Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Cube extensions for every sufficiently large deletion core


Theorem. Let q≥761q\ge761 be odd. Let RR be a q×qq\times q matrix with zero diagonal and off-diagonal entries ±1\pm1. If Rp=0Rp=0 and the coordinates of pp have distinct nonzero absolute values, then pp lies in a cube-spanned subspace of dimension q−2q-2.

Here cube-spanned means spanned over R\mathbb R by vectors in {±1}q\{\pm1\}^q. This settles all sufficiently large uniform cores in the two-relation reduction. It does not prove the global extension assertion or Erdős 963. The proof does not require uniqueness of the deletion relations.

A one-large-class criterion

Suppose two normals are r=(0,1,…,1)r=(0,1,\ldots,1) and tt, where tt has coefficient 11 at the zero position of rr, coefficients 0,0,20,0,2 at three special coordinates, and ordinary coefficients with multiplicities

a at −3,b at −1,N at 1,c at 3.a\text{ at }-3,\quad b\text{ at }-1,\quad N\text{ at }1,\quad c\text{ at }3.

Put m=b+cm=b+c. If

m≥2,N≥a+m+5,(1)m\ge2,\qquad N\ge a+m+5, \tag{1}

then ker⁡r∩ker⁡t\ker r\cap\ker t is cube-spanned of dimension q−2q-2.

Fix the cube coordinate at the zero position of rr to be one. Subtract the rr equation from the tt equation, negate the first two special signs and the signs in the +3+3 class. The resulting equation on the small groups is

S−4x−2y=−1,S=s1+s2+s3,or2x+y=u=(1+S)/2,(2)S-4x-2y=-1,\qquad S=s_1+s_2+s_3, \quad\hbox{or}\quad 2x+y=u=(1+S)/2, \tag{2}

where xx sums aa signs and yy sums mm signs. If mm is even, the allowed special patterns have u=0,2u=0,2; if mm is odd, they have u=−1,1u=-1,1. In either case the four patterns form a parity tetrahedron and affinely span the three special coordinates.

For a>0a>0, the following group sums are feasible:

(a mod 2,m mod 2)u(x,y)(0,0)0(0,0)2(0,2),(2,−2)(0,1)−1(0,−1)1(0,1),(2,−3)(1,0)0(1,−2),(−1,2)2(1,0)(1,1)−1(−1,1),(1,−3)1(1,−1)\begin{array}{c|c|c} (a\bmod2,m\bmod2)&u&(x,y)\\\hline (0,0)&0&(0,0)\\ &2&(0,2),(2,-2)\\\hline (0,1)&-1&(0,-1)\\ &1&(0,1),(2,-3)\\\hline (1,0)&0&(1,-2),(-1,2)\\ &2&(1,0)\\\hline (1,1)&-1&(-1,1),(1,-3)\\ &1&(1,-1) \end{array}

Positive even aa is at least two, and odd m≥2m\ge2 is at least three, so capacities and parities hold. At one fixed special pattern, the two listed choices give an additional group-sum direction. Each group of size at least two has a mixed-sign choice; permutations generate its full zero-sum coordinate space. Together these give affine dimension a+m+2a+m+2, the full dimension of the hyperplane (2). If a=0a=0, use x=0,y=ux=0,y=u instead; the same dimension statement follows without the extra group-sum direction.

The rr equation determines the sum in the large group. For every small solution its absolute value is at most a+m+3≤N−2a+m+3\le N-2. Its parity is NN, since q=4+a+m+Nq=4+a+m+N is odd. Thus every small solution lifts with mixed signs in that group. Permutations add N−1N-1 affine dimensions, for a total of q−3q-3. Because the fixed coordinate is one, the linear span has dimension q−2q-2.

Four-wise sign balance

Choose four deletion rows. If their coordinatewise product has at least 9292 positive and 9292 negative coordinates outside the four deleted positions, the previously proved dense criterion applies.

To see this, normalize the fourth row to one outside its zero. The other three rows give eight three-bit patterns, four in each parity class. Each parity class has a pattern occurring at least 2323 times. The two selected patterns have odd Hamming distance. If their distance is one, orient the three rows so their signed sums differ by two. If their distance is three, they are antipodal; orient the rows to give signed sums 1,−11,-1. Thus two adjacent coefficient classes each have multiplicity at least 2323, as required by the dense four-row lemma.

If no quadruple is balanced

Assume no quadruple meets that criterion. Fix three indices a,b,ca,b,c, and set

fj=rajrbjrcj(j∉{a,b,c}),f_j=r_{aj}r_{bj}r_{cj}\quad(j\notin\{a,b,c\}),

choosing arbitrary signs on the three exceptional coordinates. For every other row ii, orient it so rijfjr_{ij}f_j is negative at most 9191 times outside {a,b,c,i}\{a,b,c,i\}. This is possible by the failed balance criterion. Now apply the common coordinate signing ff. Each of the q−3q-3 resulting good rows has at most

D=91+3=94D=91+3=94

negative entries. Write NiN_i for its negative support.

These supports are distinct. If Ni=NjN_i=N_j, neither set contains ii or jj, and the two rows differ by ej−eie_j-e_i. Applying them to the transformed kernel vector would equate two of its coordinates, contrary to distinct absolute values.

On the good indices, join i,ji,j when i∈Nji\in N_j or j∈Nij\in N_i. Every induced subgraph has at most DD times its number of vertices edges, so it is 2D2D-degenerate and (2D+1)(2D+1)-colorable. Since

q−3>4(2D+1)=756,q-3>4(2D+1)=756,

there is an independent set of five good indices.

Among five distinct binary sets, some four have symmetric difference of size at least two. Otherwise, writing TT for the symmetric difference of all five and Ui=T△NiU_i=T\mathbin\triangle N_i, the five UiU_i would be distinct sets of size at most one whose symmetric difference is empty. At least four are distinct singletons, which makes that impossible.

Choose four of the independent indices i,j,k,li,j,k,l with this property, and put t=ri+rj−rkt=r_i+r_j-r_k. Independence says every internal off-diagonal entry is +1+1, so

ti=tj=0,tk=2,tl=1.t_i=t_j=0,\quad t_k=2,\quad t_l=1.

Normalize rlr_l to one outside ll; its zero coordinate may be left unchanged. The special coefficients do not change. Let a,b,N,ca,b,N,c denote the ordinary multiplicities of −3,−1,1,3-3,-1,1,3. The normalized coefficient is −1-1 or 33 exactly when the four-row product is negative. None of the five selected indices belongs to any of their negative supports. Consequently

m=b+c=∣Ni△Nj△Nk△Nl∣≥2.m=b+c=|N_i\triangle N_j\triangle N_k\triangle N_l|\ge2.

Outside the union of these four negative supports, every ordinary coefficient is one. Hence

N≥q−4−4D,a+m≤4D.N\ge q-4-4D,\qquad a+m\le4D.

The assumption q≥8D+9=761q\ge8D+9=761 implies N≥a+m+5N\ge a+m+5. Criterion (1) proves the theorem. All constructed normals are linear combinations of transformed rows of RR, so their common kernel contains the transformed pp; undoing coordinate signs preserves cube-spannedness.

The size-five core is impossible

A zero-diagonal sign relation matrix on five distinct nonzero absolute coordinates cannot have such a kernel vector. Change coordinate signs and sort it as 0<a<b<c<d<e0<a<b<c<d<e. A signed relation on four ordered positive values x<y<z<wx<y<z<w requires w=y+z±xw=y+z\pm x. Applying this to deletion of ee and dd, and using d<ed<e, gives

d=b+c−a,e=b+c+a.d=b+c-a,\qquad e=b+c+a.

Deletion of cc gives either a=ba=b or b=3ab=3a. In the latter case d=c+2ad=c+2a and e=c+4ae=c+4a. Deletion of bb then gives either c=ac=a or c=3a=bc=3a=b, again impossible.

Thus the uniform-core extension question remains only at odd sizes 7≤q≤7597\le q\le759. This is a bounded range of sizes, not a checked finite certificate for all those configurations. Moreover, even settling every such core would not establish the unrestricted global cube-extension assertion.