Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Erdős 699: index 12 is effective


This is a retained earlier research note. The current reading guide gives the latest status and distinguishes completed proofs from remaining cases.

P699 research · Erdős problem 699 · Interpolation nonvanishing

Simpler follow-up. The off-diagonal line-product proof proves the same effectivity statement using one explicit degree-72 polynomial, with algebraic term 1084510^{845}. The first proof below remains valid.

Theorem. There is an effectively computable integer N12N_{12} such that no bad triple (n,12,j)(n,12,j) has n≥N12n\ge N_{12}, for the original threshold p≥12p\ge12. Thus the entire index-twelve case reduces to a computable finite set.

The proof is retained in the checker and its certificate data. It uses twelve integer polynomial certificates. This establishes effectivity; it does not yet exclude every row below the resulting bound. Some pair-source thresholds are effective constants whose numerical values have not been evaluated here.

Subsequent complete result. The numerical tail and finite certificates exclude this entire index. The effective proof below is retained as an earlier step.

Two asymmetric pair estimates

Choose rp∈{0,…,11}r_p\in\{0,\ldots,11\} maximizing vp(n−rp)v_p(n-r_p) for each p∈{2,3,5,7,11}p\in\{2,3,5,7,11\}, and write

n−rp=Ppup,Pp=pvp(n−rp),h=n−11.n-r_p=P_pu_p,\qquad P_p=p^{v_p(n-r_p)},\qquad h=n-11.

The useful new estimates are the alternatives

u2>h.375oru7>h.123,(1)u_2>h^{.375}\quad\text{or}\quad u_7>h^{.123}, \tag{1} u2>h.248oru11>h.133.(2)u_2>h^{.248}\quad\text{or}\quad u_{11}>h^{.133}. \tag{2}

They hold above effective thresholds. All terminating decimals in this note denote exact rational numbers. The directed source checker proves (1) from

49−3⋅16=1,s=53/31,log⁡L1=.510598,49-3\cdot16=1,\qquad s=53/31,\qquad \log L_1=.510598,

and (2) from

13⋅512−5⋅1331=1,s=80/39,log⁡L1=.694514.13\cdot512-5\cdot1331=1,\qquad s=80/39,\qquad \log L_1=.694514.

In each case the retained BFT coefficient-gcd formula gives log⁡L(s)>log⁡L1\log L(s)>\log L_1 with a strictly positive, certified margin. BFT Theorem 2.2 consequently gives an effective starting value for the coefficient-gcd estimate. The same asymmetric integral-block argument used in the earlier pair table then gives (1) and (2). Their limiting endpoints are, respectively,

(.3756069008…,.1235534798…),(.2484849136…,.1333949827…).(.3756069008\ldots,.1235534798\ldots),\qquad (.2484849136\ldots,.1333949827\ldots).

The nonunit coefficients in these seeds matter. Maximizing only a common exponent for both cofactors misses useful alternatives of this kind. The source note also records rational-block refinements, but (1) and (2) already suffice for this whole-index argument.

Complete position division

Together with the retained old pair estimates, (1) and (2) give seventeen pair alternatives. Their exact disjunction has thirty-eight componentwise minimal witnessing vectors vv: for every sufficiently large row, at least one vector satisfies up≥hvpu_p\ge h^{v_p} for all five primes. The checker regenerates those vectors from the source edges.

A polynomial certificate assigns an integer row multiplicity mtm_t to t∈{0,…,11}t\in\{0,\ldots,11\}. A singleton selected position for prime pp has capacity 1−vp1-v_p. When several primes share a position, their selected prime powers have product dividing n−rn-r, so their whole group has capacity at most one.

Three certificates handle the following uniform cases:

  • repeated selected positions;
  • five distinct positions other than {0,1,2,3,4}\{0,1,2,3,4\};
  • the remaining thirty-two witness vectors, at arbitrary positions.

Their row multiplicities are nonincreasing. Rearrangement therefore puts the largest capacities at the earliest available rows. In the second case the worst available position set is {0,1,2,3,5}\{0,1,2,3,5\}. For repeated positions, the checker enumerates the set partitions of the five labeled primes and uses capacity one for each nonsingleton group. These comparisons cover all twelve possible positions, not merely the first five.

This leaves six actual, prime-labeled witness vectors and the 120120 permutations assigning each to {0,1,2,3,4}\{0,1,2,3,4\}. These 720720 cases are treated individually. Applicable AP and equal-sum product alternatives from the retained product bounds are used to reduce certificate sizes. Each such rule is checked against its actual prime positions, and every branch is retained. No implication between differently labeled vectors is inferred from sorted prefix sums.

Nine further certificates cover all these branches. Twenty-five of the 720720 position cases use additional product alternatives, giving 893893 position-certificate applications. Together with the 1,9381,938 collision partition cases and the uniform distinct-position cases, the exact checker verifies 2,9012,901 applications. The smallest gain is 3/50003/5000.

The modular calculations establish the polynomial hypotheses separately. The largest matrix has 24,02224,022 rows and 24,02524,025 columns; it has full row rank modulo 251251.

Polynomial divisibility and a computable bound

Let c=n−jc=n-j, so 12<j≤c12<j\le c. A certificate specifies

H(X,Y)=∏a=011((X−a)(Y−a))ha,Rxy=max⁡{0,mx+y−hx−hy}(x+y<12).H(X,Y)=\prod_{a=0}^{11}((X-a)(Y-a))^{h_a},\qquad R_{xy}=\max\{0,m_{x+y}-h_x-h_y\}\quad(x+y<12).

The coordinate factor H(j,c)H(j,c) is nonzero. For each nonempty residual scheme, a degree-dd symmetric jet matrix has full row rank modulo 251251, hence over Q\mathbb Q. The jet nonvanishing lemma supplies a finite family of integer residual polynomials of degree at most d+1d+1, at least one of which is nonzero at (j,c)(j,c) whenever n>11n>11. Multiplying by HH gives a nonzero F(j,c)F(j,c) with all prescribed row multiplicities. For a line-only certificate use F=HF=H.

Write D=2∑ha+max⁡(0,d+1)D=2\sum h_a+\max(0,d+1) and M=∑mtM=\sum m_t. Badness and Kummer's formula imply

∏t=011Qtmt∣F(j,c),\prod_{t=0}^{11}Q_t^{m_t}\mid F(j,c),

where QtQ_t is the part of n−tn-t supported on primes at least twelve. The contribution from any smaller prime away from its selected position is bounded using

vp(n−t)≤vp(∣t−rp∣)(t≠rp).v_p(n-t)\le v_p(|t-r_p|)\qquad(t\ne r_p).

The total such contribution is at most (11!)max⁡mt(11!)^{\max m_t}. Consequently, if CtC_t denotes the appropriate singleton or group capacity, the certificate gain is

η=M−D−∑tCtmt.(3)\eta=M-D-\sum_t C_t m_t. \tag{3}

Every gain in the complete case division is strictly positive. The factors n−tn-t and the source height h=n−11h=n-11 differ from nn by bounded additive terms. For a computable elementary threshold depending only on the certificate, their combined correction is at least 1/21/2. It follows that every sufficiently large bad row satisfies

nη≤2 ∥F∥1(11!)max⁡mt.(4)n^\eta\le 2\,\|F\|_1(11!)^{\max m_t}. \tag{4}

The coefficient on the right is computably bounded without constructing large rational kernels. If the symmetric jet matrix has rr rows, every entry is at most 2⋅12d2\cdot12^d in absolute value. A nonzero maximal minor and its adjugate give an explicit rational right inverse, and hence an explicit integer nonvanishing family. The checker retains a conservative integer power of ten bounding the right side of (4), obtained from Hadamard's determinant bound and the coordinate factor HH.

For example, with r<105r<10^5 and d<1000d<1000, it is enough to take

E=r(2max⁡(d,0)+7)+3∑aha+8max⁡tmt+9,E=r(2\max(d,0)+7)+3\sum_a h_a+8\max_t m_t+9,

so that the right side of (4) is less than 10E10^E. Thus n<10E/ηn<10^{E/\eta} for the applicable certificate. Taking the maximum of these finitely many explicit algebraic bounds, the elementary correction thresholds, and the effective pair/product source thresholds produces N12N_{12}. The algebraic part of the certificate has the evaluated bound n<103 643 130 001n<10^{3\,643\,130\,001} once its source hypotheses hold. The product thresholds have also been evaluated; some pair-source thresholds remain effective but unevaluated, so this is not claimed as the full numerical stopping bound.

The retained modular ranks and exact positive gains are finite certificates of this argument. Neither a binomial-row search nor an assumption about unverified numerical QP solutions enters the theorem.