Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 1019

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 1019, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. A planar graph on nn vertices with 3n−63n-6 edges (the maximum possible) is called saturated. Does every graph on nn vertices with $\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+\lfloor \frac{n+1}{2}\rfloor$ edges contain a saturated planar graph with >3>3 vertices?

Formulation. The Statement is the site's wording as accessed 2026-09-18 (page last edited 8 December 2025). A saturated planar graph on m≥3m\ge3 vertices is a maximal planar graph, a triangulation of the plane (Erdős 1969, p. 13: a planar G(n;3n−6)G(n;3n-6) "gibt immer eine Triangulation der Ebene"); Erdős writes PmP_m for one on mm vertices. "Contain" means as a subgraph, not necessarily induced. The question is for every nn; the site's commentary supplies the two halves of its sharpness: Turán's theorem gives a triangle (P3P_3) already at ⌊n2/4⌋+1\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+1 edges, and a graph with ⌊n2/4⌋+⌊n−12⌋\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+\lfloor\frac{n-1}2\rfloor edges and no PmP_m with m>3m>3 exists, so the threshold asked about is one more edge than the extremal example allows. The question is Erdős's own: it is stated, with the example written out, on pp. 16--17 of his 1969 paper (conjecture_p17) and restated in item 13 of his 1971 list (item_13), the passage the site cites; the site attributes the "easy to construct" example to the 1971 list, where it is not written out.

Status. Proved, in the site's label, which this page keeps with the qualification below. The site credits Simonovits's PhD thesis with the affirmative answer, in the stronger form that the graph contains a K4K_4 or a Cl+2K1C_l+2K_1 for some l≥3l\ge3, and points to the comments for the proof, which it attributes to Cambie. The status-defining text is Simonovits's PhD thesis (Chapter 9, per the thread), unpublished and not held. The evidence in hand is of three kinds: Erdős's printed attestation of 1971, "Simonovits has just proved this conjecture [15], [34]" ([Er71], p. 102; the two references are Erdős's own 1969 and 1964 papers, not a text of Simonovits); the site's acceptance of a proof posted in the discussion thread on 21 November 2025 by the account StijnC after correspondence with Simonovits, which the site credits to Cambie (the community database's file history changes the problem to proved in a commit of that day); and Erdős's own partial result, Satz 1 of the 1969 paper (a saturated planar subgraph on more than c1f(n)/nc_1f(n)/n vertices for ⌊n2/4⌋+f(n)\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+f(n) edges), whose unspecified constant does not reach m>3m>3 at the threshold. The forum proof is recorded below with its provenance and is not reproduced as this page's own; no refereed text of the theorem was found. Two third-party Lean developments state and prove the theorem (recorded under Formalization); neither was built or audited here, so they are formal support and not acceptance evidence. The label rests on a printed attestation of an unpublished thesis together with a site-accepted forum proof. The claim page Simonovits records the result as accepted on that documented evidence, with the same qualification, and the standing derives from it.

Source. erdosproblems.com/1019, accessed 2026-09-18: the problem page (PROVED, the site's label for an affirmative answer; last edited 8 December 2025; source keys [Er64f], [Er69c], [Er71, p. 102]; the page thanks three contributors by name), its eight-comment discussion thread (18 October to 21 November 2025) and its empty proof-claim tab. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1019, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1019, accessed 2026-09-18.

References.

  • [Er69c] Erdős, P., Über die in Graphen enthaltenen saturierten planaren Graphen. Math. Nachr. 40 (1969), 13--17. Library home: erdos_1969_uber_die_graphen_enthaltenen_saturierten_planaren (the Rényi archive's scan, in German). Satz 1, p. 13 (satz_1); the example and the conjecture, pp. 16--17 (conjecture_p17).
  • [Er71] Erdős, P., Some unsolved problems in graph theory and combinatorial analysis. Combinatorial Mathematics and its Applications (Proc. Conf., Oxford, 1969), Academic Press (1971), 97--109; item 13, p. 102. Library home: erdos_1971_unsolved_problems_graph_theory_combinatorial_analysis (a scan); the passage is paged at item_13.
  • [Er64f] Erdős, P., On extremal problems of graphs and generalized graphs. Israel J. Math. 2 (1964), 183--190. Library home: erdos_1964_extremal_problems_graphs_generalized_graphs (a scan). The site's third key. Erdős cites it in item 13 (his [34], printed with the year 1969) beside the 1969 paper, and the 1969 paper cites it (its [5]) for the methods by which its Satz 5 can be proved; no passage of it on saturated planar graphs was located for this page (the card records the search).
  • [Si] Simonovits, M., PhD thesis, Chapter 9 (per the thread's comment of 21 November 2025). Unpublished; not held.
  • [Si75] A 1975 paper of Simonovits which two thread comments of 18 October 2025 read from a file-sharing link and judged not to settle the statement as posed; not identified by title on the site, not held, and not cited as a source here.

Formalization. No formal-conjectures statement: no file ErdosProblems/1019.lean existed in FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/ at main on 2026-09-18, and the site's indicator recorded no formalized statement that day. Two third-party Lean developments state and prove Simonovits's theorem; neither was built or audited here, so no claim gains formalized evidence, and both are formalization links on the claim page. The file src/latest/ErdosProblems/Erdos1019.lean of Boris Alexeev's plby/lean-proofs repository (the file, added on 17 August 2026) declares itself a formalization of a solution to the problem, with Simonovits as informal author and Codex and GPT-5.6 Sol as formal authors, as the file names them; its erdos_1019_sharp proves the thread's form, a K4K_4 or a bipyramid Cl+2K1C_l+2K_1 with l≥3l\ge3 in a graph with the stated edge count, and its erdos_1019 derives the saturated-planar statement with planarity taken as isomorphism to one of those two models. Collin Yuanjie Ren's submission JSP-000849 (the submission, 16 September 2026) reuses that file as its combinatorial core and adds a planarity bridge, so that its erdos_1019_saturated_planar concludes with a plane drawing in the topological sense; its README credits the mathematical result to Simonovits and says the bridge was prepared with Claude Code (Claude Fable 5.1) assistance. The community database (teorth/erdosproblems, data/problems.yaml) recorded the problem proved (changed to proved in a commit of 21 November 2025, by the file's history) and unformalized on 2026-09-18; as of 2026-10-06 it records formal status Lean since 16 September 2026 through the second development, status "proved (Lean)", and no formalized statement file.

Current assessment

The question (site formulation of 2026-09-18). The statement above; PROVED; last edited 8 December 2025. The commentary, in this page's words, makes four points: the saturated planar graph on three vertices is the triangle, and Turán's theorem forces one as soon as a graph on nn vertices has ⌊n2/4⌋+1\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+1 edges; Erdős [Er71] calls it easy to construct a graph on nn vertices with ⌊n2/4⌋+⌊n−12⌋\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+\lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor edges and no saturated planar subgraph on more than three vertices; Erdős [Er69c] proved, answering a question of Dirac, that ⌊n2/4⌋+k\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+k edges on nn vertices force a saturated planar subgraph with ≫k/n\gg k/n vertices; and Simonovits proved the question in the affirmative in his PhD thesis, in the stronger form that the graph contains a K4K_4 or a Cl+2K1C_l+2K_1 with l≥3l\ge3; the comments carry the proof, which the site attributes to Cambie. The proof-claim tab is empty. The community database lists the problem as proved; its file history makes that change in a commit of 21 November 2025.

The thread (leads with provenance). Eight comments, oldest first. 18 October 2025, 02:05 (the account TerenceTao): ChatGPT and Gemini, asked about the problem, could not confirm the Simonovits solution and relied on the 1971 paper, the obstacle being that the reference was not available online; the comment asked for a literature review. 18 October, 18:05 (recaje): a file-sharing link to a paper of Simonovits. 18:25 (the site's curator): a reply asking how the paper was found. 20:54 (TerenceTao): on reading that paper, [Si75], the view that it does not quite settle the problem as stated: it reduces the question for saturated planar subgraphs on at least mm vertices, mm large, to an auxiliary problem on 22-connected planar subgraphs that the paper leaves for a sequel, so that the solution may be lost to the literature. 19 October, 06:44 (the curator): the problem should be marked unsolved, Erdős having presumably been misinformed about what Simonovits would go on to prove. 19 October, 12:11 (pisoir): Simonovits could be asked himself. 30 October, 12:49 (StijnC): an undertaking to ask him. 21 November, 09:39 (StijnC), marked as addressed by the site: the answer, obtained through correspondence with Simonovits and presented as his resolution in Chapter 9 of his thesis: (i) every graph GG on nn vertices with e(G)≥⌊n2/4⌋+⌊n+12⌋e(G)\ge\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+\lfloor\frac{n+1}2\rfloor contains a saturated planar graph with m≥4m\ge4 vertices; (ii) a graph with e(G)=⌊n2/4⌋+⌊n−12⌋e(G)=\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+\lfloor\frac{n-1}2\rfloor edges contains one or is the join of a tree Tn1T_{n_1} and an independent set n2K1n_2K_1 with 0≤n1−n2≤20\le n_1-n_2\le2 (with a parenthetical strengthening to m≥5m\ge5 except when 4∤n4\nmid n); followed by a verification that the join graphs contain no PmP_m with m≥4m\ge4 and a proof of (ii) by induction on nn, deleting a vertex of minimum degree (at most ⌊n+12⌋\lfloor\frac{n+1}2\rfloor) and treating four cases of its attachment, finding a K4K_4 or a Cℓ+2K1C_\ell+2K_1. This comment is the proof the site credits to Cambie. It is a forum proof, not reviewed here and not reproduced as this page's own.

Status support. Three pieces of evidence, none a refereed text of the theorem.

  • The printed attestation: item 13 of [Er71] (p. 102): "It is easy to construct a G(n;[14n2]+[12(n−1)])G(n;[\tfrac14n^2]+[\tfrac12(n-1)]) which contains no saturated planar graph of more than three vertices; perhaps this example is the best possible, and every G(n;[14n2]+[12(n+1)])G(n;[\tfrac14n^2]+[\tfrac12(n+1)]) contains a saturated planar graph of more than three vertices. Simonovits has just proved this conjecture [15], [34]." The attestation is by Erdős in a published proceedings volume (Academic Press 1971); its references point to his own papers, so it names no text of Simonovits, and the thread's reading of the 1975 paper [Si75] found no proof of the statement there.
  • The site's acceptance: the label PROVED and the commentary's attribution to the thesis, on the strength of the forum proof above, which a commenter obtained through correspondence with Simonovits. The thesis itself is unpublished and not held; its text is known here only through that summary.
  • Erdős's own partial result, Satz 1 of [Er69c] (p. 13): for any positive function ff, every G(n;[n2/4]+f(n))G(n;[n^2/4]+f(n)) contains a saturated planar graph with more than c1f(n)/nc_1f(n)/n vertices, sharp apart from c1c_1, and non-trivial only for f(n)≥n/c1f(n)\ge n/c_1; this is the site's sentence on ≫k/n\gg k/n vertices. The constant is not made explicit, so at f(n)=⌊n+12⌋f(n)=\lfloor\frac{n+1}2\rfloor the theorem gives no saturated planar subgraph on more than three vertices; it does not settle the problem.

Read depth: item 13, Satz 1 and the 1969 example and conjecture were checked clause by clause as statements; the proof of Satz 1 was followed for structure only; the forum proof was not checked. Acceptance: Erdős's attestation in print and the site's label; no publication, no independent review.

The origin and the sharpness example (an authored check). The 1969 paper (pp. 16--17) constructs the example the site calls "easy to construct": vertices x1,…,x[(n+1)/2]x_1,\dots,x_{[(n+1)/2]} and y1,…,y[n/2]y_1,\dots,y_{[n/2]}, every xix_i joined to every yjy_j, and x1x_1 joined to every other xix_i; and it states the question as "Vielleicht aber enthält jeder G(n;[n24]+[n+12])G(n;[\tfrac{n^2}4]+[\tfrac{n+1}2]) ein PmP_m mit m>3m>3", two years before the 1971 list. Checked here: the edge count is [n+12][n2]+[n+12]−1=[n24]+[n−12][\tfrac{n+1}2][\tfrac n2]+[\tfrac{n+1}2]-1=[\tfrac{n^2}4]+[\tfrac{n-1}2]; every triangle of the graph has the form {x1,xi,yj}\{x_1,x_i,y_j\}, so an edge xiyjx_iy_j with i≠1i\ne1 lies in one triangle only, while every edge of a saturated planar graph on m≥4m\ge4 vertices lies in two of its triangles; hence such a subgraph would use only edges at x1x_1, would be a star, and would have no triangle, a contradiction. So the example has the property Erdős asserts, and the example is the join of a star with an independent set, one of the extremal graphs Tn1+n2K1T_{n_1}+n_2K_1 the forum proof describes. The other half, that one more edge forces a PmP_m with m>3m>3, is the problem, and this page adds nothing to its proof.

Er64f. The site's third key is Erdős's 1964 Israel J. Math. paper, which item 13 cites (as [34]) beside the 1969 paper and which the 1969 paper cites (as [5]) for the methods proving its Satz 5; no passage of it about saturated planar graphs was located for this page, and the card records the search. It bears on the problem as a cited method, not as a statement.

Search scope. None of the routes below found a published proof, a refereed quotation of Simonovits's theorem, a disproof, or a proof claim.

  • The site: problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab; the community database that day; the formal-conjectures listing at main that day (no file 1019).
  • The primary sources: [Er69c] pp. 13--17 (Satz 1 to Satz 5, Lemma 1, the pp. 16--17 passage and the reference list); [Er71] p. 102 and its reference list.
  • arXiv API: the search abs:"saturated planar" OR abs:"maximal planar subgraph" sorted by date (3 records, on conflict graphs and on maximal planar subgraphs of random graphs, none this problem). The API searches titles and abstracts only, so this zero is weak.

Not searched: MathSciNet, zbMATH, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, X; no search for Simonovits's thesis or its later publications was made beyond the thread's account. Not held: the thesis, [Si75].

Remaining gaps. (1) The status-defining text is an unpublished thesis, not held, known here through a forum summary; the label rests on Erdős's 1971 attestation and the site's acceptance of that summary. Reopening condition: a published text of the theorem (a translation of the thesis chapter or a paper; the thread comment of 21 November 2025 says Simonovits was then preparing translations of his main works for his website), after which the statement is paged and the proof read. (2) The forum proof is unreviewed here. (3) [Si75] is unidentified on the site and not held; the thread's judgment that it does not settle the statement is recorded, not checked. (4) [Er64f]'s bearing is by citation only. (5) Proof coverage: statements only; Satz 1's proof was followed for structure. (6) There is no formal-conjectures statement of the problem; the two third-party Lean developments recorded under Formalization were not built or audited here.

Known results

  • Erdős 1969, pp. 16--17: the example with ⌊n2/4⌋+⌊n−12⌋\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+\lfloor\frac{n-1}2\rfloor edges and no saturated planar subgraph on more than three vertices (checked above), and the question.
  • Erdős 1969, Satz 1: a saturated planar subgraph on more than c1f(n)/nc_1f(n)/n vertices for ⌊n2/4⌋+f(n)\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+f(n) edges, sharp apart from the constant.
  • Erdős 1971, item 13: the question restated, with "Simonovits has just proved this conjecture".
  • Simonovits, PhD thesis, Chapter 9 (unpublished, not held; the thread's summary of 21 November 2025, accepted by the site): every graph with ⌊n2/4⌋+⌊n+12⌋\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+\lfloor\frac{n+1}2\rfloor edges contains a K4K_4 or a Cℓ+2K1C_\ell+2K_1, hence a saturated planar subgraph on at least four vertices; the extremal graphs at one edge fewer are the joins Tn1+n2K1T_{n_1}+n_2K_1.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.