Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Steele 1995 variations monotone subsequence theme erdos szekeres
problem_p128: The open problems of Steele's Section 12: Erdős's question of determining tau(n,k), the least over nonnegative weights summing to 1 of the largest weight of a k-unimodal subsequence, with the sketched bound tau(n,0) <= n^{-1} ceil(n^{1/2}), and Erdős's question on the largest sum of a monotone subsequence of n distinct reals.
theorem_8_1: Steele's theorem that for every infinite sequence of distinct reals the longest monotone subsequence of the window x_{i+1},...,x_{i+n} satisfies limsup over i,n of M/sqrt(n) >= gamma for a constant gamma > 1, while some sequence has M = ceil(sqrt(n)) on every initial segment.
theorem_9_1: Steele's stated analogue of the Erdős–Szekeres theorem for monotone subsequences whose index sequence has d descents: for n distinct reals l^+(d) l^-(d) >= dn; the printed proof treats only the cases d = 1 and d = n.
Steele, J. Michael, Variations on the monotone subsequence theme of Erdős and Szekeres. In: D. Aldous, P. Diaconis, J. Spencer, J. M. Steele (eds.), Discrete Probability and Algorithms, IMA Vol. Math. Appl., Springer, New York (1995), 111--131, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0801-3_9. The copy read for this card is an image-only scan of the printed chapter (pp. 111--131); no notice is printed in it, and its rendered first and last pages carry no copyright line. The publisher's chapter page for DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-0801-3_9 states "© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York" and offers the chapter as subscription content with no Creative Commons or Open Access statement, every other right reserved.
Source: http://www-stat.wharton.upenn.edu/~steele/Publications/.
The survey reviews the Erdős--Szekeres monotone subsequence theorem and the work that grew from it: several proofs (Section 2), higher dimensions, counts of increasing subsequences, unimodal subsequences, concentration inequalities, pseudo-random and Weyl sequences (Sections 3--7), monotone subsequences of windows of an infinite sequence (Section 8), -descent subsequences (Section 9), common ascending subsequences and sequential selection (Sections 10--11), and open problems (Section 12, p. 128). Its abstract says most attention goes to previously published research, with some new proofs and new results, in particular for monotone subsequences of sections of sequences (Section 8); Sections 8 and 9 cite no earlier source for their theorems.
Section 8 (pp. 123--125) shows that for every infinite sequence of distinct reals the longest monotone subsequence of the window , divided by , has limit superior at least a constant as (Theorem 8.1), while some sequence has longest monotone subsequence exactly on every initial segment (p. 124). Section 9 (p. 126) states a -descent analogue of the Erdős--Szekeres theorem, Theorem 9.1, whose printed proof covers only and .
Section 12 reports, after Chung (1980, p. 278), Erdős's question on weighted versions: for nonnegative weights summing to , determine , the least over of the largest total weight of a -unimodal subsequence. It sketches from perturbed uniform weights (the print first writes ), and says one suspects but that this has not been established. It then states Erdős's 1973 question of determining the largest sum of a monotone subsequence of distinct reals, "for which there seems to have been no progress" (p. 128).
Results.
- Theorem 8.1 (p. 123): for every infinite sequence of distinct reals, for a constant , with Lemma 8.1 (p. 124) and Proposition 8.1 (p. 125) as its route.
- Theorem 9.1 (p. 126): for distinct reals, for monotone subsequences along index sequences with descents.
- Section 12 (p. 128): Erdős's weighted question and his question on the largest sum of a monotone subsequence.
Read status: claims checked for Sections 8, 9 and 12 and the statement (5.1) on p. 118, read clause by clause on the page images of the print; the rest of the survey, which reports results of other authors, was not read clause by clause. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Bears on. #1026: Section 12 (p. 128) states the problem's question, as Erdős's, and reports no progress on it. Its weighted quantity uses the same normalization as the problem's precise Statement, with nonnegative weights summing to in place of distinct reals; the survey sketches the upper bound and leaves unproved.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.