Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Reviews and grade of the Problem 416 reconstructions

../

grade: Distinct grade of the four focused reviews of the Problem 416 reconstruction pages as they stood on 2026-09-28T05:03:27Z: all four pass, seven corrections accepted as C1-C7, every other finding downgraded with its reason; no tier.

kruer_kohlmeyer_lemma_2_1_reconstruction_review: Source fidelity faithful with corrections (one required, to the standing sentence about what the write-up leaves unproved); the reconstructed argument is sound at every step.

kruer_kohlmeyer_lemma_5_1_reconstruction_review: Source fidelity faithful and the reconstructed argument sound; one required correction, to the page's sentence calling the cap 1/2 not sharp, which is false for the constant 4 as the lemma states it.

kruer_kohlmeyer_theorem_1_1_reconstruction_review: Refutation-charge review of the Theorem 1.1 reconstruction as it stood on 2026-09-28T05:03:27Z: source fidelity faithful with corrections, one required correction (a misattributed description of the Lean file) plus two suggested and two notes; the conditional argument from Proposition 4.1 is sound as reconstructed.

zeraoulia_theorem_1_1_reconstruction_review: Refutation-charge review of the Theorem 1.1 reconstruction as it stood on 2026-09-28T05:03:27Z: source fidelity faithful with corrections, the reconstructed argument sound and the refutation failed; no required corrections, three suggested and four notes.


These records are the independent focused reviews of the four reconstruction pages of the Problem 416 folder as they stood on 2026-09-28T05:03:27Z, one review per page, each written in a fresh context by a reviewer distinct from the pages' author and charged to refute, and one distinct grade, the grade, written in a further fresh context by a grader distinct from the author and the reviewers, which grades each report pass or void, adjudicates every finding against the source artifacts and numbers the accepted corrections C1–C7. The reviews are focused reviews under the verification rules: each retains its stated scope, assigns no tier and changes no status, and every reconstruction page remains author-recorded.