Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 83

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 83, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Suppose that we have a family F\mathcal{F} of subsets of [4n][4n] such that ∣A∣=2n\lvert A\rvert=2n for all A∈FA\in\mathcal{F} and for every $A,B\in \mathcal{F}$ we have ∣A∩B∣≥2\lvert A\cap B\rvert \geq 2. Then

∣F∣≤12((4n2n)−(2nn)2).\lvert \mathcal{F}\rvert \leq \frac{1}{2}\left(\binom{4n}{2n}-\binom{2n}{n}^2\right).

Status. The site labels the problem PROVED (LEAN), crediting Ahlswede and Khachatrian [AhKh97]; the Lean behind the qualifier is described below. The accepted claim is the 4m-conjecture from the complete intersection theorem.

Source. erdosproblems.com/83, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #83, https://www.erdosproblems.com/83.

References.

  • [AhKh97] Ahlswede, Rudolf and Khachatrian, Levon H., The complete intersection theorem for systems of finite sets. European J. Combin. (1997), 125-136.
  • [ErKoRa61] Erdős, P. and Ko, Chao and Rado, R., Intersection theorems for systems of finite sets. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) (1961), 313-320.

Formalization. The formal-conjectures statement file states the bound, leaves its proof as sorry and points at a Lean file in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs collection that declares itself a formalization of Ahlswede and Khachatrian's solution; a statement file is not a formalization, and the proof file is linked from the claim page at its pinned commit and has not been built or audited here.

Current assessment

The site's formulation is the 4m4m-conjecture of Erdős, Ko and Rado [ErKoRa61] with m=nm=n: a family of 2n2n-element subsets of [4n][4n] in which every two members share at least two elements has at most 12((4n2n)−(2nn)2)\frac12\bigl(\binom{4n}{2n}-\binom{2n}n^2\bigr) members, the size of the family of all 2n2n-subsets containing at least n+1n+1 elements of [2n][2n], so the bound is sharp. The answer is yes: Ahlswede and Khachatrian prove it, directly and as the case t=2t=2, k=2nk=2n of their complete intersection theorem, which determines the largest tt-intersecting family of kk-subsets of an mm-set for every 1≤t≤k≤m1\le t\le k\le m; the paper is refereed in European J. Combin. and the site's curator credits it, and the problem's standing derives from that accepted claim. The site's commentary states the complete intersection theorem in Frankl's form, naming the extremal family through the parameter rr with 1r+1≤m−2k+2t−2(t−1)(k−t+1)<1r\frac1{r+1}\le\frac{m-2k+2t-2}{(t-1)(k-t+1)}<\frac1r; the claim page states the same theorem as the paper prints it. The proofs are not compiled in the library, whose card records the statements only.

Search scope, 2026-10-07: the site's page and discussion thread (three comments, of 3 December 2025, 22 December 2025 and 20 January 2026: a 1996 photograph of Ahlswede and Khachatrian receiving Erdős's prize, a variant of Erdős and Sós on families with a forbidden intersection size with recent progress at arXiv:2512.17544, and an interview of Katona recalling the tt-intersecting generalization as one he had hoped to solve; no proof claims); the community database (teorth/erdosproblems), which lists the problem as proved (Lean) as of its last update on 2026-08-24, without dating the change of state, and as formalized since 2026-09-19; and the formal-conjectures catalog, whose statement file 83.lean is tagged research solved and cites as its formal proof the Lean file Erdos83.lean in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs repository, which the claim page links at the commit the catalog cites. No other claim on the problem was found. The Lean file has not been built here, so the problem has no formalized evidence; the Erdős–Sós variant is a different question and is not assessed here.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.