Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 263

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 263, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let ana_n be an increasing sequence of positive integers such that for every sequence of positive integers bnb_n with bn/an→1b_n/a_n\to 1 the sum

∑1bn\sum\frac{1}{b_n}

is irrational. Is an=22na_n=2^{2^n} such a sequence? Must such a sequence satisfy an1/n→∞a_n^{1/n}\to \infty?

Status. Open. The site labels the problem OPEN (page last edited 2026-04-02). Its two questions are the problem's two parts. The second, whether an irrationality sequence of this kind must satisfy an1/n→∞a_n^{1/n}\to\infty, has one pending partial claim, [[problems/irrationality/E0263/claims/2026_05_09_price|a disproof of the growth question posted in 2026]], which asserts a counterexample. The first, whether an=22na_n=2^{2^n} is such a sequence, has no claim.

Source. erdosproblems.com/263, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #263, https://www.erdosproblems.com/263.

References.

  • [Ko25c] J. Koizumi, Irrationality of the reciprocal sum of doubly exponential sequences. arXiv:2504.05933 (2025).
  • [KoTa24] Kovač, V. and Tao, T., On several irrationality problems for Ahmes series. arXiv:2406.17593 (2024); Acta Math. Hungar. 175 (2025), 572–608.

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures (pinned at the repository's commit of 2026-09-18).

Current assessment

The site records Problem 263 as OPEN (page last edited 2026-04-02). On that date the site added the hypothesis that the sequence be increasing, which Erdős's formulation carries: a DeepMind prover agent had posted on 2026-02-27 (post) a Lean disproof of the second question for the statement without that hypothesis, the sequence an=23na_n=2^{3^n} except an=2na_n=2^n on a sparse set of indices. That counterexample is not increasing and refutes only the superseded statement, so it is not a claim on the current problem; the site's remarks credit it, and the formal-conjectures catalog preserves its formal proof at the commit before the correction. For the corrected statement, the one pending claim is a claimed disproof of the second question recorded on the Price claim page, an increasing sequence that GPT-5.5 Pro is said to have found as a counterexample; the first question has no claim, and the catalog's file at its commit of 2026-09-18 tags both questions research open. The Progress note below records Koizumi's theorem and Kovač and Tao's theorem and why neither settles a question; the corpus records no check of their proofs and no literature search beyond the cited sources and the site's threads.

Progress

Koizumi's Theorem 4 proves that, for all real α>1\alpha>1 outside a countable set, all positive-integer sequences asymptotic to α2n\alpha^{2^n} have irrational reciprocal sums. This does not resolve the specified base α=2\alpha=2 or the growth question in the statement.

Kovač and Tao's Theorem 2.4 (Acta Math. Hungar. 175 (2025), 572--608; card), which the site's remarks credit, proves that no strictly increasing sequence with convergent reciprocal sum and an+1/an2→0a_{n+1}/a_n^2\to0 is an irrationality sequence of this kind. It settles neither question. The sequence an=22na_n=2^{2^n} has an+1/an2=1a_{n+1}/a_n^2=1, and the theorem says nothing about sequences whose ratio an+1/an2a_{n+1}/a_n^2 does not tend to 00, such as the claimed counterexample. So it has no claim page.

Known Results

The second question has a claimed negative answer. Liam Price posted in the problem's discussion thread on 2026-05-09 that GPT-5.5 Pro disproves it, with a write-up and a Lean file auto-formalized with Aristotle and cleaned up with Claude Opus 4.7: a strictly increasing sequence, built from blocks of consecutive integers, that is an irrationality sequence in the problem's sense yet has lim inf⁡an1/n=1\liminf a_n^{1/n}=1. Nat Sothanaphan replied the same day that a standard check found no issues and that the Lean matched the paper; that is a forum remark, not acceptance, and the site's label is OPEN. The claim page records the posting.

Three forum proof claims by T. Alexander Lystad, posted on 2026-08-01 and on 2026-08-02 (claim 179 and claim 181), have no claim page: they are Lean 4 developments generated with Kimi K3 under his direction, archived on Zenodo, of the folklore sufficient criteria for being an irrationality sequence, and they settle no instance of either question, as the claimant states. The first claims that a strictly increasing sequence with c an2+ϵ≤an+1c\,a_n^{2+\epsilon}\le a_{n+1} for all large nn is an irrationality sequence in the problem's sense, the consequence of the folklore result the site's remarks state; an=22na_n=2^{2^n} has an+1=an2a_{n+1}=a_n^2 and misses the hypothesis by the ϵ\epsilon. The other two claim that every sequence of positive integers with an1/2n→∞a_n^{1/2^n}\to\infty has irrational reciprocal sum, first for monotone sequences after Erdős's 1975 argument and then without monotonicity by sorting the sequence; the claimant's write-up PROOF-1975.md (at its commit of 2026-08-02) covers only the monotone step, and the claimant notes that the lim sup⁡\limsup analogue fails without monotonicity, an interleaved Sylvester construction having lim sup⁡an1/2n=∞\limsup a_n^{1/2^n}=\infty and sum 3/23/2. The repository's adapter to the formal-conjectures catalog's variant folklore was produced by Codex Proof Forge, as its README says. In the thread Vjekoslav Kovač remarked on 2026-08-02 that Badea's criterion (the main Theorem of the 1987 paper, Theorem A of the 1993 paper; on the cards badea_1987_irrationality_certain_infinite_series and badea_1993_theorem_irrationality_infinite_series_applications) is a stronger classical criterion of the first kind, and on 2026-08-03 that the Erdős paper the claimant cites already has a non-monotone form of the second. The catalog's file for the problem at its commit of 2026-09-18 states the first criterion twice, both tagged research solved: in a lim inf⁡\liminf form, citing Folklore.lean of the claimant's repository at an earlier commit as its formal proof, and in the eventual form that matches the claim, citing no proof; its variant folklore states the second criterion without a proof link. The catalog links proofs without refereeing them.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.