Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Chojecki 2026 truncated congruence sieves erdos problem 25

../

conjecture_5_1: The paper's unproved hypothesis: nonnegative charges tau_i exist with the harmonic sum of 1/(t + a_i/n_i) over t <= Y in S_i equal to d_i log Y + O(d_i log(2/d_i) + tau_i) uniformly, and with the sum of tau_i/n_i over n_i <= X equal to o(log X).

corollary_5_3: For every X >= 2 the sum over n_i <= X of e_i log(1/(n_i e_i)), with e_i the logarithmic density of the i-th first-kill set, is << log log X; it follows from a weighted entropy inequality, Lemma 5.2.

lemma_2_1: Each finite truncation A^(k) of the truncated congruence sieve is eventually periodic, so its natural and logarithmic densities exist and are equal; their common value delta_k decreases in k to a limit delta.

proposition_4_1: The first-kill sets E_i, the integers removed for the first time by the i-th congruence, are pairwise disjoint and eventually periodic, cover the complement of A, and have logarithmic densities e_i = delta_(i-1) - delta_i summing to 1 - delta.

proposition_4_2: Each first-kill set E_i equals {a_i + n_i t : t in S_i} for a periodic quotient sieve S_i that excludes one residue class modulo n_j/(n_i, n_j) for each earlier compatible congruence j, and the density d_i of S_i is n_i e_i.

proposition_6_1: No estimate bounding the logarithmic mass of the tail union of the B_i with i > k by Phi_k + o(1), with Phi_k tending to zero, holds in general; primes with zero residues make every tail union of logarithmic density one.

proposition_6_3: For u coprime to 6 and r >= 1, an explicit block of congruences with moduli u 2^(r-j) 3^j leaves the top modulus u 3^r the first-kill set {u 3^r (1 + 2^r t) : t >= 0}, whose density is 1/(u 6^r) while its first element contributes 1/(u 3^r).

theorem_3_1: If the sum of 1/n_i converges, the set A of the truncated congruence sieve has natural density, equal to the limit delta of the truncation densities, and hence logarithmic density.

theorem_3_2: If the moduli n_i are pairwise coprime, the set A of the truncated congruence sieve has natural density, whether or not the sum of 1/n_i converges, and the density is zero when that sum diverges.

theorem_5_4: Assuming the paper's unproved Conjecture 5.1, the logarithmic density of the set A of the truncated congruence sieve exists and equals the limit delta of the truncation densities.


Przemyslaw Chojecki, Truncated Congruence Sieves and Erdős Problem 25, unpublished preprint, 19 March 2026. Source: https://www.ulam.ai/research/erdos25.pdf. The copy read for this card is the PDF at that address. No notice is printed in it, and no arXiv record of it was found (an arXiv title query returned no result on 2026-10-02); the hosting organization's research page shows only the site footer "© 2017-2026 ULAM" and names no license (https://www.ulam.ai/research, read 2026-10-02), every other right reserved.

The note treats the singleton-residue truncated sieve in Erdős problem 25. For 1≤n1<n2<⋯1\leq n_1<n_2<\cdots and one chosen class ai(modni)a_i\pmod {n_i} per modulus, put

Bi={n∈N:n≥ni, n≡ai(modni)},A=N∖⋃iBi,B_i=\{n\in\mathbb N:n\geq n_i,\ n\equiv a_i\pmod {n_i}\},\qquad A=\mathbb N\setminus\bigcup_iB_i,

and let A(k)=N∖⋃i≤kBiA^{(k)}=\mathbb N\setminus\bigcup_{i\leq k}B_i. The paper proves two positive cases and gives a conditional local-to-global reduction for the general case. It does not claim a solution: its abstract (p. 1) presents it as isolating a missing lemma rather than giving a complete proof, and it is an unrefereed preprint whose arguments remain unreviewed here.

Read status: claims checked. The preprint was read end to end, and the hypotheses and conclusions listed below were checked clause by clause. Their proofs have not been independently verified.

Finite truncations and positive cases

  • Lemma 2.1 (p. 3). For every fixed k≥1k\geq1, A(k)A^{(k)} is eventually periodic, with period dividing Lk=lcm⁡(n1,…,nk)L_k=\operatorname{lcm}(n_1,\ldots,n_k). Consequently its natural and logarithmic densities exist and agree. Writing their common value as δk\delta_k, the inclusions A(k+1)⊆A(k)A^{(k+1)}\subseteq A^{(k)} give a decreasing limit δ=lim⁡k→∞δk∈[0,1]\delta=\lim_{k\to\infty}\delta_k\in[0,1].
  • Theorem 3.1 (pp. 3--4). If ∑i1/ni<∞\sum_i1/n_i<\infty, then AA has natural density, hence logarithmic density, and its value is δ\delta. The tail union bound d‾(A(k)∖A)≤∑i>k1/ni\overline d(A^{(k)}\setminus A)\leq\sum_{i>k}1/n_i squeezes the upper and lower densities.
  • Theorem 3.2 (p. 4). If the nin_i are pairwise coprime, then AA has a natural density, whether or not ∑i1/ni\sum_i1/n_i converges. Its finite-truncation densities are ∏i≤k(1−1/ni)\prod_{i\leq k}(1-1/n_i); convergence of ∑i1/ni\sum_i1/n_i invokes Theorem 3.1, while divergence sends this product to zero as k→∞k\to\infty, and therefore d(A)=0d(A)=0.

First kills and quotient sieves

  • Proposition 4.1 (pp. 4--5). The first-kill sets Ei=A(i−1)∩BiE_i=A^{(i-1)}\cap B_i partition the complement: N∖A=⨆i≥1Ei\mathbb N\setminus A=\bigsqcup_{i\geq1}E_i. Every EiE_i is eventually periodic, and with ei=ld⁡(Ei)e_i=\operatorname{ld}(E_i) one has ei=δi−1−δie_i=\delta_{i-1}-\delta_i and ∑iei=1−δ\sum_i e_i=1-\delta.
  • Proposition 4.2 (pp. 5--6). For j<ij<i, set gij=(ni,nj)g_{ij}=(n_i,n_j). Incompatible classes ai≢aj(modgij)a_i\not\equiv a_j\pmod {g_{ij}} impose no condition. A compatible class induces one forbidden quotient residue bij(modqij)b_{ij}\pmod {q_{ij}}, where qij=nj/gijq_{ij}=n_j/g_{ij} and ai+nit≡aj(modnj)a_i+n_it\equiv a_j\pmod {n_j} exactly when t≡bij(modqij)t\equiv b_{ij}\pmod {q_{ij}}. Thus the finite periodic quotient sieve
Si={t∈N:t≢bij(modqij) for every compatible j<i}S_i=\{t\in\mathbb N:t\not\equiv b_{ij}\pmod {q_{ij}} \text{ for every compatible }j<i\}

satisfies Ei={ai+nit:t∈Si}E_i=\{a_i+n_it:t\in S_i\}. Its density did_i exists and obeys di=nieid_i=n_i e_i.

This representation does the essential localization: the infinite complement is partitioned by the first congruence that kills each integer, while the interaction with all earlier congruences becomes a finite sieve on the quotient variable tt.

Conditional reduction

  • Conjecture 5.1 (p. 6). With αi=ai/ni\alpha_i=a_i/n_i, there should be nonnegative charges τi\tau_i such that, for every ii and every Y≥1Y\geq1, with an absolute implied constant,
∑t≤Yt∈Si1t+αi=dilog⁡Y+O(dilog⁡2di+τi),\sum_{\substack{t\leq Y\\t\in S_i}}\frac1{t+\alpha_i} =d_i\log Y+O\left(d_i\log\frac2{d_i}+\tau_i\right),

where the entropy term is zero when di=0d_i=0, and such that ∑ni≤Xτi/ni=o(log⁡X)\sum_{n_i\leq X}\tau_i/n_i=o(\log X).

  • Theorem 5.4 (pp. 7--9). Assuming Conjecture 5.1, the logarithmic density of AA exists and equals δ=lim⁡kδk\delta=\lim_k\delta_k. The proof sums the first-kill harmonic masses. Lemma 5.2 and Corollary 5.3 make the total entropy error only O(log⁡log⁡X)O(\log\log X), so the genuinely missing input is the sublogarithmic global charge.

Obstructions and the remaining gap

  • Proposition 6.1 (p. 10). There is no universal bound μX(⋃i>kBi)≤Φk+o(1)\mu_X(\bigcup_{i>k}B_i)\leq\Phi_k+o(1) with Φk→0\Phi_k\to0. Taking the nin_i to be the primes and ai=0a_i=0 makes every tail union have logarithmic density one. Any viable estimate must instead control the conditioned tail A(k)∩⋃i>kBiA^{(k)}\cap\bigcup_{i>k}B_i.
  • Proposition 6.3 (pp. 10--11). For (u,6)=1(u,6)=1, r≥1r\geq1, and mj=u2r−j3jm_j=u2^{r-j}3^j, the stated choice of residues ar=0a_r=0 and aj≡u3r(1+2r−j−1)(modmj)a_j\equiv u3^r(1+2^{r-j-1})\pmod {m_j} for 0≤j<r0\leq j<r, taken as a finite block of congruences on its own, leaves at the top modulus mr=u3rm_r=u3^r exactly
Emr={u3r(1+2rt):t≥0},Smr={t∈N:t≡1(mod2r)}.E_{m_r}=\{u3^r(1+2^rt):t\geq0\},\qquad S_{m_r}=\{t\in\mathbb N:t\equiv1\pmod {2^r}\}.

Hence (Remark 6.4, p. 11) emr=1/(u6r)e_{m_r}=1/(u6^r), but its first survivor already contributes 1/(u3r)1/(u3^r), far larger than the entropy scale emrlog⁡(1/emr)≍r/(u6r)e_{m_r}\log(1/e_{m_r})\asymp r/(u6^r).

  • Conjecture 7.1 (p. 12). Every first-kill quotient sieve should have a decomposition Si=Sitr⊔SitwS_i=S_i^{\mathrm{tr}}\sqcup S_i^{\mathrm{tw}}, which the Section 7 program (pp. 11--12) reads as a transverse part and a prime-power-tower part, and a nonnegative τi\tau_i satisfying the harmonic estimate of Conjecture 5.1 uniformly in YY, with ∑ni≤Xτi/ni=o(log⁡X)\sum_{n_i\leq X}\tau_i/n_i=o(\log X). By Theorem 5.4 this would imply that ld⁡(A)\operatorname{ld}(A) exists for every truncated congruence sieve.

The exact remaining singleton-residue gap is therefore to prove that the early survivors created by infinitely many such tower compressions cannot synchronize strongly enough to make the global logarithmic mass oscillate. Quantitatively, one must obtain Conjecture 5.1's uniform estimate for every finite quotient sieve while charging all non-entropy tower spikes by τi\tau_i with ∑ni≤Xτi/ni=o(log⁡X)\sum_{n_i\leq X}\tau_i/n_i=o(\log X). Proposition 6.3 shows why the charge cannot simply be omitted; the paper supplies neither this charging theorem nor an unconditional replacement.

Bears on

  • E0025: Theorems 3.1 and 3.2 answer the problem's question yes when ∑i1/ni<∞\sum_i1/n_i<\infty and when the nin_i are pairwise coprime; Theorem 5.4 answers it yes for every sequence only under the unproved Conjecture 5.1. The general problem is left open, and Propositions 6.1 and 6.3 are obstructions to proof routes, not answers to the question.

Results

Labels and pages are those of the edition named above.

  • Lemma 2.1 (p. 3): finite truncations are eventually periodic; the densities δk\delta_k and their limit δ\delta.
  • Theorem 3.1 (pp. 3--4): natural density when ∑i1/ni<∞\sum_i1/n_i<\infty.
  • Theorem 3.2 (p. 4): natural density for pairwise coprime moduli.
  • Proposition 4.1 (pp. 4--5): the first-kill decomposition.
  • Proposition 4.2 (pp. 5--6): first-kill sets as dilates of quotient sieves.
  • Conjecture 5.1 (p. 6): the quotient-sieve harmonic estimate, with Conjecture 7.1 (p. 12).
  • Corollary 5.3 (p. 7): the entropy terms total O(log⁡log⁡X)O(\log\log X), with Lemma 5.2 (pp. 6--7).
  • Theorem 5.4 (pp. 7--9): the conditional reduction.
  • Proposition 6.1 (p. 10): no vanishing bound for the ambient tail union.
  • Proposition 6.3 (pp. 10--11): the prime-power tower gadget, with Remark 6.4 (p. 11).

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.