Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
library/ integer_sequences/ chojecki_2026_truncated_congruence_sieves_erdos_problem_25
Przemyslaw Chojecki, Truncated Congruence Sieves and Erdős Problem 25, unpublished preprint, 19 March 2026. Source: https://www.ulam.ai/research/erdos25.pdf. Local artifacts: the retained PDF, held on the source card, and its canonical conversion.
The note treats the singleton-residue truncated sieve in Erdős problem 25. For and one chosen class per modulus, put
and let . The paper proves two positive cases and gives a conditional local-to-global reduction for the general case. It does not claim a solution: it is a GPT-assisted, unrefereed preprint, and its arguments remain unreviewed here.
Read status: claims checked. The full paper in Markdown was read end to end, and the hypotheses and conclusions listed below were checked clause by clause. Their proofs have not been independently verified.
Finite truncations and positive cases
- Lemma 2.1 (p. 3). For every fixed , is eventually periodic, with period dividing . Consequently its natural and logarithmic densities exist and agree. Writing their common value as , the inclusions give a decreasing limit .
- Theorem 3.1 (pp. 3--4). If , then has natural density, hence logarithmic density, and its value is . The tail union bound squeezes the upper and lower densities.
- Theorem 3.2 (p. 4). If the are pairwise coprime, then has natural density in all cases. Its finite-truncation densities are ; convergence of invokes Theorem 3.1, while divergence sends this product to zero as , and therefore .
First kills and quotient sieves
- Proposition 4.1 (pp. 4--5). The first-kill sets are pairwise disjoint and . Each is eventually periodic; if , then and .
- Proposition 4.2 (pp. 5--6). For , set . Incompatible classes impose no condition. A compatible class induces one forbidden quotient residue , where and exactly when . Thus the finite periodic quotient sieve $S_i={t\in\mathbb N:t\not\equiv b_{ij}\pmod {q_{ij}} \text{ for every compatible }j<i}$ satisfies . Its density exists and obeys .
This representation does the essential localization: the infinite complement is partitioned by the first congruence that kills each integer, while the interaction with all earlier congruences becomes a finite sieve on the quotient variable .
Conditional reduction
- Conjecture 5.1 (p. 6). With , there should be nonnegative charges such that, for every and every , with an absolute implied constant, $\sum_{\substack{t\leq Y\t\in S_i}}\frac1{t+\alpha_i} =d_i\log Y+O\left(d_i\log\frac2{d_i}+\tau_i\right)$, where the entropy term is zero when , and such that $\sum_{n_i\leq X}\tau_i/n_i=o(\log X)$.
- Theorem 5.4 (pp. 7--9). Assuming Conjecture 5.1, the logarithmic density of exists and equals . The proof sums the first-kill harmonic masses. Lemma 5.2 and Corollary 5.3 make the total entropy error only , so the genuinely missing input is the sublogarithmic global charge.
Obstructions and the remaining gap
- Proposition 6.1 (p. 10). There is no universal bound with . Taking the to be the primes and makes every tail union have logarithmic density one. Any viable estimate must instead control the conditioned tail .
- Proposition 6.3 (pp. 10--11). For , , and , the stated choice of residues and for leaves, at the top modulus , exactly and . Hence , but its first survivor already contributes , far larger than the entropy scale .
- Conjecture 7.1 (p. 12). Every first-kill quotient sieve should split as into a transverse part and a prime-power-tower part, with a nonnegative satisfying exactly the uniform harmonic estimate and global charge condition of Conjecture 5.1. Theorem 5.4 would then answer problem 25 positively.
The exact remaining singleton-residue gap is therefore to prove that the early survivors created by infinitely many such tower compressions cannot synchronize strongly enough to make the global logarithmic mass oscillate. Quantitatively, one must obtain Conjecture 5.1's uniform estimate for every finite quotient sieve while charging all non-entropy tower spikes by with . Proposition 6.3 shows why the charge cannot simply be omitted; the paper supplies neither this charging theorem nor an unconditional replacement.
Bears on
- E0025: supplies two positive cases and a conditional reduction, but leaves the full singleton-residue problem open.