Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 794

../

claims/: The 2 claim pages of Problem 794, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Is it true that every 33-uniform hypergraph on 3n3n vertices with at least n3+1n^3+1 edges must contain either a subgraph on 44 vertices with 33 edges or a subgraph on 55 vertices with 77 edges?

Formulation. The site's wording(the page carries no last-edited date). It restates Erdős's 1969 conjecture, printed as "Every G3(3n;n3+1)G_3(3n;n^3+1) contains either a G3(4;3)G_3(4;3) or a G3(5;7)G_3(5;7)" ([Er69], p. 81; result page). The threshold n3+1n^3+1 and both forbidden configurations are Erdős's own print, and none of his words contradicts them, so the wording is judged as printed. Two facts recorded by the site's commentary and checked below bear on it: the second alternative is redundant, since a five-vertex 3-graph with seven edges always contains four vertices spanning three edges (Balogh's observation), and the statement is false, since the complete 3-partite 3-graph with three classes of nn vertices plus one triple inside a class has n3+1n^3+1 edges and no four vertices spanning three edges (Harris's counterexample at n=3n=3). The threshold n3+1n^3+1 on 3n3n vertices corresponds to the density (n3+1)/(3n3)→2/9(n^3+1)/\binom{3n}3\to2/9.

The site's commentary calls the statement probably misstated and reads it as Turán's (4,3)(4,3) problem: determine ex3(n,K4−)\mathrm{ex}_3(n,K_4^-), the largest number of triples on nn vertices with no four vertices spanning three of them, that is m(n,3,4,3)m(n,3,4,3) in the notation of [FrFu84], and ask whether its density π(K4−)=lim⁡ex3(n,K4−)/(n3)\pi(K_4^-)=\lim\mathrm{ex}_3(n,K_4^-)/\binom n3 equals 2/92/9. It records that Turán had conjectured 1/41/4 before [Er69] (the asymptotic n3/24n^3/24 of [FrFu84], p. 323), that Frankl and Füredi's construction gives at least 2/72/7, which it calls the conjectured truth, and that the statement likely carries a typo. That reading is a guess no label acts on, so it is a variant with its own answer. Its question whether π(K4−)\pi(K_4^-) equals 2/92/9 has the answer no: Theorem 3 of [FrFu84] (result page), 2+o(1)7(n3)≤m(n,3,4,3)≤13(n3)nn−2\frac{2+o(1)}7\binom n3\le m(n,3,4,3)\le\frac13\binom n3\frac n{n-2}, the lower bound from an iterated six-way blow-up and the upper bound de Caen's, gives 2/7≤π(K4−)≤1/32/7\le\pi(K_4^-)\le1/3, and the same paper refutes Turán's conjectured asymptotic n3/24n^3/24 (density 1/41/4). The exact value of π(K4−)\pi(K_4^-) is open. Sharper upper bounds from flag algebras exist in the literature (named in the Current assessment), but no value from them is recorded here, so this page records none below 1/31/3. Erdős's own 1974 remark ([Er74c], p. 81) already calls the determination of lim⁡f(n;G3(4;3))/n3\lim f(n;G_3(4;3))/n^3 "very difficult, perhaps as difficult as Turán's problem on f(n;K3(4))f(n;K_3(4))". No determination of π(K4−)\pi(K_4^-) and no proof claim was found in the search whose scope the Current assessment records; this is a bounded negative finding for the exact value of π(K4−)\pi(K_4^-), not a certificate of openness.

Status. Disproved, by an elementary counterexample to the statement as printed. The counterexample is the site's, due to Harris, recomputed in the Current assessment: the 33-uniform hypergraph on {1,…,9}\{1,\dots,9\} whose 2828 edges are the 2727 triples with one element in each of {1,2,3}\{1,2,3\}, {4,5,6}\{4,5,6\}, {7,8,9}\{7,8,9\} and the triple {1,2,3}\{1,2,3\} has 33+13^3+1 edges on 3⋅33\cdot3 vertices, and no four of its vertices span three edges (the check is in the Current assessment), so the statement fails at n=3n=3. The same construction (the complete 3-partite 3-graph on 3n3n vertices plus one triple inside a class) fails it for every n≥3n\ge3 by the same check, a class needing three vertices to hold the extra triple. The frontmatter standing is derived from the accepted claim page Harris's counterexample, whose acceptance evidence is the site's own and which also carries the links to the Lean checks of the example; a pending claim page, Aristotle's Lean proof published by Alexeev, records an independent Lean proof of the construction for every n≥3n\ge3. The site's label DISPROVED (LEAN) carries a catalog suffix explained under Formalization: the counterexample has been checked in Lean in external files the corpus has not built.

Source. erdosproblems.com/794, accessed 2026-09-18T10:47Z: the problem page (DISPROVED (LEAN), the label's gloss saying the problem is solved in the negative with the proof verified in Lean; no last-edited date; source key [Er69, p. 81]; commentary citing [FrFu84] and thanking Rishika Agrawal, Jozsef Balogh and Phillip Harris), its three-comment discussion thread (5 February 2026) and its empty proof-claim tab. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #794, https://www.erdosproblems.com/794, accessed 2026-09-18.

References.

  • [Er69] Erdős, Paul, Some applications of graph theory to number theory. The Many Facets of Graph Theory (Proc. Conf., Western Mich. Univ., Kalamazoo, Mich., 1968), Springer (1969), 77--82; the conjecture, p. 81, and the Turán paragraph before it, p. 80. Library home: erdos_1969_applications_graph_theory_number_theory; paged at conjecture_p81.
  • [FrFu84] Frankl, P. and Füredi, Z., An exact result for 33-graphs. Discrete Math. 50 (1984), 323--328, doi:10.1016/0012-365X(84)90058-X (Crossref record read; the site's reference text gives "Discrete Math. (1984), 323--328"); Theorem 3, p. 325; the disproof sentence, p. 324. Library home: frankl_1984_exact_result_graphs.
  • [Er74c] Erdős, Paul, Extremal problems on graphs and hypergraphs. Hypergraph Seminar, Lecture Notes in Math. 411 (1974), 75--84; p. 81. Not cited by the site for this problem. Library home: erdos_1974_extremal_problems_graphs_hypergraphs.
  • [JLM26] Jain, V., Luo, H. and Mubayi, D., On the maximum density of rr-graphs in which every (r+1)(r+1)-set spans 00 or 22 edges. arXiv:2606.20367 (18 June 2026; abstract read). A preprint on Problem 1 of [FrFu84]; lead, recorded below.

Formalization. The site's "(Lean)" suffix is a catalog label. The file ErdosProblems/794.lean of formal-conjectures,(the link is pinned to that revision), declares erdos_794 : answer(False) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ H : Finset (Finset (Fin (3 * n))), H.IsThreeUniform → n ^ 3 + 1 ≤ H.card → H.ContainsSubgraph 4 3 ∨ H.ContainsSubgraph 5 7 under category research solved, AMS 5, with proof sorry and a formal_proof attribute naming the file src/v4.29.1/ErdosProblems/Erdos794.lean in the repository plby/lean-proofs on its main branch (unpinned). It carries three variants, at that commit all research solved with sorry: balogh (a three-edge four-vertex subgraph in every 3-uniform hypergraph with a seven-edge five-vertex subgraph), harris (harrisHypergraph, the 27 transversal triples of the parts {0,1,2}\{0,1,2\}, {3,4,5}\{3,4,5\}, {6,7,8}\{6,7,8\} plus {0,1,2}\{0,1,2\}, is 3-uniform, has 28 edges and contains neither forbidden subgraph) and frankl_furedi (for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 and all large nn a 3-uniform hypergraph on nn vertices with no four vertices spanning three edges and at least (2/7−ε)(n3)(2/7-\varepsilon)\binom n3 edges). Since 18 September 2026 the file proves the balogh variant in full, by the double count below, and the harris variant by decide +kernel; erdos_794 and frankl_furedi keep sorry, and the file spells the uniformity predicate IsUniform 3. The external file named by the attribute, at the lean-proofs commit of 15 September 2026 pinned on the claim page: 84 lines, headed leanprover/lean4:v4.29.1 mathlib v4.29.1, importing Mathlib, naming Phillip Harris as informal author and Aristotle, ChatGPT and Boris Alexeev as formal authors, and linking the site's thread. It defines the parts S1 = {1, 2, 3}, S2 = {4, 5, 6}, S3 = {7, 8, 9}, the edge set counterexample_edges (the transversal triples and extra_edge = {1, 2, 3}) and has_subgraph E v e := ∃ s, s ⊆ V_set ∧ s.card = v ∧ (E.filter (· ⊆ s)).card ≥ e with V_set = Finset.Icc 1 9; proves counterexample_disproves_conjecture (every edge has three elements, at least 33+13^3+1 edges, no (4, 3) and no (5, 7) subgraph) by decide; defines its own predicate erdos_794 (for all n, every V with V.card = 3 * n and every 3-uniform E with E.card ≥ n ^ 3 + 1 has a (4, 3) or (5, 7) subgraph) and proves not_erdos_794 : ¬ erdos_794 by instantiating n = 3; a closing comment records #print axioms as propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound. The file contains no sorry, axiom, native_decide or unsafe. Two observations of the corpus's own: the file's erdos_794 searches for subgraphs inside the fixed set V_set rather than inside V, so it is not a literal transcription of the collection's statement, though for the counterexample, whose edges all lie in V_set, the refutation is sound; and the collection's harris variant and the external file's counterexample_disproves_conjecture state the same finite check with the vertices shifted by one. The thread names two further files at Lean v4.24.0 in the same repository: Erdos794b.lean, the same finite check by native_decide, linked on Harris's page, and Erdos794c.lean, a proof found by Aristotle without a supplied proof of the construction's properties for every n≥3n\ge3, recorded on its own claim page. The corpus has not built or audited any of these files, and no local credit is claimed. The community database (teorth/erdosproblems, data/problems.yaml) records status "disproved (Lean)" and formal_status Lean as of its last update on 5 February 2026, the statement formalized since 4 August 2026, and no formal-proof field; the site's indicator reads "Yes".

Current assessment

The question (site formulation of 2026-09-18). The statement above; DISPROVED (LEAN); no last-edited date. The commentary records Balogh's observation that the statement is probably misstated, since a 33-graph with seven edges on five vertices always has four vertices spanning three edges, so the second alternative is redundant; it then takes the question to be the Turán problem for K4−K_4^- (four vertices spanning three edges) in 33-graphs and asks whether the threshold density is 2/92/9; it cites the Frankl--Füredi construction [FrFu84] for a density of at least 2/72/7, which it calls the conjectured truth, noting that Turán had conjectured 1/41/4 before [Er69] and that the statement likely carries a typo; and it records Harris's counterexample to the statement as written, the 33-graph on {1,…,9}\{1,\ldots,9\} with the 2727 transversal triples of {1,2,3},{4,5,6},{7,8,9}\{1,2,3\},\{4,5,6\},\{7,8,9\} and the edge {1,2,3}\{1,2,3\}, 2828 edges in all. The thread's three comments, all of 5 February 2026 (the update to the first is later, since the file it links was first committed on 6 February 2026): a comment by Alexeev (19:27) reporting that Harris's counterexample was formalized by the direct finite check, with a link to the external file, a variant using native_decide and an update that Aristotle proved the result by itself without a supplied proof, with essentially the same example, to which the site appended a note that the page had been updated in response; a second commenter's remark (19:33) on the difference between native_decide and decide; and a comment by Alexeev (19:45) on the axioms each proof uses. The proof-claim tab is empty. The community database lists the problem as disproved (Lean) as of its last update on 5 February 2026.

The statement (the corpus's own checks). Two elementary checks, the corpus's own and named as such; the site attributes the observations to Balogh and Harris.

  • Balogh's observation. A 3-uniform hypergraph on five vertices has at most (53)=10\binom53=10 edges; each of its five four-vertex subsets contains four of the ten triples, and each triple lies in exactly two of the five subsets. If seven triples are edges, the five subsets contain 2⋅7=142\cdot7=14 edges in total, so some subset contains at least three. Hence the second alternative of the statement implies the first, and the statement is equivalent to: every 3-uniform hypergraph on 3n3n vertices with at least n3+1n^3+1 edges has four vertices spanning three edges.
  • Harris's counterexample. Let A={1,2,3}A=\{1,2,3\}, B={4,5,6}B=\{4,5,6\}, C={7,8,9}C=\{7,8,9\} and take the 2727 transversal triples (one element from each part) and the triple AA: 28=33+128=3^3+1 edges on 9=3⋅39=3\cdot3 vertices. A four-vertex set meets (A,B,C)(A,B,C) in the pattern (2,1,1)(2,1,1), (3,1,0)(3,1,0), (2,2,0)(2,2,0) or (4,0,0)(4,0,0) up to the order of the parts. It contains a transversal triple only in the pattern (2,1,1)(2,1,1), where it contains exactly two; it contains the edge AA only when it contains all of AA, in the patterns (3,1,0)(3,1,0) and (4,0,0)(4,0,0), which contain no transversal triple, so such a set spans exactly one edge. Every four-vertex set therefore spans at most two edges, and by the first check no five-vertex set spans seven. The statement fails at n=3n=3. The same count works for the complete 3-partite 3-graph on 3n3n vertices plus one triple inside a class, for every n≥3n\ge3 (a class needs three vertices to hold the extra triple): n3+1n^3+1 edges and no four vertices spanning three.

The disproof is therefore elementary and needs no unreviewed source; the external Lean file records the n=3n=3 check by decide, as described under Formalization.

The Turán variant. The site's reading, recorded in the Formulation as a variant: Erdős's threshold n3+1n^3+1 on 3n3n vertices (density 2/92/9) was meant for the Turán-type problem of forbidding four vertices spanning three edges, that is ex3(n,K4−)\mathrm{ex}_3(n,K_4^-), where the complete 3-partite construction is not extremal. The source-supported bounds are on Theorem 3 of Frankl and Füredi (p. 325): 2+o(1)7(n3)≤m(n,3,4,3)≤13(n3)nn−2\frac{2+o(1)}7\binom n3\le m(n,3,4,3)\le\frac13\binom n3\frac n{n-2}, where m(n,3,4,3)m(n,3,4,3) is the maximum number of edges in a 3-graph on nn vertices in which any four vertices span less than three edges (p. 323). The lower bound is Section 2's iterated construction: the six-class blow-up HSH_S of the ten-triple 3-graph S(6)S(6) (Example 1, p. 323), which already "has more than 10⌊n/6⌋310\lfloor n/6\rfloor^3 edges which is more than n3/24n^3/24, disproving Turàn's conjecture" (p. 324), refined by partitioning each class into six and adding the S(6)S(6)-pattern triples, and so on, to n3(1+o(1))/21n^3(1+o(1))/21 edges (p. 325); the upper bound "was proved by Caen [sic] [2]" (p. 325), the reference being D. de Caen. The densities: Erdős's statement corresponds to 2/9≈0.2222/9\approx0.222, Turán's conjectured n3/24n^3/24 to 1/41/4, Frankl and Füredi's construction to 2/7≈0.2862/7\approx0.286, de Caen's bound to 1/31/3. Acceptance evidence: Discrete Mathematics is refereed (the paper was received 24 January 1984). Proof coverage: Theorem 3, the definition and the disproof sentence at claims-checked depth; the count n3(1+o(1))/21n^3(1+o(1))/21 at statement depth; de Caen's proof is not in the paper. Theorems 1--2 of the same paper (p. 324) classify the 3-graphs in which every four vertices span exactly 00 or 22 edges (the blow-ups HSH_S and the circle-and-origin example) and show HSH_S over an equipartition extremal for n≥5n\ge5; they concern the stricter local condition and are context here. [Er74c], p. 81, five years after the conjecture: "the determination of lim⁡n=∞1n3f(n;G3(4;3))\lim_{n=\infty}\frac1{n^3}f(n;G_3(4;3)) seems to be very difficult, perhaps as difficult as Turán's problem on f(n;K3(4))f(n;K_3(4))". Flag-algebra upper bounds below 1/31/3 exist in the literature: the Crossref abstract of Razborov's 2010 paper says its journal version includes "significantly improving numerical bounds for several problems for which the exact value is not known yet", and the citation lists name Baber and Talbot's "New Turán densities for 3-graphs" (Electron. J. Combin. 19 (2012), arXiv:1110.4287) and Falgas-Ravry and Vaughan's "Applications of the semi-definite method to the Turán density problem for 3-graphs" (Combin. Probab. Comput. 22 (2013), arXiv:1110.1623); Razborov's preprint has no K4−K_4^- bound, and the two abstracts do not state a K4−K_4^- value, so the best known upper bound is not recorded and 1/31/3 is the bound this page cites.

The origin. [Er69], pp. 80--81 (result page): after "Turán conjectured that f(2n,3,5)=n2(n−1)+1f(2n,3,5)=n^2(n-1)+1. It is easy to show that lim⁡n→∞f(n,r,s)/nr=δr,s\lim_{n\to\infty}f(n,r,s)/n^r=\delta_{r,s} always exists and Turán proved δ2,s=1/2−1/2s\delta_{2,s}=1/2-1/2s [sic], but the value of δr,s\delta_{r,s} is unknown for every s>r>2s>r>2", Erdős writes: "I would like to state one further conjecture for rr-graphs: Every G3(3n;n3+1)G_3(3n;n^3+1) contains either a G3(4;3)G_3(4;3) or a G3(5;7)G_3(5;7)." No argument is given, and the paper turns to number theory. (The printed δ2,s=1/2−1/2s\delta_{2,s}=1/2-1/2s differs from Turán's value 12(1−1s−1)\frac12(1-\frac1{s-1}) in this normalization; recorded on the result page, not corrected.) The site's key [Er69, p. 81] matches.

Leads with provenance, not status. [JLM26] (abstract read) improves the lower bound for Problem 1 of [FrFu84] (the maximum density of an rr-graph in which every (r+1)(r+1)-set spans 00 or 22 edges) from 21−r2^{1-r} to Ω(r−3)\Omega(r^{-3}); a preprint on the stricter local condition, not on π(K4−)\pi(K_4^-). The September 2026 preprints on the uniform Turán density of the tetrahedron (arXiv:2609.08336, abstract read) record that the uniform Turán density of the "broken tetrahedron" K4(3)−K_4^{(3)-} was determined by Glebov, Král' and Volec (Israel J. Math. 211 (2016)) and Reiher, Rödl and Schacht (J. Eur. Math. Soc. 20 (2018)); the uniform density is a different quantity from π(K4−)\pi(K_4^-).

Search scope. None of the routes below found a dispute of the disproof, a determination of π(K4−)\pi(K_4^-), or a proof claim.

  • The site: problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab as of 2026-09-18; the formal-conjectures file at the revision pinned above; the external Lean file and the repository's directory listings at its head of 15 September 2026; the community database record.
  • The primary sources, at the pages cited: [Er69] pp. 80--81, [FrFu84] pp. 323--328, [Er74c] pp. 80--81.
  • Crossref: a bibliographic query for [FrFu84] (top record the Discrete Mathematics article, doi:10.1016/0012-365X(84)90058-X) and the record of Razborov's 2010 paper.
  • arXiv API: the search (abs:"K_4^-" OR abs:"K_4 minus an edge" OR abs:"K_4^{(3)-}" OR abs:"K_4^{3-}") AND abs:Turan (no records; a weak zero given the API's handling of TeX in phrases); the records of 1110.4287 (v3) and 1110.1623 (v2), 2606.20367 and 2609.08336.
  • Semantic Scholar: the citation list of [FrFu84] by DOI (123 records, by title; the K4−K_4^- titles are codegree-threshold papers and the uniform-density papers, none a determination of π(K4−)\pi(K_4^-)).

Not searched: MathSciNet, zbMATH, Google Scholar, X. Not examined: de Caen's 1983 paper; Turán's papers; the flag-algebra papers named above; the journal texts behind the uniform-density results.

Remaining gaps. (1) The Turán variant's best upper bound is not compiled: the page cites de Caen's 1/31/3 from [FrFu84] and names the flag-algebra papers as leads. (2) Proof coverage is statements only on [FrFu84]; the two elementary checks above are this page's own and are the only arguments recomputed. (3) The external Lean files are not built or audited by the corpus; the Harris file's own predicate is looser than the collection's statement, as recorded. (4) [Er69]'s printed δ2,s\delta_{2,s} is recorded as printed.

Known results

  • Erdős 1969, p. 81: the conjecture as printed; false as stated (the checks above).
  • Frankl--Füredi, Theorem 3 (1984, refereed): 2+o(1)7(n3)≤m(n,3,4,3)≤13(n3)nn−2\frac{2+o(1)}7\binom n3\le m(n,3,4,3)\le\frac13\binom n3\frac n{n-2}; the 2/72/7 construction and the disproof of Turán's n3/24n^3/24.
  • [Er74c] p. 81 (1974): the G3(4;3)G_3(4;3) density problem called "very difficult".
  • Harris's counterexample: the example as a claim page, with the Lean checks of it (pinned on the claim page; not built by the corpus) as its formalization links.
  • Aristotle's Lean proof published by Alexeev: the construction's properties for every n≥3n\ge3, proved in Lean without a supplied proof; a pending claim, not built by the corpus.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.