Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting (pp. 1, 3). A family F⊂2X\mathcal F\subset2^X is union when no two of its members have union XX (p. 1), and an intersecting-union family, or IU-family, when for all F,G∈FF,G\in\mathcal F both F∩G≠∅F\cap G\ne\emptyset and F∪G≠XF\cup G\ne X (Definition 2, p. 3). Two families are cross-IU when every member of one meets every member of the other and no such pair has union [n][n] (p. 3). The abstract (p. 1) phrases the IU condition as 1≤∣A∩B∣≤n−11\le|A\cap B|\le n-1; Definition 2, followed here, bounds the union, not the intersection, by n−1n-1.

Theorem 8 (p. 3). If F⊂2[n]\mathcal F\subset2^{[n]} is IU, then ∣F∣≤2n−2|\mathcal F|\le2^{n-2} (6).

The paper says this maximum was proved earlier by several people, among them Daykin and Lovász (its reference [3]) and Schönheim and Seymour (private communication, cf. [3]); the product example on p. 3, an intersecting family on one part of a partition of [n][n] times a union family on the other, gives many IU families of size 2n−22^{n-2}.

Theorem 9 (p. 3). If A,B⊂2[n]\mathcal A,\mathcal B\subset2^{[n]} are cross-IU, then

∣A∣∣B∣≤22n−4.(7)|\mathcal A||\mathcal B|\le2^{2n-4}. \tag{7}

Taking A=B=F\mathcal A=\mathcal B=\mathcal F recovers (6) (p. 3).

Proof pointer

Theorem 8, p. 3: F↑\mathcal F^\uparrow is intersecting and F↓\mathcal F^\downarrow is union, so each has at most 2n−12^{n-1} members, and the Harris–Kleitman inequality applied to F⊂F↑∩F↓\mathcal F\subset\mathcal F^\uparrow\cap\mathcal F^\downarrow gives (6). Theorem 9, p. 6: Harris–Kleitman gives ∣A∣/2n|\mathcal A|/2^n at most the product of the densities of A↑\mathcal A^\uparrow and A↓\mathcal A^\downarrow, and likewise for B\mathcal B; A↑,B↑\mathcal A^\uparrow,\mathcal B^\uparrow are cross-intersecting and A↓,B↓\mathcal A^\downarrow,\mathcal B^\downarrow cross-union, so each pair of densities sums to at most 11 and has product at most 1/41/4.

Read depth

Claims checked: Definition 2, the cross-IU definition, Theorems 8 and 9 and both proofs were read clause by clause on the print. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Dependencies

None in the corpus. External input named by the paper: the Harris–Kleitman inequality (its Theorem 2, p. 2).

Source. P. Frankl and A. Kupavskii, Perfect matchings in down-sets, Discrete Math. 346 (2023), Paper No. 113323, DOI 10.1016/j.disc.2023.113323; read in arXiv:2201.03865v1, Definition 2 and Theorems 8 and 9 on p. 3, the proof of Theorem 9 on p. 6. The edition is identified on the source card.

Bears on

No Erdős problem in the corpus is linked to these bounds.