Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Pikhurko 2006 dense edge magic graphs thin additive

../

lemma_10: Shows that a Sidon subset of the first n integers of size (1 + o(1)) n^(1/2) meets every subinterval and residue class in its proportional share, up to o(n^(1/2)).

lemma_12: Gives lower bounds on the scaled largest sumset s(c) for 2/sqrt 3 <= c <= 2 by randomly shifting a Sidon set and its reflection.

theorem_1: Bounds the maximum number of edges of an edge-magic graph of order n between (2/7)n^2 + O(n) and (0.489... + o(1))n^2.

theorem_2: Bounds s(k, n), the largest sumset of a k-subset of the first n integers, by n + k^2 (1/4 - 1/(pi+2)^2 + o(1)).

theorem_3: Bounds the size of a quasi-Sidon subset of the first n integers by (1.863... + o(1)) n^(1/2), improving the trivial constant 2.

theorem_4: Shows that the complete graph on n vertices has an edge-magic injection with magic sum at most (288/121 + o(1)) n^2, improving Wood's (3 + o(1)) n^2.

theorem_8: Bounds the number of sums of a set of integers that land in [2n], allowing some elements outside [n]; the general form of Theorem 2.


Oleg Pikhurko, Dense edge-magic graphs and thin additive bases. Discrete Mathematics 306 (2006), 2097-2107. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2006.05.003. The copy read for this card, the publisher's PDF, prints "© 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved." on its first page, every other right reserved.

Pikhurko studies M(n), the maximum number of edges of an edge-magic graph of order n, and proves in Theorem 1 that (2/7)n^2 + O(n) <= M(n) <= (0.489... + o(1)) n^2, the first upper bound of the form (1 - epsilon) times n choose 2. The bounds go through s(k, n), the largest possible sumset size of a k-subset of [n]: Theorem 2 gives s(k, n) <= n + k^2 (1/4 - 1/(pi+2)^2 + o(1)), proved by adapting Moser's additive-basis method, and the lower bound in Theorem 1 uses explicit thin additive bases. Theorem 3, the material result for problem 840, deduces that any quasi-Sidon set A in [n] (one with |A + A| = (1 + o(1)) binom(|A|, 2)) satisfies |A| <= ((1/4 + 1/(pi+2)^2)^(-1/2) + o(1)) n^(1/2) = (1.863... + o(1)) n^(1/2), improving on the trivial bound 2 n^(1/2) and superseding the unpublished 1.98 bound promised by Erdos and Freud, who had constructed quasi-Sidon sets of size (2/sqrt 3 + o(1)) n^(1/2) = (1.154... + o(1)) n^(1/2). Theorem 4 bounds the edge-magic injection number I(K_n) <= (288/121 + o(1)) n^2 = (2.380... + o(1)) n^2, Theorem 8 gives a generalized bound with lambda = 0.323... for sets A with at least lambda |A \ [n]| elements in [n], and Lemma 10 shows that a Sidon subset of [n] of size (1 + o(1)) n^(1/2) meets each residue class inside each subinterval in its proportional share up to o(n^(1/2)). The paper explains explicitly how the quasi-Sidon question relates to the harder s(k, n) problem.

Source: https://opikhurko.warwick.ac.uk/E/Pikhurko06dm.pdf.

Result pages. Each records the statement as printed, a proof outline and its read depth (claims checked; no proof checked).

  • Theorem 1 (p. 2098): bounds on M(n)\mathcal M(n), the maximum size of an edge-magic graph of order nn.
  • Theorem 2 (p. 2098): the upper bound on s(k,n)s(k,n).
  • Theorem 3 (p. 2099): the quasi-Sidon bound (1.863…+o(1))n1/2(1.863\ldots+o(1))n^{1/2}.
  • Theorem 4 (p. 2099): edge-magic injections of KnK_n.
  • Theorem 8 (p. 2101): the sumset bound allowing elements outside [n][n], from whose case m=0m=0 Theorem 2 follows.
  • Lemma 10 (p. 2104): equidistribution of asymptotically maximum Sidon sets in subintervals and residue classes.
  • Lemma 12 (p. 2105): lower bounds on the scaled s(c)s(c) from randomly shifted reflected Sidon sets.

Bears on.

  • #840: Theorem 3 bounds the largest quasi-Sidon subset of [n][n] by (1.863…+o(1))n1/2(1.863\ldots+o(1))n^{1/2}; with the Erdős–Freud construction of (2/3+o(1))n1/2(2/\sqrt3+o(1))n^{1/2} elements, which the paper restates (p. 2098), the largest such set has between (1.154…+o(1))n1/2(1.154\ldots+o(1))n^{1/2} and (1.863…+o(1))n1/2(1.863\ldots+o(1))n^{1/2} elements; the paper does not determine its growth.
  • #864: by the argument under Relation to E864 below, Theorem 2 gives ∣A∣≤(1.863…+o(1))N1/2|A|\le(1.863\ldots+o(1))N^{1/2} for the problem's sets, an upper bound above the constant 2/32/\sqrt3 the problem asks about.
  • #819: Lemma 10 and the reflected construction of Lemma 12 are inputs that an unrefereed 2026 note on that problem names; the paper itself states no bound on the problem's f(N)f(N).

Overview

Pikhurko studies the maximum edge count M(n)\mathcal M(n) of an edge-magic graph and, as an additive counterpart, s(k,n)=max⁡A⊂[n], ∣A∣=k∣A+A∣s(k,n)=\max_{A\subset[n],\,|A|=k}|A+A| (§1, pp. 2097–2098). Theorem 1 gives 27n2+O(n)≤M(n)≤(0.489…+o(1))n2\frac27n^2+O(n)\leq\mathcal M(n)\leq(0.489\ldots+o(1))n^2 (equation (1), p. 2098). For the lower bound, Lemma 5 turns a long interval in the restricted sumset A⊕AA\oplus A into an edge-magic graph; the paper applies a cited construction of Mrose and then Lemma 6 (pp. 2100–2101). For the upper bound, Theorem 9 bounds the length of an interval almost covered by A+AA+A, and equation (18) applies that bound to the vertex labels of an edge-magic graph (pp. 2103–2104).

The central additive estimate is Theorem 2, s(k,n)≤n+k2(14−(π+2)−2+o(1))s(k,n)\leq n+k^2(\tfrac14-(\pi+2)^{-2}+o(1)) (equation (3), p. 2098). It follows from the more general Theorem 8, which permits elements of AA outside [n][n] under a stated condition on their number (equation (8), pp. 2101–2102). The proof adapts Moser’s generating-function method: representation counts, roots of unity, and a Fourier series bound the sums missing from [2n][2n] (equations (9)–(14), pp. 2101–2102). Theorem 3 consequently bounds a quasi-Sidon subset of [n][n]—one with ∣A+A∣=(1+o(1))(∣A∣2)|A+A|=(1+o(1))\binom{|A|}{2}—by (1.863…+o(1))n(1.863\ldots+o(1))\sqrt n (p. 2099). The (2/3+o(1))n(2/\sqrt3+o(1))\sqrt n quasi-Sidon construction in equation (4) is attributed to Erdős and Freud, rather than proved as a theorem of this paper (p. 2098).

Other results locate the paper’s scope: Theorem 4 improves the magic-sum bound for injections of complete graphs (equation (5), pp. 2099–2100); Lemma 10 proves interval and residue-class equidistribution for asymptotically maximum Sidon subsets (equation (19), pp. 2104–2105); and §7 gives lower bounds for scaled s(k,n)s(k,n) by reflected Sidon sets and arithmetic progressions (Lemmas 12–13, equations (23) and (26), pp. 2105–2107). Problems 7 and 11 ask whether the respective scaled extremal quantities have limits (pp. 2101, 2105); they are questions, not results.

Relation to E864

This source bears on Problem 864.

For E864, set n=Nn=N, k=∣A∣k=|A|, and use the paper’s A+AA+A for the sums counted by rAr_A. If at most one sum repeats, then ∣A+A∣=(k+12)−D|A+A|=\binom{k+1}{2}-D, where D=∑s(rA(s)−1)≤⌈k/2⌉−1D=\sum_s(r_A(s)-1)\leq\lceil k/2\rceil-1: distinct unordered representations of a fixed sum use disjoint elements. Since A+A⊂[2,2N]A+A\subset[2,2N], this first gives k=O(N)k=O(\sqrt N). Substituting ∣A+A∣=k2/2−O(k)|A+A|=k^2/2-O(k) into Theorem 2 (equation (3), p. 2098) yields the usable upper bound

k≤(14+1(π+2)2)−1/2(1+o(1))N=(1.863…+o(1))N.k\leq\left(\tfrac14+\tfrac1{(\pi+2)^2}\right)^{-1/2}(1+o(1))\sqrt N=(1.863\ldots+o(1))\sqrt N.

Equivalently, E864 sets in this range satisfy the paper’s quasi-Sidon condition, so Theorem 3 applies (p. 2099). This is weaker than E864’s target constant 2/3=1.154…2/\sqrt3=1.154\ldots. Theorem 8 offers a possible bound for an argument that splits a set across an interval, while Lemma 10 applies only to asymptotically maximum Sidon sets; neither establishes the target upper bound. The reflected sets of §7 are analyzed there for ∣A+A∣|A+A|, not for having at most one repeated sum. Thus the paper supplies a sumset method and a quantitative upper bound for E864, but does not prove its proposed asymptotic value.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.