Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

All-order density tails for triangle-free bipartization

../


This lead's derivations that are not drawn from a cited source are Plasma AI's, credited to Plasma AI. The same tail conclusions are stated in Ferudun's earlier preprint, as recorded below. The derivations are author-recorded at tier 0, and no independent review has examined the lead.

Target and route

Problem 23 asks whether every triangle-free graph on 5n5n vertices can be made bipartite by deleting at most n2n^2 edges. Write D2(G)D_2(G) for the fewest edges whose deletion makes a finite simple graph GG bipartite, and e(G)e(G) for its number of edges. The problem page's current assessment records the problem as open, and this lead does not change that.

Theorem 2 of Balogh, Clemen and Lidický gives, for every triangle-free graph on N≥N0N\ge N_0 vertices, the bound D2(G)≤N2/23.5D_2(G)\le N^2/23.5, and the bound D2(G)≤N2/25D_2(G)\le N^2/25 when e(G)≥0.3197(N2)e(G)\ge0.3197\binom N2 or e(G)≤0.2486(N2)e(G)\le0.2486\binom N2. The source gives no explicit value of N0N_0. The route removes this large-order qualification, as Section 2.3 of the same paper already does for the whole conjecture, by a blow-up and Theorem 7 of Erdős, Győri and Simonovits. The blow-up G[t]G[t] replaces each vertex by an independent set of tt vertices and each edge by a complete bipartite graph between the corresponding sets. It is triangle-free when GG is, it has t2e(G)t^2e(G) edges, and

D2(G[t])=t2D2(G).D_2(G[t])=t^2D_2(G).

Applying the theorem to G[t]G[t] for large tt and dividing by t2t^2 gives bounds for GG itself at every order.

Results

The homogeneous transfer page is the canonical account of the route. It proves the following.

  • The blow-up identity. D2(G[t])=t2D2(G)D_2(G[t])=t^2D_2(G) for every graph GG and every t≥1t\ge1. The number of crossing edges of a cut of G[t]G[t], divided by t2t^2, is affine in each cluster's proportion on the first side, so some maximum cut keeps every cluster whole. Adding isolated vertices changes neither D2D_2 nor the edge count.
  • The general bound. Every triangle-free GG on N≥1N\ge1 vertices has D2(G)≤2N2/47D_2(G)\le2N^2/47. On N=5nN=5n vertices this is D2(G)≤(50/47)n2D_2(G)\le(50/47)n^2, weaker than the bound the problem asks.
  • The dense tail. Every triangle-free GG on N≥1N\ge1 vertices with 2e(G)/N2≥0.31972e(G)/N^2\ge0.3197 has D2(G)≤N2/25D_2(G)\le N^2/25. Here e(G[t])≥0.3197(tN)2/2≥0.3197(tN2)e(G[t])\ge0.3197(tN)^2/2\ge0.3197\binom{tN}2, so the theorem applies to G[t]G[t] directly.
  • The sparse tail. Every triangle-free GG on N≥1N\ge1 vertices with 2e(G)/N2≤0.24862e(G)/N^2\le0.2486 has D2(G)≤N2/25D_2(G)\le N^2/25, the boundary density included. The theorem is applied to G[t]G[t] with one isolated vertex adjoined, of order tN+1tN+1, whose edge count satisfies t2e(G)≤0.2486(tN+12)t^2e(G)\le0.2486\binom{tN+1}2. This gives t2D2(G)≤(tN+1)2/25t^2D_2(G)\le(tN+1)^2/25, and letting t→∞t\to\infty gives the bound. The isolated vertex is what permits the source's (N2)\binom N2 normalization at equality.

On 5n5n vertices the two tails give D2(G)≤n2D_2(G)\le n^2, the answer yes to the problem's question for those graphs, at every nn. The transfer uses the theorem at its statement. Its source is a six-page extended abstract whose proof is a sketch with omitted computations; the source card records a claims-checked reading, and the proof is not reverified here.

Relation to Ferudun's preprint

Ferudun's unrefereed preprint of 26 June 2026 states the blow-up identity as its Lemma 2.1 and the same all-order tail bounds as its Corollary 4.2, p. 5, both boundary densities included. That corollary's proof sends the two boundary densities to the preprint's positive-error band certificate, which alone does not give the sharp bound at every order. The transfer here treats the dense boundary directly and the sparse boundary through the isolated vertex, and it does not use the certificate.

The preprint's Theorem 1.1, the bound n2n^2 at every density for 1≤n≤401\le n\le40, is a pending claim. Its integer-rounding step turns a band bound 2D2(G)/N2≤2/25+δ2D_2(G)/N^2\le2/25+\delta into D2(G)≤n2D_2(G)\le n^2 on 5n5n vertices when (25/2)n2δ<1(25/2)n^2\delta<1. The transfer page checks that elementary deduction but not the numerical certificate behind its δ\delta.

Why the lead is blocked

The transfer leaves the middle band

0.2486<2e(G)N2<0.31970.2486<\frac{2e(G)}{N^2}<0.3197

at every order. Blow-ups preserve edge density, so repeating the transfer cannot remove this gap. A finite census is not implied either: reducing every middle-band obstruction to a bounded order would be an additional theorem, and none is supplied.

Completing the problem along this route needs a middle-band inequality 2D2(G)/N2≤2/252D_2(G)/N^2\le2/25 with zero error, or a family of valid errors tending to zero uniformly over the band. A single positive error, such as the preprint's, only extends a finite range by integer rounding. The two tails and the exact density normalization must be kept when such a band bound is composed with them.

The middle-band lead pursues that band bound through zero-error certificates on graphons coloured by a maximum cut. It uses this lead's tails to reduce the problem to the band, and the general bound, as 2D2(H)≤(4/47)∣V(H)∣22D_2(H)\le(4/47)|V(H)|^2, in the hereditary comparison rows of its proof sketch, whose held links list the tails.

Claim and standing

The tail bounds and the general bound are Plasma AI's pending partial claim on Problem 23. They are author-recorded at tier 0, without independent review or Lean proof, and they are written arguments with no evidence program.