Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Use the notation of L144. Throughout, 0≤a≤2−1/30\le a\le2^{-1/3}, c=1−4a6c=\sqrt{1-4a^6}, and

P(z)=z3+3a2z,qa=P−c,L(a)=ℓ(qa),L0=L(0)=ℓ(z3−1).P(z)=z^3+3a^2z,\qquad q_a=P-c,\qquad L(a)=\ell(q_a),\qquad L_0=L(0)=\ell(z^3-1).

Put β=arcsin⁡(2a3)∈[0,π/2]\beta=\arcsin(2a^3)\in[0,\pi/2], so that c=cos⁡βc=\cos\beta.

1. Reduction of all cubics to the family

By Lemmas 4 and 5 of Eremenko and Hayman, some monic cubic p∗p^* maximizes ℓ\ell and has all its critical points on its lemniscate, so its critical values have modulus one. A translation and the rotation p(z)↦e−3iθp(eiθz)p(z)\mapsto e^{-3i\theta}p(e^{i\theta}z) preserve monicity and length, so we may take p∗(z)=z3−3u2z+bp^*(z)=z^3-3u^2z+b with b≤0b\le0. Its critical values are b∓2u3b\mp2u^3, and ∣b−2u3∣=∣b+2u3∣=1|b-2u^3|=|b+2u^3|=1 gives Re⁡(buˉ3)=0\operatorname{Re}(b\bar u^3)=0 and b2+4∣u∣6=1b^2+4|u|^6=1. If b<0b<0, then u3u^3 is purely imaginary, and a rotation by a multiple of 2π/32\pi/3, which fixes bb, makes u=±iau=\pm ia with a=∣u∣a=|u|. If b=0b=0, an arbitrary rotation achieves the same normalization. Thus p∗=qap^*=q_a. This is the normalization of the research sketch. Hence every monic cubic pp has ℓ(p)≤ℓ(p∗)=L(a)\ell(p)\le\ell(p^*)=L(a) for some aa, and the inequality for every cubic follows from the family inequality.

2. The length integral

The lemniscate of qaq_a is P−1(C)P^{-1}(C), where C={s:∣s−c∣=1}C=\{s:|s-c|=1\}. The critical points of PP are ±ia\pm ia, with critical values s±=±2ia3s_\pm=\pm2ia^3, and both lie on CC since 4a6+c2=14a^6+c^2=1. Away from these two values, PP restricted to P−1(C)P^{-1}(C) is a three-sheeted covering by analytic arcs, and on each arc ∣dz∣=∣ds∣/∣P′(z)∣|dz|=|ds|/|P'(z)|. Therefore

L(a)=∫02πGa(c+eiθ) dθ,Ga(s)=∑P(z)=s1∣P′(z)∣,L(a)=\int_0^{2\pi}G_a(c+e^{i\theta})\,d\theta,\qquad G_a(s)=\sum_{P(z)=s}\frac1{|P'(z)|},

and the conjugation symmetry Ga(sˉ)=Ga(s)G_a(\bar s)=G_a(s) gives L(a)=2∫0πGa(c+eiθ) dθL(a)=2\int_0^\pi G_a(c+e^{i\theta})\,d\theta. On CC the critical values sit at θ±=π∓β\theta_\pm=\pi\mp\beta. For a=0a=0 the roots of z3=sz^3=s give G0(s)=∣s∣−2/3G_0(s)=|s|^{-2/3}.

3. Root identities

If P(z)=sP(z)=s, expansion gives

(z2+a2)2(z2+4a2)=z6+6a2z4+9a4z2+4a6=s2+4a6.(z^2+a^2)^2(z^2+4a^2)=z^6+6a^2z^4+9a^4z^2+4a^6=s^2+4a^6.

Since P′(z)=3(z2+a2)P'(z)=3(z^2+a^2), for s≠s±s\ne s_\pm,

1∣P′(z)∣=∣z2+4a2∣1/23∣s2+4a6∣1/2.\frac1{|P'(z)|}=\frac{|z^2+4a^2|^{1/2}}{3|s^2+4a^6|^{1/2}}.

Let UU be either root of U−a6/U=sU-a^6/U=s and let u1,u2,u3u_1,u_2,u_3 be the cube roots of UU. Then (u−a2/u)3+3a2(u−a2/u)=u3−a6/u3=s(u-a^2/u)^3+3a^2(u-a^2/u)=u^3-a^6/u^3=s, the roots of P(z)=sP(z)=s are uj−a2/uju_j-a^2/u_j (the other choice of UU is −a6/U-a^6/U, whose cube roots are −a2/uj-a^2/u_j, giving the same roots), and z2+4a2=(u+a2/u)2z^2+4a^2=(u+a^2/u)^2. Hence

Ga(s)=∑j∣uj+a2/uj∣3∣s2+4a6∣1/2.(1)G_a(s)=\frac{\sum_j|u_j+a^2/u_j|}{3|s^2+4a^6|^{1/2}}. \tag{1}

For a>0a>0 put σ=s/a3\sigma=s/a^3. Then Ga(s)=a−2G1(σ)G_a(s)=a^{-2}G_1(\sigma), where G1G_1 is (1) with a=1a=1.

4. The comparison with z3−cz^3-c

Let Φ(c)=∫02π∣c+eiθ∣−2/3 dθ\Phi(c)=\int_0^{2\pi}|c+e^{i\theta}|^{-2/3}\,d\theta, the length of {∣z3−c∣=1}\{|z^3-c|=1\}. For 0≤c<10\le c<1, (1+ceiθ)−1/3=∑kbkckeikθ(1+ce^{i\theta})^{-1/3}=\sum_kb_kc^ke^{ik\theta} with bk=(−1/3k)b_k=\binom{-1/3}k, and Parseval gives Φ(c)=2π∑kbk2c2k\Phi(c)=2\pi\sum_kb_k^2c^{2k}, strictly increasing for c>0c>0. To pass to c=1c=1, use ∣c+eiθ∣2=(1−c)2+c∣1+eiθ∣2|c+e^{i\theta}|^2=(1-c)^2+c|1+e^{i\theta}|^2 for c≥1/2c\ge1/2 and dominated convergence; the limiting singularity has exponent −2/3-2/3. Monotone convergence of the series and the beta integral at c=1c=1 give

Φ(c)≤Φ(1)=L0=2π 2F1 ⁣(13,13;1;1)=2π Γ(1/3)Γ(2/3)2=21/3B ⁣(12,16)≈9.1797.\Phi(c)\le\Phi(1)=L_0=2\pi\,{}_2F_1\!\left(\tfrac13,\tfrac13;1;1\right) =\frac{2\pi\,\Gamma(1/3)}{\Gamma(2/3)^2} =2^{1/3}B\!\left(\tfrac12,\tfrac16\right)\approx9.1797.

Indeed ∣1+eiθ∣=2∣cos⁡(θ/2)∣|1+e^{i\theta}|=2|\cos(\theta/2)| evaluates the integral as the beta value displayed, and the gamma duplication formula gives the gamma quotient.

For a>0a>0 write g(σ)=G1(σ)−∣σ∣−2/3g(\sigma)=G_1(\sigma)-|\sigma|^{-2/3} and let Γa\Gamma_a be the circle ∣a3σ−c∣=1|a^3\sigma-c|=1, the image of CC. Since Ga(s)=a−2G1(σ)G_a(s)=a^{-2}G_1(\sigma), ∣s∣−2/3=a−2∣σ∣−2/3|s|^{-2/3}=a^{-2}|\sigma|^{-2/3} and ∣ds∣=a3∣dσ∣|ds|=a^3|d\sigma|,

L(a)=Φ(c)+a I(a),I(a)=∫Γag(σ) ∣dσ∣,soL(a)≤L0+a I(a).(2)L(a)=\Phi(c)+a\,I(a),\qquad I(a)=\int_{\Gamma_a}g(\sigma)\,|d\sigma|, \qquad\text{so}\qquad L(a)\le L_0+a\,I(a). \tag{2}

5. Small parameters: 0<a≤13/640<a\le13/64

Here it suffices that I(a)<0I(a)<0. The circle Γa\Gamma_a has center c/a3c/a^3 and radius a−3a^{-3} and passes through ±2i\pm2i. For a≤13/64a\le13/64 one has a6⋅502<1a^6\cdot50^2<1 and c/a3>50c/a^3>50. Hence the arc of Γa\Gamma_a near the origin is the graph

x=xa(y)=a3(y2−4)c+1−a6y2,∣y∣≤50,∣dσ∣=dy1−a6y2,x=x_a(y)=\frac{a^3(y^2-4)}{c+\sqrt{1-a^6y^2}},\qquad |y|\le50,\qquad |d\sigma|=\frac{dy}{\sqrt{1-a^6y^2}},

and every other point of Γa\Gamma_a has ∣σ∣≥50|\sigma|\ge50. The integrand and the arc are symmetric under conjugation.

Tail. Let ∣σ∣≥Y>2|\sigma|\ge Y>2, let TT be the root of T−1/T=σT-1/T=\sigma with ∣T∣≥1|T|\ge1, so ∣T∣≥∣σ∣−1|T|\ge|\sigma|-1, let τ\tau be a cube root of TT, ε=τ−2\varepsilon=\tau^{-2} and e=∣ε∣=∣T∣−2/3≤(Y−1)−2/3e=|\varepsilon|=|T|^{-2/3}\le(Y-1)^{-2/3}. From (1) with a=1a=1,

g(σ)=∣T∣−2/3(A(ε)∣1+ε3∣−∣1−ε3∣−2/3),A(ε)=13∑j=02∣1+εω−2j∣,g(\sigma)=|T|^{-2/3}\left(\frac{A(\varepsilon)}{|1+\varepsilon^3|} -|1-\varepsilon^3|^{-2/3}\right),\qquad A(\varepsilon)=\frac13\sum_{j=0}^2|1+\varepsilon\omega^{-2j}|,

with ω=e2πi/3\omega=e^{2\pi i/3}. The real parts of the three terms of AA sum to three, and ∣1+w∣≤1+Re⁡w+∣w∣2/(2(1−∣w∣))|1+w|\le1+\operatorname{Re}w+|w|^2/(2(1-|w|)), so 1≤A≤1+e2/(2(1−e))1\le A\le1+e^2/(2(1-e)). With (1+e3)−2/3≥1−23e3(1+e^3)^{-2/3}\ge1-\tfrac23e^3 and (1−e3)−2/3≤(1−e3)−1(1-e^3)^{-2/3}\le(1-e^3)^{-1} this gives $|g(\sigma)|\le K|T|^{-2}\le K(|\sigma|-1)^{-2}$, where

K=max⁡{e+1/(2(1−e))1−e3+2e3, 2e1−e3},e=(Y−1)−2/3.K=\max\left\{\frac{e+1/(2(1-e))}{1-e^3}+\frac{2e}3,\ \frac{2e}{1-e^3}\right\}, \qquad e=(Y-1)^{-2/3}.

Parametrize CC by s=c−eiψs=c-e^{i\psi}. Denote the near arc by AY\mathcal A_Y; it is ∣ψ∣≤ψY|\psi|\le\psi_Y with sin⁡ψY=a3Y\sin\psi_Y=a^3Y, and on the rest ∣s∣≥a3Y|s|\ge a^3Y and ∣s∣2≥4csin⁡2(ψ/2)|s|^2\ge4c\sin^2(\psi/2). Hence

∫Γa∖AY∣dσ∣(∣σ∣−1)2≤a3(1−1/Y)2∫ψY<∣ψ∣≤πdψ∣s∣2≤a3cot⁡(ψY/2)c(1−1/Y)2≤2cY(1−1/Y)2.\int_{\Gamma_a\setminus\mathcal A_Y}\frac{|d\sigma|}{(|\sigma|-1)^2} \le\frac{a^3}{(1-1/Y)^2}\int_{\psi_Y<|\psi|\le\pi}\frac{d\psi}{|s|^2} \le\frac{a^3\cot(\psi_Y/2)}{c(1-1/Y)^2}\le\frac{2}{cY(1-1/Y)^2}.

With Y=50Y=50 this tail is at most 0.030.03 in absolute value.

Near arc. For each box a∈[k/64,(k+1)/64]a\in[k/64,(k+1)/64], 0≤k≤120\le k\le12, the program bounds 2∫050g(xa(y)+iy)(1−a6y2)−1/2dy2\int_0^{50}g(x_a(y)+iy)(1-a^6y^2)^{-1/2}dy from above, uniformly for aa in the box. On [0,2−10][0,2^{-10}] it uses ∣σ∣≤X+y|\sigma|\le X+y, with XX the largest ∣xa∣|x_a| there, so the subtracted term is at least 3[(X+2−10)1/3−X1/3]3[(X+2^{-10})^{1/3}-X^{1/3}]. On [2−2−13,2+2−13][2-2^{-13},2+2^{-13}] it uses G1(σ)=N1(σ)/(3∣σ−2i∣1/2∣σ+2i∣1/2)G_1(\sigma)=N_1(\sigma)/(3|\sigma-2i|^{1/2}|\sigma+2i|^{1/2}) with a ball enclosure of the numerator and ∣σ−2i∣≥∣y−2∣|\sigma-2i|\ge|y-2|, so that the window contributes at most the enclosure times 4⋅2−13/24\cdot2^{-13/2}. Elsewhere it sums the supremum of a ball enclosure of the integrand over each piece times the piece width. Every box gives I(a)<0I(a)<0; the largest bound is about −0.216-0.216. By (2), L(a)<L0L(a)<L_0 for 0<a≤13/640<a\le13/64.

The first parameter box includes a=0a=0 only as an enclosure of the continuous formula for xa(y)x_a(y) and its weight. The circle Γa\Gamma_a and (2) are used only for a>0a>0; at a=0a=0 the target equality is exact. The head estimate integrates the ∣y∣−2/3|y|^{-2/3} singularity rather than evaluating it at zero, and the window estimate integrates the ∣y−2∣−1/2|y-2|^{-1/2} singularity. Thus no positive lower cutoff on aa or on distance to either singularity is assumed.

6. Larger parameters: 7/512≤β≤π/27/512\le\beta\le\pi/2

Here the program bounds L(a)=2∫0πGa(c+eiθ)dθL(a)=2\int_0^\pi G_a(c+e^{i\theta})d\theta itself, uniformly for β\beta in each box, with c=cos⁡βc=\cos\beta and a3=sin⁡β/2a^3=\sin\beta/2. A window WW contains θ+=π−β\theta_+=\pi-\beta for every β\beta in the box. On it, Ga(s)=Na(s)/(3∣s−s+∣1/2∣s−s−∣1/2)G_a(s)=N_a(s)/(3|s-s_+|^{1/2}|s-s_-|^{1/2}) by (1), with ∣s−s+∣=2∣sin⁡((θ−θ+)/2)∣≥(2/π)∣θ−θ+∣|s-s_+|=2|\sin((\theta-\theta_+)/2)|\ge(2/\pi)|\theta-\theta_+| and ∫W∣θ−θ+∣−1/2dθ≤22∣W∣\int_W|\theta-\theta_+|^{-1/2}d\theta\le2\sqrt{2|W|}; so the window is bounded by the supremum of Na/(3∣s−s−∣1/2)N_a/(3|s-s_-|^{1/2}) over WW times (π/2)1/2 22∣W∣(\pi/2)^{1/2}\,2\sqrt{2|W|}. The point θ−=π+β\theta_-=\pi+\beta lies outside [0,π][0,\pi]. Off the window the program sums piece suprema of ball enclosures of (1). Starting from 300 equal boxes and bisecting any box whose bound is not below L0−1/100L_0-1/100, it covers [7/512,π/2][7/512,\pi/2] by 591 consecutive boxes, each with L(a)<L0−1/100L(a)<L_0-1/100.

The program checks 0<inf⁡W<sup⁡W<π0<\inf W<\sup W<\pi and inclusion of every possible θ+\theta_+ before accepting a window. It integrates the nonnegative density up to an upper dyadic enclosure π+≥π\pi_+\ge\pi for an upper bound. The parameter cover likewise ends at a dyadic enclosure of π/2\pi/2 from above, so it includes c=0c=0 without assuming c>0c>0. The density formula remains valid in this small extension by taking c=cos⁡βc=\cos\beta and a3=sin⁡β/2a^3=\sin\beta/2.

7. Coverage and conclusion

The program checks 7/512<arcsin⁡(2(13/64)3)7/512<\arcsin(2(13/64)^3), so the two regimes overlap and together cover 0<a≤2−1/30<a\le2^{-1/3}. Hence L(a)<L0L(a)<L_0 for every aa in that range. With Section 1, every monic cubic pp satisfies ℓ(p)≤L0\ell(p)\le L_0.

On the nonsingular pieces, every bound in Sections 5 and 6 is a finite sum of exact piece widths times enclosing endpoints of arb balls. The explicit head, window and tail estimates bound all omitted pieces. All formulas take the whole parameter box as their input, so the bound holds at every parameter in that box, rather than only at sampled values. Stopping an integration subdivision at its depth limit retains the same certified rectangle bound; a nonfinite enclosure fails. The adaptive tolerances affect only sharpness.

The square-root and cube-root choices in (1) cause no loss of coverage: either quadratic root and any cube root give the same multiset of three roots of P(z)=sP(z)=s. A fixed branch is enclosed on each input ball; the code rotates its cut when convenient. No holomorphic integration assumption is used. As a control, the program also computes a lower bound at β=1/2\beta=1/2 using lower ends on the regular pieces, omitting the singular window, and stopping at a lower dyadic enclosure π−≤π\pi_-\le\pi. Nonnegativity makes these omissions valid. The two bounds are 8.1746≤L≤8.18308.1746\le L\le8.1830.

8. Uniqueness of the maximizer

Let pp be a monic cubic of maximal length; then ℓ(p)≥L0\ell(p)\ge L_0. Translate so that p(z)=z3−3u2z+bp(z)=z^3-3u^2z+b.

If u=0u=0, Section 2 with G0(s)=∣s∣−2/3G_0(s)=|s|^{-2/3} on the circle ∣s+b∣=1|s+b|=1 gives ℓ(p)=Φ(∣b∣)\ell(p)=\Phi(|b|) when ∣b∣≤1|b|\le1 and ℓ(p)=∣b∣−2/3Φ(1/∣b∣)\ell(p)=|b|^{-2/3}\Phi(1/|b|) when ∣b∣>1|b|>1. Since b1=−1/3≠0b_1=-1/3\ne0, Φ\Phi is strictly increasing, so ℓ(p)<L0\ell(p)<L_0 unless ∣b∣=1|b|=1.

If u≠0u\ne0, the critical points ±u\pm u are simple and the critical values b∓2u3b\mp2u^3 are distinct. If both lie on the unit circle T\mathbf T, Section 1 makes pp a rotation and translation of q∣u∣q_{|u|}, and Sections 5 to 7 give ℓ(p)<L0\ell(p)<L_0, a contradiction. Otherwise use the deformation in the proof of Eremenko and Hayman's Lemma 5, which applies to every extremal polynomial: for a critical value v∉Tv\notin\mathbf T and an open disc U∋vU\ni v missing T\mathbf T and the other critical values, it gives monic polynomials pλ=ϕλ∘p∘ψλ−1p_\lambda=\phi_\lambda\circ p\circ\psi_\lambda^{-1}, ∣λ∣<ϵ|\lambda|<\epsilon, with ϕλ,ψλ\phi_\lambda,\psi_\lambda homeomorphisms, the critical value vv moved to v+λv+\lambda, the other critical value fixed, and ℓ(pλ)=ℓ(p)\ell(p_\lambda)=\ell(p). Each pλp_\lambda again has two simple critical points.

Let v∉Tv\notin\mathbf T be a critical value of pp and ww the other one. Choose a simple arc γ\gamma from vv to a point ζ∈T\zeta\in\mathbf T, ζ≠w\zeta\ne w, avoiding ww and meeting T\mathbf T only at ζ\zeta. Such an arc exists in either component of C∖T\mathbb C\setminus\mathbf T, with one point removed if necessary. The set of t∈γ∖{ζ}t\in\gamma\setminus\{\zeta\} for which some maximizer has critical values tt and ww contains vv and is relatively open by the deformation.

It is also relatively closed. Center each maximizer by translation, writing it as z3−3uj2z+bjz^3-3u_j^2z+b_j. If its critical values are tj→tt_j\to t and ww, then bj=(tj+w)/2b_j=(t_j+w)/2 and ∣uj∣3=∣w−tj∣/4|u_j|^3=|w-t_j|/4 are bounded. A subsequence converges to a monic cubic with critical values tt and ww, and its length is maximal by Lemma 4. The connectedness of γ∖{ζ}\gamma\setminus\{\zeta\} therefore gives every tt on that arc. The same compactness argument at ζ\zeta gives a maximizer with the two distinct critical values ζ\zeta and ww.

If w∉Tw\notin\mathbf T, repeat with an arc from ww to a point of T∖{ζ}\mathbf T\setminus\{\zeta\} avoiding ζ\zeta. This produces a maximizer with two distinct critical values on T\mathbf T, which the strict family inequality excludes.

Therefore every maximizer is (z−z0)3−w(z-z_0)^3-w with ∣w∣=1|w|=1. Conversely each such polynomial is a rotation and translation of z3−1z^3-1 and has length L0L_0.