Conditional-argument reading and reconstruction reviews

../

conditional_argument_grade: Pass with named corrections solely for a disclosed non-blind source reading; full findings, exact subjects and no whole-claim tier credit.

conditional_argument_reading: Full conditional checks and checklist from a disclosed non-blind source reading, with exact subject provenance and no tier-bearing acceptance.

source_reading: Exact Bhalla PDF identity, five-page visual coverage, non-blind exposure and disposable rendering instructions for the retained reading.

source_reconstruction_grade: Preserves the complete independent grade, re-review, findings and exact C1--C7 correction mapping, with documentary adjudication separately attributed.

source_reconstruction_review: Preserves the complete independent source-proof review, its attacks, findings and four required corrections, with later C1--C7 compilation decisions separately attributed.

source_reconstruction_source_reading: Names the retained Bhalla PDF, the independent review subjects and their exact native successor, and maps only the seven accepted documentary corrections.

---

The mathematical reading retains the conditional deductions, attacks and checklist. The source-reading record identifies the exact manuscript and actual visual coverage. The distinct grade is pass with named corrections solely for disclosed non-blind source-only reading. These records are not a tier-bearing whole-claim review.

The independent review and the distinct grade preserve a separate fresh-context assessment of the three reconstruction pages, each reporting faithful with corrections. The source-reading record names their exact reviewed-v1 subjects and maps the seven merged corrections to the current pages.

The lead remains unreviewed. A fresh-context whole-argument review is required before independently accepted proof coverage or stronger standing is asserted. Filing the existing record is not a new review cycle.