation is represented by an Eisenstein integer of norm , modulo the six unit rotations. The ideal-count argument in arithmetic palettes, now in , bounds the number of such orientations by . Consequently (4) gives
Since for every , it follows that eventually for every fixed . Thus a polynomially finer common triangular lattice is excluded, not merely the lattice of mesh .
There is a coordinate-free arithmetic consequence. Normalize . If the squared-distance palette is contained in , with a positive integer, choose a good unit equilateral triangle with vertices . For every , subtraction of its squared distances gives
Hence , where is the unit triangular lattice generated by . Applying the preceding result with shows that eventually for every fixed . No bounded-height rational reduction is inferred for arbitrary sets.
The missing rotation estimate
More generally, if is a family of direct isometries with , then
Every point of this union has its three anchor distances in , so the same theorem proves (6). For translations, convex difference multiplicities supply (2). For varying rotations, the collision count instead involves intersections . The moving-frame argument supplies a lower bound under bounded rarity, still compatible with (6). The arithmetic-palette argument closes this gap only under its progression-cover hypothesis. No common orientation or unrestricted contradiction is inferred.
The author checked (1)--(4), the primary source, the boundary count, and the scope of the common-lattice conclusion in (5); the argument is author-recorded. Neither unrestricted assertion is solved.
A local field-alignment observation for finite patches
Let and . Suppose
If a point is equidistant from three distinct points of , then
Indeed, normalize and write . Three points on a circle are noncollinear. Subtracting their squared-distance equations therefore gives an invertible two-by-two integer linear system for : its coefficients are differences of and , of size , and its right sides are differences of , of size . The determinant is a nonzero integer of size ; Cramer's rule bounds the numerators by and proves both assertions.
If a second patch is contained in and , at most one of its points can be such a circumcenter of three points of , even allowing different radii. Two distinct centers would have difference both in and in , forcing . Thus any fixed cross-distance graph between two such patches has degree at most two at all but one vertex on each side, by applying the statement in both directions.
This does not bound the multiplicity in the full configuration: one vertex may have two neighbors in each of many different patches. Field-commensurable but differently oriented patches are not excluded. No near-linear many-anchor bound, palette progression cover, or global alignment conclusion was established. The author checked the integer linear system and the field intersection argument; they are author-recorded.