Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 1076

../

claims/: The 7 claim pages of Problem 1076, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let k≥5k\geq 5 and let Fk\mathcal{F}_k be the family of all 33-uniform hypergraphs with kk vertices and k−2k-2 edges. Is it true that

ex3(n,Fk)∼n26?\mathrm{ex}_3(n,\mathcal{F}_k)\sim \frac{n^2}{6}?

Statement (corrected). Let k≥5k\geq 5 and let Fk\mathcal{F}_k be the family of all 33-uniform hypergraphs with jj vertices and j−2j-2 edges for some 4≤j≤k4\leq j\leq k. Is it true that

ex3(n,Fk)∼n26?\mathrm{ex}_3(n,\mathcal{F}_k)\sim \frac{n^2}{6}?

Notes. The site's wording defines Fk\mathcal F_k as the single family of 33-graphs with kk vertices and k−2k-2 edges, so that ex3(n,Fk)\mathrm{ex}_3(n,\mathcal F_k) is the Brown–Erdős–Sós function f(3)(n;k,k−2)−1f^{(3)}(n;k,k-2)-1 of [BES73], and that is what Erdős printed: display (13) of [Er74c], pp. 80–81, guesses that lim⁡f(3)(n;k,k−2)/n2=1/6\lim f^{(3)}(n;k,k-2)/n^2=1/6 for every kk, with the hedge that the conjecture "may easily turn out to be nonsense", and Erdős's "only argument in favour", the theorem that 13(n2)+1\frac13\binom n2+1 edges force a (5,3)(5,3)- or a (6,4)(6,4)-configuration, concerns two configurations forbidden together. Under that wording the displayed asymptotic is false: the limit is 1/51/5 at k=5k=5 ([Gl19]), 7/367/36 at k=6k=6 ([GJKKLP24]), 1/51/5, 61/33061/330 and 1/51/5 at k=7,8,9k=7,8,9 ([GKLPS26]) and at least 3/163/16 at k=10k=10 ([PiSu26]), all refereed, and the file for the problem in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs collection refutes the k=5k=5 case with explicit systems of density 92/52992/529; only the lower bound (1/6−o(1))n2(1/6-o(1))n^2 holds, for every kk, by [BoWa19] and [GKLO20]. The site's curator, Thomas Bloom, reads the problem as the approximate form of Problem 207, in which every (j,j−2)(j,j-2)-configuration with 4≤j≤k4\le j\le k is forbidden at once. The site's commentary (page last edited 7 October 2025, after Zach Hunter's thread comment of 6 October 2025 calling the problem "essentially a weaker version of" Problem 207) says that for kk satisfying the right divisibility conditions the extremal number is known exactly and that "the asymptotic version asked for here" was proved independently by Bohman and Warnke and by Glock, Kühn, Lo and Osthus, and it labels the problem PROVED. Each of those statements is true of the family F4∪⋯∪Fk\mathcal F_4\cup\dots\cup\mathcal F_k and false of the single family: a 33-graph avoiding F4\mathcal F_4 is linear, so ex3(n,F4∪⋯∪Fk)≤(n2)/3\mathrm{ex}_3(n,\mathcal F_4\cup\dots\cup\mathcal F_k)\le\binom n2/3 for every kk, the two credited papers give the matching lower bound, and a Steiner triple system of high girth (Problem 207, proved by Kwan, Sah, Sawhney and Simkin) gives the exact value n(n−1)/6n(n-1)/6 for large admissible nn. The corrected Statement replaces "with kk vertices and k−2k-2 edges" by "with jj vertices and j−2j-2 edges for some 4≤j≤k4\le j\le k" and changes nothing else. It follows Bloom's reading; nothing in Erdős's text points to it, and the Brown–Erdős–Sós literature treats the single-family question as Erdős's. The answer to the site's wording is no, by the four refereed papers; their results are correct, but they answer the printed wording (a single family Fk\mathcal F_k), not the corrected Statement (the cumulative family), so their claim pages are kept and rejected and do not count toward the problem's standing, and Alexeev's file is rejected for the same reason. The answer to the corrected Statement is yes, and the problem is proved. Collin Yuanjie Ren's Lean submission states the corrected Statement and assembles its proof from the formalized theorem on Problem 207; the lean-proofs file states the site's wording. Neither is built here.

Status. The site's label is PROVED (page last edited 7 October 2025), and it describes the corrected Statement: the site's remark credits the asymptotic version to Bohman and Warnke [BoWa19] and to Glock, Kühn, Lo and Osthus [GKLO20], whose lower bound (1/6−o(1))n2(1/6-o(1))n^2, with the upper bound (n2)/3\binom n2/3 that linearity gives, proves it (Glock–Kühn–Lo–Osthus 2018, Bohman–Warnke 2018). The site's wording, with Fk\mathcal F_k the single family of 33-graphs with kk vertices and k−2k-2 edges, is refuted at k=5k=5 (Glock 2019), at k=6k=6 (Glock–Joos–Kim–Kühn–Lichev–Pikhurko 2024), at k=7,8,9k=7,8,9 (Glock–Kim–Lichev–Pikhurko–Sun 2026) and at k=10k=10 (Pikhurko–Sun 2026), all refereed, and at k=5k=5 by the Lean file Alexeev 2026; those five claim pages are rejected, as they answer the site's wording, not the corrected Statement.

Source. erdosproblems.com/1076, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1076, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1076.

References.

  • [BES73] Brown, W. G. and Erdős, P. and Sós, V. T., [[../library/extremal_graph_theory/brown_1973_extremal_problems_graphs/_index|Some extremal problems on rr-graphs]]. (1973), 53-63.
  • [BoWa19] Bohman, Tom and Warnke, Lutz, [[../library/set_systems/bohman_2019_large_girth_approximate_steiner_triple_systems/_index|Large girth approximate Steiner triple systems]]. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) (2019), 895-913.
  • [Er74c] Erdős, Paul, [[../library/extremal_graph_theory/erdos_1974_extremal_problems_graphs_hypergraphs/_index|Extremal problems on graphs and hypergraphs]]. (1974), 75-84.
  • [GKLO20] Glock, Stefan and Kühn, Daniela and Lo, Allan and Osthus, Deryk, [[../library/set_systems/glock_2020_conjecture_erdos_locally_sparse_steiner_triple/_index|On a conjecture of Erdős on locally sparse Steiner triple systems]]. Combinatorica (2020), 363-403.
  • [Gl19] Glock, Stefan, Triple systems with no three triples spanning at most five points. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 51 (2019), no. 2, 230-236; arXiv:1809.02100. Not cited by the site on this problem.
  • [GJKKLP24] Glock, Stefan and Joos, Felix and Kim, Jaehoon and Kühn, Marcus and Lichev, Lyuben and Pikhurko, Oleg, On the (6,4)(6,4)-problem of Brown, Erdős and Sós. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. B 11 (2024), 173-186; arXiv:2209.14177. Not cited by the site on this problem.
  • [GKLPS26] Glock, Stefan and Kim, Jaehoon and Lichev, Lyuben and Pikhurko, Oleg and Sun, Shumin, On the (k+2,k)(k+2,k)-problem of Brown, Erdős, and Sós for k=5,6,7k=5,6,7. Canad. J. Math. 78 (2026), no. 5, 1566-1608; arXiv:2403.04474. Not cited by the site on this problem.
  • [PiSu26] Pikhurko, Oleg and Sun, Shumin, On the quadratic 8-edge case of the Brown–Erdős–Sós problem. European J. Combin. 135 (2026), 104364; arXiv:2506.01739. Not cited by the site on this problem.

Formalization. None recorded by the site, and the formal-conjectures catalog has no statement file for the problem. Two third-party Lean developments are linked from the claim pages: Collin Yuanjie Ren's submission states the corrected Statement and assembles its proof, linked from the two pages it credits, and the file in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs collection refutes the site's wording, on its own rejected claim page. The corpus has built neither.

Current assessment

The corrected Statement forbids, for k≥5k\ge5, every 33-graph with jj vertices and j−2j-2 edges for some 4≤j≤k4\le j\le k, the family F4∪⋯∪Fk\mathcal F_4\cup\dots\cup\mathcal F_k in the single-family notation of the site's wording, and asks whether the extremal number is asymptotic to n2/6n^2/6. The site's wording forbids only the single family Fk\mathcal F_k of 33-graphs with kk vertices and k−2k-2 edges, and the sources answer the two differently.

Corrected Statement. The site's remark calls the problem essentially a weaker form of Problem 207, Erdős's conjecture that Steiner triple systems avoiding every (j,j−2)(j,j-2)-configuration with 4≤j≤k4\le j\le k exist for all large admissible orders, and credits the asymptotic version to [BoWa19] and [GKLO20]. A 33-graph avoiding F4\mathcal F_4 has no two edges sharing a pair, so the upper bound (n2)/3\binom n2/3 is immediate, and the locally sparse systems of Glock, Kühn, Lo and Osthus and of Bohman and Warnke supply the matching lower bound (1/6−o(1))n2(1/6-o(1))n^2, so the answer is yes for every kk and the problem is proved; the exact version is Problem 207, proved by Kwan, Sah, Sawhney and Simkin (card).

Site's wording. A 33-graph contains a member of Fk\mathcal F_k exactly when some k−2k-2 of its edges span at most kk vertices, so ex3(n,Fk)\mathrm{ex}_3(n,\mathcal F_k) is the Brown–Erdős–Sós function f(3)(n;k,k−2)−1f^{(3)}(n;k,k-2)-1 of their 1973 paper, and Erdős's display (13) of 1974 guessed, with the hedge that the guess might be nonsense, that f(3)(n;k,k−2)/n2→1/6f^{(3)}(n;k,k-2)/n^2\to1/6 (card). Brown, Erdős and Sós proved the quadratic order for every k≥4k\ge4 and the limit 1/61/6 at k=4k=4, where F4\mathcal F_4-free means linear. The lower bound (1/6−o(1))n2(1/6-o(1))n^2 holds for every kk, by the same two constructions, which avoid every Fj\mathcal F_j with 4≤j≤k4\le j\le k at once. The upper bound fails: the limit is 1/51/5 at k=5k=5 (Glock 2019) and 7/367/36 at k=6k=6 (Glock, Joos, Kim, Kühn, Lichev and Pikhurko 2024), both refereed. The limits at k=7,8,9k=7,8,9 are 1/51/5, 61/33061/330 and 1/51/5 (Glock, Kim, Lichev, Pikhurko and Sun, Canad. J. Math. 78 (2026), 1566–1608), and at k=10k=10 the limit is at least 3/163/16 (Pikhurko and Sun, Eur. J. Combin. 135 (2026), 104364), so under this wording the answer is no for every kk from 55 to 1010. The explicit (5,3)(5,3)-free systems of density 92/529>1/692/529>1/6 in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs file give a weaker, self-contained refutation at k=5k=5. The four refereed results are correct, but they answer the site's wording, not the corrected Statement, so their pages are rejected and do not count toward the problem's standing, and Alexeev's page is rejected for the same reason.

Standing. The two credited papers are accepted full claims on the corrected Statement, so the problem is proved. The four refereed papers on the single family, which determine the limit at k=5k=5, at k=6k=6 and at k=7,8,9k=7,8,9 and bound it below by 3/163/16 at k=10k=10, and Alexeev's file have rejected claim pages. The theorem statements of [Gl19] and [GJKKLP24] are taken from the papers' arXiv abstracts and Crossref records, and those of [GKLPS26] and [PiSu26] from the arXiv versions of the papers; none of the four is in the library and their proofs are unreviewed.

Search scope: the site's page and discussion thread (one comment, of 6 October 2025, pointing to the two credited papers and to the exact results on Problem 207), the community database (teorth/erdosproblems), the formal-conjectures catalog, the lean-proofs catalog, and the arXiv and Crossref records of the papers cited above. The corpus has built neither of the two third-party Lean developments linked from the claim pages, so no formalized evidence is listed.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.