Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 267
claims/: The 6 claim pages of Problem 267, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. Let and be the Fibonacci sequence. Let $n_1<n_2<\cdots $ be an infinite sequence with $n_{k+1}/n_k \geq c>1$. Must
be irrational?
Status. Claimed. The site labels the problem OPEN (page last edited 18 January 2026). The case is settled by Badea's 1993 corollary, the accepted partial claim on the Badea claim page, and the site's commentary records the case as open. One pending full claim, a Lean 4 proof of 2026, asserts the answer yes for every ; the frontmatter standing follows from it.
Source. erdosproblems.com/267, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #267, https://www.erdosproblems.com/267.
References.
- [An89] André-Jeannin, Richard, Irrationalité de la somme des inverses de certaines suites récurrentes. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. (1989), 539-541.
- [Ba87] Badea, C., The irrationality of certain infinite series. Glasgow Math. J. (1987), 221-228.
- [Ba93] Badea, C., A theorem on irrationality of infinite series and applications. Acta Arith. (1993), 313-323.
- [BiHo76] Hoggatt, Jr., V. E. and Bicknell, Marjorie, A reciprocal series of Fibonacci numbers with subscripts . Fibonacci Quart. (1976), 453-455.
- [Go74] Good, I. J., A reciprocal series of Fibonacci numbers. Fibonacci Quart. (1974), 346.
Formalization. Statement in
formal-conjectures
(pinned at the repository's commit of 2026-09-18), which tags the statement
research solved with answer yes and cites in its formal_proof attribute the
Lean 4 proof recorded on
the claim page; its
variant specialization_pow_two, the instance , cites a formal proof
by AlphaProof, recorded on
its claim page. The
corpus records no build or audit of either.
Current assessment
The site records Problem 267 as OPEN (page last edited 18 January 2026). The Progress note below records the two literature results and the index range they leave open, ; the corpus records a check of their statements against the papers, no check of their proofs, and no literature search beyond the sources named below. The pending claim described next would close that range.
Proof claims on the site. The proof-claims tab carries one full claim, submitted 2026-07-15 by Colin Snyder with an AI system credited for the proof: a Lean 4 development stating that the sum is irrational for every index sequence with for some real , which would close the range . The claim page records the formal statement and its standing: the site labels the problem OPEN, the proof-claim entry has no comments, the only referee report is an automated one on the hosting site, and the formal-conjectures catalog tags the statement solved and cites the proof. The corpus records no build or audit of the Lean files. The problem's discussion thread carries four remarks, all on results within or within Badea's condition: Kevin Barreto (2026-01-01) on Badea's proofs of the and Lucas instances and of the case , Alfaiz (2026-02-23) on Nguyen's transcendence result, and Alfaiz and Terence Tao (2026-04-30) on the Chattopadhyay instance , which Tao notes is much easier because each denominator divides the next.
Progress
Badea's 1993 Corollary 3.2, recorded on [[problems/irrationality/E0267/claims/1993_01_01_badea|the accepted partial claim page]] and on the card badea_1993_theorem_irrationality_infinite_series_applications, proves the sum irrational whenever for all large , and Badea notes that this answers the problem for every . Nguyen's Theorem 1.2 adds that the sum is transcendental whenever the index ratio is at least a fixed , even if Fibonacci and Lucas reciprocals are mixed; his introduction notes that irrationality in this range follows already from a simpler denominator-and-tail estimate. The question remains open for index ratios bounded below by a constant in . Good's evaluation for indices gives a quadratic irrational, consistent with the original question.
Known Results
Every is settled by Badea 1993, the accepted partial claim on
the Badea page. Its
condition also contains the instance results the site and its thread record,
each an accepted partial claim of its own: Good 1974 on
the Good page and
Hoggatt and Bicknell 1976 on
the Hoggatt–Bicknell page
(, with the value , and for every fixed
), and Badea 1987 on
the Badea 1987 page
(, which meets Badea's 1993 condition with equality although its
ratios are below ). The formal-conjectures variant specialization_pow_two
states the instance and cites a formal proof by AlphaProof, the
pending partial claim on
the AlphaProof page.
Chattopadhyay's for integers , cited in the thread on
2026-04-30, also lies inside Badea's condition. Nguyen 2022 strengthens
irrationality to transcendence for . André-Jeannin's 1989 irrationality
of itself concerns the full sequence, whose index ratios tend to
, outside the problem's hypothesis, so it settles no instance and has no
claim page. No result among the sources named on this page settles the whole
range , which the site's commentary records as open; the pending
Snyder claim asserts
the answer yes there.
Linked library material
These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.
- badea_1987_irrationality_certain_infinite_series
- badea_1987_irrationality_certain_infinite_series / corollary_1
- badea_1987_irrationality_certain_infinite_series / corollary_4
- badea_1987_irrationality_certain_infinite_series / corollary_5
- badea_1987_irrationality_certain_infinite_series / theorem
- badea_1993_theorem_irrationality_infinite_series_applications
- good_1974_reciprocal_series_fibonacci_numbers
- good_1974_reciprocal_series_fibonacci_numbers / theorem_p346
- hoggattjr_1976_reciprocal_series_fibonacci_numbers_subscripts
- hoggattjr_1976_reciprocal_series_fibonacci_numbers_subscripts / theorem_p455
- nguyen_2022_transcendental_series_reciprocals_fibonacci_lucas_numbers
- nguyen_2022_transcendental_series_reciprocals_fibonacci_lucas_numbers / theorem_1_2
- nguyen_2022_transcendental_series_reciprocals_fibonacci_lucas_numbers / theorem_1_3