Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Full fixed-similarity orbits have unbounded rarity despite collisions


Fix contractive planar similarities f1,…,fbf_1,\ldots,f_b, allowing reflections, and a point pp. Put

Ad={fw1∘⋯∘fwd(p):wi∈{1,…,b}},Nd=∣Ad∣.A_d=\{f_{w_1}\circ\cdots\circ f_{w_d}(p): w_i\in\{1,\ldots,b\}\},\qquad N_d=|A_d|.

Theorem. If Nd→∞N_d\to\infty, then R(Ad)→∞R(A_d)\to\infty. If the generators do not have a common fixed point, then

R(Ad)≥Nd1/6−o(1).R(A_d)\ge N_d^{1/6-o(1)}.

Unlike the dense-word theorem, this allows arbitrarily severe exact collisions. It concerns the full image sets of a fixed finite family, not arbitrary sparse selections or depth-dependent similarities. It does not resolve either unrestricted question of Problem 132.

1. Positive entropy and convex sumsets

Let GdG_d be the distinct affine maps represented by words of length dd. Write their generating linear parts as riRθiJϵir_iR_{\theta_i}J^{\epsilon_i}, where JJ is reflection in the real axis. A word's scale is a product ∏rici\prod r_i^{c_i} with 0≤ci≤d0\le c_i\le d, and its angle is ∑aiθi\sum a_i\theta_i with ∣ai∣≤d|a_i|\le d. There are therefore at most

P(d)=2(d+1)b(2d+1)bP(d)=2(d+1)^b(2d+1)^b

possible linear parts. A map is determined by its linear part and its value at pp, giving

Nd≤∣Gd∣≤P(d)Nd.N_d\le |G_d|\le P(d)N_d.

Submultiplicativity ∣Gd+e∣≤∣Gd∣∣Ge∣|G_{d+e}|\le|G_d||G_e| and Fekete's lemma show that Nd=exp⁡(hd+o(d))N_d=\exp(hd+o(d)) for some h≥0h\ge0.

If two generators have distinct fixed points, choose a large closed ball containing pp and preserved by every generator. Sufficiently large equal powers of these two generators map it into disjoint neighborhoods of their fixed points. Words in these two blocks have pairwise distinct images of pp: remove their common prefix and use injectivity and the disjoint images at the first differing block. Hence Nkℓ≥2ℓN_{k\ell}\ge2^\ell for a fixed block length kk. The limit defining hh gives h>0h>0.

Translate pp to zero and split each word at s=⌊d/2⌋s=\lfloor d/2\rfloor, t=d−st=d-s. Grouping prefixes by linear part gives

Ad=⋃L(BL+LAt),BL⊆As,A_d=\bigcup_L(B_L+LA_t),\qquad B_L\subseteq A_s,

with at most P(s)P(s) summands. The convex-sumset theorem checked in minkowski_sum_layers bounds every convexly independent subset of P+QP+Q by C(∣P∣2/3∣Q∣2/3+∣P∣+∣Q∣)C(|P|^{2/3}|Q|^{2/3}+|P|+|Q|). Thus every convexly independent subset of AdA_d has size at most

Hd=CP(s)(Ns2/3Nt2/3+Ns+Nt)=Nd2/3+o(1).H_d=CP(s)(N_s^{2/3}N_t^{2/3}+N_s+N_t) =N_d^{2/3+o(1)}.

The external input is Theorem 1 of Eisenbrand--Pach--Rothvoß--Sopher, Convexly independent subsets of the Minkowski sum of planar point sets. Its full statement imposes no separation or unique-representation condition; it was checked in the full paper in this attempt and in the earlier sumset argument.

Every convex vertex layer obeys this same bound. The rank--layer argument gives

R(Ad)≥⌊Nd/(2Hd)⌋=Nd1/6−o(1).R(A_d)\ge\left\lfloor\sqrt{N_d/(2H_d)}\right\rfloor =N_d^{1/6-o(1)}.

Rank existence follows exactly as in the selected-sumset proof. This also proves, for every fixed ϵ>0\epsilon>0,

Bd⊆Ad,∣Bd∣≥Nd2/3+ϵ⟹R(Bd)≥Ndϵ/2−o(1).B_d\subseteq A_d,\quad |B_d|\ge N_d^{2/3+\epsilon} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad R(B_d)\ge N_d^{\epsilon/2-o(1)}.

2. Common fixed points: normalization and counting

Move the common fixed point to zero. The case p=0p=0 has bounded orbit, so assume ∣p∣=1|p|=1. Let RR be the largest contraction ratio, put gi=R−1fig_i=R^{-1}f_i, and choose a ratio-one generator g0=U0g_0=U_0. The sets

Sd=U0−d{gw(p):∣w∣=d}S_d=U_0^{-d}\{g_w(p):|w|=d\}

are similar to AdA_d, lie in the unit disk, and are nested: prepend U0U_0 to obtain Sd⊆Sd+1S_d\subseteq S_{d+1}. If every generator has ratio one, SdS_d lies on one circle; all its distance graphs have maximum degree two and at least (Nd−1)/2(N_d-1)/2 distances occur. The conclusion follows.

Otherwise call a factor with ratio less than one subunit. We prove that there is a fixed integer r≥0r\ge0 such that

#{x∈Sd:x has a representation with at most K subunit factors}=OK((d+1)r),(1)\#\{x\in S_d:x\text{ has a representation with at most }K \text{ subunit factors}\}=O_K((d+1)^r), \tag{1} Nd≥c(d+1)r+1(d sufficiently large).(2)N_d\ge c(d+1)^{r+1}\quad(d\text{ sufficiently large}). \tag{2}

We use elementary finitely generated Abelian group counting. If an angular subgroup Γ⊂S1\Gamma\subset S^1 has torsion-free rank rr, its bounded-exponent sets have O((d+1)r)O((d+1)^r) elements. Positive products of at most dd generators have Ω((d+1)r)\Omega((d+1)^r) elements: select rr generators with linearly independent free-coordinate vectors in Γ≅Zr⊕F\Gamma\cong\mathbb Z^r\oplus F.

There are three cases, with angles understood modulo 2π2\pi.

A ratio-one reflection is available. Choose it as U0=JU_0=J. Let Γ\Gamma be generated by the angles of all ratio-one generators. A word with at most KK subunit factors has boundedly many possible subunit contributions; its remaining angular part is a bounded-exponent element of Γ\Gamma. This proves (1). Even ratio-one words generate rotations R2θR_{2\theta} from direct generators and Rθ=(RθJ)JR_\theta=(R_\theta J)J from reversing ones. Their subgroup has the same rank as Γ\Gamma. Padding with J2J^2, and using a single JJ for odd lengths, gives Ω(dr)\Omega(d^r) images at each sufficiently large exact length. For 0≤k≤d/20\le k\le d/2, insert kk copies of one fixed subunit generator. These give distinct radii and Ω(dr)\Omega(d^r) points at each radius, proving (2).

All generators are direct. Write U0=RαU_0=R_\alpha and let Γ\Gamma be generated by θi−α\theta_i-\alpha for the ratio-one generators. Commutativity and padding by U0U_0 give (1) and Ω(dr)\Omega(d^r) exact-length ratio-one images. Inserting kk copies of a subunit generator as above gives (2).

All ratio-one generators are direct, but a subunit reflection exists. Again write U0=RαU_0=R_\alpha; take Γ\Gamma generated by 2α2\alpha and the ratio-one angles θi−α\theta_i-\alpha. If a word has k≤Kk\le K subunit factors, the signed number of its ratio-one letters has the parity of d−kd-k. After subtracting dαd\alpha, its angular contribution is a bounded-exponent element of Γ\Gamma, up to one of boundedly many offsets, including −kα-k\alpha. This proves (1).

For (2), fix a subunit reflection g=sRϕJg=sR_\phi J. For each odd k≤d/2k\le d/2, set D=d−kD=d-k and use words

Uleft gk U0D−ℓ,U_{\rm left}\,g^k\,U_0^{D-\ell},

where UleftU_{\rm left} is any ratio-one word of length ℓ≤D\ell\le D. Their varying normalized angles include all positive products of at most DD elements from 2α2\alpha and θi+α\theta_i+\alpha. These generate the same group Γ\Gamma. Thus there are Ω(dr)\Omega(d^r) points at each of the Ω(d)\Omega(d) distinct radii sks^k, proving (2).

3. A finite surrounding set, or finitely many lines

In the reflection-reference case, consider the group generated by the angles of all generators. If it is finite, finitely many lines cover every SdS_d. If infinite, a direct generator's even powers or the block (RθJ)J(R_\theta J)J give a dense angular sequence among the nested sets SdS_d.

In the direct-only case use instead all angles θi−α\theta_i-\alpha. An infinite-order generator gives a dense sequence by its powers; a finite group again gives finitely many lines.

In the last case choose a subunit reflection angle ϕ∗\phi_*. The normalized directions lie in a bounded number of cosets of the group generated by

2α,θi−α (i direct),ϕj−ϕ∗ (j reversing).2\alpha,\quad \theta_i-\alpha\ (i\text{ direct}), \quad \phi_j-\phi_*\ (j\text{ reversing}).

If finite, this gives a uniform finite line cover. If infinite, a dense angular sequence comes from, respectively, words g∗U0kg_*U_0^k, powers of a direct generator, or powers of a pair of reflections. For the last case one may assume 2α2\alpha is torsion, since otherwise the first case already supplies the sequence; subtracting 2α2\alpha then preserves infinite order.

Finite line covers imply rarity growth by line_covers. In the remaining case, choose three directions of the dense sequence not contained in a closed semicircle. Their radii are positive, so their convex hull contains zero in its interior. Nesting gives a fixed DD and ϵ>0\epsilon>0 with

B(0,ϵ)⊆conv⁡(SD).(3)B(0,\epsilon)\subseteq\operatorname{conv}(S_D). \tag{3}

4. Negligible fixed layers in the zero-entropy case

Choose a subunit generator gg and LL so that the contraction ratio ρ\rho of V=gLV=g^L is smaller than ϵ\epsilon. Put

Cj=U0−(D+jL)VjU0DSD.C_j=U_0^{-(D+jL)}V^jU_0^D S_D.

Then Cj⊆SD+jLC_j\subseteq S_{D+jL}. Each CjC_j is an orthogonal image of ρjSD\rho^j S_D, so (3) implies

Cj+1⊂int⁡conv⁡(Cj),B(0,ϵρj)⊆conv⁡(Cj).C_{j+1}\subset\operatorname{int}\operatorname{conv}(C_j), \qquad B(0,\epsilon\rho^j)\subseteq\operatorname{conv}(C_j).

For sufficiently large dd, CjC_j survives the first jj convex vertex-layer deletions from SdS_d, by induction using the nested convex hulls. Every vertex of layer j+1j+1 consequently has radius at least ϵρj\epsilon\rho^j.

Let κ<1\kappa<1 be the largest subunit ratio. A point of that radius can use at most ⌊log⁡(ϵρj)/log⁡κ⌋\lfloor\log(\epsilon\rho^j)/\log\kappa\rfloor subunit factors. By (1)--(2), the (j+1)(j+1)-st layer therefore has Oj(dr)=Oj(Nd/d)=o(Nd)O_j(d^r)=O_j(N_d/d)=o(N_d) points. Every fixed number of outer layers is negligible. The rank--layer theorem now makes every fixed number of largest distances rare eventually, completing the proof.

Checks and remaining scope

The author checked the positive-entropy argument, including exact overlaps and the polynomial count of linear parts; the three angular normal forms; the distinct-radius lower bounds; the normalization of the nested sets; and the rotation-independent nesting of CjC_j. The proofs were supplied by a separate author and are author-recorded.

This excludes full fixed-similarity word sets as bounded-rarity families even when Nd/bd→0N_d/b^d\to0. The positive-entropy selected-set bound above does not cover arbitrary sparse selections, and there is no reduction from arbitrary planar sets or nonstationary recursive constructions to this theorem.