Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 925

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 925, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Is there a constant δ>0\delta>0 such that, for all large nn, if GG is a graph on nn vertices which is not Ramsey for K3K_3 (i.e. there exists a 2-colouring of the edges of GG with no monochromatic triangle) then GG contains an independent set of size ≫n1/3+δ\gg n^{1/3+\delta}?

Formulation. The site's wording (the page shows no last-edited date). "≫n1/3+δ\gg n^{1/3+\delta}" means at least c n1/3+δc\,n^{1/3+\delta} for a constant c>0c>0 independent of GG. The site's reformulation: with R(3,3,m)R(3,3,m) the least NN such that every 33-coloring of the edges of KNK_N has a monochromatic triangle in one of the first two colors or a monochromatic KmK_m in the third (the r(K3,K3,Km)r(K_3,K_3,K_m) of the resolving paper), the question asks whether R(3,3,m)≪m3−cR(3,3,m)\ll m^{3-c} for some c>0c>0; the two are equivalent because the graph of the first two colors of such a 33-coloring is a graph that is not Ramsey for K3K_3 whose independent sets are the cliques of the third color. The easy bound ≫n1/3\gg n^{1/3} is the one Erdős calls "very easy" in the origin and the site's commentary calls easy.

Status. Disproved. The status-defining source is Theorem 3.2 of Alon and Rödl, Combinatorica 25 (2005), 125--141 (refereed; the page numbers used here are the authors' final manuscript's), in the form of the explicit lower-bound construction inside its proof (p. 7): for infinitely many NN, a 33-coloring of KNK_N with no monochromatic triangle in the first two colors and a third color whose clique number is below c N1/3(log⁡N)2c\,N^{1/3}(\log N)^2, so the graph of the first two colors is 22-colorable without a monochromatic triangle and has independence number below c N1/3(log⁡N)2c\,N^{1/3}(\log N)^2, which is o(N1/3+δ)o(N^{1/3+\delta}) for every δ>0\delta>0; the answer is no. The conversion is written in the Current assessment and named there as authored; the paper never states the problem. The site's commentary credits Alon and Rödl [AlRo05] with the disproof, with the bounds m3/(log⁡m)4+o(1)≪R(3,3,m)≪m3log⁡log⁡m/(log⁡m)2m^3/(\log m)^{4+o(1)}\ll R(3,3,m)\ll m^3\log\log m/(\log m)^2 and Sudakov's removal of the log⁡log⁡m\log\log m, and so records the same resolution through the reformulation. The claim page Alon and Rödl 2005 records the theorem, its construction, the conversion and its acceptance evidence, and the frontmatter standing derives from it.

Source. erdosproblems.com/925, accessed 2026-09-18: the problem page (DISPROVED, which the site glosses as solved in the negative; no last-edited date shown; source key [Er69b]; commentary citing [AlRo05] and Problem 553; an indicator reporting no formalized statement), its empty discussion thread and its empty proof-claim tab. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #925, https://www.erdosproblems.com/925, accessed 2026-09-18.

References.

  • [AlRo05] Alon, N. and Rödl, V., Sharp bounds for some multicolor Ramsey numbers. Combinatorica 25 (2005), no. 2, 125--141, doi:10.1007/s00493-005-0011-9 (Crossref record accessed: issue dated March 2005). The pages and statement numbers used here are those of the authors' "Final Version" manuscript (15 pages) from Alon's publication list; Theorem 3.2, p. 6; its proof with the construction, pp. 6--7; the Remark, p. 7. Library home: alon_2005_sharp_bounds_some_multicolor_ramsey_numbers.
  • [Er69b] Erdős, P., Problems and results in chromatic graph theory. Proof Techniques in Graph Theory (Proc. Second Ann Arbor Graph Theory Conf., Ann Arbor, Mich., 1968), Academic Press (1969), 27--35. The question, p. 33. Library home: erdos_1969_problems_results_chromatic_graph_theory (a Rényi archive scan).
  • [AKS80] Ajtai, M., Komlós, J. and Szemerédi, E., A note on Ramsey numbers. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 29 (1980), no. 3, 354--360, DOI 10.1016/0097-3165(80)90030-8; Theorem 3, printed p. 358 (PDF p. 5 of the publisher's open-archive file): R(3,x)<100x2/ln⁡xR(3,x)<100x^2/\ln x. Library home: ajtai_1980_note_ramsey_numbers; paged at theorem_3. The upper half of the k=1k=1 case r(K3,Km)=Θ(m2/log⁡m)r(K_3,K_m)=\Theta(m^2/\log m) that [AlRo05]'s induction starts from, cited in the paper and taken at statement depth.
  • [Ki95] Kim, J. H., The Ramsey number R(3,t)R(3,t) has order of magnitude t2/log⁡tt^2/\log t. Random Structures Algorithms 7 (1995), 173--207. The lower half of the same k=1k=1 case, cited in the paper; in the library on Problem 553's account and not read.

Formalization. None. No file ErdosProblems/925.lean exists in formal-conjectures(the directory then had 673 entries); the site's indicator reports no formalized statement, and the community database (teorth/erdosproblems) records the problem disproved and unformalized (record last updated 31 August 2025).

Current assessment

The question (site formulation of 2026-09-18). The statement above; DISPROVED; source key [Er69b]. The commentary states that an independent set of size ≫n1/3\gg n^{1/3} is easy to find, restates the question as whether R(3,3,m)≪m3−cR(3,3,m)\ll m^{3-c} for some c>0c>0, and records that Alon and Rödl [AlRo05] disproved it with the bounds m3/(log⁡m)4+o(1)≪R(3,3,m)≪m3log⁡log⁡m/(log⁡m)2m^3/(\log m)^{4+o(1)}\ll R(3,3,m)\ll m^3\log\log m/(\log m)^2, adding that, as [AlRo05] relays, Sudakov saw how to drop the log⁡log⁡m\log\log m factor from the upper bound, and pointing to Problem 553. The thread and the proof-claim tab are empty. The community database record says disproved and not formalized (record last updated 31 August 2025).

Origin. [Er69b], printed p. 33 (PDF p. 7 of the Rényi archive scan), in Section 2 right after the Erdős--Hajnal edge-coloring question of Problem 924: "Hajnal and I recently observed that the following question seems to be relevant here. Let GnG_n be a graph whose edges can be colored by two colors such that there is no C3C_3 all of whose edges have the same color. What can be said about I(Gn)I(G_n)? It is very easy to show that I(Gn)>cn1/3I(G_n)>cn^{1/3}; but perhaps I(Gn)>cn(1/3)+δI(G_n)>cn^{(1/3)+\delta} also holds." The site's statement follows this passage; the bound Erdős calls "very easy" is the one the site's commentary calls easy. (The easy bound, not needed for the status, by the standard argument: fix a 22-coloring of the edges of GG with no monochromatic triangle and write α=α(G)\alpha=\alpha(G). The red neighborhood of a vertex spans no red edge, so the edges of GG inside it are all blue and contain no triangle; a triangle-free graph on R(3,α+1)R(3,\alpha+1) vertices has an independent set of size α+1\alpha+1, so each red neighborhood, and likewise each blue neighborhood, has fewer than R(3,α+1)≤(α+22)R(3,\alpha+1)\le\binom{\alpha+2}{2} vertices. Hence every degree of GG is O(α2)O(\alpha^2), and the greedy bound α≥n/(Δ(G)+1)\alpha\ge n/(\Delta(G)+1) gives α3≫n\alpha^3\gg n, that is, α≫n1/3\alpha\gg n^{1/3}. The site and the source state the bound without proof and no source cited here proves it; the argument is an authored observation.)

Status support. Theorem 3.2 of [AlRo05] (p. 6): for every fixed k≥1k\ge1, rk(K3;Km)=Θ~(mk+1)r_k(K_3;K_m)=\tilde\Theta(m^{k+1}), equality up to polylogarithmic factors, with the two bounds inside its proof, rk(K3;Km)≤ckmk+1(log⁡log⁡m)k−1/(log⁡m)kr_k(K_3;K_m)\le c_km^{k+1}(\log\log m)^{k-1}/(\log m)^k and rk(K3;Km)≥Ω(mk+1/(log⁡m)2k+δ)r_k(K_3;K_m)\ge\Omega(m^{k+1}/(\log m)^{2k+\delta}) for every δ>0\delta>0 and all large mm. The lower-bound construction (p. 7): for n=23fn=2^{3f} with ff not divisible by 33, Alon's explicit triangle-free (n,d,λ)(n,d,\lambda)-graph with d=(14+o(1))n2/3d=(\frac14+o(1))n^{2/3} and λ=(9+o(1))n1/3\lambda=(9+o(1))n^{1/3} is blown up by a factor r=nk/3−2/3(log⁡n)2−δr=n^{k/3-2/3}(\log n)^{2-\delta}; the blow-up GG is triangle-free on N=nr=n(k+1)/3(log⁡n)2−δN=nr=n^{(k+1)/3}(\log n)^{2-\delta} vertices, and by Theorem 2.1 the number MM of its independent sets of size m=c(k)n1/3(log⁡n)2m=c(k)n^{1/3}(\log n)^2 satisfies Mk<(Nm)k−1M^k<\binom Nm^{k-1}, so by Lemma 3.1 kk random shifts of GG give a (k+1)(k+1)-coloring of KNK_N with no monochromatic triangle in the first kk colors and no KmK_m in color k+1k+1: rk(K3;Km)>Nr_k(K_3;K_m)>N. The conversion to the site's statement, an authored deduction the paper does not make (its Conjecture 1.1 and abstract concern the ratio R(3,3,m)/R(3,m)R(3,3,m)/R(3,m) of Problem 553): take k=2k=2 and let HH be the graph on the N=n(log⁡n)2−δN=n(\log n)^{2-\delta} vertices formed by the edges of the first two colors. Its edges are 22-colored with no monochromatic triangle, so HH is not Ramsey for K3K_3; an independent set of HH is a clique of the third color, so α(H)<m=c n1/3(log⁡n)2≤c N1/3(log⁡N)2\alpha(H)<m=c\,n^{1/3}(\log n)^2\le c\,N^{1/3}(\log N)^2 (as n≤Nn\le N). For any δ′>0\delta'>0, c N1/3(log⁡N)2<N1/3+δ′c\,N^{1/3}(\log N)^2<N^{1/3+\delta'} once NN is large, so along the infinite sequence of these NN the graphs HH have no independent set of size N1/3+δ′N^{1/3+\delta'}; the site's question, which asks for such a set in every such graph for all large nn, has answer no for every δ>0\delta>0. Equivalently, the lower bound R(3,3,m)≥Ω(m3/(log⁡m)4+δ)R(3,3,m)\ge\Omega(m^3/(\log m)^{4+\delta}) refutes R(3,3,m)≪m3−cR(3,3,m)\ll m^{3-c} for every c>0c>0. Acceptance evidence: Combinatorica is refereed, and the Crossref record places the article in volume 25, issue 2, March 2005; the pages cited are the authors' final manuscript's, not the journal typesetting's, and the two are not compared. Read depth: claims checked for Theorem 3.2, the two bounds and the construction's parameters inside its proof and the Remark (pp. 6--7); the proof read for structure and not checked. The construction's inputs, Alon's explicit graphs and Theorem 2.1's count of independent sets, rest on the paper's citations; the k=1k=1 base of the upper bound is [AKS80] and [Ki95], cited, not proved.

Best known bounds on the reformulation, not status. From [AlRo05] with Sudakov's Remark, Ω(m3/(log⁡m)4+δ)≤R(3,3,m)≤O(m3/(log⁡m)2)\Omega(m^3/(\log m)^{4+\delta})\le R(3,3,m)\le O(m^3/(\log m)^2). In the problem's terms, the least independence number α\alpha of an nn-vertex graph that is not Ramsey for K3K_3 satisfies n<R(3,3,α+1)n<R(3,3,\alpha+1) (give the non-edges the third color), so the upper bound yields α≫n1/3(log⁡n)2/3\alpha\gg n^{1/3}(\log n)^{2/3}, the best known lower bound, above the easy ≫n1/3\gg n^{1/3}; on the other side the construction's parameters N=n(log⁡n)2−δN=n(\log n)^{2-\delta} and m=c n1/3(log⁡n)2m=c\,n^{1/3}(\log n)^2 give α<c N1/3(log⁡N)4/3+δ/3\alpha<c\,N^{1/3}(\log N)^{4/3+\delta/3} along the construction's sequence, so α≤O(n1/3(log⁡n)4/3+δ)\alpha\le O(n^{1/3}(\log n)^{4/3+\delta}) for every δ>0\delta>0 (both deductions are readings of the paper's bounds and parameters, not statements of the paper). The exact power of log⁡n\log n is open in the sources cited and is not the site's question. Problem 553 compiles the same theorem for the ratio question.

Search scope. None of the routes below found a dispute of Theorem 3.2, a retraction, or a sharper determination bearing on the question.

  • The site: problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab; the community database record; the formal-conjectures directory (no file 925).
  • Crossref: the record of [AlRo05] (DOI).
  • Semantic Scholar: the citation list of [AlRo05] (80 records, scanned by title; the 2024--2026 items concern the Erdős--Rogers function, off-diagonal and multicolor lower bounds, set-coloring Ramsey numbers and finite-geometry containers; none concerns the independence number of graphs that are not Ramsey for K3K_3).
  • The primary sources: [AlRo05] pp. 2, 6 and 7 (the construction, with Theorem 3.2 and the Remark as recorded on its result page); [Er69b] p. 33.

Not searched: MathSciNet, zbMATH, Google Scholar, X; no arXiv query specific to this formulation was run (Problem 553's page ran the multicolor Ramsey queries). The search did not consult [AKS80]; [Ki95] is cited and not read.

Remaining gaps. (1) Proof coverage is statements only: Theorem 3.2 and its construction are paged at claims checked, the proof read for structure and not checked; the authored conversion above is elementary and was checked here. (2) The construction rests on Alon's explicit graphs and on Theorem 2.1 of the paper, neither paged, and the k=1k=1 input on [AKS80] and [Ki95], cited there; [AKS80]'s Theorem 3 is read at statement depth on its result page and [Ki95] is not read. (3) The journal text of [AlRo05] is not compared with the authors' manuscript cited here. (4) The easy lower bound ≫n1/3\gg n^{1/3} is stated by the source and the site without proof; no source cited here proves it, and the standard argument in the Origin paragraph is an authored observation.

Known results

  • Alon--Rödl, Theorem 3.2 (2005, refereed): rk(K3;Km)=Θ~(mk+1)r_k(K_3;K_m)=\tilde\Theta(m^{k+1}); the construction inside its proof at k=2k=2 disproves the problem, with the conversion authored above.
  • Erdős 1969, p. 33: the origin, with the "very easy" bound I(Gn)>cn1/3I(G_n)>cn^{1/3} (the card of erdos_1969_problems_results_chromatic_graph_theory).

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.