Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 719

../

claims/: The 2 claim pages of Problem 719, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let exr(n;Kr+1r)\mathrm{ex}_r(n;K_{r+1}^r) be the maximum number of rr-edges that can be placed on nn vertices without forming a Kr+1rK_{r+1}^r (the rr-uniform complete graph on r+1r+1 vertices).

Is every rr-hypergraph GG on nn vertices the union of at most exr(n;Kr+1r)\mathrm{ex}_{r}(n;K_{r+1}^r) many copies of KrrK_r^r and Kr+1rK_{r+1}^r, no two of which share a KrrK_r^r?

Statement (corrected). Let exr(n;Kr+1r)\mathrm{ex}_r(n;K_{r+1}^r) be the maximum number of rr-edges that can be placed on nn vertices without forming a Kr+1rK_{r+1}^r (the rr-uniform complete graph on r+1r+1 vertices).

Is every rr-hypergraph GG on nn vertices, for r≥2r\ge2, the union of at most exr(n;Kr+1r)\mathrm{ex}_{r}(n;K_{r+1}^r) many copies of KrrK_r^r and Kr+1rK_{r+1}^r, no two of which share a KrrK_r^r?

Notes. The site's wording, like Erdős's in [Er81] (Part IV, item 3), states no range for rr. With r=1r=1 it fails trivially: the edges of a 11-uniform hypergraph are single vertices, ex1(n;K21)=1\mathrm{ex}_1(n;K_2^1)=1, and the hypergraph of all n≥3n\ge3 singletons needs at least ⌈n/2⌉≥2\lceil n/2\rceil\ge2 copies of K11K_1^1 and K21K_2^1. The corrected Statement adds only the range r≥2r\ge2. Erdős poses the conjecture for rr-graphs as the generalization of the Erdős–Goodman–Pósa theorem on graphs, the case r=2r=2 ([Er81], Part IV, item 3), and the formal-conjectures statement assumes r≥2r\ge2.

Status. Open on erdosproblems.com (label OPEN; the site's notes call it a conjecture of Erdős and Sauer).

Source. erdosproblems.com/719, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #719, https://www.erdosproblems.com/719.

References.

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures, added on 2026-10-07 for every r≥2r\ge2 and marked research open there with no formal proof; the community database records the statement formalized from that date. No Lean proof of any case is recorded, and the lean-proofs catalog holds no file for the problem.

Current assessment

The corrected Statement asks, for every r≥2r\ge2, whether every rr-uniform hypergraph on nn vertices is the union of at most exr(n;Kr+1r)\mathrm{ex}_r(n;K_{r+1}^r) copies of KrrK_r^r (single edges) and Kr+1rK_{r+1}^r, no two sharing an edge. Erdős states the conjecture in [Er81] directly after the theorem it generalizes: with Goodman and Pósa he proved that every graph on nn vertices is the union of at most ⌊n2/4⌋\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor edge-disjoint cliques, which can be taken to be edges and triangles. Since ex2(n;K3)=⌊n2/4⌋\mathrm{ex}_2(n;K_3)=\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor, that theorem is the case r=2r=2 of the question for every nn, and it is recorded as the accepted partial claim Erdős, Goodman and Pósa (1966), accepted on its refereed publication. The site's label and commentary credit no result on the problem.

For r≥3r\ge3 nothing is accepted. The one pending claim is partial: Rafik Zeraoulia's preprint of 7 September 2026, written with OpenAI GPT-5.6 Thinking, states that the r=3r=3 inequality holds for every 33-uniform hypergraph on at most nine vertices and presents local packing lemmas toward the general r=3r=3 case, which it does not claim; the preprint is not refereed and no reviewer has endorsed it. The same author's comment of 8 February 2026 on the site's discussion thread reports an exhaustive check of the r=3r=3 inequality on six vertices, with ex3(6;K43)=14\mathrm{ex}_3(6;K_4^3)=14, and notes that the case r=7r=7, n=8n=8 is immediate. The case r=3r=3 with n≥10n\ge10, and every case r≥4r\ge4 beyond the trivial range n≤r+1n\le r+1, are untouched by any claim found. The problem is open with no full claim.

Search scope, 2026-10-07: the site's problem page, discussion thread (one comment) and proof-claims tab (one claim), the community database entry (teorth/erdosproblems), the formal-conjectures statement file, the lean-proofs catalog, and the cards of [Er81] and [EGP66]. No other claim on the problem was found.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.