Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
All-order density tails for triangle-free bipartization
This lead's derivations that are not drawn from a cited source are Plasma AI's, credited to Plasma AI. The same tail conclusions are stated in Ferudun's earlier preprint, as recorded below. The derivations are author-recorded at tier 0, and no independent review has examined the lead.
Target and route
Problem 23 asks whether every triangle-free graph on vertices can be made bipartite by deleting at most edges. Write for the fewest edges whose deletion makes a finite simple graph bipartite, and for its number of edges. The problem page's current assessment records the problem as open, and this lead does not change that.
Theorem 2 of Balogh, Clemen and Lidický gives, for every triangle-free graph on vertices, the bound , and the bound when or . The source gives no explicit value of . The route removes this large-order qualification, as Section 2.3 of the same paper already does for the whole conjecture, by a blow-up and Theorem 7 of Erdős, Győri and Simonovits. The blow-up replaces each vertex by an independent set of vertices and each edge by a complete bipartite graph between the corresponding sets. It is triangle-free when is, it has edges, and
Applying the theorem to for large and dividing by gives bounds for itself at every order.
Results
The homogeneous transfer page is the canonical account of the route. It proves the following.
- The blow-up identity. for every graph and every . The number of crossing edges of a cut of , divided by , is affine in each cluster's proportion on the first side, so some maximum cut keeps every cluster whole. Adding isolated vertices changes neither nor the edge count.
- The general bound. Every triangle-free on vertices has . On vertices this is , weaker than the bound the problem asks.
- The dense tail. Every triangle-free on vertices with has . Here , so the theorem applies to directly.
- The sparse tail. Every triangle-free on vertices with has , the boundary density included. The theorem is applied to with one isolated vertex adjoined, of order , whose edge count satisfies . This gives , and letting gives the bound. The isolated vertex is what permits the source's normalization at equality.
On vertices the two tails give , the answer yes to the problem's question for those graphs, at every . The transfer uses the theorem at its statement. Its source is a six-page extended abstract whose proof is a sketch with omitted computations; the source card records a claims-checked reading, and the proof is not reverified here.
Relation to Ferudun's preprint
Ferudun's unrefereed preprint of 26 June 2026 states the blow-up identity as its Lemma 2.1 and the same all-order tail bounds as its Corollary 4.2, p. 5, both boundary densities included. That corollary's proof sends the two boundary densities to the preprint's positive-error band certificate, which alone does not give the sharp bound at every order. The transfer here treats the dense boundary directly and the sparse boundary through the isolated vertex, and it does not use the certificate.
The preprint's Theorem 1.1, the bound at every density for , is a pending claim. Its integer-rounding step turns a band bound into on vertices when . The transfer page checks that elementary deduction but not the numerical certificate behind its .
Why the lead is blocked
The transfer leaves the middle band
at every order. Blow-ups preserve edge density, so repeating the transfer cannot remove this gap. A finite census is not implied either: reducing every middle-band obstruction to a bounded order would be an additional theorem, and none is supplied.
Completing the problem along this route needs a middle-band inequality with zero error, or a family of valid errors tending to zero uniformly over the band. A single positive error, such as the preprint's, only extends a finite range by integer rounding. The two tails and the exact density normalization must be kept when such a band bound is composed with them.
The middle-band lead pursues that band bound through zero-error certificates on graphons coloured by a maximum cut. It uses this lead's tails to reduce the problem to the band, and the general bound, as , in the hereditary comparison rows of its proof sketch, whose held links list the tails.
Claim and standing
The tail bounds and the general bound are Plasma AI's pending partial claim on Problem 23. They are author-recorded at tier 0, without independent review or Lean proof, and they are written arguments with no evidence program.