Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Common shift blocks


Checking Section 5 of the independent input gives the following new obstruction. The proof below makes its local estimate finite and also controls all quotient ranges in a single block. It does not settle the unrestricted coherent-residue problem.

The later weighted prime-residue estimate allows growing numbers of local residues and gives a uniform harmonic bound from their weighted support sizes. Its single-residue specialization also verifies the quantitative rate T(log⁡Q)−0.086071…+o(1)T(\log Q)^{-0.086071\ldots+o(1)} on intervals of length T≥Q1+εT\ge Q^{1+\varepsilon}. The qualitative interval range in (1) below is wider, so neither formulation is discarded.

Uniform interval bound: proved

For integers Q≥2Q\ge2 and bb, put

UQ(b)=⋃Q≤q≤2Q(b+qZ).U_Q(b)=\bigcup_{Q\le q\le2Q}(b+q\mathbb Z).

Uniformly in bb and in intervals II of length HH,

∣UQ(b)∩I∣H⟶0as Q→∞ and H/Q→∞.(1)\frac{|U_Q(b)\cap I|}{H}\longrightarrow0 \quad\text{as }Q\to\infty\text{ and }H/Q\to\infty. \tag{1}

There is no restriction on the location of the interval or on the size of the common shift.

Finite estimate. For squarefree P≤QP\le Q, define

A(P)=3∏p∣P(2−1/pp+(1−1/p)3/2).A(P)=\sqrt3\prod_{p\mid P} \left(\frac{\sqrt{2-1/p}}p+(1-1/p)^{3/2}\right).

Then

∣UQ(b)∩I∣H≤A(P)+2PQH.(2)\frac{|U_Q(b)\cap I|}{H}\le A(P)+\frac{2PQ}{H}. \tag{2}

Proof. On a residue r(modP)r\pmod P, the incidence sum is

SQ(r)=∑Q≤q≤2Q(q,P)q1(q,P)∣r−b.S_Q(r)=\sum_{Q\le q\le2Q}\frac{(q,P)}q \mathbf1_{(q,P)\mid r-b}.

For fixed t(modP)t\pmod P, the nonnegative periodic function ft(q)=(q,P)1(q,P)∣tf_t(q)=(q,P)\mathbf1_{(q,P)\mid t} has mean

WP(t)=∏p∣Pp∣t(2−1/p)∏p∣Pp∤t(1−1/p).(3)W_P(t)= \prod_{\substack{p\mid P\\p\mid t}}(2-1/p) \prod_{\substack{p\mid P\\p\nmid t}}(1-1/p). \tag{3}

Indeed the residues with (q,P)=d(q,P)=d have proportion φ(P/d)/P\varphi(P/d)/P; summing dφ(P/d)/Pd\varphi(P/d)/P over d∣(P,t)d\mid(P,t) factors as (3). Splitting [Q,2Q][Q,2Q] into periods of length PP and using 1/q≤1/Q1/q\le1/Q gives SQ(r)≤3WP(r−b)S_Q(r)\le3W_P(r-b) when P≤QP\le Q.

CRT and the elementary count in one progression give

∣UQ(b)∩I∩(r+PZ)∣≤HPSQ(r)+2Q.|U_Q(b)\cap I\cap(r+P\mathbb Z)| \le \frac HP S_Q(r)+2Q.

The trivial bound in the same residue class is H/P+1H/P+1. Taking the smaller bound and summing over rr yields

∣UQ(b)∩I∣H≤1P∑r mod Pmin⁡(1,SQ(r))+2PQH.\frac{|U_Q(b)\cap I|}{H} \le\frac1P\sum_{r\bmod P}\min(1,S_Q(r))+\frac{2PQ}{H}.

Since min⁡(1,x)≤x\min(1,x)\le\sqrt x for x≥0x\ge0, the first term is at most 3 Et mod PWP(t)=A(P)\sqrt3\,\mathbb E_{t\bmod P}\sqrt{W_P(t)}=A(P). The product formula for this expectation follows from CRT independence. This proves (2).

For PP the product of successively more primes,

A(P)=exp⁡[−(3/2−2)∑p∣P1p+O(1)]⟶0.A(P)=\exp\left[-(3/2-\sqrt2)\sum_{p\mid P}\frac1p+O(1)\right] \longrightarrow0.

Here 3/2−2>03/2-\sqrt2>0 and the prime reciprocal sum diverges. The latter also follows directly because the Euler product over p≤zp\le z dominates H⌊z⌋H_{\lfloor z\rfloor}, while its logarithm is ∑p≤z1/p+O(1)\sum_{p\le z}1/p+O(1). In (2), first fix such a PP, then let Q,H/Q→∞Q,H/Q\to\infty, and finally increase PP. This proves (1). □\square

The same bounds apply to any coherent subfamily with moduli in [Q,2Q][Q,2Q]: finite CRT supplies a common integer shift, even when the residues originally come from an arbitrary profinite center. Both the center and the subfamily may vary with QQ. Delayed activation only reduces the counted set.

Uniform harmonic bound for one block: proved

Let BQB_Q be any delayed coherent singleton union with moduli in [Q,2Q][Q,2Q]. Then

sup⁡BQsup⁡X≥2HBQ(X)H⌊X⌋⟶0(Q→∞).(4)\sup_{B_Q}\sup_{X\ge2} \frac{H_{B_Q}(X)}{H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}}\longrightarrow0 \qquad(Q\to\infty). \tag{4}

Thus a single coherently shifted dyadic block cannot retain positive normalized harmonic deletion by moving its hits to arbitrarily large quotients.

For a proof, write NQ(t)=∣BQ∩[1,t]∣N_Q(t)=|B_Q\cap[1,t]|. It vanishes for t<Qt<Q, and (2), applied to (0,t](0,t], gives NQ(t)≤A(P)t+2PQN_Q(t)\le A(P)t+2PQ. Partial summation, for X≥QX\ge Q, gives

HBQ(X)≤A(P)(1+log⁡(X/Q))+2P.H_{B_Q}(X) \le A(P)(1+\log(X/Q))+2P.

Consequently, for Q≥max⁡(P,3)Q\ge\max(P,3),

sup⁡BQ,X≥2HBQ(X)H⌊X⌋≤A(P)+2Plog⁡Q.(5)\sup_{B_Q,X\ge2}\frac{H_{B_Q}(X)}{H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}} \le A(P)+\frac{2P}{\log Q}. \tag{5}

First let Q→∞Q\to\infty and then increase the primorial PP. This proves (4).

Scope and limitations

The condition H/Q→∞H/Q\to\infty in (1) cannot simply be removed. For b=Qb=Q, every integer in [2Q,3Q][2Q,3Q] is an active hit, witnessed by q=n−Q∈[Q,2Q]q=n-Q\in[Q,2Q]. Such natural-density spikes therefore remain possible, although (4) shows their uniformly vanishing normalized harmonic effect.

An unbounded number of dyadic blocks need not obey a summable version of (4). Neither this result nor the earlier bounded-quotient compression bound controls a general conditioned tail. The unrestricted coherent case is still unresolved.

Coherence is essential for the long-interval conclusion

For arbitrary singleton residues the interval assertion (1) is false, even when the Haar footprint tends to zero and H/Q→∞H/Q\to\infty. This is a natural-counting obstruction, not a logarithmic-density counterexample.

Let L≥12L\ge12 be divisible by 1212, and choose Q>LQ>L, Q≥12Q\ge12. Independently color each integer q∈[Q,2Q]q\in[Q,2Q] uniformly by jq∈{1,…,L}j_q\in\{1,\ldots,L\} and use the class jq(modq)j_q\pmod q. Write bQ=μ(⋃Q≤q≤2QqZ^)b_Q=\mu(\bigcup_{Q\le q\le2Q}q\widehat{\mathbb Z}). For every coloring its Haar union has measure at most LbQLb_Q, since it is contained in the union of LL common translates of this multiples window. The proved bound (2) implies bQ→0b_Q\to0.

Fix an integer n∈I=[3LQ/4,LQ]n\in I=[3LQ/4,LQ]. For each integer L/2≤k≤2L/3L/2\le k\le2L/3, choose j∈[1,L]j\in[1,L] with j≡n(modk)j\equiv n\pmod k. Such a jj exists because k≤Lk\le L. Then

q=(n−j)/k∈[Q,2Q]:q≥9Q/8−3/2≥Q,q≤2Q.q=(n-j)/k\in[Q,2Q]:\qquad q\ge9Q/8-3/2\ge Q,\quad q\le2Q.

Different chosen pairs give different moduli: if n=kq+j=k′q+j′n=kq+j=k'q+j', then q∣j−j′q|j-j', and ∣j−j′∣<L<Q≤q|j-j'|<L<Q\le q forces j=j′j=j' and k=k′k=k'. Thus at least L/6L/6 independent colors can delete nn, each with probability 1/L1/L. Consequently

Pr⁡(n is deleted)≥1−e−1/6.\Pr(n\text{ is deleted})\ge1-e^{-1/6}.

Averaging over nn supplies a coloring deleting at least this fraction of the integer points of II. All these hits are active, since n>qn>q.

For each increasing LL, choose QQ so large that LbQ≤1/LLb_Q\le1/L. Then the Haar footprint tends to zero, whereas the interval length is H=LQ/4H=LQ/4 and its deleted proportion stays bounded away from zero. The moduli are distinct and all lie in a single dyadic window.

Why the consecutive-shift container does not amplify harmonically

Let

V=⋃1≤j≤K⋃Q≤q≤2Q[j]q,1≤K<Q.V=\bigcup_{1\le j\le K}\bigcup_{Q\le q\le2Q}[j]_q, \qquad 1\le K<Q.

Writing s=∑Q≤q≤2Q1/q≥1/2s=\sum_{Q\le q\le2Q}1/q\ge1/2, its full incidence count FF has mean KsKs. For d=(q,r)d=(q,r), at most K2/d+KK^2/d+K pairs (j,ℓ)∈[1,K]2(j,\ell)\in[1,K]^2 satisfy j≡ℓ(modd)j\equiv\ell\pmod d. Therefore

EF2≤K2s2+KGQ,GQ=∑Q≤q,r≤2Q(q,r)qr≤4(1+log⁡(2Q)).\mathbb EF^2\le K^2s^2+K G_Q, \qquad G_Q=\sum_{Q\le q,r\le2Q}\frac{(q,r)}{qr} \le4(1+\log(2Q)).

The last bound follows from (q,r)=∑d∣q,rφ(d)(q,r)=\sum_{d\mid q,r}\varphi(d). Cauchy--Schwarz gives

μ(V)≥Ks2Ks2+GQ≥KK+16(1+log⁡(2Q)).\mu(V)\ge\frac{Ks^2}{Ks^2+G_Q} \ge\frac{K}{K+16(1+\log(2Q))}.

Thus making this entire container's footprint tend to zero requires K=o(log⁡Q)K=o(\log Q). Even the full range [Q,KQ][Q,KQ] contributes only O(1+log⁡K)=o(log⁡Q)O(1+\log K)=o(\log Q) harmonic mass, not a positive normalized harmonic anomaly. This does not give a lower bound for every colored subunion, whose measure can be much smaller than that of its container.