Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Coding refinement


This page proves a stronger sufficient affine-code criterion for the local seven-edge property than the sevenfold-XOR criterion in Certificates and obstructions. It also proves that the stronger criterion still cannot give an asymptotic counterexample in its stated range.

Fano classification extension extends the classification and sufficient threefold-XOR criterion to n<9k/5n<9k/5, using Füredi's fractional matching theorem. The polynomial obstruction below retains its own narrower entropy hypotheses.

Scope. These are obstructions to particular sufficient conditions. They do not prove the conjectured upper bound for arbitrary affine-code families satisfying the local property, or for arbitrary set families. No counterexample to Problem 644 is obtained.

Comparison with the independent input. Sections 7.2–7.5 of first independent record have been checked. Its sevenfold-XOR lemma is valid, but the exact obstruction in Certificates and obstructions already forces τ≤⌈3k/4⌉\tau\le\lceil3k/4\rceil under that criterion, even for specially structured codes; the independent random-code entropy diagnostic is therefore weaker. Its conditional Fano-line XOR estimate is also correct. The missing classification is supplied below for D=4n−7k<k/17D=4n-7k<k/17, and the later polynomial argument excludes an asymptotic improvement by the refined distance criterion throughout that range. Neither conclusion extends to arbitrary coding criteria or asserts that the classification holds for larger deficiency.

The same comparison applies to the checked §§6.3–6.4 of second independent record. Its condition that the linear code contain a word of weight exactly k+d−1k+d-1 is sufficient for the stated covering loss, but existence of that particular word is not needed by the forbidden-interval argument below. The later nonlinear forbidden-distance theorem removes affine closure from this obstruction as well. The record's robust-classification gap is therefore filled only in the displayed narrow-deficiency range, while its weaker sevenfold-XOR route is excluded outright.

Exact Fano structure sufficiently close to the threshold

Comparison with the third record. Its §9 correctly leaves the code construction unproved, but the present notes have progressed beyond its small-deficiency discussion. The checked fractional-matching argument classifies all degree-four spectra whenever n<9k/5n<9k/5, equivalently D=4n−7k<k/5D=4n-7k<k/5. The threefold-XOR bound then holds throughout that range. This does not extend the separate polynomial/entropy obstruction below beyond its stated n≤30k/17n\le30k/17 range. The nonlinear forbidden-distance argument already rules out that sufficient distance criterion in the latter range, more strongly than the input's heuristic random-code entropy comparison. Distinct-seven XOR separately excludes a total-XOR avoidance criterion for 7k/4≤n<2k7k/4\le n<2k. None rules out every code-defined family satisfying P7P_7.

Let A1,…,A7A_1,\ldots,A_7 be kk-subsets of an nn-point set, with no two-point transversal. Suppose

n<3017k.(1)n<\frac{30}{17}k. \tag{1}

The degree of a point is its number of containing sets, and its spectrum is the corresponding subset of [7][7]. Every degree is at most four: a point of degree at least five, together with a point in the intersection of the at most two remaining sets, would be a transversal. Here n<2kn<2k guarantees that any two sets intersect.

Put

D=4n−7k=∑v(4−deg⁡v).D=4n-7k=\sum_v(4-\deg v).

In particular D≥0D\ge0. Call the degree-four points standard and let NN be the other points. Then

∣N∣≤D,D<k/17.(2)|N|\le D,\qquad D<k/17. \tag{2}

We prove that the spectra of the standard points are exactly the seven complements of the lines of a Fano plane on [7][7], with every one of these spectra occurring. This adapts the good-pair argument in Claims 2–5 of Section 2 of the supplied 1999 paper; all estimates needed here are proved below.

Write aij=∣Ai∩Aj∣a_{ij}=|A_i\cap A_j| and m=max⁡i≠jaijm=\max_{i\ne j}a_{ij}. For every ii,

∑j≠iaij=∑v∈Ai(deg⁡v−1)≥3k−D.(3)\sum_{j\ne i}a_{ij} =\sum_{v\in A_i}(\deg v-1) \ge 3k-D. \tag{3}

Hence m≥k/2−D/6m\ge k/2-D/6. Choose a maximum pair, say a12=ma_{12}=m. The number of points outside its union is at least

n−2k+m≥k/4+D/12>D,n-2k+m\ge k/4+D/12>D,

so there is a standard point outside A1∪A2A_1\cup A_2. Its missing spectrum has the form {1,2,r}\{1,2,r\}. Necessarily

Ar∩A1∩A2=∅,(4)A_r\cap A_1\cap A_2=\varnothing, \tag{4}

because a point of this triple intersection would complete a two-point transversal.

If another standard point outside A1∪A2A_1\cup A_2 had missing triple {1,2,s}\{1,2,s\}, s≠rs\ne r, then both ArA_r and AsA_s would avoid A1∩A2A_1\cap A_2. Consequently

∣Ar∩As∣≥2k−n+m>m,|A_r\cap A_s|\ge2k-n+m>m,

a contradiction. Thus all standard points outside the union miss ArA_r. Together with (4), this gives

Ar⊆(A1△A2)∪N,A_r\subseteq(A_1\triangle A_2)\cup N,

and therefore

m≤k+D2.(5)m\le\frac{k+D}{2}. \tag{5}

Using (3) and (5), every pair satisfies

aij≥3k−D−5m≥k2−7D2.(6)a_{ij}\ge3k-D-5m\ge\frac{k}{2}-\frac{7D}{2}. \tag{6}

For any pair i,ji,j, its outside region consequently has size at least

n−2k+aij≥k4−13D4>D.n-2k+a_{ij}\ge\frac{k}{4}-\frac{13D}{4}>D.

It contains a standard point. If two standard points there had different missing triples {i,j,r}\{i,j,r\} and {i,j,s}\{i,j,s\}, then the same argument as (4) would give

∣Ar∩As∣≥2k−n+aij≥3k4−15D4>k+D2≥m,|A_r\cap A_s| \ge2k-n+a_{ij} \ge\frac{3k}{4}-\frac{15D}{4} >\frac{k+D}{2}\ge m,

where the strict inequality is exactly 17D<k17D<k.

It follows that every pair of indices is in exactly one missing triple of a standard point. These triples form a Steiner triple system on seven points, hence the Fano plane. In particular all its seven lines occur as missing triples, as claimed.

A threefold-XOR criterion

Continue with the preceding bad seven-tuple, and let L\mathcal L be its Fano plane on the row indices. A degree-three spectrum cannot be a line L∈LL\in\mathcal L: the complementary cap occurs as the spectrum of a standard point, and these two points would cover all seven rows.

For each line LL, define

XL=△i∈LAi.X_L=\mathop{\triangle}_{i\in L}A_i.

For a point of degree rr, the number of XLX_L containing it is the number of Fano lines meeting its spectrum oddly. The possibilities are

SpectrumDegreeNumber of odd line intersections
Empty00
Singleton13
Pair24
Nonline triple33
Fano cap40

The table follows from the facts that each Fano point is on three lines and each pair determines one line. For a nonline triple, its three pair-lines are distinct; they have even intersection, while three other lines have singleton intersection. The excluded line triple is the only additional degree-three possibility.

In every row of the table, the last entry is at most 3(4−r)3(4-r). Therefore

∑L∈L∣XL∣≤3D,min⁡L∈L∣XL∣≤3D7.(7)\sum_{L\in\mathcal L}|X_L|\le3D, \qquad \min_{L\in\mathcal L}|X_L|\le\frac{3D}{7}. \tag{7}

Now let C=c+L⊆F2nC=c+L\subseteq\mathbb F_2^n be an affine subspace, and let

d=min⁡a∈C∣a∣.d=\min_{a\in C}|a|.

If a kk-uniform family H\mathcal H has all its incidence vectors in CC, then the XOR of any three members also belongs to CC. Thus (7) proves the following sufficient condition:

n<3017k,d>37(4n−7k)⟹H has the local seven-edge two-point property.(8)\boxed{\quad n<\frac{30}{17}k,\qquad d>\frac37(4n-7k) \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \mathcal H\text{ has the local seven-edge two-point property.}\quad} \tag{8}

If n<7k/4n<7k/4, the local property already follows from the degree argument, without any condition on CC.

Large transversal number forces a forbidden weight interval

The next observations require no local two-point property. Suppose H⊆C=c+L\mathcal H\subseteq C=c+L is kk-uniform and τ(H)>t\tau(\mathcal H)>t, with tt an integer. Set

w=n−t,j=w−k.w=n-t,\qquad j=w-k.

Every ww-point set contains an edge, so j≥0j\ge0. More generally, every set of at least ww points contains an edge.

If z∈Lz\in L has weight s≥ws\ge w, choose a∈Ha\in\mathcal H supported inside the support of zz. Then z+a∈Cz+a\in C and ∣z+a∣=s−k≥d|z+a|=s-k\ge d. Hence

L has no word with weight in [w,k+d−1].(9)\boxed{L\text{ has no word with weight in }[w,k+d-1].} \tag{9}

Also, counting the ww-sets containing each edge gives

∣L∣=∣C∣≥∣H∣≥(nw)(n−kw−k)=(nk)(wk).(10)|L|=|C|\ge|\mathcal H| \ge\frac{\binom nw}{\binom{n-k}{w-k}} =\frac{\binom nk}{\binom wk}. \tag{10}

Polynomial bound for one forbidden weight

Suppose a binary linear space L⊆F2nL\subseteq\mathbb F_2^n has no word of weight 2p2p, where pp is prime and 4p>n4p>n. Then

∣L∣≤(n+1)∑i=0p−1(ni).(11)|L|\le(n+1)\sum_{i=0}^{p-1}\binom ni. \tag{11}

Here is a self-contained polynomial proof. Fix a weight layer

Fs={supp⁡(x):x∈L, ∣x∣=s}.\mathcal F_s=\{\operatorname{supp}(x):x\in L,\ |x|=s\}.

For distinct A,B∈FsA,B\in\mathcal F_s, one cannot have ∣A∩B∣≡s(modp)|A\cap B|\equiv s\pmod p. Otherwise ∣A△B∣|A\triangle B| would be a positive multiple of 2p2p, and 4p>n4p>n would force it to equal 2p2p, contrary to the hypothesis.

Over Fp\mathbb F_p, associate to each A∈FsA\in\mathcal F_s the polynomial

PA(x1,…,xn)=1−(∑i∈Axi−s)p−1.P_A(x_1,\ldots,x_n) =1-\left(\sum_{i\in A}x_i-s\right)^{p-1}.

On incidence vectors of Fs\mathcal F_s, this polynomial is one at AA and zero at every other member. Multilinearizing does not change its values on binary vectors and leaves degree at most p−1p-1. These polynomials are linearly independent, so

∣Fs∣≤∑i=0p−1(ni).|\mathcal F_s|\le\sum_{i=0}^{p-1}\binom ni.

Summing over the n+1n+1 layers proves (11).

An asymptotic obstruction valid throughout the range of (8)

Let k→∞k\to\infty. Uniformly over affine spaces and kk-uniform families as above, if

74k≤n≤3017k,t≥34k,τ(H)>t,\frac74k\le n\le\frac{30}{17}k, \qquad t\ge\frac34k, \qquad\tau(\mathcal H)>t,

then

d≤n−k−t+o(k)=j+o(k).(12)\boxed{d\le n-k-t+o(k)=j+o(k).} \tag{12}

To prove this, suppose along a sequence that d≥j+εkd\ge j+\varepsilon k for a fixed ε>0\varepsilon>0. By (9), LL forbids every weight from ww to k+d−1k+d-1. The prime number theorem supplies a prime

p=w/2+o(k),2p≥w,p=w/2+o(k),\qquad 2p\ge w,

with 2p≤k+d−12p\le k+d-1 for large kk. Thus weight 2p2p is forbidden. Also w≥k>n/2w\ge k>n/2, so 4p>n4p>n.

Write

α=n/k,c=t/k,u=w/k=α−c,\alpha=n/k,\qquad c=t/k,\qquad u=w/k=\alpha-c,

and use natural-log entropy

h(x)=−xlog⁡x−(1−x)log⁡(1−x).h(x)=-x\log x-(1-x)\log(1-x).

Here

7/4≤α≤30/17,1≤u≤69/68.7/4\le\alpha\le30/17,\qquad 1\le u\le69/68.

By (10), Stirling's formula gives

log⁡∣L∣≥k[αh(1/α)−uh(1/u)]−O(log⁡k).(13)\log|L|\ge k\left[\alpha h(1/\alpha)-u h(1/u)\right]-O(\log k). \tag{13}

By (11) and the usual binomial-sum entropy bound,

log⁡∣L∣≤kαh ⁣(u2α)+o(k).(14)\log|L|\le k\alpha h\!\left(\frac{u}{2\alpha}\right)+o(k). \tag{14}

There is a uniform positive gap between the main terms of (13) and (14). Indeed, αh(1/α)\alpha h(1/\alpha) is increasing in α>1\alpha>1, uh(1/u)u h(1/u) is increasing in u≥1u\ge1, and αh(u/(2α))\alpha h(u/(2\alpha)) is increasing separately in α,u\alpha,u when 0<u<α0<u<\alpha. Consequently the gap is at least

74h(4/7)−6968h(68/69)−3017h(23/80).(15)\frac74h(4/7) -\frac{69}{68}h(68/69) -\frac{30}{17}h(23/80). \tag{15}

For completeness, this is strictly positive without relying on a numerical calculation. Since h′′(x)=−1/[x(1−x)]h''(x)=-1/[x(1-x)],

h(4/7)≥log⁡2−1/96,h(23/80)≤log⁡2−289/3200.h(4/7)\ge\log2-1/96, \qquad h(23/80)\le\log2-289/3200.

The first follows by bounding h′′≥−49/12h''\ge-49/12 on [1/2,4/7][1/2,4/7]; the second follows from h′′≤−4h''\le-4. Furthermore,

6968h(68/69)=log⁡(69/68)+log⁡6968≤log⁡69+168.\frac{69}{68}h(68/69) =\log(69/68)+\frac{\log69}{68} \le\frac{\log69+1}{68}.

Thus (15) is at least

51320−7384−log⁡2+log⁡69+168>51320−7384−768>0,\frac{51}{320}-\frac7{384} -\frac{\log2+\log69+1}{68} >\frac{51}{320}-\frac7{384}-\frac7{68}>0,

using log⁡2<1\log2<1 and log⁡69<5\log69<5. This contradicts (13)–(14) and proves (12).

Finally, suppose a sequence of families satisfies the sufficient criterion (8), but has τ(H)>(3/4+ε)k\tau(\mathcal H)>(3/4+\varepsilon)k for some fixed ε>0\varepsilon>0. If n<7k/4n<7k/4, the universal bound τ≤n−k+1\tau\le n-k+1 already gives a contradiction for large kk. Otherwise take

t=⌊(3/4+ε)k⌋,δ=n−7k/4≥0.t=\lfloor(3/4+\varepsilon)k\rfloor, \qquad\delta=n-7k/4\ge0.

Then j=δ−(t−3k/4)j=\delta-(t-3k/4), while (8) gives d>12δ/7d>12\delta/7. Hence

d−j>57δ+(t−3k/4)≥εk−1,d-j>\frac57\delta+(t-3k/4)\ge\varepsilon k-1,

contradicting (12). Therefore the stronger sufficient criterion also forces

τ(H)≤34k+o(k).\tau(\mathcal H)\le\frac34k+o(k).

This conclusion concerns the distance criterion (8), not arbitrary affine families with the local property. A construction using more information than the minimum weight of an affine coset remains outside the argument.