Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 819

../

claims/: The 2 claim pages of Problem 819, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let f(N)f(N) be maximal such that there exists $A\subseteq {1,\ldots,N}$ with ∣A∣=⌊N1/2⌋\lvert A\rvert=\lfloor N^{1/2}\rfloor such that $\lvert (A+A)\cap [1,N]\rvert=f(N)$. Estimate f(N)f(N).

Formulation. The site's wording(the page shows no last-edited date). A+AA+A is the full sumset {a+b:a,b∈A}\{a+b:a,b\in A\}, doubles included; only the sums in [1,N][1,N] are counted, and ∣A∣|A| is exactly ⌊N1/2⌋\lfloor N^{1/2}\rfloor. Since ∣A+A∣≤(∣A∣+12)|A+A|\le\binom{|A|+1}2, f(N)≤N/2+O(N1/2)f(N)\le N/2+O(N^{1/2}) trivially (an observation made here, also stated in the thread's note). The site's source keys are [Er91] and [ErFr91]. [ErFr91]'s Proposition 1 (p. 203) bounds T(n)T(n), the maximal number of different sums ai+aja_i+a_j below nn of a set 1≤a1<⋯<ak≤n1\le a_1<\cdots<a_k\le n with k≤(1+o(1))n1/2k\le(1+o(1))n^{1/2}; the site's f(N)f(N) fixes ∣A∣=⌊N1/2⌋|A|=\lfloor N^{1/2}\rfloor and counts the sums in [1,N][1,N], and the two agree up to o(N)o(N), since adding elements of [1,N][1,N] loses no sum and removing o(N1/2)o(N^{1/2}) elements from a set of O(N1/2)O(N^{1/2}) loses o(N)o(N) sums (a one-line step made here). [Er91] is not held, so the problem's original wording is known here only as the site states it.

Status. Open. The site labels the problem OPEN. Its commentary credits Erdős and Freud [ErFr91] (J. Number Theory 38 (1991) 196--205, refereed) with (38−o(1))N≤f(N)≤(12+o(1))N(\tfrac38-o(1))N\le f(N)\le(\tfrac12+o(1))N and ties the problem to how large a quasi-Sidon set can be, Problem 840. The bounds are the paper's Proposition 1 (p. 203): "Given any ε>0\varepsilon>0, then for nn large enough 3/8−ε≤T(n)/n≤1/2+ε3/8-\varepsilon\le T(n)/n\le1/2+\varepsilon", the upper bound being the count of all sums and the lower bound the set B∪(3n/4−B)B\cup(3n/4-B) for a maximally dense Sidon set B⊂[1,n/4]B\subset[1,n/4], whose sums are all distinct except those equal to 3n/43n/4; the connection to quasi-Sidon sets rests on the paper's statement (p. 204) that improving the upper bound of Proposition 1 and pushing the coefficient in the trivial quasi-Sidon bound k≤(2+o(1))n1/2k\le(2+o(1))n^{1/2} below 2\sqrt2 are equivalent problems. The lower bound is the accepted partial claim Erdős and Freud's lower bound, on the refereed paper. A discussion-thread comment of 15 May 2026 announces a nine-page note on the commenter's personal site claiming lim inf⁡f(N)/N≥(162−17)/12≈0.4690\liminf f(N)/N\ge(16\sqrt2-17)/12\approx0.4690, found with GPT-5.5 and Rethlas and verified by hand according to the comment; the note's statement is recorded and its argument is not checked in this corpus; no proof claim is on the tab and the site's commentary does not mention it. It has a partial claim page, Liu's lower bound 0.469, with status claimed. No refereed source improving the bounds was found in the search whose scope the Current assessment records; this is a bounded negative finding, not a certificate of openness.

Source. erdosproblems.com/819, accessed 2026-09-18 and 2026-10-07: the problem page (labeled OPEN, with the site's note that the problem cannot be settled by a finite computation; no last-edited date; source key [Er91]; commentary citing [ErFr91] and Problem 840; a thanks line naming one contributor; OEIS indicator "Possible"), its two-comment discussion thread (15 and 17 May 2026; new comments suspended on 2026-10-07) and its empty proof-claim tab. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #819, https://www.erdosproblems.com/819, accessed 2026-10-07.

References.

  • [ErFr91] Erdős, P. and Freud, R., On sums of a Sidon-sequence. J. Number Theory 38 (1991), no. 2, 196--205, DOI 10.1016/0022-314X(91)90083-N (June 1991; the Crossref record lists the publisher's open-archive license). The definition of T(n)T(n), Proposition 1 with its proof, Remark 1 and the Definition of a quasi-Sidon sequence, printed p. 203; the quasi-Sidon construction, the trivial bound (37), the unproved 1.981.98, the equivalence sentence and Remark 2, p. 204; Lemma 1 on the uniform distribution of maximal Sidon sequences, p. 197. Claim page: Erdős and Freud's lower bound. Library home: erdos_freud_1991_sums_sidon_sequence; result pages Proposition 1 and Definition (p. 203).
  • [Er91] Erdős, P., Problems and results in combinatorial analysis and combinatorial number theory. Graph theory, combinatorics, and applications, Vol. 1 (Kalamazoo, MI, 1988) (1991), 397--406. Not held.
  • [Pi06] Pikhurko, O., Dense edge-magic graphs and thin additive bases. Discrete Math. 306 (2006), 2097--2107, DOI 10.1016/j.disc.2006.05.003; library home: pikhurko_2006_dense_edge_magic_graphs_thin_additive. Its p. 2098 restates the quasi-Sidon question of [ErFr91] with their construction of quasi-Sidon sets of size (2/3+o(1))n1/2(2/\sqrt3+o(1))n^{1/2} and their promised bound 1.98n1/21.98n^{1/2}, its Lemma 10 (p. 2104) generalizes [ErFr91]'s Lemma 1 (p. 197) on the uniform distribution of maximum Sidon sets, and its Lemma 12 (p. 2105) borrows from [ErFr91] the reflected set A∪(n−A)A\cup(n-A) of a Sidon set AA (the construction of [ErFr91]'s Proposition 1, p. 203, and its enlargement, p. 204). It does not restate the bounds on f(N)f(N) and is context for the problem, not progress on it.
  • [Liu26] Liu, Y. L., Erdős #819: Reflected Sidon lower bound. A note dated 15 May 2026, 9 pp., at https://leon2k2k2k.github.io/assets/pdf/erdos/erdos819.pdf (the thread links https://leon2k2k2k.github.io/erdos819.pdf, which redirects there; not held); its Theorem 3 (p. 1) claims lim inf⁡f(N)/N≥(162−17)/12\liminf f(N)/N\ge(16\sqrt2-17)/12. Claim page: Liu's lower bound 0.469.

Formalization. None. Google-deepmind/formal-conjectures has no file ErdosProblems/819.lean, the site's indicator reads "Formalised statement? No", and the community database records the problem open and unformalized, with no formal proof.

Current assessment

The question (site formulation of 2026-09-18). The statement above; OPEN; no last-edited date. The commentary credits Erdős and Freud [ErFr91] with (38−o(1))N≤f(N)≤(12+o(1))N(\frac38-o(1))N\le f(N)\le(\frac12+o(1))N and relates the problem to the largest possible quasi-Sidon set, Problem 840. The thread: on 15 May 2026 the author of [Liu26] reported the lower bound (162−17)/12≈0.469(16\sqrt2-17)/12\approx0.469 with the note, describing the construction as two reflected copies of a maximum Sidon set with random shifts, taken along the subsequence N=4q2N=4q^2, controlled by Pikhurko's uniformity lemma, with the closed-form expected score F(u)=1−2u2−(1−2u)3/12F(u)=1-2u^2-(1-2u)^3/12, maximized at u∗=3/2−2u^*=3/2-\sqrt2, and an interpolation to all large NN, found with GPT-5.5 and Rethlas and verified by hand, according to the comment; on 17 May 2026 a second commenter reported having run a standard check, linking a chat transcript, which found no issue. The proof-claim tab is empty. The community database lists the problem open as of its last update, dated 31 August 2025. The refereed lower bound has its own accepted partial claim page, Erdős and Freud's lower bound.

The origin and the bounds. [Er91], Erdős's Kalamazoo problem paper and the site's key, is not held. [ErFr91] is the paper the site credits with the bounds. Its main Theorem (p. 196) concerns Sidon sequences: S(n)S(n), the maximal number of sums ai+aja_i+a_j below nn of a Sidon sequence in [1,n][1,n], satisfies 1−1/2−ε≤S(n)/n≤1/π+ε1-1/\sqrt2-\varepsilon\le S(n)/n\le1/\pi+\varepsilon for nn large. The bounds on this problem are its Proposition 1 (p. 203): for any set 1≤a1<⋯<ak≤n1\le a_1<\cdots<a_k\le n with k≤(1+o(1))n1/2k\le(1+o(1))n^{1/2} and T(n)T(n) the maximal number of different sums ai+aja_i+a_j below nn, "Given any ε>0\varepsilon>0, then for nn large enough $3/8-\varepsilon\le T(n)/n\le 1/2+\varepsilon$", with S(n)≤T(n)S(n)\le T(n). The one-paragraph proof takes a maximally dense Sidon sequence b1,b2,…b_1,b_2,\ldots in [1,n/4][1,n/4] and adds the values 3n/4−bi3n/4-b_i: "a set having about n1/2n^{1/2} elements, and all sums are distinct, except the ones bi+(3n/4−bi)b_i+(3n/4-b_i) which all give 3n/43n/4", every bi+bjb_i+b_j and bi+(3n/4−bj)b_i+(3n/4-b_j) lying below nn; Remark 2 (p. 204) notes that the bounds hold when only uniquely represented values are counted. Page 203 then defines a quasi-Sidon sequence, one whose sums give (1+o(1))(k2)(1+o(1))\binom k2 different values, and p. 204 prints the "one third" enlargement (a Sidon sequence in [1,n/3][1,n/3] with the values n−bin-b_i), k∼(2/3)n1/2k\sim(2/\sqrt3)n^{1/2}, the trivial (37) k≤(2+o(1))n1/2k\le(2+o(1))n^{1/2}, the unproved "We can replace the coefficient 2 by 1.98 in (37)", and the sentence behind the site's cross-reference: "any improvement in the upper bound of Proposition 1 is equivalent to the reduction of this coefficient in (37) below 2\sqrt2" (no argument printed). [Pi06]'s account (p. 2098) of the definition, the construction and the promised 1.981.98 matches the paper, and its reflected set X=A∪(n−A)X=A\cup(n-A) (p. 2105) is the paper's construction. An observation made here from that equivalence: [Pi06]'s quasi-Sidon bound (1.863…+o(1))n1/2(1.863\ldots+o(1))n^{1/2} lowers the coefficient of (37) to a value above 2≈1.414\sqrt2\approx1.414, so by the paper's sentence it does not improve the upper bound of Proposition 1. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

The 2026 thread claim. [Liu26], Theorem 3 (p. 1): "lim inf⁡N→∞f(N)/N≥(162−17)/12≈0.4690\liminf_{N\to\infty}f(N)/N\ge(16\sqrt2-17)/12\approx0.4690", "improving the classical Erdős--Freud bound of 3/8=0.3753/8=0.375 and closing most of the gap to the trivial upper bound f(N)/N≤1/2+o(1)f(N)/N\le1/2+o(1)"; the note defines f(N)f(N) exactly as the site does (Definition 1), states the Erdős--Freud lower bound as its display (2) attributed to [2] (the 1991 paper) "given by an explicit construction (a union of an arithmetic progression and a structured complement)" (the paper's own construction, p. 203, is the reflected Sidon set B∪(3n/4−B)B\cup(3n/4-B); the description is the note's), and proceeds by a reflected two-copy of an asymptotically maximum Sidon set, each copy shifted by a small random amount, Pikhurko's uniformity lemma (its Lemma 5, quoting [Pi06]'s Lemma 10) and the Bose--Chowla construction; its Theorem 20 bounds the expected count of sums below by (N/2)F(u)−O(ηN)−o(N)(N/2)F(u)-O(\eta N)-o(N) for u∈(0,1/4)u\in(0,1/4) and η∈(0,u/2)\eta\in(0,u/2), and its Corollary 25 gives F(u∗)=(162−17)/6F(u^*)=(16\sqrt2-17)/6, so the constant is F(u∗)/2F(u^*)/2. The argument is not checked in this corpus, and no acceptance evidence exists (an unrefereed note on a personal site, not on a preprint server; the site's commentary on 2026-10-07 gives the bounds 3/83/8 and 1/21/2 and does not mention it). The claim page Liu's lower bound 0.469 records it as a partial claim with status claimed. If correct it raises the lower constant from 3/83/8 to about 0.4690.469 and leaves the asymptotic size of f(N)/Nf(N)/N open below 1/21/2.

Search scope. None of the routes below produced a refereed improvement of the bounds or a proof claim.

  • The site: problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab on 2026-09-18; formal-conjectures (no file for the problem on that date); the community database on 2026-09-18.
  • Crossref: the bibliographic query identifying [ErFr91]'s record.
  • The publisher's open-archive page for [ErFr91].
  • arXiv API: the search (abs:Sidon AND abs:Erdős AND abs:Freud) OR abs:"quasi-Sidon" sorted by date (two records: a 2021 paper on extremal Sidon sets being Fourier uniform and [Pi06]'s 2003 arXiv version; neither bears on f(N)f(N)).
  • The thread's note [Liu26], at statement depth.
  • [Pi06], searched for its Erdős--Freud passages.

Not searched: MathSciNet, zbMATH, Google Scholar, X. Not held: [Er91].

Remaining gaps. (1) The bounds are Proposition 1 of [ErFr91], recorded on an accepted partial claim page; the problem's original wording remains the site's account, [Er91] not being held. (2) The thread's 0.4690.469 lower bound is unreviewed and was found with GPT-5.5 and Rethlas; its claim page records what it covers. (3) The connection to quasi-Sidon sets (Problem 840) is recorded as the site's cross-reference, and it is the paper's printed equivalence (p. 204); [Pi06] is context and gains no row here. (4) [ErFr91]'s library card and its result pages for Proposition 1 and the Definition (p. 203) name this problem.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.