Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. C. Badea, The irrationality of certain infinite series, Glasgow Math. J. 29 (1987), no. 2, 221--228, doi:10.1017/S0017089500006868. The Theorem is stated on p. 222 (Section 2, "Main result") and proved on pp. 222--223. Bibliographic details are on the source card.
Statement
Theorem (p. 222). Let and , , be sequences of positive integers such that
(the paper's (1)) holds for every large . Then is irrational.
The paper assumes throughout that the series it treats converge, or alternatively adopts the convention that counts as irrational (Section 1, p. 221); the Theorem is read under that convention.
The remark after the proof (pp. 223--224) notes that the same argument would give the Theorem for positive real and if Froda's generalization of Brun's criterion held, and states that Froda's generalization is false, citing the author's counterexample. The Theorem is stated and proved only for positive integers.
Proof pointer
Pp. 222--223. With and , the partial sums are , an increasing sequence of rationals. Brun's criterion (the paper's reference [3]) gives irrationality of the limit of an increasing sequence of quotients of positive integers when the difference quotients decrease strictly for all large . Using , the paper reduces that condition for , to inequality (1).
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and its hypotheses were read clause by clause on p. 222 of the print; the proof was read for structure only.
Dependencies
Brun's irrationality criterion (V. Brun, 1910, the paper's reference [3]), used as a black box.
Bears on
- Problem 267: through Corollary 1 the paper derives Corollary 4, the irrationality of , which is the single instance of the problem. The Theorem states nothing about other index sequences.
- Problem 243: through Corollary 1, a sequence of positive integers with rational reciprocal sum has for infinitely many ; the paper does not give the problem's conclusion.
- Problem 263: context only. The problem page records a thread remark calling the Theorem a stronger classical irrationality criterion; the paper addresses neither of the problem's questions.