Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 169

../

claims/: The 6 claim pages of Problem 169, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let k≥3k\geq 3 and f(k)f(k) be the supremum of $\sum_{n\in A}\frac{1}{n}$ as AA ranges over all sets of positive integers which do not contain a kk-term arithmetic progression. Estimate f(k)f(k).

Is

lim⁡k→∞f(k)log⁡W(k)=∞\lim_{k\to \infty}\frac{f(k)}{\log W(k)}=\infty

where W(k)W(k) is the van der Waerden number?

Status. Open. The site's label is OPEN (page last edited 4 April 2026). Six partial claims are recorded, none bearing on the displayed limit question. The refereed lower bounds the site credits are accepted partial claims: Berlekamp gives f(k)≥(log⁡22−o(1))kf(k)\ge(\frac{\log2}{2}-o(1))k through his two-coloring bound W(p+1)>p 2pW(p+1)>p\,2^p for prime pp, and Gerver gives f(k)≥(1−o(1))klog⁡kf(k)\ge(1-o(1))k\log k. Among the numerical records, Wróblewski's set gives f(3)≥3.00849f(3)\ge3.00849, accepted on its journal record, and Walker's Kempner sets give f(4)≥4.43975f(4)\ge4.43975 and f(10)≥14.056f(10)\ge14.056, an arXiv preprint that stays claimed. Corollary 11.2 of the OpenAI release manuscript Quasipolynomial bounds for arithmetic progressions (23 September 2026; claim page) claims that f(k)f(k) is finite for every k≥3k\ge3, with the bound f(k)≤∑m≥02−mrk(2m)f(k)\le\sum_{m\ge0}2^{-m}r_k(2^m) and no numerical value. The finiteness itself follows, by Gerver's equivalence recorded in the site's commentary, from the reciprocal-sum theorem of Problem 3, which this corpus accepts on that problem's claim page; the explicit bound stays claimed. Neither gives an estimate of f(k)f(k) or anything on the displayed limit question. Kiichi's explicit sets, posted on the problem's thread on 26 September 2026 with a manuscript of 3 October 2026, give f(3)≥3.0085385f(3)\ge3.0085385 and f(4)≥4.4397534742f(4)\ge4.4397534742, beyond the records of Wróblewski and Walker; the claimants state each set as a Lean theorem of their own, which this corpus has not built, and claim nothing on the growth of f(k)f(k). The release's companion manuscript Quantitative superexponential bounds for van der Waerden numbers (23 September 2026; intake card openai_2026_quantitative_superexponential_bounds_van_der_waerden_numbers) proves W(k)>kckW(k)>k^{ck} with c=10−5c=10^{-5} for all large kk, accepted with formalized evidence on Problem 138's claim page, hence log⁡W(k)≥cklog⁡k\log W(k)\ge ck\log k; it makes no claim about f(k)f(k) or the ratio f(k)/log⁡W(k)f(k)/\log W(k) and does not name this problem, so it is recorded here as an input to the limit question and gets no claim page. Gerver's lower bound and the trivial f(k)/log⁡W(k)≥1/2f(k)/\log W(k)\ge1/2 recorded by the site are unchanged by these results, so the problem stays open.

Source. erdosproblems.com/169, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #169, https://www.erdosproblems.com/169.

References.

  • [Be68] Berlekamp, E. R., A construction for partitions which avoid long arithmetic progressions. Canad. Math. Bull. 11 (1968), no. 3, 409-414.
  • [Er80] Erdős, Paul, A survey of problems in combinatorial number theory. Ann. Discrete Math. (1980), 89-115.
  • [Ge77] Gerver, Joseph L., The sum of the reciprocals of a set of integers with no arithmetic progression of kk terms. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (1977), 211-214.
  • [Wa25] A. Walker, Integer sets of large harmonic sum which avoid long arithmetic progressions. arXiv:2203.06045 (2025).
  • [Wr84] Wróblewski, J., A nonaveraging set of integers with a large sum of reciprocals. Math. Comp. (1984), 261-262.

Formalization. None recorded.

Progress

Not yet compiled.

Known Results

Not yet compiled.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.