We prove L43.
The source results are conditional premises from the
unrefereed manuscript;
L65
is used as stated. Natural logarithms are used throughout.
Notation
Write B=loglogx, ψ(B)=(logB−loglogB)/λ,
m=⌊ψ(B)⌋, θ(x)=ψ(B)−m and
Z(x)=xGm/logx, as in the manuscript's Equations (2.3)–(2.4). Call the
set of x with m(x)=n the n-th period. For B>e,
ψ′(B)=λB1(1−logB1)∈(0,λB1),
so θ is continuous and strictly increasing on each period, and the
mean value theorem gives
0<ψ(B(x+1))−ψ(B(x))≤λxlogxloglogx1.(1)
Let C(x) be either V(x) or V′(x), and let A(s) be correspondingly
A(1;s) or A(f0;s). Theorem 2.1 of the manuscript and L65 give
C(x)=Z(x)(A(θ(x))+o(1)),0<c−≤A(s)≤c+<∞.(2)
Each count increases by at most one from x to x+1: the interval
(x,x+1] contains one integer, which is at most one new totient and at
most one new argument of φ. Both counts tend to infinity, since
C(x)≥V′(x)≥π(x). Hence
C(x)C(x±1)⟶1.(3)
Finite coefficients have one-sided limits
Fix a sufficiently large H and f:[1,∞)→[0,1]. By the
manuscript's Lemma 6.3, the witnesses of all phases form one finite set,
and all tail totients d with a witness form a finite set. In (2.5) the
phase enters only through αs=λeλs, which is
continuous and strictly increasing, in two conditions:
0.9αshρ−h≤vh≤1.1αshρ−h for P≤h<H, and
loga≤exp(2αsPρ−P). Each condition holds for s in an
interval: the first for
vh/(1.1hρ−h)≤αs≤vh/(0.9hρ−h), the second for all
s when a≤e and otherwise for αs≥logloga/(2Pρ−P).
The remaining conditions of (2.5) do not involve s. Hence each witness is
admissible exactly on an interval of phases, and the finitely many endpoints
of these intervals cut [0,1) into finitely many open intervals and points
on each of which every witness set WH,s(d) is constant.
On such an open interval, Equation (2.8) is a finite sum of terms
cαs−Hexp(−αsγST),ST=h≥H∑ρhη∈TmaxD(h,η),
where c and the absolutely convergent ST do not depend on s: by
(2.6), D(h,η) depends only on the coordinates vl of the witness.
Each term is the restriction of a continuous function of all real s.
Therefore AH(f;⋅) is continuous outside finitely many points and has
a right limit at every s∈[0,1) and a left limit at every s∈(0,1].
Suppose AH→A uniformly on [0,1) and fix s∗∈(0,1]. Given
ε>0, choose H with sup∣AH−A∣<ε/3, and then
δ>0 such that ∣AH(t)−AH(t′)∣<ε/3 whenever
s∗−δ<t,t′<s∗. Then ∣A(t)−A(t′)∣<ε for those t,t′, so
A has a left limit at s∗ by the Cauchy criterion. Right limits are
identical. This applies to A(1;⋅) by Theorem 2.1 and to
A(f0;⋅) by L65.
Interior points
Fix s∗∈(0,1). As in the manuscript's Lemma 6.6, for each large n
there is yn with ψ(B(yn))=n+s∗, so m(yn)=n and
θ(yn)=s∗. By (1), ψ(B(yn±1))=n+s∗+o(1), so for large n
the points yn±1 lie in the n-th period and
θ(yn−1)<s∗<θ(yn+1),θ(yn±1)⟶s∗.
Within one period m=n is fixed and
Gn(B′)/Gn(B)=(B′/B)n. Since n≤ψ(B)+1≪logB and, by
dB/dx=1/(xlogx), 0<log(B(x+1)/B(x))≤1/(Bxlogx),
Z(yn)Z(yn±1)⟶1.(4)
Divide (2) at yn±1 by (2) at yn, and use (3), (4) and the bounds in
(2):
A(θ(yn±1))=A(s∗)+o(1).
The left side tends to the right limit A(s∗+) along yn+1 and to the
left limit A(s∗−) along yn−1. Hence
A(s∗−)=A(s∗)=A(s∗+), and A is continuous at s∗. The same
argument along yn+1, with s∗=0, proves right continuity at 0.
The end of a period
For each large n let xn satisfy ψ(Bn)=n, where
Bn=B(xn). Then m(xn)=n and θ(xn)=0, while (1) gives
m(xn−1)=n−1 and θ(xn−1)→1 from below. Moving the argument of
Gn−1 from B(xn−1) to Bn as in (4),
Z(xn)Z(xn−1)=(1+o(1))Gn(Bn)Gn−1(Bn)=(1+o(1))Bnngn.
The recurrence (2.2) gives gnρn→γ. Here is a direct
justification. Put F(z)=∑j≥1ajzj, analytic for ∣z∣<1 since
aj=O(log(j+1)). The generating function of gn is 1/(1−F(z)).
On ∣z∣≤ρ, the triangle inequality and positivity of every aj
show that F(z)=1 only at z=ρ. This zero of 1−F is simple.
Consequently, for some ρ<R<1,
1−F(z)1−1−z/ργ
is analytic on ∣z∣<R: the pole cancels because
γ=1/(ρF′(ρ)), and isolation of zeros leaves a larger
zero-free disk after that cancellation. Cauchy's coefficient bound on any
circle of radius r with ρ<r<R gives
gn=γρ−n+O(r−n), proving the limit.
The equation ψ(Bn)=n says
Bn=ρ−nlogBn and logBn=λn+loglogBn, so
logBn/n→λ and
Bnngn=logBnngnρn⟶λγ.(5)
Now divide (2) at xn−1 by (2) at xn and use (3) and (5):
λγA(0)+o(1)A(θ(xn−1))+o(1)⟶1.
Since θ(xn−1) tends to 1 from below and A has a left limit at
1, that limit equals (λ/γ)A(0). This holds for
A(1;⋅) and A(f0;⋅) with the same factor.
The quotient and the limit set
The denominator of q=A(f0;⋅)/A(1;⋅) is at least c−>0, so q
is continuous on [0,1), and its left limit at 1 is
(λ/γ)A(1;0)(λ/γ)A(f0;0)=q(0).
Thus q is a continuous function on R/Z. By (10) of L65,
V(x)/V′(x)=1/q(θ(x))+o(1). Every value 1/q(s) is a limit along
the exact-phase sequence of s. Conversely, if
V(xk)/V′(xk)→L, choose a subsequence with θ(xk) converging
in R/Z to some t; continuity gives L=1/q(t). The limit
set is therefore the image of the circle under the continuous function
1/q, a compact interval.
By L65, V/V′ converges if and only if q is constant. A continuous
function on the circle is the uniform limit of the Fejér means of its
Fourier series, so it is constant if and only if
q^(n)=∫01q(s)e−2πinsds=0(n=0).
For large H, uniform convergence gives AH(1;⋅)≥c−/2, so
qH=AH(f0;⋅)/AH(1;⋅) is defined, piecewise continuous, and
converges uniformly to q. Hence q^(n) is the limit of the
corresponding integrals of qH.
The boundary factor is not one
The coefficients aj=∫jj+1logtdt are strictly increasing and
grow at most logarithmically. Absolute convergence therefore permits
reindexing to give
(1−ρ)j≥1∑jajρj−j≥1∑ajρj=j≥2∑(j−1)(aj−aj−1)ρj>0.
The two sums on the left are 1/γ and 1, respectively. Hence
γ<1−ρ<−logρ=λ.
The second inequality is strict for 0<ρ<1. If A(1;⋅) were
constant, its left limit at 1 would equal A(1;0)>0, contradicting the
factor λ/γ>1.