Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Fano classification extension


This improves the n<30k/17n<30k/17 classification in Coding refinement, but does not improve the unrestricted upper bound for Problem 644. It classifies the degree-four points in a hypothetical bad seven-tuple, not an arbitrary ambient family.

The fractional matching input

We use the following case of Füredi's fractional matching theorem: an intersecting 3-uniform hypergraph containing no Fano plane has fractional transversal number at most two. More generally, a qq-uniform hypergraph containing no projective plane of uniformity qq has τ∗≤(q−1)ν\tau^*\le(q-1)\nu.

The latter statement was checked in the proof of Proposition 2.4, p. 8, of Aharoni--Zerbib, A generalization of Tuza's conjecture, arXiv:1611.07497v7, where it is attributed to Füredi, Maximum degree and fractional matchings in uniform hypergraphs, Combinatorica 1 (1981), 155--162. Only the intersecting, 3-uniform specialization is needed below.

Exact classification below nine fifths

Theorem. Let A1,…,A7A_1,\ldots,A_7 be kk-subsets of an nn-point set, with no transversal of size at most two. If

n<95k,(1)n<\frac95k, \tag{1}

then the degree-four spectra of the tuple are exactly the seven caps of a Fano plane on its row indices, and every cap occurs.

Proof. Since n<2kn<2k, any two rows intersect. A point occurring in at least five rows could therefore be supplemented by one point meeting the remaining at-most-two rows. Thus every point has degree at most four. Put

D=4n−7k,N={v:deg⁡(v)<4}.D=4n-7k,\qquad N=\{v:\deg(v)<4\}.

The incidence count gives

D=∑v(4−deg⁡(v)),∣N∣≤D.(2)D=\sum_v(4-\deg(v)),\qquad |N|\le D. \tag{2}

For each degree-four point, take the triple of row indices it misses. The collection JJ of these triples is intersecting: two disjoint missing triples would give a two-point transversal. It is nonempty, since otherwise 7k≤3n7k\le3n, contrary to (1).

Suppose JJ has no Fano plane. The fractional matching theorem gives nonnegative weights y1,…,y7y_1,\ldots,y_7 with total at most two, and with ∑i∈Lyi≥1\sum_{i\in L}y_i\ge1 for each L∈JL\in J. Summing over the degree-four points, and noting that row ii misses precisely n−kn-k ground points, gives

n−∣N∣≤∑i=17yi ∣{v:deg⁡(v)=4, v∉Ai}∣≤2(n−k).(3)n-|N| \le\sum_{i=1}^7 y_i\,|\{v:\deg(v)=4,\ v\notin A_i\}| \le2(n-k). \tag{3}

But (2) implies n−∣N∣≥7k−3nn-|N|\ge7k-3n. Together with (3), this yields 9k≤5n9k\le5n, contradicting (1).

Hence JJ contains all lines of a Fano plane. No additional triple can intersect all seven lines. Indeed, represent a nonline triple by linearly independent nonzero vectors a,b,c∈F23a,b,c\in\mathbb F_2^3; the line {a+b,a+c,b+c}\{a+b,a+c,b+c\} is disjoint from it. Since JJ is intersecting, it consists of exactly the seven Fano lines. Taking complements proves the theorem. □\square

Consequence for threefold symmetric differences

The spectrum count in Coding refinement now applies throughout (1). A degree-three spectrum cannot be a Fano line, since its complementary cap occurs. For each Fano line LL, put XL=△i∈LAiX_L=\mathop{\triangle}_{i\in L}A_i. The numbers of lines meeting a spectrum oddly, for degrees 0,1,2,3,40,1,2,3,4, are respectively 0,3,4,3,00,3,4,3,0, where the degree-three case is a nonline and the degree-four case a cap. Each count is at most three times the corresponding deficiency 4−deg⁡(v)4-\deg(v). Therefore

∑L∣XL∣≤3D,min⁡L∣XL∣≤37(4n−7k).(4)\sum_{L}|X_L|\le3D, \qquad \min_L|X_L|\le\frac37(4n-7k). \tag{4}

In particular, for an arbitrary kk-uniform family on n<9k/5n<9k/5 points, the sufficient condition

min⁡A,B,C∈H∣A△B△C∣>37(4n−7k)(5)\min_{A,B,C\in\mathcal H}|A\triangle B\triangle C| >\frac37(4n-7k) \tag{5}

implies P7P_7. Repetitions are allowed in the minimum.

This extends the validity range of the sufficient criterion, not the range of the polynomial obstruction or narrow-ground upper bound in Forbidden distances: their separate entropy estimate still has its stated hypotheses. Neither (1) nor (5) establishes either unrestricted asymptotic assertion.