Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

For integers n>k>rn>k>r and 0<s≤(kr)0<s\le\binom kr, m(n,r,k,s)m(n,r,k,s) is "the maximum number of edges in an rr-graph on nn vertices in which any kk vertices span less than ss edges" (p. 323); so m(n,3,4,3)m(n,3,4,3) is the largest number of triples on nn points with no four points spanning three triples, the Turán number of the 3-graph on four vertices with three edges. Theorem 3 (p. 325):

2+o(1)7(n3)≤m(n,3,4,3)≤13(n3)nn−2.\frac{2+o(1)}{7}\binom n3\le m(n,3,4,3)\le\frac13\binom n3\frac{n}{n-2}.

"The upper bound was proved by Caen [2]. Let us mention that the lower bound of the theorem was proved independently by Giraud [5] also" (p. 325; [2] is D. de Caen, Ars Combinatoria 16 (1983) 5--10, and [5] "G. Giraud, Private communication by Paul Erdös", p. 328). The lower bound comes from Section 2, "A remark on m(n,3,4,3)m(n,3,4,3)" (pp. 324-325): once four points may span up to two edges rather than exactly zero or two, edges can be added to the six-class blow-up HSH_S of Example 1 iteratively, by splitting each class into six sets, adding the triples that follow the pattern S(6)S(6) across those sets, and repeating inside each set; "Making the partitions always as equal as possible, finally one obtains n3(1+o(1))/21n^3(1+o(1))/21 edges." Since (n3)=(1+o(1))n3/6\binom n3=(1+o(1))n^3/6, that is (2+o(1))(n3)/7(2+o(1))\binom n3/7. The introduction (pp. 323-324) records the target: "Turàn (cf. [3, 7]) conjectured that m(n,3,4,3)m(n,3,4,3) is asymptotic to n3/24n^3/24", and already HSH_S with ∣Vi∣≥⌊n/6⌋|V_i|\ge\lfloor n/6\rfloor "has more than 10⌊n/6⌋310\lfloor n/6\rfloor^3 edges which is more than n3/24n^3/24, disproving Turàn's conjecture".

Source. P. Frankl and Z. Füredi, An exact result for 3-graphs, Discrete Math. 50 (1984), 323--328, doi:10.1016/0012-365X(84)90058-X (the Crossref record); Theorem 3 on printed p. 325 = PDF p. 3 of the six-page publisher scan (printed p. nn = PDF p. n−322n-322), read on the page image, with pp. 323-324 and 328 read for the definition, the conjecture and the references. The artifact is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, the definition of m(n,r,k,s)m(n,r,k,s), the Section 2 construction paragraph and the attribution sentences were read clause by clause on the page images. The count n3(1+o(1))/21n^3(1+o(1))/21 was not replayed, and de Caen's proof of the upper bound is not in the paper.

Proof pointer

Lower bound: the iterated construction of Section 2 (pp. 324-325), starting from Example 1's HSH_S (the blow-up of the ten-triple 3-graph S(6)S(6) on six points, p. 323). Upper bound: de Caen (reference [2]), not held.

Dependencies

De Caen's upper bound (external, not held); the six-point 3-graph S(6)S(6) of p. 323 and Example 1.

Bears on

  • Problem 794: the site's commentary reads the problem as asking for the density of m(n,3,4,3)m(n,3,4,3), and the problem page records that reading as a variant with its own answer, not as a corrected statement. For that variant the lower bound gives the site's 2/72/7, which the site calls the conjectured truth, the p. 324 disproof sentence refutes Turán's n3/24n^3/24 (density 1/41/4), and the upper bound stated here is de Caen's 1/31/3. The iterated construction also has more than n3+1n^3+1 triples on 3n3n points for large nn, which the problem's claim page for this paper uses against the statement as printed.