Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 3

../

claims/: The 3 claim pages of Problem 3, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. If A⊆NA\subseteq \mathbb{N} has ∑n∈A1n=∞\sum_{n\in A}\frac{1}{n}=\infty then must AA contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions?

Status. OPEN, the site's label (page last edited 4 April 2026, as accessed 2026-09-04). The OpenAI mathematics release of 23 September 2026 answers the question yes. Its manuscript states rk(N)≤CkNexp⁡(−ck(log⁡N)εk)r_k(N)\le C_kN\exp(-c_k(\log N)^{\varepsilon_k}) for every fixed k≥3k\ge3 (Theorem 1.1) and sums that bound over dyadic intervals (Corollary 1.2). The release's Lean proves the yes answer from a weaker bound, rk(N)≤CNexp⁡(−c(log⁡log⁡N)1+η)r_k(N)\le CN\exp(-c(\log\log N)^{1+\eta}). This corpus built that declaration, checked its axioms and found it identical to the release's comparator challenge, so the result is accepted on its claim page and the problem stands solved and proved here. Theorem 1.1's bound is not formalized; it is a claimed partial result on Problem 142's claim page. The case k=3k=3, proved by Bloom and Sisask, is a claimed partial result on its own claim page, and the case AA the set of primes, proved by Green and Tao, is an accepted partial result on its own claim page.

Source. erdosproblems.com/3, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #3, https://www.erdosproblems.com/3.

References.

  • [BlSi20] Bloom, T.F. and Sisask, O., Breaking the logarithmic barrier in Roth's theorem on arithmetic progressions. arXiv:2007.03528 (2020).
  • [Er81] Erdős, P., On the combinatorial problems which I would most like to see solved. Combinatorica (1981), 25-42.
  • [Er83c] Erdős, Paul, Combinatorial problems in geometry. Math. Chronicle (1983), 35-54.
  • [Go01] Gowers, W. T., A new proof of Szemerédi's theorem. Geom. Funct. Anal. (2001), 465-588.
  • [GrTa08] Green, Ben and Tao, Terence, The primes contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. Ann. of Math. (2) (2008), 481-547.
  • [GrTa17] Green, Ben and Tao, Terence, New bounds for Szemerédi's theorem, III: a polylogarithmic bound for r4(N)r_4(N). Mathematika (2017), 944-1040.
  • [Gu04] Guy, Richard K., Unsolved problems in number theory. 3rd ed., Problem Books in Mathematics, Springer, New York (2004), xviii+437 pp. Section A5 "Arithmetic progressions of primes", printed p. 25: "More generally, Erdős conjectures that if {ai}\{a_i\} is any infinite sequence of integers for which ∑1/ai\sum1/a_i is divergent, then the sequence contains arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. He offered $3000.00 for a proof or disproof of this conjecture"; the printed prize differs from the site's. Section E10, printed p. 318, points back to "a potentially remunerative conjecture of Erdős, which, if true, would imply Szemerédi's theorem". Library home: guy_2004_unsolved_problems_number_theory.
  • [KeMe23] Kelley, Z. and Meka, R., Strong Bounds for 3-Progressions. arXiv:2302.05537 (2023).
  • [LSS24] Leng, J., Sah, A. and Sawhney, M., Improved bounds for Szemerédi's theorem. arXiv:2402.17995 (2024).

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures at its commit of 2026-10-06, which states the question as erdos_3 with answer(sorry) and a sorry body and carries no formal_proof attribute; its five solved variants are the three-term case and the rkr_k bounds of Kelley--Meka, Green--Tao, Gowers and Leng--Sah--Sawhney recorded in the Current assessment.

Current assessment

The site's formulation (page last edited 4 April 2026) asks whether every A⊆NA\subseteq\mathbb N with divergent reciprocal sum contains arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. The answer is yes by Corollary 1.2 of the OpenAI release manuscript of 23 September 2026, accepted on its claim page on the release's Lean declaration, which this corpus built and whose axioms it checked; the site's label is OPEN and the release has no journal record or outside review.

Known results before the release, as the site's commentary and the cited papers give them. The case k=3k=3 is Corollary 1.2 of Bloom and Sisask [BlSi20], deduced by partial summation from their bound r3(N)≪N/(log⁡N)1+cr_3(N)\ll N/(\log N)^{1+c}; it is the claimed partial result on its claim page, with no journal version. Kelley and Meka [KeMe23] proved r3(N)≪Nexp⁡(−c(log⁡N)1/12)r_3(N)\ll N\exp(-c(\log N)^{1/12}), which gives the three-term case with room to spare. Green and Tao [GrTa17] proved r4(N)≪N/(log⁡N)cr_4(N)\ll N/(\log N)^c for some c>0c>0. Gowers [Go01] proved rk(N)≪N/(log⁡log⁡N)ckr_k(N)\ll N/(\log\log N)^{c_k} for every kk, and Leng, Sah and Sawhney [LSS24] improved this for every k≥5k\ge5 to rk(N)≪N/exp⁡((log⁡log⁡N)ck)r_k(N)\ll N/\exp((\log\log N)^{c_k}); neither bound is summable over dyadic blocks, so neither settles a case k≥5k\ge5, and neither has a claim page. Green and Tao's theorem that the primes contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions [GrTa08] is the special case AA the set of primes, proved directly; Erdős had viewed this problem as the only way to approach it. It is an accepted partial result on its own claim page. The formal-conjectures file records the three-term case and the four rkr_k bounds as its solved variants.

Search scope: the site's page as accessed 2026-09-04 and 2026-10-06, its references, the formal-conjectures statement file at its commit of 2026-10-06, and the OpenAI release of 23 September 2026 at the revision pinned on the claim page.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.