Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Pollack 2016 problems erdos sum divisors function
conjecture_1_4: The paper conjectures, from a heuristic random model of s(n) = sigma(n) - n, that the numbers outside the range of s have asymptotic density Delta, the limit of (1/log y) times the sum of (1/a)e^{-a/s(a)} over even a up to y; it is not proved.
theorem_1_1: States that the count of up-down reversals and the count of down-up reversals in [1,x] are each at most x/exp((sqrt(3)+o(1))(log_3 x log_4 x)^{1/2}) as x tends to infinity, with log_k the k-fold iterated logarithm.
theorem_1_2: States that the number of up-down reversals in [1,x], the n that are nondeficient with s(n) deficient, is bounded below by a constant times x/((log_2 x)(log_3 x)^3).
theorem_1_3: States that the number of down-up reversals in [1,x], the n that are deficient with s(n) nondeficient, is bounded below by a constant times x/((log_2 x)(log_3 x)^2).
theorem_1_5: States that the number of primitive friendly pairs contained in [1,x], unordered pairs of distinct integers with equal sigma(n)/n and no nontrivial common unitary divisor, is at most x^{1/2+o(1)} as x tends to infinity.
theorem_1_6: States that for each fixed nonnegative integer k the number N_k(x) of n at most x having at least k friends m at most x is (alpha_k+o(1))x for a constant alpha_k, and that alpha_k tends to 0 as k tends to infinity.
theorem_5_2: States that the limiting proportions alpha_k of Theorem 1.6 decrease strictly while positive: if alpha_k > 0, then alpha_k > alpha_{k+1}.
theorem_p24: States that the number g(x) of coprime pairs a < b <= x with sigma(a) = sigma(b) exceeds x^{1.4} for all sufficiently large x, so g(x)/x tends to infinity.
Paul Pollack, Carl Pomerance, Some problems of Erdős on the sum-of-divisors function. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Series B 3 (2016), 1-26. doi:10.1090/btran/10. The file prints "©2016 by the authors under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 License (CC BY NC 3.0)": the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 license; its offprint footer also reads "This is a free offprint provided to the author by the publisher. Copyright restrictions may apply."
The paper takes up three of Erdős's themes on and , and closes with a fourth. First, aliquot reversals: an up-down reversal is a nondeficient with deficient, a down-up reversal a deficient with nondeficient (p. 2). Theorem 1.1 lowers the upper bound for both counts in to , while Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 give the first lower bounds, and , established for even numbers (p. 3). Second, Conjecture 1.4 predicts, from a heuristic random model of , the asymptotic density of the nonaliquot numbers (those outside the range of ); the counts to in Table 1 are consistent with a density of about (p. 3), and Section 3.3 (p. 17) treats the analogue for . Third, on friendly numbers (equal ), Theorem 1.5 bounds the primitive friendly pairs in by , strengthening the convergence of used by Erdős, and Theorem 1.6 shows that the number of with at least friends in is with ; Theorem 5.2 shows whenever . Finally, Section 6 (pp. 23--24) proves that the number of coprime pairs with exceeds for large . The reversal upper bounds rest on sieve methods, counts of primitive nondeficient numbers and bounds for solutions of ; the lower bounds on explicit sieve constructions.
No result of the paper bears directly on Problem 410, which iterates rather than ; the paper is context for it. It records that and differ in parity exactly when is a square or twice a square (Section 1, p. 2), and its reversal counts measure how often iteration of turns between nondeficient and deficient.
Source: https://math.dartmouth.edu/~carlp/btran10.pdf.
Results
Page numbers are those of the journal print (pp. 1--26).
- Theorem 1.1 (p. 2): both reversal counts in are at most .
- Theorem 1.2 (p. 2): up-down reversals in number .
- Theorem 1.3 (p. 2): down-up reversals in number .
- Conjecture 1.4 (p. 3): the nonaliquot numbers have density ; a heuristic, with the analogue of Section 3.3 (p. 17).
- Theorem 1.5 (p. 4): at most primitive friendly pairs lie in .
- Theorem 1.6 (p. 5): for each fixed , , and .
- Theorem 5.2 (p. 22): if then .
- Section 6 result (pp. 23--24): coprime pairs with number more than for large .
Read status. Claims checked for the eight results above, read clause by clause on the print; the proofs were read for their structure only, and the computations behind Tables 1--4 were not rerun.
Bears on
- Problem 824: the Section 6 result gives for large , hence ; the problem asks whether , which the paper does not decide.
- Problem 418: context only. Section 3.3 (p. 17) gives a conjectural density and computed counts for the integers not of the form ; they prove nothing about the problem.
- Problem 830: context only. The lesser member of an amicable pair is an up-down reversal (p. 2), so Theorem 1.1 bounds above the number of lesser members of amicable pairs in ; the problem asks for infinitely many pairs and a lower bound, which an upper bound does not decide.
- Problem 410: context only, as explained above.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.