Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Two-relation cube lifts and the uniform-core gap


The global assertion in the lift note remains unproved. The following gives a new sufficient condition for a cube-spanned extension of codimension two. It does not supply successive compatible quotients or prove Erdős 963.

Two relations with more than a one-coordinate exchange

Theorem. Let r,s∈{−1,0,1}nr,s\in\{-1,0,1\}^n have even supports A,BA,B. If a=∣A∖B∣a=|A\setminus B| and b=∣B∖A∣b=|B\setminus A| are positive and (a,b)≠(1,1)(a,b)\ne(1,1), then ker⁡r∩ker⁡s\ker r\cap\ker s is spanned by sign-cube vertices and has dimension n−2n-2.

After individual coordinate sign changes, the nonzero columns of the two-row matrix have types

(1,0),(0,1),(1,1),(1,−1),(1,0),\quad(0,1),\quad(1,1),\quad(1,-1),

with multiplicities a,b,c,da,b,c,d. The rows are independent because a,b>0a,b>0. Zero columns supply free coordinates and may be omitted from the argument. For a cube solution, write x,yx,y for its sums in the last two groups. The other group sums are −x−y,−x+y-x-y,-x+y, so the feasible group sums satisfy

∣x∣≤c,∣y∣≤d,∣x+y∣≤a,∣x−y∣≤b,x≡c,y≡d(mod2).(1)|x|\le c,\quad |y|\le d,\quad |x+y|\le a,\quad |x-y|\le b, \qquad x\equiv c,\quad y\equiv d\pmod2. \tag{1}

Even row supports give a≡b≡c+d(mod2)a\equiv b\equiv c+d\pmod2.

The following feasible choices span all the available group-sum degrees of freedom. A choice involving a positive even coordinate is omitted if that group is empty.

  • If a,b,c,da,b,c,d are even, use (0,0),(2,0),(0,2)(0,0),(2,0),(0,2); here a,b≥2a,b\ge2.
  • If a,ba,b are even and c,dc,d odd, use (±1,±1)(\pm1,\pm1).
  • If a,b≥3a,b\ge3 are odd, interchange c,dc,d if needed so that cc is odd and dd even. Use (±1,0)(\pm1,0) and (±1,±2)(\pm1,\pm2).
  • If a=1,b≥3a=1,b\ge3, with cc odd and dd even, use (1,0),(−1,0),(1,−2),(−1,2)(1,0),(-1,0),(1,-2),(-1,2). Row interchange and sign changes give the remaining cases.

These same choices give a mixed-sign solution in every group of size at least two: use zero in an even common group and ±1\pm1 in an odd common group; use group sum zero in an even exclusive group and ±1\pm1 in an odd exclusive group of size at least three. Permuting a mixed-sign solution inside that group shows that differences of cube solutions span its entire zero-sum coordinate subspace. Together with the group-sum degrees of freedom and the free zero columns, this proves the theorem.

Exact reduction in codimension two

Let U⊂RnU\subset\mathbb R^n be rational, admit an all-odd integer point, and have distinct nonzero coordinate functions up to sign. Suppose dU≤n−2d_U\le n-2, in the notation of the global lift note. Consider the inclusion-minimal supports of nonzero ternary vectors in U⊥U^\perp. All have even cardinality. Their total intersection is empty, since deleting any coordinate leaves a dependent (n−1)(n-1)-set.

If two minimal supports differ by more than one coordinate on either side, the theorem gives a cube-spanned (n−2)(n-2)-space containing UU. Otherwise every pair differs by exactly one exchange. All supports therefore have one common even size kk and form a clique in the Johnson graph. Such a clique either consists of sets containing a fixed (k−1)(k-1)-set, or of sets contained in a fixed (k+1)(k+1)-set KK.

For completeness, write two members as X∪{i}X\cup\{i\} and X∪{j}X\cup\{j\}. Every other member either contains XX, or contains i,ji,j and all but one element of XX. If the latter kind occurs, no member X∪{t}X\cup\{t\} with t∉{i,j}t\notin\{i,j\} can occur; hence all members lie in X∪{i,j}X\cup\{i,j\}. This proves the stated alternative.

The common-intersection alternative is impossible here. Empty total intersection in the second alternative forces all the supports

K∖{i},i∈K.(2)K\setminus\{i\},\qquad i\in K. \tag{2}

Write q=∣K∣=k+1q=|K|=k+1, which is odd and at least five, since a two-term relation would identify two coordinates up to sign. The corresponding qq relation rows form a zero-diagonal {±1}\{\pm1\}-matrix. Every principal (q−1)(q-1)-minor reduces modulo two to I+JI+J of even order, hence is invertible. Its rank is therefore q−1q-1, since the given odd point lies in its kernel. Thus the coordinate projection U∣KU|_K is an odd rational line, with distinct nonzero absolute coordinates.

On KK each support in (2) has a unique relation up to reversal: half the difference of two other orientations would be a smaller nonzero ternary relation. Odd parity excludes a full-qq-support relation. Consequently the remaining scalar problem is precisely:

If an odd qq-vector pp has exactly qq antipodal pairs of nonzero ternary relations, one omitting each coordinate, must pp lie in a cube-spanned space of dimension at most q−2q-2?

This is unproved. A solution on KK would suffice: add the n−qn-q outside coordinates freely. The product of a nonzero cube-spanned space with Rn−q\mathbb R^{n-q} is again cube-spanned, by varying the added signs and using their negatives.

Why three relation rows cannot repair a uniform core

Choose three deletion relations and let RR be their matrix, with special zero coordinates i,j,ki,j,k. All remaining entries are ±1\pm1. The principal-minor argument above implies that these rows are independent. For a cube vertex ε=1−2z\varepsilon=\mathbf1-2z,

Rε/2≡R1/2+(I+J)(zi,zj,zk)T+t1(mod2),(3)R\varepsilon/2\equiv R\mathbf1/2+ (I+J)(z_i,z_j,z_k)^{\mathsf T}+t\mathbf1\pmod2, \tag{3}

where tt is the parity of the other zz-coordinates.

Only rational projective lines need consideration: on any other line, every integer cube image RεR\varepsilon is zero, leaving span dimension at most q−3q-3. Fix a rational line with primitive integer generator vv. If RεR\varepsilon belongs to it, then Rε/2∈ZvR\varepsilon/2\in\mathbb Zv. The image of I+JI+J on F23\mathbb F_2^3 is the even-weight plane, which does not contain 1\mathbf1. Its intersection with an affine translate of span⁡{1,vˉ}\operatorname{span}\{\mathbf1,\bar v\} has dimension at most one. Equation (3) consequently restricts the special sign triples to at most two antipodal pairs.

Two antipodal pairs in {±1}3\{\pm1\}^3 always share an equation εa=±εb\varepsilon_a=\pm\varepsilon_b for some two coordinates. The span of the whole projective-line group therefore forces that same equality. It cannot contain pp, whose absolute coordinates are distinct. Thus no two-dimensional relation space inside the span of these three rows gives the required cube-spanned annihilator. At least four deletion relations must be involved in this repair.

A sufficient four-row condition

There is a proved construction when four rows have sufficiently rich sign patterns. Choose distinct i,j,k,li,j,k,l and put t=ri±rj±rkt=r_i\pm r_j\pm r_k. Change coordinate signs so that rlr_l is 11 at every coordinate other than ll. The coefficients of tt are odd, in {−3,−1,1,3}\{-3,-1,1,3\}, at the ordinary coordinates outside {i,j,k,l}\{i,j,k,l\}; they are in {−2,0,2}\{-2,0,2\} at i,j,ki,j,k, and tl∈{±1,±3}t_l\in\{\pm1,\pm3\}.

Sufficient condition. If two adjacent ordinary coefficient classes b0,b1=b0+2b_0,b_1=b_0+2 each have multiplicity at least 2323, then ker⁡rl∩ker⁡t\ker r_l\cap\ker t is cube-spanned of dimension q−2q-2.

To prove this, fix εl=1\varepsilon_l=1. Choose the other three special signs, and choose a sum in each ordinary class other than the two large classes. In an even-sized class use 0,±20,\pm2, and in an odd-sized class use ±1\pm1; an empty class is omitted. The sums x0,x1x_0,x_1 in the two large classes must solve

x0+x1=U,b0x0+b1x1=V,x_0+x_1=U,\qquad b_0x_0+b_1x_1=V,

where ∣U∣≤7|U|\le7 and ∣V∣≤21|V|\le21. Thus ∣x0∣,∣x1∣≤21|x_0|,|x_1|\le21.

The parity of UU is automatically the sum of the two large class sizes. Requiring x1x_1 to have its prescribed parity is one congruence modulo four,

V−b0U≡2m1(mod4).V-b_0U\equiv2m_1\pmod4.

The three special signs have odd coefficients in this congruence. Changing any one of them switches its residue by two; therefore exactly four of their eight patterns satisfy it. These four form a parity tetrahedron and affinely span three dimensions. The choices in other ordinary classes do not affect the congruence, because their coefficients b−b0b-b_0 are even and their allowed sums differ by two.

Every chosen pattern is feasible in the two large classes, with mixed signs, since their sizes are at least 2323. Independent variations of the other class sums and the four special patterns span the full affine space of group sums satisfying the two equations. Permutations in each nontrivial group supply its zero-sum subspace, as in the two-relation theorem. The resulting cube vertices with εl=1\varepsilon_l=1 affinely span dimension q−3q-3; their linear span has dimension q−2q-2. This proves the condition.

What remains is to guarantee such a four-row choice or handle the sparse-pattern cases. No such general argument is established.

A second four-row criterion for a sparse pattern

There is also a small-multiplicity case, requiring no large classes. Let q=a+b+4q=a+b+4 be odd. Suppose, after coordinate sign changes and relabeling, that

r=(0,1,…,1),r=(0,1,\ldots,1),

and tt has entry 11 in the first coordinate, entries 0,0,20,0,2 at three special coordinates, and respectively aa entries −1-1 and bb entries 11 elsewhere. If a≥1a\ge1 and b≥2b\ge2, then

ker⁡r∩ker⁡tis cube-spanned of dimension q−2.(4)\ker r\cap\ker t \quad\text{is cube-spanned of dimension }q-2. \tag{4}

The first entry of tt may instead be −1-1, by changing that coordinate's sign.

Fix the first cube coordinate to 11, call the three special signs s1,s2,s3s_1,s_2,s_3, and let x−,x+x_-,x_+ be the sums in the two ordinary groups. The equations give

x−=(1+s3−s1−s2)/2,x+=(−1−3s3−s1−s2)/2.x_-=(1+s_3-s_1-s_2)/2,\qquad x_+=(-1-3s_3-s_1-s_2)/2.

For even aa, the following four choices are feasible, since a≥2a\ge2 and b≥3b\ge3 is odd:

(s1,s2,s3)(x−,x+)(1,1,1)(0,−3)(−1,−1,1)(2,−1)(1,−1,−1)(0,1)(−1,1,−1)(0,1).\begin{array}{c|c} (s_1,s_2,s_3)&(x_-,x_+)\\\hline (1,1,1)&(0,-3)\\ (-1,-1,1)&(2,-1)\\ (1,-1,-1)&(0,1)\\ (-1,1,-1)&(0,1). \end{array}

For odd aa, use the following choices; here b≥2b\ge2 is even:

(s1,s2,s3)(x−,x+)(1,−1,1)(1,−2)(−1,1,1)(1,−2)(1,1,−1)(−1,0)(−1,−1,−1)(1,2).\begin{array}{c|c} (s_1,s_2,s_3)&(x_-,x_+)\\\hline (1,-1,1)&(1,-2)\\ (-1,1,1)&(1,-2)\\ (1,1,-1)&(-1,0)\\ (-1,-1,-1)&(1,2). \end{array}

In either case the four special triples affinely span three dimensions. Every ordinary group of size at least two has a mixed-sign realization among the choices; permutations generate its full zero-sum coordinate subspace. The affine span therefore has dimension 3+(a−1)+(b−1)=q−33+(a-1)+(b-1)=q-3. Since the first coordinate is 11, the linear span has dimension q−2q-2, proving (4).

Arranging the three special coefficients

For any four deletion rows, designate rlr_l. Some signed sum tt of the other three has one of the following patterns at their three zero coordinates:

  • all three coefficients are zero; or
  • exactly one coefficient is ±2\pm2, the other two are zero, and ∣tl∣=1|t_l|=1.

Indeed, canceling each of the three special coefficients imposes a prescribed product on one pair of row-orientation signs. If the three constraints are compatible, satisfy them all. If they are incompatible, six of the eight orientations satisfy exactly two constraints. Independently, six orientations give ∣tl∣=1|t_l|=1. At least four orientations meet both conditions.

This controls the special coordinates but not the ordinary ±1,±3\pm1,\pm3 classes. The new large-core theorem supplies a further criterion and proves that a criterion always applies when q≥761q\ge761. Smaller cores and the global extension theorem remain unresolved.

A checked uniform seven-point example

The known set {3,15,31,33,35,41,55}\{3,15,31,33,35,41,55\} does have a five-generator full-sign cover, with external generators 1,7,10,12,251,7,10,12,25:

3=−1+7+10+12−25,15=−1−7+10−12+25,31=1+7+10−12+25,33=−1+7−10+12+25,35=1+7−10+12+25,41=1−7+10+12+25,55=1+7+10+12+25.\begin{array}{rcl} 3&=&-1+7+10+12-25,\\ 15&=&-1-7+10-12+25,\\ 31&=&1+7+10-12+25,\\ 33&=&-1+7-10+12+25,\\ 35&=&1+7-10+12+25,\\ 41&=&1-7+10+12+25,\\ 55&=&1+7+10+12+25. \end{array}

This resolves that example only. Neither the uniform-core assertion nor the unrestricted global extension statement follows from it.

Criterion (4) gives a direct four-row construction for the same example. The two normals

r=(0,1,−1,−1,1,−1,1),t=(−1,0,−1,0,−1,−1,2)r=(0,1,-1,-1,1,-1,1),\qquad t=(-1,0,-1,0,-1,-1,2)

annihilate p=(3,15,31,33,35,41,55)p=(3,15,31,33,35,41,55). Orient each deletion relation to have its first nonzero coefficient positive. Then rr omits 33, and tt is the relation omitting 1515, minus those omitting 3333 and 5555. Multiplying the coordinates by (−1,1,−1,−1,1,−1,1)(-1,1,-1,-1,1,-1,1) transforms the normals to

r′=(0,1,1,1,1,1,1),t′=(1,0,1,0,−1,1,2).r'=(0,1,1,1,1,1,1),\qquad t'=(1,0,1,0,-1,1,2).

Thus a=1,b=2a=1,b=2 in (4). This explains the successful small example without asserting that its pattern must occur in other cores.