Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Alon 2006 extremal hypergraph problem brown erdos sos

../

conjecture_1: Alon and Shapira's statement of the Brown-Erdős-Sós problem for every number of edges, with both the o(n^k) upper bound and the matching n^{k-o(1)} lower bound; Theorem 1 is its case e = 3.

proposition_5_1: A step from e-1 to e edges for the lower bound of the Brown-Erdős-Sós problem when r = k+1, giving n^{2-o(1)} < f_3(n,7,4) and n^{2-o(1)} < f_3(n,8,5) from the (6,3) lower bound.

proposition_5_2: Reduces the upper bound of the Brown-Erdős-Sós conjecture for every exponent k to its quadratic case k = 2, the upper half of Problem 1178's conjecture.

theorem_1: The three-edge case of the Brown-Erdős-Sós problem for every uniformity and every exponent, with a matching lower bound of order n^{k-o(1)}.


N. Alon and A. Shapira, On an extremal hypergraph problem of Brown, Erdős and Sós, Combinatorica 26 (2006), no. 6, 627--645, doi:10.1007/s00493-006-0035-9 (the Crossref record). Combinatorica is a refereed journal.

Edition read. The copy read for this card is an authors' preprint: 15 pages with a text layer, no journal header, PDF metadata dated 31 May 2004, the second author's footnote saying the work is part of his Ph.D. thesis; printed and PDF pages agree. The journal version was not compared, so its labels and text may differ from the preprint's. Provenance: obtained in September 2026 (the download URL was not recorded); 192,842 bytes. No notice is printed on any page of the preprint, so no host's terms could be read; the publisher's version is not the copy read; the term is unstated.

Read status: claims checked for Theorem 1 (p. 2), for the introduction's displays (1)-(4) with their sentences (pp. 1-2), and for Conjecture 1 and Propositions 5.1 and 5.2 (pp. 12-13), read clause by clause on the page images; the construction and the proofs (Sections 2-4, pp. 3-11, and the proofs of Section 5) were read for their structure and not checked.

Contents

  • Setting (p. 1): fr(n,v,e)f_r(n,v,e) is the largest number of edges in an rr-graph on nn vertices that contains no ee edges spanned by vv vertices. For e=(vr)e=\binom vr this is the Turán problem for the complete rr-graph on vv vertices.
  • The Brown-Erdős-Sós result quoted (p. 1): for every 2≤k<r2\le k<r and e≥3e\ge3, fr(n,e(r−k)+k,e)=Θ(nk)f_r(n,e(r-k)+k,e)=\Theta(n^k), the upper bound because any kk vertices lie in at most e−1e-1 edges and the lower bound by the deletion method; this "suggested the much more difficult problem" (1) of the asymptotics of fr(n,e(r−k)+k+1,e)f_r(n,e(r-k)+k+1,e).
  • Displays (2)-(4) (p. 2): Ruzsa and Szemerédi's n2−o(1)<f3(n,6,3)=o(n2)n^{2-o(1)}<f_3(n,6,3)=o(n^2); Erdős, Frankl and Rödl's n2−o(1)<fr(n,3(r−2)+3,3)=o(n2)n^{2-o(1)}<f_r(n,3(r-2)+3,3)=o(n^2) for every fixed rr (the case e=3e=3, k=2k=2; the preprint prints 3(r−3)+33(r-3)+3, a misprint, since at r=3r=3 the display must reduce to (2)); Sárközy and Selkow's fr(n,e(r−k)+k+⌊log⁡2e⌋,e)=o(nk)f_r(n,e(r-k)+k+\lfloor\log_2e\rfloor,e)=o(n^k).
  • Theorem 1 (p. 2): for any fixed 2≤k<r2\le k<r, nk−o(1)<fr(n,3(r−k)+k+1,3)=o(nk)n^{k-o(1)}<f_r(n,3(r-k)+k+1,3)=o(n^k); the upper bound follows from (4) and, per Section 3, from a reduction to the (6,3)(6,3) upper bound; the lower bound uses a Behrend-type number-theoretic construction and an algebraic pseudo-random matrix (Sections 2-4). Paged at theorem_1.
  • Sections 2-4 (pp. 3-11): the matrix of Lemma 2.2 (p. 6), the Behrend-type sets of Lemma 3.1 (p. 7), the rr-graph of Section 3 with Claim 3.1 (p. 7), the Key Lemma 3.2 (p. 8) and the proof of Theorem 1 (p. 8); the Key Lemma is proved in Section 4. Technical steps, not paged separately.
  • Section 5 (pp. 12-13), concluding remarks and open problems: Conjecture 1 (p. 12), nk−o(1)<fr(n,e(r−k)+k+1,e)=o(nk)n^{k-o(1)}<f_r(n,e(r-k)+k+1,e)=o(n^k) for every fixed 2≤k<r2\le k<r and 3≤e3\le e; Proposition 5.1 (p. 12), a step from e−1e-1 to ee edges for the lower bound when r=k+1r=k+1, giving n2−o(1)<f3(n,7,4)n^{2-o(1)}<f_3(n,7,4) and n2−o(1)<f3(n,8,5)n^{2-o(1)}<f_3(n,8,5) (p. 13); Proposition 5.2 (p. 13), the upper bound of (13) for every kk from its case k=2k=2; and remarks on induced matchings and on applications of the (6,3)(6,3)-problem.

Compiled scope

Pages 1-2 and the statements on pp. 12-13 were read clause by clause on the page images; Sections 2-4 and the proofs of Section 5 were read for their structure only. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #1157: with s=3s=3 edges and k=(r−t)⋅3+t+1k=(r-t)\cdot3+t+1 vertices in the site's letters, Theorem 1 gives nt−o(1)<exr(n,F)=o(nt)n^{t-o(1)}<\mathrm{ex}_r(n,\mathcal F)=o(n^t) for every r>t≥2r>t\ge2, which is the case s=3s=3 of the general Brown-Erdős-Sós conjecture the site states, proved for every uniformity and every exponent. Conjecture 1 (p. 12) states the same two bounds for every s≥3s\ge3 (a conjecture); Proposition 5.1 (pp. 12-13) gives the lower bounds ex3(n,F)>n2−o(1)\mathrm{ex}_3(n,\mathcal F)>n^{2-o(1)} for (k,s)=(7,4)(k,s)=(7,4) and (8,5)(8,5), lower bounds only; Proposition 5.2 (p. 13) derives the conjecture's upper bound for every tt from its case t=2t=2, a conditional reduction. #716: pp. 1--2 (text layer), the "(6, 3)-problem" with the 1973 bounds Ω(n3/2)=f3(n,6,3)=O(n2)\Omega(n^{3/2})=f_3(n,6,3)=O(n^2) and display (2), Ruzsa and Szemerédi's n2−o(1)<f3(n,6,3)=o(n2)n^{2-o(1)}<f_3(n,6,3)=o(n^2): the problem's question and its answer as this paper cites them. #1076: p. 1, the Brown--Erdős--Sós result fr(n,e(r−k)+k,e)=Θ(nk)f_r(n,e(r-k)+k,e)=\Theta(n^k) for 2≤k<r2\le k<r and e≥3e\ge3, which at r=3r=3, k=2k=2 reads f3(n,e+2,e)=Θ(n2)f_3(n,e+2,e)=\Theta(n^2), the order of the problem's ex3(n,Fk)\mathrm{ex}_3(n,\mathcal F_k) with k=e+2k=e+2 vertices and ee edges (the constant 1/61/6 the problem asks for is not discussed). #1178: the same Θ(nk)\Theta(n^k) sentence at k=2k=2 gives dr(e)>(r−2)e+2d_r(e)>(r-2)e+2 for every r≥3r\ge3, and display (3) (Erdős--Frankl--Rödl, p. 2) with Theorem 1 at k=2k=2 gives fr(n,3(r−2)+3,3)=o(n2)f_r(n,3(r-2)+3,3)=o(n^2), so dr(3)=(r−2)⋅3+3d_r(3)=(r-2)\cdot3+3: the case e=3e=3 of the problem's conjecture for every r≥3r\ge3 (a reading of the displayed bounds made here, with display (3) as corrected for its misprint). The upper half of the problem's conjecture, fr(n,(r−2)e+3,e)=o(n2)f_r(n,(r-2)e+3,e)=o(n^2) for every r≥3r\ge3 and e≥3e\ge3, is the hypothesis of Proposition 5.2 (p. 13) and the upper half of the case k=2k=2 of Conjecture 1 (p. 12); neither proves a further case.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.