Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (pp. 2--3). For , is the down-set generated by , the sets contained in some member of ; it does not depend on (p. 2). Families and are cross-intersecting when for all , (p. 3).
Theorem 6 (p. 3). If are cross-intersecting, then
The paper notes (p. 3) that when and are moreover both union families (no two members have union ), so are and , the right side of (5) is then at most , and gives the bound for IU families of Theorem 8.
Proof pointer
Section 3, p. 5. Assume . Theorem 5 matches into by disjoint pairs. Cross-intersection lets at most one set of each pair lie in its family ( or ), which gives .
Read depth
Claims checked: the definitions, Theorem 6 and the remark on union families were read clause by clause on the print, and the three-line proof on p. 5 was followed. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Dependencies
Source. P. Frankl and A. Kupavskii, Perfect matchings in down-sets, Discrete Math. 346 (2023), Paper No. 113323, DOI 10.1016/j.disc.2023.113323; read in arXiv:2201.03865v1, Theorem 6 on p. 3, its proof on p. 5. The edition is identified on the source card.
Bears on
- Problem 701: the paper's proof of Theorem 7, Chvátal's conjecture for intersecting families of covering number at most , applies Theorem 6 to the two cross-intersecting traces of the family on a two-element cover. Theorem 6 by itself makes no statement about the conjecture.