Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 25
claims/: The 2 claim pages of Problem 25, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. Let be an arbitrary sequence of integers, each with an associated residue class . Let be the set of integers such that for every either or $n\not\equiv a_i\pmod{n_i}$. Must the logarithmic density of exist?
Status. Open.
Source. erdosproblems.com/25, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #25, https://www.erdosproblems.com/25.
Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures.
Current assessment
The question, in the site's formulation accessed, asks whether the set of integers that avoid, for every modulus not exceeding them, the residue class modulo must have a logarithmic density; the site labels the problem OPEN and notes it as a special case of Problem 486. The standing is open with no full claim. One pending partial claim is recorded: Chojecki's note of 19 March 2026 ([[problems/integer_sequences/E0025/claims/2026_03_19_chojecki|claim page]]) proves that has natural, hence logarithmic, density when and when the are pairwise coprime, and the same note reduces the general case to an unproved uniform harmonic estimate for its quotient sieves ([[problems/integer_sequences/E0025/claims/2026_03_19_chojecki_conditional|conditional page]]). The note is unrefereed and neither page counts toward the standing. The zero-residue case, every , makes the complement of the set of multiples of the , whose logarithmic density exists by Theorem 1 of Davenport and Erdős (card); that deduction is a remark made here, which the paper does not state for this problem and the site does not credit, so it has no claim page. Wang's proposed counterexample to Problem 486, a sieve with several forbidden residues per modulus and no logarithmic density, does not transfer to a single residue per modulus, as its card explains (card). No literature search beyond these sources and no independent review of any proof is recorded.
Linked library material
These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.
- balister_2018_erdos_covering_problem_density_uncovered_set
- hough_2015_solution_minimum_modulus_problem_covering_systems
- davenport_1951_sequences_positive_integers
- davenport_1951_sequences_positive_integers / main_theorem
- araujo_2026_sarnaks_program_erdos_sieves_part_ii_measure_systems_applications
- besicovitch_1935_density_certain_sequences_integers
- besicovitch_1935_density_certain_sequences_integers / construction_p340
- besicovitch_1935_density_certain_sequences_integers / theorem_1
- chojecki_2026_truncated_congruence_sieves_erdos_problem_25
- chojecki_2026_truncated_congruence_sieves_erdos_problem_25 / conjecture_5_1
- chojecki_2026_truncated_congruence_sieves_erdos_problem_25 / corollary_5_3
- chojecki_2026_truncated_congruence_sieves_erdos_problem_25 / lemma_2_1
- chojecki_2026_truncated_congruence_sieves_erdos_problem_25 / proposition_4_1
- chojecki_2026_truncated_congruence_sieves_erdos_problem_25 / proposition_4_2
- chojecki_2026_truncated_congruence_sieves_erdos_problem_25 / proposition_6_1
- chojecki_2026_truncated_congruence_sieves_erdos_problem_25 / proposition_6_3
- chojecki_2026_truncated_congruence_sieves_erdos_problem_25 / theorem_3_1
- chojecki_2026_truncated_congruence_sieves_erdos_problem_25 / theorem_3_2
- chojecki_2026_truncated_congruence_sieves_erdos_problem_25 / theorem_5_4
- davenport_1936_sequences_positive_integers
- filaseta_2007_sieving_large_integers_covering_systems_congruences
- filaseta_2007_sieving_large_integers_covering_systems_congruences / lemma_2_1
- filaseta_2007_sieving_large_integers_covering_systems_congruences / lemma_3_4
- filaseta_2007_sieving_large_integers_covering_systems_congruences / theorem_2
- filaseta_2007_sieving_large_integers_covering_systems_congruences / theorem_6
- wang_2026_proposed_solution_erdos_problem_486