Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Coherent logarithmic criterion


This is a proved sufficient condition for the original activation rule, not a solution of the unrestricted coherent or arbitrary-residue problem.

The logarithmic criterion

Let DD be a set of moduli, let PP be its primitive core, and fix a coherent center α∈Z^\alpha\in\widehat{\mathbb Z}. Suppose

WP(X):=∑q∈Pq≤Xlog⁡qq=O(log⁡X).(1)W_P(X):=\sum_{\substack{q\in P\\q\le X}}\frac{\log q}{q} =O(\log X). \tag{1}

Then the delayed union

B={n≥1:∃q∈D, q≤n, n≡α(modq)}B=\{n\ge1:\exists q\in D,\ q\le n,\ n\equiv\alpha\pmod q\}

has logarithmic density β=μ(⋃q∈D[α]q)\beta=\mu(\bigcup_{q\in D}[\alpha]_q). It has finite-periodic approximation in upper logarithmic density. The conclusion holds for every coherent center, not just integer centers.

Deleting nonminimal multiples changes neither the full nor the delayed union, so work with PP. If q(n)q(n) is the least full covering modulus, put, for 0<η≤1/20<\eta\le1/2,

Bη={n:q(n)≤n1−η},Eη=B∖Bη.B_\eta=\{n:q(n)\le n^{1-\eta}\},\qquad E_\eta=B\setminus B_\eta.

The power-cutoff theorem proves that BηB_\eta has natural, hence logarithmic, density β\beta. Every point of EηE_\eta in the qq-cell satisfies q≤n<q1/(1−η)q\le n<q^{1/(1-\eta)}. Write the normalized residue as 0≤aq<q0\le a_q<q and n=aq+tqn=a_q+tq, with t≥1t\ge1. Summing over all possible quotients, whether or not they are first kills, gives

HEη(X)≤∑q∈Pq≤X1qH⌊qη/(1−η)⌋≤HP(X)+η1−ηWP(X).(2)\begin{aligned} H_{E_\eta}(X) &\le\sum_{\substack{q\in P\\q\le X}} \frac1q H_{\lfloor q^{\eta/(1-\eta)}\rfloor}\\ &\le H_P(X)+\frac{\eta}{1-\eta}W_P(X). \end{aligned} \tag{2}

The activation condition is essential to t≥1t\ge1 here.

Primitive sets have logarithmic density zero, as proved in structured residues. Thus HP(X)=o(log⁡X)H_P(X)=o(\log X). Writing A=lim sup⁡WP(X)/log⁡X<∞A=\limsup W_P(X)/\log X<\infty, (2) yields

ld⁡‾(B)≤β+Aη1−η.\overline{\operatorname{ld}}(B) \le\beta+\frac{A\eta}{1-\eta}.

Let η↓0\eta\downarrow0. Fixed finite prefixes give the reverse lower bound, proving the claimed logarithmic density. For a finite prefix FF, subtracting its periodic harmonic asymptotic gives

ld⁡(B∖BF)=β−βF.\operatorname{ld}(B\setminus B_F)=\beta-\beta_F.

This tends to zero as the prefix is exhausted, proving the approximation statement. No natural-density conclusion for BB is asserted.

A finite small-footprint consequence

For a finite coherent primitive family, put AX=WP(X)/H⌊X⌋A_X=W_P(X)/H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}. The exact multiples comparison gives HP(X)≤βH⌊X⌋H_P(X)\le\beta H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}. The finite power-cutoff bound and (2) consequently imply

HB(X)H⌊X⌋≤fη(β)+β+η1−ηAX,fη(β)≤min⁡(1,Cηlog⁡(2/β)).(3)\frac{H_B(X)}{H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}} \le f_\eta(\beta)+\beta+\frac{\eta}{1-\eta}A_X, \qquad f_\eta(\beta)\le\min\left(1,\frac{C}{\eta\log(2/\beta)}\right). \tag{3}

In particular, if AX≤AA_X\le A, optimizing 0<η≤1/20<\eta\le1/2 gives

HB(X)H⌊X⌋≤min⁡{1, β+C′A+1log⁡(2/β)}.(4)\frac{H_B(X)}{H_{\lfloor X\rfloor}} \le\min\left\{1,\, \beta+C'\sqrt{\frac{A+1}{\log(2/\beta)}}\right\}. \tag{4}

For the parameter range where the suggested optimizer exceeds 1/21/2, the trivial bound one implies (4) after enlarging C′C'. An empty family is treated separately. Thus (4) is a uniform finite harmonic small-footprint bound under a bounded weighted reciprocal hypothesis.

The condition permits failure of natural density

There are primitive sets satisfying (1) but failing the reciprocal-shell condition used in the earlier natural-density theorem. Here is a deterministic recursive example.

Fix 0<ε<1/30<\varepsilon<1/3. Having chosen finite blocks P1,…,Pj−1P_1,\ldots,P_{j-1}, let LjL_j be their common period, taking L1=1L_1=1. Choose the least integer Nj≥2N_j\ge2 satisfying

Lj∣Nj,Nj>2Nj−1,log⁡Nj≥2log⁡Nj−1,μ(M((Nj,2Nj]∩N))≤ε2−j,(5)L_j\mid N_j,\quad N_j>2N_{j-1},\quad \log N_j\ge2\log N_{j-1},\quad \mu(M((N_j,2N_j]\cap\mathbb N))\le\varepsilon2^{-j}, \tag{5}

omitting conditions involving N0N_0 at the first stage. Such choices exist by the uniform multiples-window bound, which holds along all sufficiently large multiples of LjL_j. Set

Pj={q∈(Nj,2Nj]:r∤q for all r∈P1∪⋯∪Pj−1}.P_j=\{q\in(N_j,2N_j]:r\nmid q \text{ for all }r\in P_1\cup\cdots\cup P_{j-1}\}.

No two numbers in one block divide one another, and the definition prevents divisibility from an older block. Hence P=⋃jPjP=\bigcup_jP_j is primitive. Its full multiples footprint β\beta is at most ∑jε2−j=ε\sum_j\varepsilon2^{-j}=\varepsilon.

The old multiples union is LjL_j-periodic with density β<j≤ε\beta_{<j}\le\varepsilon. The interval (Nj,2Nj](N_j,2N_j] is an exact union of periods, so

∣Pj∣=(1−β<j)Nj≥(1−ε)Nj,∑q∈Pj1q≥1−ε2.(6)|P_j|=(1-\beta_{<j})N_j\ge(1-\varepsilon)N_j, \qquad \sum_{q\in P_j}\frac1q\ge\frac{1-\varepsilon}{2}. \tag{6}

On the other hand ∑N<q≤2N1/q≤log⁡2\sum_{N<q\le2N}1/q\le\log2. Geometric growth of log⁡Nj\log N_j in (5) therefore gives, for all X≥2X\ge2,

WP(X)≤(log⁡2)∑Nj<Xlog⁡(2Nj)≤4(log⁡2)log⁡X.(7)W_P(X) \le(\log2)\sum_{N_j<X}\log(2N_j) \le4(\log2)\log X. \tag{7}

For any fixed η>0\eta>0, put Xj=2NjX_j=2N_j. Eventually Xj1−η<NjX_j^{1-\eta}<N_j, so the entire jjth block lies in (Xj1−η,Xj](X_j^{1-\eta},X_j]. Equation (6) shows that the reciprocal-shell limsup is at least (1−ε)/2(1-\varepsilon)/2, independently of η\eta. Thus the natural-density criterion does not apply.

For the zero center, the multiples union itself has upper natural density at least (1−ε)/2>β(1-\varepsilon)/2>\beta, by counting PjP_j below 2Nj2N_j. Its logarithmic density equals β\beta, so natural density does not exist (natural density, if present, would equal logarithmic density). Nevertheless (1) proves logarithmic density for every coherent center on this same modulus set. This example distinguishes the two density conclusions; it is not a counterexample to Problem 25.