Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Prime filtration


This approach exposes entire prime-adic coordinates rather than installing congruences in increasing modulus order. The following estimates are proved, but their transfer to the full activated integer orbit remains incomplete. All moduli are distinct unless indicated. The case q=1q=1 is trivial and is omitted.

Write G=∏pZpG=\prod_p\mathbb Z_p, let SS be the full Haar survivor set, and suppose μ(S)=δ>0\mu(S)=\delta>0. Put ν=δ−11Sμ\nu=\delta^{-1}\mathbf1_S\mu. For q=pemq=p^e m with P+(m)<pP^+(m)<p, and an earlier-coordinate configuration xx, define the forbidden new-coordinate fraction

αp(x)=μp(⋃q=pem:x≡aq(modm)[aq]pe).(1)\alpha_p(x)=\mu_p\left( \bigcup_{\substack{q=p^e m\,: x\equiv a_q\pmod m}}[a_q]_{p^e}\right). \tag{1}

Use P+(1)=1P^+(1)=1. This includes every chosen modulus with largest prime factor pp, regardless of the size of its smaller-prime part.

A finite conditional entropy budget

With earlier-coordinate expectation under ν\nu,

∑pEν[−log⁡(1−αp)]≤log⁡(1/δ).(2)\sum_p\mathbb E_\nu[-\log(1-\alpha_p)]\le\log(1/\delta). \tag{2}

In particular ∑pEναp<∞\sum_p\mathbb E_\nu\alpha_p<\infty.

For a proof, the conditional law Kp(x,⋅)K_p(x,\cdot) of the pp-coordinate under ν\nu is supported on a set of μp\mu_p-measure at most 1−αp(x)1-\alpha_p(x). Relative entropy therefore satisfies

D(Kp(x,⋅)∥μp)≥−log⁡(1−αp(x)).D(K_p(x,\cdot)\Vert\mu_p)\ge-\log(1-\alpha_p(x)).

This follows by conditioning Haar on the allowed set and using nonnegativity of relative entropy. Fibers with αp=1\alpha_p=1 have zero earlier marginal under ν\nu. The chain rule, over finitely many prime coordinates, gives

∑p≤PEνD(Kp∥μp)=D(ν≤P∥μ≤P)≤log⁡(1/δ).\sum_{p\le P}\mathbb E_\nu D(K_p\Vert\mu_p) =D(\nu_{\le P}\Vert\mu_{\le P})\le\log(1/\delta).

For completeness, if hP=Eμ(1S∣F≤P)h_P=\mathbb E_\mu(\mathbf1_S\mid\mathcal F_{\le P}), the right side equals

log⁡(1/δ)+δ−1Eμ[hPlog⁡hP].\log(1/\delta)+\delta^{-1}\mathbb E_\mu[h_P\log h_P].

The martingale hPh_P converges to 1S\mathbf1_S; bounded convergence of hPlog⁡hPh_P\log h_P shows that this expression tends to log⁡(1/δ)\log(1/\delta). Summing the preceding conditional lower bounds proves (2). This entropy statement itself permits multiple residues.

A summable Haar second moment using singleton distinctness

The union bound in the new coordinate gives

αp(x)≤Ap(x):=∑q=pemp−e1[aq]m(x).\alpha_p(x)\le A_p(x):= \sum_{q=p^em}p^{-e}\mathbf1_{[a_q]_m}(x).

Since each pemp^em occurs at most once, pairwise CRT and enlargement to all pp-smooth smaller parts give

Eμαp2≤EμAp2≤1(p−1)2∑P+(m),P+(r)<p(m,r)mr=Up:=1(p−1)2∏ℓ<p1+1/ℓ(1−1/ℓ)2≪log⁡3(2p)p2.(3)\begin{aligned} \mathbb E_\mu\alpha_p^2 &\le\mathbb E_\mu A_p^2\\ &\le\frac1{(p-1)^2} \sum_{P^+(m),P^+(r)<p}\frac{(m,r)}{mr}\\ &=U_p:=\frac1{(p-1)^2} \prod_{\ell<p}\frac{1+1/\ell}{(1-1/\ell)^2} \ll\frac{\log^3(2p)}{p^2}. \end{aligned} \tag{3}

Indeed the local series is $\sum_{i,j\ge0}\ell^{-\max(i,j)} =(1+1/\ell)/(1-1/\ell)^2$. The product in (3) is at most ∏ℓ<p(1−1/ℓ)−3\prod_{\ell<p}(1-1/\ell)^{-3}, so the already checked elementary Euler-product bound applies. Thus ∑pEμαp2<∞\sum_p\mathbb E_\mu\alpha_p^2<\infty universally. Repeated residues would add multiplicities in this calculation.

An activated arithmetic second moment

For an integer nn, truncate using the actual activation condition:

Ap(n)=∑q=pem≤n:P+(m)<pp−e1n≡aq(modm).A_p(n)=\sum_{\substack{q=p^em\le n\,: P^+(m)<p}} p^{-e}\mathbf1_{n\equiv a_q\pmod m}.

Then, for X≥2X\ge2,

1H⌊X⌋∑n≤XAp(n)2n≤Up+2XH⌊X⌋(p2−1)2.(4)\frac1{H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}}\sum_{n\le X}\frac{A_p(n)^2}{n} \le U_p+\frac{2X}{H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}(p^2-1)^2}. \tag{4}

For each compatible pair q=pemq=p^em, q′=pfrq'=p^fr, the smaller-coordinate conditions form one class modulo [m,r][m,r], counted only for n≥T=max⁡(q,q′)n\ge T=\max(q,q'). Its harmonic sum is at most

H⌊X⌋/[m,r]+1/T.H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}/[m,r]+1/T.

To check the error, normalize that class modulo [m,r][m,r]: its only possible positive root below the modulus contributes at most 1/T1/T, and the later terms are bounded by the harmonic progression of zero residue. The main terms sum to at most UpU_p as in (3).

For fixed e,fe,f, discarding smoothness only increases the error. The number of pairs with max⁡(pem,pfr)≤t\max(p^em,p^fr)\le t is at most t2/pe+ft^2/p^{e+f}. Partial summation therefore bounds the sum of 1/max⁡(pem,pfr)1/\max(p^em,p^fr) below XX by 2X/pe+f2X/p^{e+f}. Multiplication by p−e−fp^{-e-f} and summation over e,f≥1e,f\ge1 gives 2X/(p2−1)22X/(p^2-1)^2, proving (4).

For any fixed threshold a>0a>0, Markov's inequality and a union bound now show that the normalized harmonic mass of integers n≤Xn\le X with Ap(n)>aA_p(n)>a for some p>Yp>Y is at most

a−2[O(log⁡3(2Y)Y)+O(XH⌊X⌋Y3)].(5)a^{-2}\left[ O\left(\frac{\log^3(2Y)}Y\right) +O\left(\frac{X}{H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}Y^3}\right)\right]. \tag{5}

This is useful, for example, at Y=X1/3Y=X^{1/3}. It bounds large-potential fibers, not the total number of deletions by those primes. It gives no vanishing bound for the remaining moving prime range. In fact, a uniform original-activation second-moment bound for the uncapped ApA_p is false. The counterexample below does not refute such a bound for the exact forbidden fraction αp\alpha_p.

Positive survivor measure gives no pointwise distortion cap

For a prime pp, use moduli qj=pjq_j=pj, 1≤j<p1\le j<p, and residues

aj≡0(modj),aj≡j(modp).a_j\equiv0\pmod j,\qquad a_j\equiv j\pmod p.

These moduli are distinct and all have largest prime factor pp. The full survivor density is at least 1−Hp−1/p→11-H_{p-1}/p\to1. Nevertheless, on the earlier-coordinate fiber x≡0(modL)x\equiv0\pmod L, where L=lcm⁡(1,…,p−1)L=\operatorname{lcm}(1,\ldots,p-1), the stage removes p−1p-1 of the pp digits. Conditional survival forces the zero digit, so its density relative to Haar in that coordinate is pp. The earlier fiber has positive ν\nu-mass 1/(δpL)1/(\delta pL). Thus (2) cannot be replaced by a uniform pointwise bound based on δ\delta, even when δ\delta tends to one.

The remaining difficulty is specific: (2) is averaged under the full survivor law ν\nu, while (4)--(5) sample actual integers. Nonlinear events determined by earlier prime coordinates can have periods far larger than XX, despite individual active moduli being at most XX. No transfer estimate connecting these two controls, and no proof of the required lower logarithmic density, was obtained.

The later full-survivor trace obstruction shows that directly sampling the canonical earlier-coordinate densities of this infinite law ν\nu can in fact give a nonzero signed trace, even at a fixed prime. Uniform high-prime cancellation also fails for these weights despite δ>1/4\delta>1/4, weights bounded by four, and the pointwise bound αp(n)≤1/p\alpha_p(n)\le1/p. The example's actual delayed sieve has natural density. Thus a viable transfer must retain finite activation or impose additional arithmetic information; the infinite conditional marginals themselves are not available arithmetic weights.

Exact arithmetic moments with stronger power activation

There is a useful exact transfer under a different activation rule. It does not establish density even for that stronger rule; the remaining conditional-trace obstruction is stated below.

Fix an integer k≥2k\ge2 and replace activation by n≥qkn\ge q^k. Put

Ap,k(n)=∑q=pem, P+(m)<pqk≤np−e1n≡aq(modm).A_{p,k}(n)=\sum_{\substack{q=p^em,\ P^+(m)<p\\q^k\le n}} p^{-e}\mathbf1_{n\equiv a_q\pmod m}.

For every integer X≥1X\ge1, both natural and harmonic moments obey

1X∑n≤XAp,k(n)k≤Up,k,1HX∑n≤XAp,k(n)kn≤Up,k,(6)\frac1X\sum_{n\le X}A_{p,k}(n)^k\le U_{p,k},\qquad \frac1{H_X}\sum_{n\le X}\frac{A_{p,k}(n)^k}{n}\le U_{p,k}, \tag{6}

where

Up,k=1(p−1)k∏ℓ<p(∑a≥0(a+1)k−akℓa)≪klog⁡2k−1(2p)pk.(7)U_{p,k}=\frac1{(p-1)^k} \prod_{\ell<p}\left(\sum_{a\ge0} \frac{(a+1)^k-a^k}{\ell^a}\right) \ll_k\frac{\log^{2^k-1}(2p)}{p^k}. \tag{7}

In particular Up,2=UpU_{p,2}=U_p: quadratic activation removes the entire XX-dependent error from (4).

To prove this, expand the kkth power. A compatible tuple qj=pejmjq_j=p^{e_j}m_j specifies one residual class modulo d=[m1,…,mk]d=[m_1,\ldots,m_k]. Every active point in that tuple satisfies

n≥max⁡jqjk≥∏jqj≥d.n\ge\max_jq_j^k\ge\prod_jq_j\ge d.

The exact delayed progression bounds are therefore at most X/dX/d for counting and HX/dH_X/d for harmonic sums. Discarding compatibility and enlarging the modulus collection increases the resulting positive sum. Distinctness ensures that each pemp^em occurs at most once. The sums over e1,…,ek≥1e_1,\ldots,e_k\ge1 give (p−1)−k(p-1)^{-k}; at a smaller prime ℓ\ell, the number of exponent tuples with maximum exactly aa is (a+1)k−ak(a+1)^k-a^k. This gives the product (7). Its local factor is 1+(2k−1)/ℓ+Ok(ℓ−2)1+(2^k-1)/\ell+O_k(\ell^{-2}), so the elementary Euler-product bound proves the last estimate in (7).

Consequently, for Y≥2Y\ge2 and t>0t>0, the natural or normalized harmonic mass below XX of

{n:∃p>Y, Ap,k(n)>t}\{n:\exists p>Y,\ A_{p,k}(n)>t\}

is at most

Ckt−klog⁡2k−1(2Y)Yk−1,(8)C_k t^{-k}\frac{\log^{2^k-1}(2Y)}{Y^{k-1}}, \tag{8}

uniformly in XX. This follows from Markov's inequality, a union bound, and summing (7), even over all integers greater than YY.

The missing transfer is still not a moment estimate of this kind. Haar prime-stage normalization uses cancellation while all earlier coordinates are fixed. An arithmetic distortion argument would require control of signed expressions of the form

1HX∑n≤Xwp−(n)(1Bp(n)−αp(n))n,\frac1{H_X}\sum_{n\le X} \frac{w_{p-}(n)(\mathbf1_{B_p}(n)-\alpha_p(n))}{n},

where wp−w_{p-} is a nonlinear accumulated weight depending on arbitrarily many earlier congruences. Bounding products of kk active congruences does not bound this trace. Their accumulated CRT conductor can exceed nn despite qk≤nq^k\le n for every individual active modulus. No arithmetic conditional cancellation has been proved, so neither (6) nor (8) is a density theorem for arbitrary residues.

Removing repeated largest prime factors from the tail

There is a simple exact reduction, valid for arbitrary residues. Put

R={q≥2:P+(q)2∣q}.\mathcal R=\{q\ge2:P^+(q)^2\mid q\}.

Unique factorization and the established elementary Euler-product bound give

∑q∈R1q=∑p(∑e≥2p−e)∑P+(m)<p1m=∑p1p(p−1)∏ℓ<p(1−1/ℓ)−1≪∑plog⁡(2p)p2<∞.(9)\begin{aligned} \sum_{q\in\mathcal R}\frac1q &=\sum_p\left(\sum_{e\ge2}p^{-e}\right) \sum_{P^+(m)<p}\frac1m\\ &=\sum_p\frac1{p(p-1)} \prod_{\ell<p}(1-1/\ell)^{-1} \ll\sum_p\frac{\log(2p)}{p^2}<\infty. \end{aligned} \tag{9}

Here P+(1)=1P^+(1)=1. Moreover, the portion with P+(q)>YP^+(q)>Y is O(log⁡(2Y)/Y)O(\log(2Y)/Y), by comparison with the corresponding sum over all integers greater than YY.

For each normalized residue, activation gives at most X/qX/q hits below XX. Thus moduli from R\mathcal R beyond a numerical cutoff QQ have, uniformly in XX, at most

X∑q∈Rq>Q1qX\sum_{\substack{q\in\mathcal R\\q>Q}}\frac1q

hits. Their tails are negligible in upper natural density and hence in upper logarithmic density. This does not say that deleting the whole family R\mathcal R leaves the density unchanged: its fixed initial classes can have positive density and must be retained in finite approximations.

Consequently, to prove finite-congruence logarithmic approximation in general, it suffices to treat the core

q=pm,P+(m)<p,q=pm,\qquad P^+(m)<p,

and then add back the reciprocal-summable family by the preceding tail estimate. In this core the prime-stage forbidden fraction is exactly the number of distinct forbidden pp-digits represented by matching smaller-coordinate classes, divided by pp. This reduction does not bound that digit count on the activated integer orbit and does not supply the missing conditional trace estimate.

A uniform original-activation second-moment bound is false

Despite the summable Haar bound (3), the original-activation arithmetic second moments of ApA_p need not be uniformly bounded, even for systems whose moduli all have total prime-factor rank five and whose largest prime factor occurs only once.

Let pp tend to infinity through primes, put X=p5X=p^5, and let Dp\mathcal D_p consist of the products of four distinct primes at most p/2p/2. Unique factorization and Chebyshev's prime-counting bounds give

Mp:=∣Dp∣=(π(p/2)4)≍p4(log⁡p)4.M_p:=|\mathcal D_p| =\binom{\pi(p/2)}4\asymp \frac{p^4}{(\log p)^4}.

For each m∈Dpm\in\mathcal D_p, install the single modulus q=pmq=pm with normalized residue

apm=X−pm⌊Xpm⌋.a_{pm}=X-pm\left\lfloor\frac{X}{pm}\right\rfloor.

These moduli are distinct, satisfy q≤p(p/2)4<Xq\le p(p/2)^4<X, and have P+(q)=pP^+(q)=p, vp(q)=1v_p(q)=1, and Ω(q)=5\Omega(q)=5. Thus they already belong to the core retained in the preceding reduction.

At the integer n=Xn=X, every smaller-coordinate condition matches: X≡apm(modm)X\equiv a_{pm}\pmod m, and every modulus is active. Hence

Ap(X)=Mpp,1HX∑n≤XAp(n)2n≥Mp2p2XHX≫p(log⁡p)9⟶∞.A_p(X)=\frac{M_p}{p},\qquad \frac1{H_X}\sum_{n\le X}\frac{A_p(n)^2}{n} \ge\frac{M_p^2}{p^2XH_X} \gg\frac{p}{(\log p)^9}\longrightarrow\infty.

In particular, for every fixed YY, the supremum over finite systems and cutoffs of

∑p>Y1HX∑n≤XAp(n)2n\sum_{p>Y}\frac1{H_X}\sum_{n\le X}\frac{A_p(n)^2}{n}

is infinite. The natural-average second moment also diverges, since its corresponding one-point lower bound is Mp2/(p2X)≫p/(log⁡p)8M_p^2/(p^2X)\gg p/(\log p)^8.

This construction does not produce a large exact forbidden fraction. Every assigned residue has the same pp-digit, namely apm≡X≡0(modp)a_{pm}\equiv X\equiv0\pmod p. Consequently αp≤1/p\alpha_p\le1/p on every smaller-coordinate fiber, with equality at n=Xn=X. The obstruction is multiplicity in the union-bound potential ApA_p, not a failure of a uniform estimate for αp\alpha_p. No conclusion about the remaining conditioned arithmetic trace follows from this example.

Information as finite congruences activate

The obstruction to infinite-survivor marginals does not invalidate the following finite information identity. It still supplies no arithmetic trace bound.

For a finite increasing family, let

Sj=⋂i≤jCic,δj=μ(Sj)>0,νj=δj−11Sjμ,S0=G,δ0=1.S_j=\bigcap_{i\le j}C_i^c,\quad \delta_j=\mu(S_j)>0,\quad \nu_j=\delta_j^{-1}\mathbf1_{S_j}\mu, \quad S_0=G,\quad\delta_0=1.

Work modulo a common finite period, exposing its prime-power coordinates in increasing prime order. Write Kp(j)K_p^{(j)} for the conditional law of the coordinate at pp under νj\nu_j, given earlier coordinates. Then

∑j=1J∑pEνjD(Kp(j)∥Kp(j−1))=log⁡1δJ.(10)\sum_{j=1}^J\sum_p\mathbb E_{\nu_j} D(K_p^{(j)}\Vert K_p^{(j-1)}) =\log\frac1{\delta_J}. \tag{10}

The expectation is over the earlier-coordinate marginal of νj\nu_j. Conditional versions on null fibers do not matter, since νj≪νj−1\nu_j\ll\nu_{j-1}.

Indeed, on SjS_j the density ratio dνj/dνj−1d\nu_j/d\nu_{j-1} equals δj−1/δj\delta_{j-1}/\delta_j, so D(νj∥νj−1)=log⁡(δj−1/δj)D(\nu_j\Vert\nu_{j-1})=\log(\delta_{j-1}/\delta_j). The finite relative-entropy chain rule, followed by telescoping in jj, proves (10). In particular, if the infinite survivor measure is δ>0\delta>0, every finite budget is at most log⁡(1/δ)\log(1/\delta). The identity does not use singleton distinctness.

There are also exact projection recursions. Put

hp,j=Eμ(1Sj∣F≤p),wp,j=hp,j/δj,Fj=Sj−1∖Sj,ej=μ(Fj).h_{p,j}=\mathbb E_\mu(\mathbf1_{S_j}\mid\mathcal F_{\le p}), \qquad w_{p,j}=h_{p,j}/\delta_j, \qquad F_j=S_{j-1}\setminus S_j,\quad e_j=\mu(F_j).

Linearity and δj=δj−1−ej\delta_j=\delta_{j-1}-e_j give

hp,j−hp,j−1=−Eμ(1Fj∣F≤p),h_{p,j}-h_{p,j-1} =-\mathbb E_\mu(\mathbf1_{F_j}\mid\mathcal F_{\le p}), wp,j−wp,j−1=ejwp,j−1−Eμ(1Fj∣F≤p)δj,0≤wp,j≤1/δJ.(11)w_{p,j}-w_{p,j-1} =\frac{e_jw_{p,j-1} -\mathbb E_\mu(\mathbf1_{F_j}\mid\mathcal F_{\le p})} {\delta_j}, \qquad 0\le w_{p,j}\le1/\delta_J. \tag{11}

To retain actual activation, let SnS_n use exactly the moduli q≤nq\le n, with δn=μ(Sn)\delta_n=\mu(S_n), and define hp,nh_{p,n} accordingly. For each finite cutoff XX, both telescopes are finite and yield

∑n≤X1A(n)−δnn=∑p∑n≤Xhp,n(n)−hp−,n(n)n=−∑q≤X∑q≤n≤X1Fq(n)−eqn.(12)\begin{aligned} \sum_{n\le X}\frac{\mathbf1_A(n)-\delta_n}{n} &=\sum_p\sum_{n\le X} \frac{h_{p,n}(n)-h_{p-,n}(n)}n\\ &=-\sum_{q\le X}\sum_{q\le n\le X} \frac{\mathbf1_{F_q}(n)-e_q}{n}. \end{aligned} \tag{12}

Here hp−,nh_{p-,n} fixes primes below pp, and the initial prime projection is the constant δn\delta_n. At an active point all earlier congruences are active, so the full first-kill cells FqF_q give exactly the second equality.

Thus exchanging the prime and activation sums reproduces the original first-kill discrepancy. The bounded information in (10) is integrated under changing Haar-conditioned laws, whereas (12) samples their changing functions at x=nx=n. No estimate transferring the former to this diagonal trace was obtained. Since HX−1∑n≤Xδn/n→δH_X^{-1}\sum_{n\le X}\delta_n/n\to\delta, an o(log⁡X)o(\log X) bound for (12) is still precisely the required candidate-density conclusion, not a consequence of the telescoping.