Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 418
claims/: The 3 claim pages of Problem 418, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. Are there infinitely many positive integers not of the form ?
Status. Proved. The site labels the problem PROVED (LEAN): Browkin and
Schinzel's 1995 theorem answers yes, and the Lean qualification corresponds
to the formal proof that formal-conjectures' 418.lean records, a Lean 4
development held outside this corpus and not audited here; see
the claim page.
Source. erdosproblems.com/418, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #418, https://www.erdosproblems.com/418.
References.
- [BaLu04] Banks, William D. and Luca, Florian, Noncototients and nonaliquots. arXiv:math/0409231 (2004).
- [BaLu05] Banks, William D. and Luca, Florian, Nonaliquots and Robbins numbers. Colloq. Math. 103 (2005), 27-32.
- [BrSc95] Browkin, J. and Schinzel, A., On integers not of the form . Colloq. Math. (1995), 55-58.
- [ChZh11] Chen, Yong-Gao and Zhao, Qing-Qing, Nonaliquot numbers. Publ. Math. Debrecen (2011), 439-442.
- [FlLu00] Flammenkamp, A. and Luca, F., Infinite families of noncototients. Colloq. Math. 86 (2000), 37-41.
- [Er73b] Erdős, P., Über die Zahlen der Form und . Elem. Math. (1973), 83-86.
- [Gu04] Guy, Richard K., Unsolved problems in number theory, third edition, Problem Books in Mathematics, Springer (2004), xviii+437 pp.; B36 "Euler's totient function", printed p. 139: the noncototients, the for which has no solution, the Sierpiński and Erdős conjecture that there are infinitely many, and the [BrSc95] proof that none of , , is of the form . Library home: guy_2004_unsolved_problems_number_theory.
- [PoPo16] Pollack, Paul and Pomerance, Carl, Some problems of Erdős on the sum-of-divisors function. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. B (2016), 1-26.
Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures (pinned commit of 2026-09-04), which records as the problem's formal proof a Lean 4 development in the lean-proofs repository (pinned commit), neither built nor audited here.
Current assessment
The question (site formulation, 2026-09-04). Whether infinitely many positive integers are not of the form . PROVED (LEAN). The site's commentary records that Erdős and Sierpiński asked the question, calls the integers not of the form noncototients, notes that Goldbach's conjecture would make every odd number of the form (strictly, a slight strengthening is needed: that every even number above is a sum of two distinct primes , since then gives ), and asks what happens for even numbers.
Standing. Two accepted full claims and one pending full claim. Browkin and
Schinzel [BrSc95]
(claim page),
refereed and reviewed, prove that none of , , is of the
form, which answers yes; the site's curator credits the result and Guy [Gu04]
reports it. Flammenkamp and Luca [FlLu00]
(claim page),
refereed, give a sufficient condition on for every to be a
noncototient and find seven such , among them . Banks and Luca's
preprint [BaLu04]
(claim page),
claimed, proves that is a noncototient for almost all primes ; its
journal version [BaLu05] omits this theorem. The site's discussion thread links
both later papers (comment of 21 November 2025), but the site's commentary
credits neither. The community database lists the problem as proved (Lean) as of
its last update on 2025-11-23; the formal proof is a Lean 4 development in the
lean-proofs repository, which the formal-conjectures statement file credits to
Alexeev using Aristotle and records as the problem's formal proof. This corpus
has neither built nor audited it, so no formalized evidence is listed.
Search scope (2026-10-07). The site's problem page (last edited 2025-12-08) and discussion thread, the community database, the formal-conjectures statement file and the lean-proofs file; [BrSc95] through its library card, [FlLu00] on the publisher's site and [BaLu04] on arXiv. No proof was reconstructed here.
Known Results
- [BrSc95], Browkin and Schinzel, Theorem: every with is a noncototient. The proof shows that is one, by congruences and a lower bound for , and extends to the family through Riesel's result that every is composite (claim page).
- [FlLu00], Flammenkamp and Luca, Proposition and Theorem: if is an odd prime, not a Mersenne prime, with composite for every and a noncototient, then every with is a noncototient; seven such are found by computation (claim page).
- Open: whether the noncototients have positive density (the site's commentary and a closing problem of [BrSc95]). The best count known here is [BaLu04], Theorem 1: is a noncototient for almost all primes , so at least noncototients lie below (preprint only; claim page).
- Adjacent, for the companion function (the nonaliquot numbers): Erdős [Er73b] proved that a set of positive lower density is not of that form; Banks and Luca [BaLu05] gave the lower density at least , improved to by Chen and Zhao [ChZh11]; Pollack and Pomerance [PoPo16] give a heuristic that predicts the density, about . These results concern and not the question.
- Guy [Gu04] discusses the question as problem B36.
Linked library material
These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.
- banks_2005_nonaliquots_robbins_numbers
- browkin_1995_integers_not_form
- chen_2011_nonaliquot_numbers
- chen_2011_nonaliquot_numbers / theorem_1
- erdos_1973_uber_die_zahlen_der_form_und
- erdos_1973_uber_die_zahlen_der_form_und / satz_i
- pollack_2016_problems_erdos_sum_divisors_function
- pollack_2016_problems_erdos_sum_divisors_function / conjecture_1_4
- guy_2004_unsolved_problems_number_theory